Scored using Motherboards Methodology v3.0
Motherboards Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Motherboards Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Motherboards Methodology v3.0

GIGABYTE AORUS GA-Z270X-Gaming 7 review: 109 specs compared

Avg. price:~£250CPU socket:LGA 1151Chipset:Intel Z270Form factor:ATX

GIGABYTE AORUS GA-Z270X-Gaming 7 Review: Compare 109 technical specifications and 15 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Motherboards category and whether it is worth buying.

GIGABYTE AORUS GA-Z270X-Gaming 7
6.7/10

Overall score

Score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, expert reviews, best-of lists, owners and ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 40%, Reviews score 20%, List score 20%, Sentiment score 10%, User score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

40%

5.7

Technical score

20%

8.8

Reviews score

20%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

5.7

Sentiment score

10%

5.7

User score

â–¼Worse than 60% of motherboards
7.4

Value for money

Value for money
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the motherboard's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a motherboard that offers a strong balance of features, performance, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.7

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

â–¼Worse than 73%
5.7

Technical score

Technical score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

19%

6.0

Memory

16%

7.3

Platform

16%

5.6

Storage

15%

4.0

Network

13%

5.0

Ports

8%

4.0

Expansion

8%

6.5

Power & Cooling

5%

8.8

Audio

â–¼Worse than 57%
8.8

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.8/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.8 for now.
Share: Reviews count 20% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10

80%

8.6

Average grade

20%

9.5

Popularity

Grades by review (15)
10 reviews: 4 with a printed score, 6 estimated from the review. 5 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 20% of the overall score.
Ratings from across the web count in the User score, not in this score.
★Better than 95%
5.7

User score

User score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 7.9, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 10% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10

5.7

Mark 8.0 is below the typical mark 8.4 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

70%

8.2

Rating

30%

7.7

Popularity

â–¼Worse than 77%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 20% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • gigabyte-aorus-ga-z270x-gaming-7
  • gigabyte-aorus-ga-z270x-gaming-7
  • gigabyte-aorus-ga-z270x-gaming-7
  • gigabyte-aorus-ga-z270x-gaming-7
  • gigabyte-aorus-ga-z270x-gaming-7
  • gigabyte-aorus-ga-z270x-gaming-7
  • gigabyte-aorus-ga-z270x-gaming-7
gigabyte-aorus-ga-z270x-gaming-7
gigabyte-aorus-ga-z270x-gaming-7
gigabyte-aorus-ga-z270x-gaming-7
gigabyte-aorus-ga-z270x-gaming-7
gigabyte-aorus-ga-z270x-gaming-7
gigabyte-aorus-ga-z270x-gaming-7
gigabyte-aorus-ga-z270x-gaming-7
Where to buy
    N/A~ £250
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the GIGABYTE AORUS GA-Z270X-Gaming 7

Based on 10 · 6

Reviewers praise the overclocking, design, ports and build, but networking disappoints and storage splits opinion.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of motherboard GIGABYTE AORUS GA-Z270X-Gaming 7

Technical score
Technical score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

19%

6.0

Memory

16%

7.3

Platform

16%

5.6

Storage

15%

4.0

Network

13%

5.0

Ports

8%

4.0

Expansion

8%

6.5

Power & Cooling

5%

8.8

Audio

5.7
Reviews score
8.8
User score
5.7
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the motherboard's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a motherboard that offers a strong balance of features, performance, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

6.7

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

7.4
CPU socket
LGA 1151
This motherboard uses LGA 1151, which is less up-to-date than 70.7% of Motherboards and the same as 13.7% of Motherboards.
CPU platform
Intel
Chipset
Intel Z270
This motherboard uses Intel Z270, which is less capable than 73.5% of Motherboards and as capable as 2.2% of Motherboards.
Form factor
ATX
Integrated graphics support
yes
This motherboard supports integrated graphics. 10.2% of motherboards support this feature.
Rear outputs: HDMI + DisplayPort + USB4 / Thunderbolt.
Show more
What reviewers say
DDR memory version
DDR4
This motherboard uses DDR4, which is more modern than 13.4% of Motherboards and the same as 50.4% of Motherboards.
Memory slots
4
This motherboard has 4 Memory slots, which is more than 21.9% of motherboards and equal to 72% of motherboards.
Maximum memory capacity
64 GB
This motherboard supports up to 64 GB of memory, which is less than 63% of motherboards and equal to 23.9% of motherboards.
Memory channels
2
Maximum RAM speed
4,133 MT/s
This motherboard supports memory speeds up to 4,133 MT/s, which is lower than that of 55.8% of motherboards and equal to that of 1% of motherboards.
Show more
N. of M.2 sockets
2
This motherboard has 2 M.2 sockets, which is more than 30.5% of motherboards and equal to 34.5% of motherboards.
M.2 slot interface per slot
1x PCIe 3.0 x4, 1x PCIe 3.0 x4/SATA
This motherboard offers M.2 slots: 1x PCIe 3.0x4, 1x PCIe 3.0x4/SATA, which is slower than 61.8% of Motherboards and the same as 1.9% of Motherboards.
N. of SATA 3 connectors
6
This motherboard has 6 SATA 3 connectors, which is more than 53.5% of motherboards and equal to 31.2% of motherboards.
Supported RAID levels
0/1/5/10
This motherboard RAID support: 0/1/5/10, which is more flexible than 32.5% of Motherboards and the same as 67.5% of Motherboards.
JBOD excluded from RAID-level set
NVMe RAID support
yes
This motherboard supports NVMe RAID. 40.2% of motherboards support this feature.
Show more
What reviewers say
N. of PCIe 5.0 x16 slots
0
This motherboard has 0 PCIe 5.0x16 slots, which is fewer than 31.6% of motherboards and equal to 68.4% of motherboards.
N. of PCIe 4.0 x16 slots
0
This motherboard has 0 PCIe 4.0x16 slots, which is fewer than 44.8% of motherboards and equal to 55.2% of motherboards.
N. of PCIe 3.0 x16 slots
3
This motherboard has 3 PCIe 3.0x16 slots, which is more than 82.7% of motherboards and equal to 11.1% of motherboards.
PCIe slot electrical configuration
x16/x0/x4, x8/x8/x4
This motherboard splits its PCIe lanes as x16/x0/x4, x8/x8/x4, which is more generous than 62.6% of Motherboards and the same as 12.4% of Motherboards.
PCIe bifurcation support
yes
This motherboard supports PCIe bifurcation. 40.3% of motherboards support this feature.
Show more
Total USB ports (rear I/O)
8
This motherboard has 8 USB ports (rear I/O), which is more than 40.6% of motherboards and equal to 30.3% of motherboards.
Total USB ports (including headers)
17
This motherboard has 17 USB ports (including headers), which is more than 71.3% of motherboards and equal to 10.4% of motherboards.
Total USB-C ports (rear I/O)
1
This motherboard has 1 USB-C ports (rear I/O), which is more than 35.8% of motherboards and equal to 48.3% of motherboards.
Thunderbolt / USB4 Type-C ports counted.
Total USB-C ports (including headers)
1
This motherboard has 1 USB-C ports (including headers), which is more than 30.5% of motherboards and equal to 21.1% of motherboards.
N. of USB 3.2 Gen2x2 ports (USB-C)
0
This motherboard has 0 USB 3.2 Gen2x2 ports (USB-C), which is fewer than 18% of motherboards and equal to 82% of motherboards.
Show more
What reviewers say
LAN speed
1 Gbps
This motherboard supports LAN speeds up to 1 Gbps, which is lower than that of 51.1% of motherboards and equal to that of 48.9% of motherboards.
LAN controller
Killer E2500
This motherboard has a Killer E2500 LAN controller, which is slower than 94% of Motherboards and equal to 1% of Motherboards.
N. of RJ45 ports
2
This motherboard has 2 RJ45 ports, which is more than 85.6% of motherboards and equal to 13.3% of motherboards.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This motherboard does not support Wi-Fi connectivity. 50.1% of motherboards support this feature.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Show more
What reviewers say
Audio codec
Creative Sound Core3D
This motherboard uses Creative Sound Core3D, which is higher-end than 52.3% of Motherboards and the same as 0.5% of Motherboards.
Audio channels
7.1
This motherboard offers 7.1 audio channels, which is more than 4.7% of motherboards and equal to 95.3% of motherboards.
Audio SNR
120 dB
This motherboard has an audio SNR of 120 dB, which is higher than that of 55.6% of motherboards and equal to that of 41% of motherboards.
Headphone amp support
yes
This motherboard supports a headphone amp. 41.2% of motherboards support this feature.
headphone amp on front panel.
N. of 3.5mm audio jacks
5
This motherboard has 5 3.5mm audio jacks, which is more than 50.6% of motherboards and equal to 36.3% of motherboards.
Show more
What reviewers say
VRM phases
8+3
This motherboard has 8+3 VRM phases, which is fewer than 52% of motherboards and equal to 0.4% of motherboards.
N. of CPU power connectors
1
This motherboard has 1 CPU power connectors, which is fewer than 45.2% of motherboards and equal to 54.9% of motherboards.
N. of fan headers
8
This motherboard has 8 fan headers, which is more than 82.2% of motherboards and equal to 15% of motherboards.
Pump header
yes
This motherboard has a pump header. 22.1% of motherboards include this feature.
Pump header max current
2 A
This motherboard supports up to 2 A on the pump header, which is higher than that of 45.1% of motherboards and equal to that of 32.6% of motherboards.
Show more
What reviewers say

GIGABYTE AORUS GA-Z270X-Gaming 7 vs the average motherboard

246810TotalPlatformMemoryStorageExpansionPortsNetworkAudioPower & Cooling
  • 1 more RJ45 ports
    This motherboard has more RJ45 ports than the average motherboard (2 vs 1). The average motherboard has 1 RJ45 port/s.
    2 vs 1
  • Includes dual BIOS
    This motherboard has dual BIOS, while the average motherboard does not. 22.4% of motherboards include dual BIOS.
  • Includes POST code display
    This motherboard has a POST code display, while the average motherboard does not. 26.7% of motherboards include a POST code display.
  • 1 more U.2 sockets
    This motherboard has more U.2 sockets than the average motherboard (1 vs 0). The average motherboard has 0 U.2 socket/s.
    1 vs 0
  • 1 more USB 3.2 Gen1 headers
    This motherboard has more USB 3.2 Gen1 headers than the average motherboard (2 vs 1). The average motherboard has 1 USB 3.2 Gen1 header/s.
    two internal headers
    2 vs 1
  • 2.5 more fan headers
    This motherboard has more fan headers than the average motherboard (8 vs 5.5). The average motherboard has 5.5 fan header/s.
    8 vs 5.5
  • 2 more PCIe x1 slots
    This motherboard has more PCIe x1 slots than the average motherboard (3 vs 1). The average motherboard has 1 PCIe x1 slot/s.
    3 vs 1
  • 20.5% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.8 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 20% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    80%

    8.6

    Average grade

    20%

    9.5

    Popularity

    Grades by review (15)
    10 reviews: 4 with a printed score, 6 estimated from the review. 5 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 20% of the overall score.
    Ratings from across the web count in the User score, not in this score.
    8.8 vs 7.3
  • 20.5% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.8 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 20% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    80%

    8.6

    Average grade

    20%

    9.5

    Popularity

    Grades by review (15)
    10 reviews: 4 with a printed score, 6 estimated from the review. 5 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 20% of the overall score.
    Ratings from across the web count in the User score, not in this score.
    8.8 vs 7.3
  • Includes dual BIOS
    This motherboard has dual BIOS, while the average motherboard does not. 22.4% of motherboards include dual BIOS.
  • Includes POST code display
    This motherboard has a POST code display, while the average motherboard does not. 26.7% of motherboards include a POST code display.
  • Broader Windows support
    This motherboard supports a wider range of Windows versions than the average motherboard (Windows 11, Windows 10, Windows 8.1, Windows 8, Windows 7 vs Windows 11, Windows 10).
    Windows 11, Windows 10, Windows 8.1, Windows 8, Windows 7 vs Windows 11, Windows 10
  • 1 more U.2 sockets
    This motherboard has more U.2 sockets than the average motherboard (1 vs 0). The average motherboard has 0 U.2 socket/s.
    1 vs 0
  • 2 more SATA 3 connectors
    This motherboard has more SATA 3 connectors than the average motherboard (6 vs 4). The average motherboard has 4 SATA 3 connectors.
    6 vs 4
  • 2 more PCIe x1 slots
    This motherboard has more PCIe x1 slots than the average motherboard (3 vs 1). The average motherboard has 1 PCIe x1 slot/s.
    3 vs 1
  • 2 more PCIe 3.0x16 slots
    This motherboard has more PCIe 3.0x16 slots than the average motherboard (3 vs 1). The average motherboard has 1 PCIe 3.0x16 slot/s.
    3 vs 1
  • 1 more USB 3.2 Gen1 headers
    This motherboard has more USB 3.2 Gen1 headers than the average motherboard (2 vs 1). The average motherboard has 1 USB 3.2 Gen1 header/s.
    two internal headers
    2 vs 1
  • 2 more total USB connections
    This motherboard has more total USB connections than the average motherboard (17 vs 15). The average motherboard has 15 total USB connections.
    17 vs 15
  • 1 more Thunderbolt 3 ports
    This motherboard has more Thunderbolt 3 ports than the average motherboard (1 vs 0). The average motherboard has 0 Thunderbolt 3 port/s.
    Thunderbolt 3 on USB-C
    1 vs 0
  • 1 more USB 3.2 Gen1 ports
    This motherboard has more USB 3.2 Gen1 ports than the average motherboard (5 vs 4). The average motherboard has 4 USB 3.2 Gen1 port/s.
    5 vs 4
  • 1 more RJ45 ports
    This motherboard has more RJ45 ports than the average motherboard (2 vs 1). The average motherboard has 1 RJ45 port/s.
    2 vs 1
  • More capable onboard audio
    This motherboard has a higher-end audio codec than the average motherboard (Creative Sound Core3D vs Realtek ALC897).
    Creative Sound Core3D vs Realtek ALC897
  • 5 dB higher audio SNR
    This motherboard has a higher audio SNR than the average motherboard (120 dB vs 115 dB). The average motherboard has audio SNR of 115 dB.
    120 dB vs 115 dB
  • 2 more 3.5mm audio jacks
    This motherboard has more 3.5mm audio jacks than the average motherboard (5 vs 3). The average motherboard has 3 3.5mm audio jacks.
    5 vs 3
  • 2.5 more fan headers
    This motherboard has more fan headers than the average motherboard (8 vs 5.5). The average motherboard has 5.5 fan header/s.
    8 vs 5.5
  • Includes onboard RGB lighting
    This motherboard has onboard RGB lighting, while the average motherboard does not. 50% of motherboards include onboard RGB lighting.
    integrated RGB Fusion lighting
  • More basic chipset
    This motherboard uses a more basic chipset than the average motherboard (Intel Z270 vs Intel B860).
    Intel Z270 vs Intel B860
  • 60% lower LAN speed
    This motherboard has a lower LAN speed than the average motherboard (1 Gbps vs 2.5 Gbps). The average motherboard offers LAN speed of 2.5 Gbps.
    1 Gbps vs 2.5 Gbps
  • Slower NVMe storage slots
    This motherboard has slower M.2 slots than the average motherboard (1x PCIe 3x4, 1x PCIe 3x4/SATA vs 1x PCIe 5x4, 2x PCIe 4x4).
    1x PCIe 3.0x4, 1x PCIe 3.0x4/SATA vs 1x PCIe 5.0x4, 2x PCIe 4.0x4
  • 50% less maximum memory capacity
    This motherboard has fewer maximum memory capacity than the average motherboard (64 GB vs 128 GB). The average motherboard supports 128 GB of memory.
    64 GB vs 128 GB
  • No Wi-Fi connectivity
    This motherboard does not support Wi-Fi connectivity, while the average motherboard does. 50.1% of motherboards support Wi-Fi connectivity.
  • No BIOS flashback support
    This motherboard does not support BIOS flashback, while the average motherboard does. 51.3% of motherboards support BIOS flashback.
  • No Wi-Fi antenna included
    This motherboard does not include a Wi-Fi antenna, while the average motherboard does. 51.1% of motherboards include a Wi-Fi antenna.
  • 2 fewer ARGB headers
    This motherboard has fewer ARGB headers than the average motherboard (0 vs 2). The average motherboard has 2 ARGB header/s.
    0 vs 2
  • 24.0% lower sentiment score
    5.7 vs 7.5
  • 23.0% lower user score
    User score
    5.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 7.9, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 10% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    5.7

    Mark 8.0 is below the typical mark 8.4 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.2

    Rating

    30%

    7.7

    Popularity

    5.7 vs 7.4
  • 66.7% more expensive
    GIGABYTE AORUS GA-Z270X-Gaming 7 is more expensive than the average motherboard (£250 vs £150).
    £250 vs £150
  • 3.3% worse value for money
    GIGABYTE AORUS GA-Z270X-Gaming 7 has worse value for money than the average motherboard (7.45 vs 7.7).
    7.45 vs 7.7
  • More basic chipset
    This motherboard uses a more basic chipset than the average motherboard (Intel Z270 vs Intel B860).
    Intel Z270 vs Intel B860
  • No BIOS flashback support
    This motherboard does not support BIOS flashback, while the average motherboard does. 51.3% of motherboards support BIOS flashback.
  • Fewer BIOS update methods
    This motherboard offers fewer BIOS update methods than the average motherboard (UEFI utility, Windows app vs UEFI utility, flashback, Windows app).
    UEFI utility, Windows app vs UEFI utility, flashback, Windows app
  • Not ready for Windows 11
    This motherboard is not ready for Windows 11, while the average motherboard is. 77.4% of motherboards are ready for Windows 11.
  • 50% less maximum memory capacity
    This motherboard has fewer maximum memory capacity than the average motherboard (64 GB vs 128 GB). The average motherboard supports 128 GB of memory.
    64 GB vs 128 GB
  • 12.1% lower maximum RAM speed
    This motherboard has a lower maximum RAM speed than the average motherboard (4,133 MT/s vs 4,699.5 MT/s). The average motherboard supports RAM speed of 4,699.5 MT/s.
    4,133 MT/s vs 4,699.5 MT/s
  • 17.3% lower overclocked RAM speed
    This motherboard has a lower overclocked RAM speed than the average motherboard (4,133 MT/s vs 5,000 MT/s). The average motherboard supports overclocked RAM speed of 5,000 MT/s.
    4,133 MT/s vs 5,000 MT/s
  • Slower NVMe storage slots
    This motherboard has slower M.2 slots than the average motherboard (1x PCIe 3x4, 1x PCIe 3x4/SATA vs 1x PCIe 5x4, 2x PCIe 4x4).
    1x PCIe 3.0x4, 1x PCIe 3.0x4/SATA vs 1x PCIe 5.0x4, 2x PCIe 4.0x4
  • 60% lower LAN speed
    This motherboard has a lower LAN speed than the average motherboard (1 Gbps vs 2.5 Gbps). The average motherboard offers LAN speed of 2.5 Gbps.
    1 Gbps vs 2.5 Gbps
  • No Wi-Fi connectivity
    This motherboard does not support Wi-Fi connectivity, while the average motherboard does. 50.1% of motherboards support Wi-Fi connectivity.
  • No Wi-Fi antenna included
    This motherboard does not include a Wi-Fi antenna, while the average motherboard does. 51.1% of motherboards include a Wi-Fi antenna.
  • Less capable LAN controller
    This motherboard has a slower LAN controller than the average motherboard (Killer E2500 vs Killer + Intel + Realtek).
    Killer E2500 vs Killer + Intel + Realtek
  • 2 fewer ARGB headers
    This motherboard has fewer ARGB headers than the average motherboard (0 vs 2). The average motherboard has 2 ARGB header/s.
    0 vs 2

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
Gamers Nexus
≈ estimated
23/01/2017
VRM analysis · measurements and power calculations
Verdict
The GIGABYTE AORUS GA-Z270X-Gaming 7 has plenty of power delivery margin, with no real complaints about the VRMs.
9.0
Vortez
≈ estimated
03/01/2017
Hands-on review · overclocking and feature tour
Verdict
The GIGABYTE AORUS GA-Z270X-Gaming 7 is a strong pick for gamers and enthusiasts who want the most from their system.
9.0
TechteamGB
✓ explicit
03/01/2017
Hands-on review · overclocking, BIOS and fan tests
Verdict
The GIGABYTE AORUS GA-Z270X-Gaming 7 is highly recommended for Z270 buyers, with solid overclocking options and fan control.
9.0
OC3D TV
≈ estimated
03/01/2017
Hands-on review · memory and BIOS testing
Verdict
The GIGABYTE AORUS GA-Z270X-Gaming 7 earns an enthusiastic recommendation, but its BIOS looks dated and memory has limits above 3600 MHz.
6.0
Gamers Nexus
≈ estimated
03/01/2017
Hands-on review · overclocking, BIOS and CPU temperature tests
Verdict
The GIGABYTE AORUS GA-Z270X-Gaming 7 is a solid board once the Vcore issue is fixed, but its price is hard to justify.
Hands-on video, no verdict
Not graded
Not graded
Not graded

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

9.0
vortez.net
≈ estimated
03/01/2017
Full review · Feature-rich Z270 board
Verdict
The Aorus Z270X-Gaming 7 is a feature-rich Z270 board for enthusiasts, with Thunderbolt 3, dual M.2 slots and Creative audio.
8.5
kitguru.net
✓ explicit
04/01/2017
Full review · Layout and lighting
Verdict
The Aorus Z270X-Gaming 7 is a well-built, feature-rich board with strong lighting, though its lower M.2 slot slows down when hot.
9.0
bit-tech.net
≈ estimated
04/01/2017
Full review · Kaby Lake board
Verdict
The Aorus Z270X-Gaming 7 is a well-equipped Kaby Lake board with Thunderbolt 3 and extensive RGB, but it has few rear USB ports.
7.0
tomshardware.com
≈ estimated
09/01/2017
Lab review · Firmware and overclocking
Verdict
The Aorus Z270X-Gaming 7 suits PC tuners thanks to strong overclocking and stability, but buyers who avoid firmware tweaking should wait for a major update.
9.7
wccftech.com
✓ explicit
03/01/2017
Full review · Design and overclocking
Verdict
The Aorus Z270X-Gaming 7 is a well-rounded board with a striking design and strong overclocking, suiting Intel 6th and 7th gen builders, though it lacks built-in Wi-Fi.
8.0
geeknetic.es
✓ explicit
01/05/2017
Full review · High-end Z270 board
Verdict
The Aorus GA-Z270X-Gaming 7 is one of the most complete Z270 boards, with Thunderbolt 3, dual Ethernet and extensive RGB lighting, aimed at builders who want the most extras.
7.0
tomshw.it
≈ estimated
25/01/2017
Lab test · Overclocking board
Verdict
The Aorus Z270X-Gaming 7 suits overclockers, with strong memory and CPU stability, but quirky firmware makes it a poor pick for beginners.
8.0
hwupgrade.it
≈ estimated
24/01/2017
Benchmark test · Overclocking
Verdict
The Aorus Z270X-Gaming 7 matches rival Z270 boards in games and hits 5 GHz when overclocked, suiting gamers who like tweaking.
8.0
tech.everyeye.it
≈ estimated
22/08/2017
Hands-on review · Audio and overclocking
Verdict
The Aorus Z270X-Gaming 7 has above-average sound and easy LED control, but its two Ethernet ports can't be teamed.
10
nexthardware.com
✓ explicit
25/01/2017
Full review · Gaming motherboard
Verdict
The Aorus Z270X-Gaming 7 is a strong, stable gaming board with good overclocking, but it lacks built-in Wi-Fi.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about GIGABYTE AORUS GA-Z270X-Gaming 7

  • Exceptional overclocking stability for both CPU and DRAM
  • Comprehensive connectivity including Thunderbolt 3 (40Gbps) and USB 3.1 Gen 2 Type-C
  • Extensive storage options with dual M.2 slots, U.2 port, and SATA Express support
  • High-quality onboard audio featuring Creative Sound Core3D and SBX Pro Studio
  • Advanced fan control with 8 hybrid fan headers and Smart Fan 5 technology
  • Premium RGB lighting system (RGB Fusion) with customizable zones and RGBW header support
  • Dual Gigabit LAN featuring both Intel and Killer E2500 controllers
  • Sturdy build quality with steel-reinforced PCIe and RAM slots

What customers don't like about GIGABYTE AORUS GA-Z270X-Gaming 7

  • BIOS/UEFI interface is less refined and responsive compared to some competitors
  • Overclocking settings can be difficult to navigate due to being buried in multiple submenus
  • Lack of built-in Wi-Fi, which is often expected at this price tier
  • Default firmware settings may require manual tuning for optimal energy-saving performance
  • The white-and-black aesthetic may not appeal to all users compared to more neutral designs

Verdict

The Gigabyte Aorus GA-Z270X-Gaming 7 is a high-end ATX motherboard designed for Intel 6th and 7th Gen Core processors, featuring the Z270 chipset and support for up to 64GB of DDR4 memory at overclocked speeds of 4133MHz+. Its key characteristics include a robust storage interface with dual M.2 slots, a U.2 connector, and triple NVMe PCIe SSD RAID 0 support, alongside premium connectivity options like 40Gbps Thunderbolt 3, dual Gigabit LAN (Killer E2500 and Intel), and USB 3.1 Gen 2 Type-C. Pros include its exceptional Creative Sound Core3D quad-core audio with an upgradable OP-AMP, extensive RGB Fusion lighting with an RGBW header, and the advanced Smart Fan 5 cooling system with eight hybrid fan headers. However, notable cons include high default voltage levels in some BIOS versions, a lack of built-in Wi-Fi, and the absence of dedicated M.2 thermal cooling shields.

Compare GIGABYTE AORUS GA-Z270X-Gaming 7 with other products in the Motherboards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of GIGABYTE AORUS GA-Z270X-Gaming 7 and other products in the Motherboards category

No results found