OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Microphones Methodology v1.0
Microphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Microphones Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Microphones Methodology v1.0

Razer Seiren X Review | 76 Data compared

Avg. price:~£45Connection type:USBTransducer type:condenserMax SPL:110 dB SPLSupported sample rates:44.1, 48 kHzOutput connector type:USB-C

Razer Seiren X Review: Compare 76 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Microphones category and whether it is worth buying.

6.5

Overall score

Score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the microphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best microphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components

75%

5.6

Technical score

25%

9.1

User score

â–¼Worse than 78% of microphones
5.6

Technical score

Technical score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Microphones category across these key areas: Audio Performance, Connectivity, Recording, Pickup Patterns, Controls & Features, Power, Design, Accessories, Compatibility.
When it matters
When you want to compare microphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
Score components

20%

6.3

Audio Performance

20%

3.5

Recording

16%

1.0

Pickup Patterns

16%

6.4

Controls & Features

10%

10

Power

7%

10

Compatibility

5%

6.7

Connectivity

3%

7.5

Design

3%

6.0

Accessories

â–¼Worse than 91% of microphones
9.1

User score

User score
9.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the microphone.
When it matters
When you want to know how a microphone performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 84% of models
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

9.8

Number of reviews

Based on 8,564 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–²Better than 84% of microphones
  • razer-seiren-x
  • razer-seiren-x
  • razer-seiren-x
  • razer-seiren-x
  • razer-seiren-x
  • razer-seiren-x
  • razer-seiren-x
razer-seiren-x
razer-seiren-x
razer-seiren-x
razer-seiren-x
razer-seiren-x
razer-seiren-x
razer-seiren-x

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of microphone Razer Seiren X

Technical score
Technical score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Microphones category across these key areas: Audio Performance, Connectivity, Recording, Pickup Patterns, Controls & Features, Power, Design, Accessories, Compatibility.
When it matters
When you want to compare microphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
Score components:

20%

6.3

Audio Performance

20%

3.5

Recording

16%

1.0

Pickup Patterns

16%

6.4

Controls & Features

10%

10

Power

7%

10

Compatibility

5%

6.7

Connectivity

3%

7.5

Design

3%

6.0

Accessories

5.6
User score
User score
9.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the microphone.
When it matters
When you want to know how a microphone performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 84% of models
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

9.8

Number of reviews

Based on 8,564 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
9.1
Popularity
Popularity
9.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the microphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 87% of models
Popularity:
Razer Seiren X has a popularity score of 9.8 points, which is higher than 87.4% of microphones.
9.8
Value for money
Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the microphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a microphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
Score components:

60%

6.5

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.5
Microphone type
studio
Transducer type
condenser
Diaphragm size
25 mm
Capsule type
single
Sensitivity
-35 dBV/Pa
Show more
Connection type
USB
Output connector type
USB-C
Headphone output
yes
Headphone output
yes
â–² Better than 38% of models
This microphone includes a headphone output. 62.3% of microphones include this output.
3.5 mm audio jack
yes
3.5 mm audio jack
yes
â–² Better than 37% of models
This microphone includes a 3.5 mm jack. 62.8% of microphones include this connector.
6.35 mm audio jack connector
no
6.35 mm audio jack connector
no
â–¼ Worse than 2% of models
This microphone does not include a 6.35 mm jack. 2% of microphones include this connector.
Show more
Supported sample rates
44.1, 48 kHz
Supported bit depths
16 bit
Audio interface sample rate
48 kHz
Audio interface sample rate
48 kHz
â–¼ Worse than 42% of models
Market range: <48 kHz – >192 kHz
This microphone supports an interface sample rate of 48 kHz which is higher than that of 2.3% of microphones and equal to that of 55.6% of microphones.
Audio interface bit depth
16 bit
Audio interface bit depth
16 bit
â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
Market range: <16 bit – >24 bit
This microphone supports an interface bit depth of 16 bit which is lower than that of 58.5% of microphones and equal to that of 41.5% of microphones.
Signal-to-noise ratio (DAC)
85 dB
Signal-to-noise ratio (DAC)
85 dB
â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
Market range: <70 dB – >100 dB
This microphone has a DAC SNR of 85 dB which is lower than that of 65.7% of microphones.
Headphone amplifier.
Show more
N. of polar patterns
1
N. of polar patterns
1
â–¼ Worse than 25% of models
Market range: <1 – >4
The number of selectable polar patterns offered by this microphone is 1, which is lower than that of 24.6% of microphones and equal to that of 75.4% of microphones.
Cardioid pattern
no
Cardioid pattern
no
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
This microphone does not support a cardioid pickup pattern. 91.5% of microphones support this pattern.
Omnidirectional pattern
no
Omnidirectional pattern
no
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
This microphone does not support an omnidirectional pickup pattern. 26.1% of microphones support this pattern.
Hypercardioid pattern
no
Hypercardioid pattern
no
â–¼ Worse than 2% of models
This microphone does not support a hypercardioid pickup pattern. 1.5% of microphones support this pattern.
Bidirectional pattern
no
Bidirectional pattern
no
â–¼ Worse than 17% of models
This microphone does not support a bidirectional pickup pattern. 17.1% of microphones support this pattern.
Mute function
yes
Mute function
yes
â–² Better than 32% of models
This microphone includes a mute function. 67.8% of microphones include this control.
Onboard gain control
no
Onboard gain control
no
â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
This microphone does not include onboard gain control. 51.3% of microphones include this control.
Volume control levels
1
Volume control levels
1
â–² Better than 35% of models
Market range: <0 – >2
This microphone offers volume output of 1 which is higher than that of 34.9% of microphones and equal to that of 49.5% of microphones.
Flat DSP mode
no
Flat DSP mode
no
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
This microphone does not support a flat DSP mode. 25.6% of microphones offer this processing option.
DSP presets
0
DSP presets
0
â–¼ Worse than 17% of models
Market range: <0 – >3
This microphone offers 0 DSP presets, which is fewer than 16.6% of microphones and equal to 83.4% of microphones.
Show more
Phantom power required
no
Phantom power required
no
â–² Better than 10% of models
This microphone does not require phantom power. 90.5% of microphones also operate without phantom power.
Phantom power voltage
N/A
USB bus-powered
yes
USB bus-powered
yes
â–² Better than 14% of models
This microphone supports USB bus power. 85.9% of microphones support USB-powered operation.
Battery life
N/A
Height
184 mm
Height
184 mm
â–² Better than 51% of models
Market range: <130 mm – >252.8 mm
This microphone is 184 mm tall, which is shorter than 51.3% of microphones and equal in height to 2.1% of microphones.
Width
50 mm
Width
50 mm
â–² Better than 76% of models
Market range: <48 mm – >109 mm
This microphone is 50 mm wide, which is narrower than 75.9% of microphones and equal in width to 8.7% of microphones.
Thickness
50 mm
Thickness
50 mm
â–² Better than 74% of models
Market range: <45 mm – >114 mm
This microphone is 50 mm thick, which is thinner than 73.7% of microphones and equal in thickness to 7.9% of microphones.
Weight
383 g
Weight
383 g
â–² Better than 74% of models
Market range: <226.8 g – >1k g
This microphone weighs 383 g, which is lighter than 73.6% of microphones.
With included stand.
Body material
plastic
Show more
Included accessories
stand; cable
Shock mount included
yes
Shock mount included
yes
â–² Better than 51% of models
This microphone includes a shock mount. 49.3% of microphones include this accessory.
Pop filter included
no
Pop filter included
no
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
This microphone does not include a pop filter. 60.8% of microphones include this accessory.
Windscreen included
no
Windscreen included
no
â–¼ Worse than 32% of models
This microphone does not include a windscreen. 31.8% of microphones include this accessory.
Cable length
1.8 m
Cable length
1.8 m
â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
Market range: <1.4 m – >3 m
This microphone has a cable length of 1.8 m which is shorter than that of 66.3% of microphones and equal to that of 15% of microphones.
Android compatibility
yes
Android compatibility
yes
â–² Better than 34% of models
This microphone is compatible with Android. 65.8% of microphones are compatible with Android.
iOS compatibility
yes
iOS compatibility
yes
â–² Better than 39% of models
This microphone is compatible with iOS. 61.3% of microphones are compatible with iOS.
Windows compatibility
yes
Windows compatibility
yes
Category Benchmark
This microphone is compatible with Windows. 100% of microphones are compatible with Windows.
macOS compatibility
yes
macOS compatibility
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This microphone is compatible with macOS. 99.5% of microphones are compatible with macOS.
Xbox compatibility
no
Xbox compatibility
no
â–¼ Worse than 2% of models
This microphone is not compatible with Xbox. 1.5% of microphones are compatible with Xbox.
Show more

Razer Seiren X vs the average microphone

246810TotalAudio PerformanceConnectivityRecordingPickup PatternsControls & FeaturesPowerDesignAccessoriesCompatibility
  • 81 mW higher headphone output power
    Headphone output power
    125 mW
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    Market range: <10 mW – >130 mW
    This microphone has a higher headphone output power than the average microphone (125 mW vs 44 mW). The average microphone has a headphone output power of 44 mW.
    125 mW vs 44 mW
  • Includes shock mount
    Shock mount included
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This microphone includes a shock mount, the average microphone does not.
  • 30.7% lighter
    Weight
    383 g
    â–² Better than 74% of models
    Market range: <226.8 g – >1k g
    This microphone is lighter than the average microphone (383 g vs 553 g). The average microphone weighs 553 g.
    With included stand.
    383 g vs 553 g
  • 58% more popular
    Razer Seiren X has a higher popularity than the average microphone (9.83 vs 6.2).
    9.83 vs 6.22
  • 6 mm thinner body
    Thickness
    50 mm
    â–² Better than 74% of models
    Market range: <45 mm – >114 mm
    This microphone is thinner than the average microphone (50 mm vs 56 mm). The average microphone has a thickness of 56 mm.
    50 mm vs 56 mm
  • 13.4% higher user score
    User score
    9.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the microphone.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a microphone performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Razer Seiren X
    the average microphone
    Razer Seiren X has a higher user score than the average microphone (9.10 vs 8.027).
    9.1 vs 8.03
  • 58% more popular
    Razer Seiren X has a higher popularity than the average microphone (9.83 vs 6.2).
    9.83 vs 6.22
  • 13.4% higher user score
    User score
    9.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the microphone.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a microphone performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Razer Seiren X
    the average microphone
    Razer Seiren X has a higher user score than the average microphone (9.10 vs 8.027).
    9.1 vs 8.03
  • 81 mW higher headphone output power
    Headphone output power
    125 mW
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    Market range: <10 mW – >130 mW
    This microphone has a higher headphone output power than the average microphone (125 mW vs 44 mW). The average microphone has a headphone output power of 44 mW.
    125 mW vs 44 mW
  • 30.7% lighter
    Weight
    383 g
    â–² Better than 74% of models
    Market range: <226.8 g – >1k g
    This microphone is lighter than the average microphone (383 g vs 553 g). The average microphone weighs 553 g.
    With included stand.
    383 g vs 553 g
  • 6 mm thinner body
    Thickness
    50 mm
    â–² Better than 74% of models
    Market range: <45 mm – >114 mm
    This microphone is thinner than the average microphone (50 mm vs 56 mm). The average microphone has a thickness of 56 mm.
    50 mm vs 56 mm
  • Includes shock mount
    Shock mount included
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This microphone includes a shock mount, the average microphone does not.
  • No zero-latency monitoring
    Zero-latency monitoring
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This microphone does not support zero-latency monitoring, the average microphone does.
  • No gain control
    Onboard gain control
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This microphone does not include onboard gain control, the average microphone does.
  • 8 bit lower interface bit depth
    Audio interface bit depth
    16 bit
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    Market range: <16 bit – >24 bit
    This microphone supports a lower audio interface bit depth than the average microphone (16 bit vs 24 bit). The average microphone audio interface supports 24 bit.
    16 bit vs 24 bit
  • No cardioid pickup
    Cardioid pattern
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    This microphone does not support cardioid pickup, the average microphone does.
  • 11 dB SPL lower limit
    Max SPL
    110 dB SPL
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
    Market range: <110 dB SPL – >140 dB SPL
    This microphone has a lower max SPL than the average microphone (110 dB SPL vs 121 dB SPL). The average microphone handles a max SPL of 121 dB SPL.
    110 dB SPL vs 121 dB SPL
  • 18 dB narrower dynamic range
    Dynamic range
    78 dB
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <77.5 dB – >130 dB
    This microphone has a narrower dynamic range than the average microphone (78 dB vs 96 dB). The average microphone has a dynamic range of 96 dB.
    78 dB vs 96 dB
  • No pop filter
    Pop filter included
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This microphone does not include a pop filter, the average microphone does.
  • 6.5 dB lower DAC signal-to-noise ratio
    Signal-to-noise ratio (DAC)
    85 dB
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <70 dB – >100 dB
    This microphone has a lower DAC signal-to-noise ratio than the average microphone (85 dB vs 91.5 dB). The average microphone DAC has a signal-to-noise ratio of 91.5 dB.
    Headphone amplifier.
    85 dB vs 91.5 dB
  • 5.5% worse value for money
    Razer Seiren X has a lower value-for-money score than the average microphone (7.52 vs 7.9).
    7.52 vs 7.94
  • 11 dB SPL lower limit
    Max SPL
    110 dB SPL
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
    Market range: <110 dB SPL – >140 dB SPL
    This microphone has a lower max SPL than the average microphone (110 dB SPL vs 121 dB SPL). The average microphone handles a max SPL of 121 dB SPL.
    110 dB SPL vs 121 dB SPL
  • 18 dB narrower dynamic range
    Dynamic range
    78 dB
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <77.5 dB – >130 dB
    This microphone has a narrower dynamic range than the average microphone (78 dB vs 96 dB). The average microphone has a dynamic range of 96 dB.
    78 dB vs 96 dB
  • No zero-latency monitoring
    Zero-latency monitoring
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This microphone does not support zero-latency monitoring, the average microphone does.
  • 8 bit lower interface bit depth
    Audio interface bit depth
    16 bit
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    Market range: <16 bit – >24 bit
    This microphone supports a lower audio interface bit depth than the average microphone (16 bit vs 24 bit). The average microphone audio interface supports 24 bit.
    16 bit vs 24 bit
  • 6.5 dB lower DAC signal-to-noise ratio
    Signal-to-noise ratio (DAC)
    85 dB
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <70 dB – >100 dB
    This microphone has a lower DAC signal-to-noise ratio than the average microphone (85 dB vs 91.5 dB). The average microphone DAC has a signal-to-noise ratio of 91.5 dB.
    Headphone amplifier.
    85 dB vs 91.5 dB
  • No cardioid pickup
    Cardioid pattern
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    This microphone does not support cardioid pickup, the average microphone does.
  • No gain control
    Onboard gain control
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This microphone does not include onboard gain control, the average microphone does.
  • 3 older release date
    Release date
    2017
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This microphone is older than the average microphone (2017 vs 2020). The average microphone was released in 2020.
    October 2017.
    2017 vs 2020
  • No pop filter
    Pop filter included
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This microphone does not include a pop filter, the average microphone does.
  • 0.2 m shorter cable length
    Cable length
    1.8 m
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <1.4 m – >3 m
    This microphone has a shorter cable than the average microphone (1.8 m vs 2 m). The average microphone has a cable length of 2 m.
    1.8 m vs 2 m

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

M
musicradar.com
12/07/2021
Summary of the review
Razer Seiren X review - MusicRadar
F
futurefive.co.nz
06/06/2020
Summary of the review
Hands-on Review: Razer Seiren X microphone
G
gamingtrend.com
02/11/2019
Summary of the review
Affordable sound quality — Razer Seiren X microphone review
T
thumbculture.co.uk
19/07/2018
Summary of the review
Razer Seiren X Gaming Microphone Review - Testing Testing 1, 2, 3 Are you interested in comparing these results with the more recent Razer Seiren V2 X...
B
basic-tutorials.com
05/03/2018
Summary of the review
Razer Seiren X Review: USB Microphone for Streamer
G
gamezoom.net
17/03/2018
Summary of the review
Razer Seiren X - Test/Review (+Video) - Gamezoom
(Translated)Show original
G
gamezgeneration.de
07/10/2021
Summary of the review
Razer Seiren X Review – Entry-Level Streaming Microphone
(Translated)Show original
G
games.ch
09/12/2021
Summary of the review
Razer Seiren X - Hardware Review - The Perfect Beginner Microphone?
(Translated)Show original
G
gamertech.fr
09/03/2018
Summary of the review
Razer Seiren X Review: Can it compete with the Blue Yeti?", "Razer Seiren X Test: Can it match the Blue Yeti?
(Translated)Show original
R
roxarmy.com
21/07/2019
Summary of the review
Razer Seiren X Review: A Compact Microphone for Streamers", "Testing the Razer Seiren X: A Compact Mic for Streamers
(Translated)Show original
G
gamergen.com
18/07/2020
Summary of the review
Razer Seiren X Review: An ultra-compact microphone that lacks features.
(Translated)Show original
W
warlegend.net
11/04/2019
Summary of the review
Razer Seiren X Review – The Golden-Scaled Siren
(Translated)Show original
M
muycomputer.com
27/05/2020
Summary of the review
Razer Seiren X (PS4) Review: Whispers in the Wind
(Translated)Show original
N
noticias3d.com
10/03/2019
Summary of the review
Mini review: Razer Seiren X
(Translated)Show original
R
robadainformatici.it
02/04/2026
Summary of the review
Razer Seiren X - Full Review - IT Stuff
(Translated)Show original
G
gamesource.it
01/07/2019
Summary of the review
Razer Seiren X PS4 Microphone - Review - GameSource
(Translated)Show original
T
techtesters.eu
05/06/2018
Summary of the review
Razer Seiren X review - Techtesters
(Translated)Show original
H
hardware.info
22/08/2019
Summary of the review
6 USB Microphones Review - Razer Seiren X - Hardware Info
(Translated)Show original
N
nl.ign.com
05/06/2019
Summary of the review
Razer's Streaming Lineup Tested - IGN Benelux
(Translated)Show original
T
techgirl.nl
22/07/2019
Summary of the review
Sound seductive like a siren with the Razer Seiren X - Techgirl
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on 8,564 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Razer Seiren X

  • Compact and sleek design ideal for small desk spaces and portability
  • Simple plug-and-play setup requiring no additional drivers or software
  • Good overall sound quality for the price, especially for beginners
  • Built-in zero-latency 3.5mm headphone monitoring jack
  • Features a built-in shock mount to help dampen desk vibrations
  • Physical mute button with a clear LED status indicator

What we don't like about Razer Seiren X

  • Prone to picking up background noise like mechanical keyboard clicks and mouse movements
  • Plastic build quality can feel less premium or sturdy compared to metal alternatives
  • Limited physical controls, lacking a dedicated gain knob
  • Monitoring volume through the headphone jack can be very quiet
  • Only offers a single (supercardioid) polar pattern, reducing versatility
  • Uses an older Micro-USB connection rather than the modern USB-C

Verdict

The Razer Seiren X is a compact USB condenser microphone designed for streaming, featuring a large 25mm condenser capsule and a supercardioid polar pattern that provides a tight pickup angle to minimize background noise. Technically, it offers a frequency response of 20Hz–20kHz, a maximum sound pressure level (SPL) of 110dB, and supports a sampling rate of up to 48kHz with a 16-bit bit depth. Main characteristics include an integrated shock mount to dampen vibrations from desk bumps and a zero-latency 3.5mm headphone monitoring jack for real-time audio tracking. Its primary pros are its highly portable form factor, simple plug-and-play USB connectivity, and clear vocal reproduction suitable for gaming setups. However, notable cons include a primarily plastic build quality that may feel less premium, a headphone monitoring volume that some users find too quiet, and a lack of dedicated on-mic gain control, requiring adjustments through computer software.

Compare Razer Seiren X with other products in the Microphones category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Razer Seiren X and other products in the Microphones category

No results found