OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Microphones Methodology v1.0
Microphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Microphones Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Microphones Methodology v1.0

Mars Gaming MMIC-SE Review | 76 Data compared

Avg. price:~£25Connection type:USBTransducer type:condenserMax SPL:120 dB SPLSupported sample rates:192 kHzOutput connector type:USB-c

Mars Gaming MMIC-SE Review: Compare 76 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Microphones category and whether it is worth buying.

6.9

Overall score

Score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the microphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best microphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
Score components

75%

6.9

Technical score

25%

?

User score

â–¼Worse than 60% of microphones
6.9

Technical score

Technical score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Microphones category across these key areas: Audio Performance, Connectivity, Recording, Pickup Patterns, Controls & Features, Power, Design, Accessories, Compatibility.
When it matters
When you want to compare microphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 52% of models
Score components

20%

7.7

Audio Performance

20%

6.4

Recording

16%

3.2

Pickup Patterns

16%

6.4

Controls & Features

10%

10

Power

7%

10

Compatibility

5%

6.5

Connectivity

3%

8.3

Design

3%

7.8

Accessories

â–²Better than 52% of microphones
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the microphone.
When it matters
When you want to know how a microphone performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £25

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of microphone Mars Gaming MMIC-SE

Technical score
Technical score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Microphones category across these key areas: Audio Performance, Connectivity, Recording, Pickup Patterns, Controls & Features, Power, Design, Accessories, Compatibility.
When it matters
When you want to compare microphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 52% of models
Score components:

20%

7.7

Audio Performance

20%

6.4

Recording

16%

3.2

Pickup Patterns

16%

6.4

Controls & Features

10%

10

Power

7%

10

Compatibility

5%

6.5

Connectivity

3%

8.3

Design

3%

7.8

Accessories

6.9
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the microphone.
When it matters
When you want to know how a microphone performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the microphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
Mars Gaming MMIC-SE has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than 68.3% of microphones.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the microphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a microphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
Score components:

60%

6.9

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.8
Microphone type
studio
Transducer type
condenser
Diaphragm size
?
Capsule type
single
Sensitivity
-40 dBV/Pa
Show more
Connection type
USB
Output connector type
USB-c
Headphone output
yes
Headphone output
yes
â–² Better than 38% of models
This microphone includes a headphone output. 62.3% of microphones include this output.
3.5 mm audio jack
yes
3.5 mm audio jack
yes
â–² Better than 37% of models
This microphone includes a 3.5 mm jack. 62.8% of microphones include this connector.
6.35 mm audio jack connector
no
6.35 mm audio jack connector
no
â–¼ Worse than 2% of models
This microphone does not include a 6.35 mm jack. 2% of microphones include this connector.
Show more
Supported sample rates
192 kHz
Supported bit depths
24 bit
Audio interface sample rate
192 kHz
Audio interface sample rate
192 kHz
â–² Better than 83% of models
Market range: <48 kHz – >192 kHz
This microphone supports an interface sample rate of 192 kHz which is higher than that of 83% of microphones and equal to that of 17% of microphones.
Audio interface bit depth
24 bit
Audio interface bit depth
24 bit
â–² Better than 42% of models
Market range: <16 bit – >24 bit
This microphone supports an interface bit depth of 24 bit which is higher than that of 42.1% of microphones and equal to that of 56.7% of microphones.
Signal-to-noise ratio (DAC)
70 dB
Signal-to-noise ratio (DAC)
70 dB
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
Market range: <70 dB – >100 dB
This microphone has a DAC SNR of 70 dB which is lower than that of 91.4% of microphones and equal to that of 5.7% of microphones.
Show more
N. of polar patterns
1
N. of polar patterns
1
â–¼ Worse than 25% of models
Market range: <1 – >4
The number of selectable polar patterns offered by this microphone is 1, which is lower than that of 24.6% of microphones and equal to that of 75.4% of microphones.
Cardioid pattern
yes
Cardioid pattern
yes
â–² Better than 9% of models
This microphone supports a cardioid pickup pattern. 91% of microphones support this pattern.
Omnidirectional pattern
no
Omnidirectional pattern
no
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
This microphone does not support an omnidirectional pickup pattern. 26.1% of microphones support this pattern.
Hypercardioid pattern
no
Hypercardioid pattern
no
â–¼ Worse than 2% of models
This microphone does not support a hypercardioid pickup pattern. 1.5% of microphones support this pattern.
Bidirectional pattern
no
Bidirectional pattern
no
â–¼ Worse than 17% of models
This microphone does not support a bidirectional pickup pattern. 17.1% of microphones support this pattern.
Mute function
yes
Mute function
yes
â–² Better than 32% of models
This microphone includes a mute function. 67.8% of microphones include this control.
Onboard gain control
no
Onboard gain control
no
â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
This microphone does not include onboard gain control. 51.3% of microphones include this control.
Volume control levels
1
Volume control levels
1
â–² Better than 35% of models
Market range: <0 – >2
This microphone offers volume output of 1 which is higher than that of 34.9% of microphones and equal to that of 49.5% of microphones.
Flat DSP mode
no
Flat DSP mode
no
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
This microphone does not support a flat DSP mode. 25.6% of microphones offer this processing option.
DSP presets
0
DSP presets
0
â–¼ Worse than 17% of models
Market range: <0 – >3
This microphone offers 0 DSP presets, which is fewer than 16.6% of microphones and equal to 83.4% of microphones.
Show more
Phantom power required
no
Phantom power required
no
â–² Better than 10% of models
This microphone does not require phantom power. 90.5% of microphones also operate without phantom power.
Phantom power voltage
N/A
USB bus-powered
yes
USB bus-powered
yes
â–² Better than 14% of models
This microphone supports USB bus power. 85.9% of microphones support USB-powered operation.
Battery life
N/A
Height
128 mm
Height
128 mm
★ Better than 92% of models
Market range: <130 mm – >252.8 mm
This microphone is 128 mm tall, which is shorter than 91.8% of microphones and equal in height to 0.5% of microphones.
Width
65 mm
Width
65 mm
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Market range: <48 mm – >109 mm
This microphone is 65 mm wide, which is wider than 65.1% of microphones and equal in width to 1% of microphones.
Thickness
54 mm
Thickness
54 mm
â–² Better than 57% of models
Market range: <45 mm – >114 mm
This microphone is 54 mm thick, which is thinner than 57.4% of microphones and equal in thickness to 2.6% of microphones.
Weight
?
Body material
metal
Show more
Included accessories
stand; shock mount; pop filter; cable
Shock mount included
yes
Shock mount included
yes
â–² Better than 51% of models
This microphone includes a shock mount. 49.3% of microphones include this accessory.
Pop filter included
yes
Pop filter included
yes
â–² Better than 40% of models
This microphone includes a pop filter. 60.3% of microphones include this accessory.
Windscreen included
no
Windscreen included
no
â–¼ Worse than 32% of models
This microphone does not include a windscreen. 31.8% of microphones include this accessory.
Cable length
1.8 m
Cable length
1.8 m
â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
Market range: <1.4 m – >3 m
This microphone has a cable length of 1.8 m which is shorter than that of 66.3% of microphones and equal to that of 15% of microphones.
Android compatibility
yes
Android compatibility
yes
â–² Better than 34% of models
This microphone is compatible with Android. 65.8% of microphones are compatible with Android.
iOS compatibility
yes
iOS compatibility
yes
â–² Better than 39% of models
This microphone is compatible with iOS. 61.3% of microphones are compatible with iOS.
Windows compatibility
yes
Windows compatibility
yes
Category Benchmark
This microphone is compatible with Windows. 100% of microphones are compatible with Windows.
macOS compatibility
yes
macOS compatibility
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This microphone is compatible with macOS. 99.5% of microphones are compatible with macOS.
Xbox compatibility
no
Xbox compatibility
no
â–¼ Worse than 2% of models
This microphone is not compatible with Xbox. 1.5% of microphones are compatible with Xbox.
Show more

Mars Gaming MMIC-SE vs the average microphone

246810TotalAudio PerformanceConnectivityRecordingPickup PatternsControls & FeaturesPowerDesignAccessoriesCompatibility
  • 144 kHz higher interface sample rate
    Audio interface sample rate
    192 kHz
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    Market range: <48 kHz – >192 kHz
    This microphone supports a higher audio interface sample rate than the average microphone (192 kHz vs 48 kHz). The average microphone audio interface supports 48 kHz.
    192 kHz vs 48 kHz
  • Includes shock mount
    Shock mount included
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This microphone includes a shock mount, the average microphone does not.
  • 3 newer release date
    Release date
    2023
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This microphone is newer than the average microphone (2023 vs 2020). The average microphone was released in 2020.
    2023 vs 2020
  • 57 mm shorter body
    Height
    128 mm
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    Market range: <130 mm – >252.8 mm
    This microphone is shorter than the average microphone (128 mm vs 185 mm). The average microphone has a height of 185 mm.
    128 mm vs 185 mm
  • Includes RGB lighting
    RGB lighting
    yes
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    This microphone includes RGB lighting, the average microphone does not.
    ARGB Flow lighting.
  • 2.8x cheaper
    Mars Gaming MMIC-SE is cheaper than the average microphone (£25 vs £70).
    £25 vs £70
  • 2.8x cheaper
    Mars Gaming MMIC-SE is cheaper than the average microphone (£25 vs £70).
    £25 vs £70
  • 144 kHz higher interface sample rate
    Audio interface sample rate
    192 kHz
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    Market range: <48 kHz – >192 kHz
    This microphone supports a higher audio interface sample rate than the average microphone (192 kHz vs 48 kHz). The average microphone audio interface supports 48 kHz.
    192 kHz vs 48 kHz
  • 3 newer release date
    Release date
    2023
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This microphone is newer than the average microphone (2023 vs 2020). The average microphone was released in 2020.
    2023 vs 2020
  • 57 mm shorter body
    Height
    128 mm
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    Market range: <130 mm – >252.8 mm
    This microphone is shorter than the average microphone (128 mm vs 185 mm). The average microphone has a height of 185 mm.
    128 mm vs 185 mm
  • Includes RGB lighting
    RGB lighting
    yes
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    This microphone includes RGB lighting, the average microphone does not.
    ARGB Flow lighting.
  • Includes shock mount
    Shock mount included
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This microphone includes a shock mount, the average microphone does not.
  • No gain control
    Onboard gain control
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This microphone does not include onboard gain control, the average microphone does.
  • 21.5 dB lower DAC signal-to-noise ratio
    Signal-to-noise ratio (DAC)
    70 dB
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <70 dB – >100 dB
    This microphone has a lower DAC signal-to-noise ratio than the average microphone (70 dB vs 91.5 dB). The average microphone DAC has a signal-to-noise ratio of 91.5 dB.
    70 dB vs 91.5 dB
  • 1 dB SPL lower limit
    Max SPL
    120 dB SPL
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <110 dB SPL – >140 dB SPL
    This microphone has a lower max SPL than the average microphone (120 dB SPL vs 121 dB SPL). The average microphone handles a max SPL of 121 dB SPL.
    120 dB SPL vs 121 dB SPL
  • 6.22x less popular
    Mars Gaming MMIC-SE has a lower popularity than the average microphone (1 vs 6.2).
    1 vs 6.22
  • 0.3% lower user score
    User score
    8.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the microphone.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a microphone performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Mars Gaming MMIC-SE
    the average microphone
    Mars Gaming MMIC-SE has a lower user score than the average microphone (8.00 vs 8.027).
    8 vs 8.03
  • 0.2 m shorter cable length
    Cable length
    1.8 m
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <1.4 m – >3 m
    This microphone has a shorter cable than the average microphone (1.8 m vs 2 m). The average microphone has a cable length of 2 m.
    1.8 m vs 2 m
  • 6.22x less popular
    Mars Gaming MMIC-SE has a lower popularity than the average microphone (1 vs 6.2).
    1 vs 6.22
  • 0.3% lower user score
    User score
    8.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the microphone.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a microphone performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Mars Gaming MMIC-SE
    the average microphone
    Mars Gaming MMIC-SE has a lower user score than the average microphone (8.00 vs 8.027).
    8 vs 8.03
  • 1 dB SPL lower limit
    Max SPL
    120 dB SPL
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <110 dB SPL – >140 dB SPL
    This microphone has a lower max SPL than the average microphone (120 dB SPL vs 121 dB SPL). The average microphone handles a max SPL of 121 dB SPL.
    120 dB SPL vs 121 dB SPL
  • 21.5 dB lower DAC signal-to-noise ratio
    Signal-to-noise ratio (DAC)
    70 dB
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <70 dB – >100 dB
    This microphone has a lower DAC signal-to-noise ratio than the average microphone (70 dB vs 91.5 dB). The average microphone DAC has a signal-to-noise ratio of 91.5 dB.
    70 dB vs 91.5 dB
  • No gain control
    Onboard gain control
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This microphone does not include onboard gain control, the average microphone does.
  • 0.2 m shorter cable length
    Cable length
    1.8 m
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <1.4 m – >3 m
    This microphone has a shorter cable than the average microphone (1.8 m vs 2 m). The average microphone has a cable length of 2 m.
    1.8 m vs 2 m

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

C
codegeek.es
10/11/2023
Summary of the review
Review of the MMIC-SE ARGB Professional Studio Microphone
(Translated)Show original
M
mein.post-modern.de
24/04/2026
Summary of the review
Mars Gaming MMIC-SE Review: 24-bit Studio Audio and ARGB Flow
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

What we like about Mars Gaming MMIC-SE

  • High-definition 196kHz/24-bit recording for clear and crisp vocal capture
  • Comes fully equipped with a sturdy metal stand, anti-vibration shock mount, and metal mesh pop filter
  • Eye-catching ARGB flow lighting that enhances gaming and streaming setups
  • Built-in 3.5mm headphone jack for zero-latency, real-time audio monitoring
  • Intuitive, easy-to-reach touch controls for volume adjustment and mute
  • Plug-and-play USB connection requiring no complicated external audio interfaces

What we don't like about Mars Gaming MMIC-SE

  • The included desk stand is relatively heavy but fixed in height; users often need an aftermarket boom arm for better desk ergonomics
  • Cardioid pickup pattern is highly sensitive, meaning it requires a quiet room as it can pick up some background noise if not positioned close to the mouth
  • ARGB lighting cannot be fully customized or synced with third-party software (e.g., Razer Chroma or Corsair iCUE)

Verdict

The Mars Gaming MMIC-SE is a professional studio microphone featuring an ultra-high-definition 192kHz/24-bit ADC and a cardioid condenser capsule designed for precise, unidirectional sound capture. Key technical specifications include a frequency response of 20Hz–20kHz, a 70dB signal-to-noise ratio, and a maximum SPL of 120dB, with connectivity provided via a seamless USB-A/USB-C interface. Its main pros include mesmerizing ARGB Flow lighting, a latency-free 3.5mm monitoring jack, and a comprehensive accessory kit that includes a shock mount and metal mesh pop filter. Notable cons include its relatively large and heavy metal build (316g), and occasional reports of sound cutting out during extended use.

Compare Mars Gaming MMIC-SE with other products in the Microphones category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Mars Gaming MMIC-SE and other products in the Microphones category

No results found