OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Microphones Methodology v1.0
Microphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Microphones Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Microphones Methodology v1.0

FIFINE K669B Review | 76 Data compared

Avg. price:~£30Connection type:USBTransducer type:condenserMax SPL:130 dB SPLSupported sample rates:48 kHzOutput connector type:USB

FIFINE K669B Review: Compare 76 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Microphones category and whether it is worth buying.

7.1

Overall score

Score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the microphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best microphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 50% of models
Score components

75%

6.3

Technical score

25%

9.3

User score

â–²Better than 50% of microphones
6.3

Technical score

Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Microphones category across these key areas: Audio Performance, Connectivity, Recording, Pickup Patterns, Controls & Features, Power, Design, Accessories, Compatibility.
When it matters
When you want to compare microphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
Score components

20%

8.4

Audio Performance

20%

4.5

Recording

16%

3.2

Pickup Patterns

16%

6.4

Controls & Features

10%

10

Power

7%

10

Compatibility

5%

4.0

Connectivity

3%

6.9

Design

3%

4.1

Accessories

â–¼Worse than 66% of microphones
9.3

User score

User score
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the microphone.
When it matters
When you want to know how a microphone performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 88% of models
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on 49,449 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–²Better than 88% of microphones
  • fifine-k669b
  • fifine-k669b
  • fifine-k669b
  • fifine-k669b
  • fifine-k669b
  • fifine-k669b
  • fifine-k669b
fifine-k669b
fifine-k669b
fifine-k669b
fifine-k669b
fifine-k669b
fifine-k669b
fifine-k669b

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of microphone FIFINE K669B

Technical score
Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Microphones category across these key areas: Audio Performance, Connectivity, Recording, Pickup Patterns, Controls & Features, Power, Design, Accessories, Compatibility.
When it matters
When you want to compare microphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
Score components:

20%

8.4

Audio Performance

20%

4.5

Recording

16%

3.2

Pickup Patterns

16%

6.4

Controls & Features

10%

10

Power

7%

10

Compatibility

5%

4.0

Connectivity

3%

6.9

Design

3%

4.1

Accessories

6.3
User score
User score
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the microphone.
When it matters
When you want to know how a microphone performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 88% of models
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on 49,449 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
9.3
Popularity
Popularity
10.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the microphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 90% of models
Popularity:
FIFINE K669B has a popularity score of 10 points, which is higher than 90.5% of microphones.
10
Value for money
Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the microphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a microphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
Score components:

60%

7.1

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.9
Microphone type
studio
Transducer type
condenser
Diaphragm size
16 mm
Capsule type
single
Sensitivity
?
Show more
Connection type
USB
Output connector type
USB
Headphone output
no
Headphone output
no
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
This microphone does not include a headphone output. 62.8% of microphones include this output.
3.5 mm audio jack
no
3.5 mm audio jack
no
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
This microphone does not include a 3.5 mm jack. 63.3% of microphones include this connector.
6.35 mm audio jack connector
no
6.35 mm audio jack connector
no
â–¼ Worse than 2% of models
This microphone does not include a 6.35 mm jack. 2% of microphones include this connector.
Show more
Supported sample rates
48 kHz
Supported bit depths
16 bit
Audio interface sample rate
48 kHz
Audio interface sample rate
48 kHz
â–¼ Worse than 42% of models
Market range: <48 kHz – >192 kHz
This microphone supports an interface sample rate of 48 kHz which is higher than that of 2.3% of microphones and equal to that of 55.6% of microphones.
Audio interface bit depth
16 bit
Audio interface bit depth
16 bit
â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
Market range: <16 bit – >24 bit
This microphone supports an interface bit depth of 16 bit which is lower than that of 58.5% of microphones and equal to that of 41.5% of microphones.
Signal-to-noise ratio (DAC)
N/A
Show more
N. of polar patterns
1
N. of polar patterns
1
â–¼ Worse than 25% of models
Market range: <1 – >4
The number of selectable polar patterns offered by this microphone is 1, which is lower than that of 24.6% of microphones and equal to that of 75.4% of microphones.
Cardioid pattern
yes
Cardioid pattern
yes
â–² Better than 9% of models
This microphone supports a cardioid pickup pattern. 91% of microphones support this pattern.
Omnidirectional pattern
no
Omnidirectional pattern
no
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
This microphone does not support an omnidirectional pickup pattern. 26.1% of microphones support this pattern.
Hypercardioid pattern
no
Hypercardioid pattern
no
â–¼ Worse than 2% of models
This microphone does not support a hypercardioid pickup pattern. 1.5% of microphones support this pattern.
Bidirectional pattern
no
Bidirectional pattern
no
â–¼ Worse than 17% of models
This microphone does not support a bidirectional pickup pattern. 17.1% of microphones support this pattern.
Mute function
no
Mute function
no
â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
This microphone does not include a mute function. 68.3% of microphones include this control.
Onboard gain control
yes
Onboard gain control
yes
â–² Better than 49% of models
This microphone includes onboard gain control. 50.8% of microphones include this control.
Volume control levels
1
Volume control levels
1
â–² Better than 35% of models
Market range: <0 – >2
This microphone offers volume output of 1 which is higher than that of 34.9% of microphones and equal to that of 49.5% of microphones.
Flat DSP mode
no
Flat DSP mode
no
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
This microphone does not support a flat DSP mode. 25.6% of microphones offer this processing option.
DSP presets
0
DSP presets
0
â–¼ Worse than 17% of models
Market range: <0 – >3
This microphone offers 0 DSP presets, which is fewer than 16.6% of microphones and equal to 83.4% of microphones.
Show more
Phantom power required
no
Phantom power required
no
â–² Better than 10% of models
This microphone does not require phantom power. 90.5% of microphones also operate without phantom power.
Phantom power voltage
N/A
USB bus-powered
yes
USB bus-powered
yes
â–² Better than 14% of models
This microphone supports USB bus power. 85.9% of microphones support USB-powered operation.
Battery life
N/A
Height
203 mm
Height
203 mm
â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
Market range: <130 mm – >252.8 mm
This microphone is 203 mm tall, which is taller than 63.6% of microphones and equal in height to 2.6% of microphones.
Width
90 mm
Width
90 mm
â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
Market range: <48 mm – >109 mm
This microphone is 90 mm wide, which is wider than 79% of microphones and equal in width to 1.5% of microphones.
Thickness
50 mm
Thickness
50 mm
â–² Better than 74% of models
Market range: <45 mm – >114 mm
This microphone is 50 mm thick, which is thinner than 73.7% of microphones and equal in thickness to 7.9% of microphones.
Weight
?
Body material
metal
Show more
Included accessories
stand; cable
Shock mount included
no
Shock mount included
no
â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
This microphone does not include a shock mount. 49.8% of microphones include this accessory.
Pop filter included
no
Pop filter included
no
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
This microphone does not include a pop filter. 60.8% of microphones include this accessory.
Windscreen included
no
Windscreen included
no
â–¼ Worse than 32% of models
This microphone does not include a windscreen. 31.8% of microphones include this accessory.
Cable length
1.8 m
Cable length
1.8 m
â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
Market range: <1.4 m – >3 m
This microphone has a cable length of 1.8 m which is shorter than that of 66.3% of microphones and equal to that of 15% of microphones.
Android compatibility
yes
Android compatibility
yes
â–² Better than 34% of models
This microphone is compatible with Android. 65.8% of microphones are compatible with Android.
iOS compatibility
yes
iOS compatibility
yes
â–² Better than 39% of models
This microphone is compatible with iOS. 61.3% of microphones are compatible with iOS.
Windows compatibility
yes
Windows compatibility
yes
Category Benchmark
This microphone is compatible with Windows. 100% of microphones are compatible with Windows.
macOS compatibility
yes
macOS compatibility
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This microphone is compatible with macOS. 99.5% of microphones are compatible with macOS.
Xbox compatibility
no
Xbox compatibility
no
â–¼ Worse than 2% of models
This microphone is not compatible with Xbox. 1.5% of microphones are compatible with Xbox.
Show more

FIFINE K669B vs the average microphone

246810TotalAudio PerformanceConnectivityRecordingPickup PatternsControls & FeaturesPowerDesignAccessoriesCompatibility
  • Includes mix control
    Mix control
    yes
    â–² Better than 70% of models
    This microphone includes mix control, the average microphone does not.
  • 9 dB SPL higher limit
    Max SPL
    130 dB SPL
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    Market range: <110 dB SPL – >140 dB SPL
    This microphone has a higher max SPL than the average microphone (130 dB SPL vs 121 dB SPL). The average microphone handles a max SPL of 121 dB SPL.
    130 dB SPL vs 121 dB SPL
  • 2.33x cheaper
    FIFINE K669B is cheaper than the average microphone (£30 vs £70).
    £30 vs £70
  • 60.7% more popular
    FIFINE K669B has a higher popularity than the average microphone (10 vs 6.2).
    10 vs 6.22
  • 15.6% higher user score
    User score
    9.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the microphone.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a microphone performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    FIFINE K669B
    the average microphone
    FIFINE K669B has a higher user score than the average microphone (9.28 vs 8.027).
    9.28 vs 8.03
  • 6 mm thinner body
    Thickness
    50 mm
    â–² Better than 74% of models
    Market range: <45 mm – >114 mm
    This microphone is thinner than the average microphone (50 mm vs 56 mm). The average microphone has a thickness of 56 mm.
    50 mm vs 56 mm
  • 2.33x cheaper
    FIFINE K669B is cheaper than the average microphone (£30 vs £70).
    £30 vs £70
  • 60.7% more popular
    FIFINE K669B has a higher popularity than the average microphone (10 vs 6.2).
    10 vs 6.22
  • 15.6% higher user score
    User score
    9.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the microphone.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a microphone performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    FIFINE K669B
    the average microphone
    FIFINE K669B has a higher user score than the average microphone (9.28 vs 8.027).
    9.28 vs 8.03
  • 9 dB SPL higher limit
    Max SPL
    130 dB SPL
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    Market range: <110 dB SPL – >140 dB SPL
    This microphone has a higher max SPL than the average microphone (130 dB SPL vs 121 dB SPL). The average microphone handles a max SPL of 121 dB SPL.
    130 dB SPL vs 121 dB SPL
  • Includes mix control
    Mix control
    yes
    â–² Better than 70% of models
    This microphone includes mix control, the average microphone does not.
  • 6 mm thinner body
    Thickness
    50 mm
    â–² Better than 74% of models
    Market range: <45 mm – >114 mm
    This microphone is thinner than the average microphone (50 mm vs 56 mm). The average microphone has a thickness of 56 mm.
    50 mm vs 56 mm
  • No zero-latency monitoring
    Zero-latency monitoring
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This microphone does not support zero-latency monitoring, the average microphone does.
  • 8 bit lower interface bit depth
    Audio interface bit depth
    16 bit
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    Market range: <16 bit – >24 bit
    This microphone supports a lower audio interface bit depth than the average microphone (16 bit vs 24 bit). The average microphone audio interface supports 24 bit.
    16 bit vs 24 bit
  • No mute function
    Mute function
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This microphone does not include a mute function, the average microphone does.
  • No headphone output
    Headphone output
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This microphone does not include a headphone output, the average microphone does.
  • No pop filter
    Pop filter included
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This microphone does not include a pop filter, the average microphone does.
  • No 3.5 mm jack
    3.5 mm audio jack
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This microphone does not include a 3.5 mm jack, the average microphone does.
  • 3 older release date
    Release date
    2017
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This microphone is older than the average microphone (2017 vs 2020). The average microphone was released in 2020.
    2017 vs 2020
  • 0.2 m shorter cable length
    Cable length
    1.8 m
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <1.4 m – >3 m
    This microphone has a shorter cable than the average microphone (1.8 m vs 2 m). The average microphone has a cable length of 2 m.
    1.8 m vs 2 m
  • No headphone output
    Headphone output
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This microphone does not include a headphone output, the average microphone does.
  • No 3.5 mm jack
    3.5 mm audio jack
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This microphone does not include a 3.5 mm jack, the average microphone does.
  • No zero-latency monitoring
    Zero-latency monitoring
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This microphone does not support zero-latency monitoring, the average microphone does.
  • 8 bit lower interface bit depth
    Audio interface bit depth
    16 bit
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    Market range: <16 bit – >24 bit
    This microphone supports a lower audio interface bit depth than the average microphone (16 bit vs 24 bit). The average microphone audio interface supports 24 bit.
    16 bit vs 24 bit
  • No mute function
    Mute function
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This microphone does not include a mute function, the average microphone does.
  • 3 older release date
    Release date
    2017
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This microphone is older than the average microphone (2017 vs 2020). The average microphone was released in 2020.
    2017 vs 2020
  • 18 mm taller body
    Height
    203 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    Market range: <130 mm – >252.8 mm
    This microphone is taller than the average microphone (203 mm vs 185 mm). The average microphone has a height of 185 mm.
    203 mm vs 185 mm
  • 34 mm wider body
    Width
    90 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <48 mm – >109 mm
    This microphone is wider than the average microphone (90 mm vs 56 mm). The average microphone has a width of 56 mm.
    90 mm vs 56 mm
  • No pop filter
    Pop filter included
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This microphone does not include a pop filter, the average microphone does.
  • 0.2 m shorter cable length
    Cable length
    1.8 m
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <1.4 m – >3 m
    This microphone has a shorter cable than the average microphone (1.8 m vs 2 m). The average microphone has a cable length of 2 m.
    1.8 m vs 2 m

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
tdcat.com
29/12/2018
Summary of the review
Fifine K669 Microphone - Worth a Listen? — tdcat.com Podcastage
O
onetechtraveller.com
03/04/2019
Summary of the review
Fifine K669 Affordable Mic for Podcast and Streamers
P
podcastage.com
17/02/2026
Summary of the review
FiFine K669 USB Podcast Microphone Review / Test - Podcastage
D
dignited.com
07/06/2023
Summary of the review
Fifine K669B USB Condenser Microphone Review - Dignited
G
geeksrising.com
17/02/2017
Summary of the review
FiFine K669 USB Podcast Microphone Review / Test - Geeks Rising
H
homestudiobasics.com
28/04/2026
Summary of the review
Fifine K669 Review: Crystal Clear Sound With A Caveat?
O
obli.net
19/04/2021
Summary of the review
Fifine K669B Review – Budget USB Microphone for Under 30 Euros
(Translated)Show original
G
gamestar.de
16/11/2022
Summary of the review
The Best Headphones with Microphone for PC Gamers - Buying Guide (Section: For Occasional Use: Fifine K669B)
(Translated)Show original
N
n-gamz.com
07/04/2021
Summary of the review
PC YouTuber Micro Fifine K669B: My Review! This is crazy! A tiny price for mind-blowing quality!
(Translated)Show original
M
mandigames.wordpress.com
21/04/2023
Summary of the review
FIFINE KB669B Microphone Unboxing and Review
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on 49,449 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about FIFINE K669B

  • Exceptional value for money, often outperforming more expensive budget competitors.
  • Solid all-metal construction that feels durable and premium for its price point.
  • Simple plug-and-play setup requiring no additional drivers or phantom power.
  • Onboard analog gain control knob for quick, real-time volume adjustments.
  • Small, portable footprint that saves desk space and is easy to transport.
  • Clear and crisp audio quality suitable for vocals, voiceovers, and gaming.

What we don't like about FIFINE K669B

  • Hardwired (non-detachable) USB cable makes repair or replacement difficult if damaged.
  • Highly sensitive condenser capsule picks up significant background noise (fans, keyboard clicks).
  • Lack of a dedicated physical mute button and LED status indicator.
  • Included tripod stand has limited adjustability and can be slightly flimsy.
  • Incompatibility with Xbox consoles and most mobile phones.
  • Prone to clipping and distortion if input levels are too high or the user is too close.

Verdict

The Fifine K669B is a budget-friendly USB condenser microphone featuring a uni-directional cardioid polar pattern and a frequency response of 20Hz–20KHz. Built with a durable metal body and a 5.9-foot hardwired USB cable, it offers straightforward plug-and-play functionality with a maximum SPL of 130dB and a signal-to-noise ratio of 78dB. Its primary pros include an integrated analog gain knob for real-time volume adjustments and impressive audio clarity that rivals more expensive units for streaming and podcasting. However, notable cons include its high sensitivity to background noise, a lack of a dedicated mute button or headphone monitoring jack, and a non-detachable cable that limits portability and repairability.

Compare FIFINE K669B with other products in the Microphones category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of FIFINE K669B and other products in the Microphones category

No results found