OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Mice Methodology v1.0
Mice Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Mice Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Mice Methodology v1.0

Trust Tm 270 Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price:~£35Connectivity:wirelessMaximum polling rate:125 HzMaximum DPI:2400 DPIWeight:115 g

Trust Tm 270 Review: Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Mice category and whether it is worth buying.

Trust Tm 270
5.2/10

Overall score

Score
5.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the mouse's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best mice on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 77% of models
Score components

80%

4.7

Technical score

20%

7.5

User score

▼Worse than 77% of mice
6.7

Value for money

Value for money
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the mouse's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a mouse that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components

70%

5.2

Overall score

30%

10

Price

▼Worse than 78%
4.7

Technical score

Technical score
4.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 77% of models
Score components

36%

3.4

Performance & Sensor

22%

5.7

Controls

16%

4.7

Design

14%

2.8

Features

7%

9.6

Connectivity

5%

7.9

Battery & Charging

▼Worse than 77%
7.5

User score

User score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 80% of models
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

4.4

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
▼Worse than 80%
  • trust-tm-270
  • trust-tm-270
  • trust-tm-270
  • trust-tm-270
  • trust-tm-270
  • trust-tm-270
  • trust-tm-270
  • trust-tm-270
  • trust-tm-270
trust-tm-270
trust-tm-270
trust-tm-270
trust-tm-270
trust-tm-270
trust-tm-270
trust-tm-270
trust-tm-270
trust-tm-270
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of mouse Trust Tm 270

Technical score
Technical score
4.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 77% of models
Score components:

36%

3.4

Performance & Sensor

22%

5.7

Controls

16%

4.7

Design

14%

2.8

Features

7%

9.6

Connectivity

5%

7.9

Battery & Charging

4.7
User score
User score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 80% of models
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

4.4

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
7.5
Popularity
Popularity
4.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you prefer a mouse that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 70% of models
Popularity:
Trust Tm 270 has a popularity score of 4.4 points, which is lower than that of 69.4% of products in this category.
4.4
Value for money
Value for money
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the mouse's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a mouse that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components:

70%

5.2

Overall score

30%

10

Price

6.7
Brand name
Trust
Maximum polling rate
125 Hz
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 125 Hz, which is lower than 75.8% of mice and equal to 23.9% of mice.
Wired polling rate
125 Hz
Market range: <125 Hz – >1k Hz
This mouse has a wired polling rate of 125 Hz, which is lower than 89.2% of mice and equal to 10.8% of mice.
2.4 GHz polling rate
125 Hz
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 125 Hz, which is lower than 71.1% of mice and equal to 28.8% of mice.
Bluetooth polling rate
0 Hz
Market range: <0 Hz – >125 Hz
This mouse has a Bluetooth polling rate of 0 Hz, which is lower than 36% of mice and equal to 64% of mice.
2.4GHz only.
Show more
Connectivity
wireless
This mouse supports wireless connectivity, which is more versatile than 35% of mice and equal to 21.7% of mice.
connection modes: 2.4 GHz.
Bluetooth support
no
This mouse does not support Bluetooth. 35.6% of mice support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
yes
This mouse supports proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless. 38.8% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
Receiver included
yes
This mouse includes a receiver. 37.8% of mice include a receiver.
Show more
Battery life
?
Battery capacity
?
Battery form factor
integrated
Rechargeable battery
yes
This mouse uses a rechargeable battery. 54.2% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
Removable battery
no
This mouse does not use a removable battery. 22.3% of mice use a removable battery.
Show more
N. of buttons
6
Market range: <4 – >9
This mouse has 6 buttons, which is more than 23.2% of mice and equal to 40% of mice.
N. of side buttons
2
Market range: <0 – >3
This mouse has 2 side buttons, which is more than 15% of mice and equal to 68.6% of mice.
N. of programmable buttons
0
Market range: <0 – >9
This mouse has 0 programmable buttons, which is less than 83.4% of mice and equal to 16.7% of mice.
DPI switching button
yes
This mouse includes a DPI switching button. 14.7% of mice include a DPI switching button.
Profile switching button
no
This mouse does not include a profile switching button. 16% of mice include a profile switching button.
Show more
Orientation
right-handed
Weight
115 g
Market range: <52 g – >125 g
This mouse weighs 115 g, which is heavier than 84.1% of mice and equal to 0.6% of mice.
Extra weights
0 g
Market range: <0 g – >25 g
This mouse comes with 0 g extra weights, which is less than 4.6% of mice and equal to 95.4% of mice.
Cable length
1.5 m
Market range: <1.5 m – >2 m
This mouse has a cable length of 1.5 m, which is less than 87.2% of mice and equal to 8.3% of mice.
Cable type
?
Show more
Onboard memory profiles
0
Market range: <0 – >5
This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, which is less than 52.2% of mice and equal to 47.8% of mice.
Onboard memory size
0 KB
Market range: <0 KB – >128 KB
This mouse has an onboard memory size of 0 KB, which is smaller than 12.6% of mice and equal to 87.4% of mice.
no onboard memory.
Software name
N/A
Firmware upgradable
?
Suitable for gaming
no
This mouse is not suitable for gaming. 76.2% of mice are suitable for gaming.

Trust Tm 270 vs the average mouse

246810TotalPerformance & SensorConnectivityBattery & ChargingControlsDesignFeatures
  • Silent primary switches
    This mouse uses silent primary switches, while the average mouse does not. 14.1% of mice use silent primary switches.
  • Usable while charging
    This mouse can be used while charging, while the average mouse cannot. 47.5% of mice can be used while charging.
  • Vertical design
    This mouse uses a vertical design, while the average mouse does not. 2.7% of mice use a vertical design.
  • Rechargeable battery
    This mouse uses a rechargeable battery, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
  • Detachable cable
    This mouse comes with a detachable cable, while the average mouse does not. 43% of mice come with a detachable cable.
  • Receiver storage inside mouse
    This mouse has receiver storage inside the mouse, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice have receiver storage inside the mouse.
  • 3 newer release date
    This mouse was released in 2024, while the average mouse was released in 2021.
    August 2024
    2024 vs 2021
  • Receiver storage inside mouse
    This mouse has receiver storage inside the mouse, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice have receiver storage inside the mouse.
  • Usable while charging
    This mouse can be used while charging, while the average mouse cannot. 47.5% of mice can be used while charging.
  • Rechargeable battery
    This mouse uses a rechargeable battery, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
  • Silent primary switches
    This mouse uses silent primary switches, while the average mouse does not. 14.1% of mice use silent primary switches.
  • Vertical design
    This mouse uses a vertical design, while the average mouse does not. 2.7% of mice use a vertical design.
  • Detachable cable
    This mouse comes with a detachable cable, while the average mouse does not. 43% of mice come with a detachable cable.
  • 3 newer release date
    This mouse was released in 2024, while the average mouse was released in 2021.
    August 2024
    2024 vs 2021
  • 6 fewer programmable buttons
    This mouse has 0 programmable buttons, while the average mouse has 6 programmable buttons.
    0 vs 6
  • 87.5% lower maximum polling rate
    This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 125 Hz, while the average mouse has a maximum polling rate of 1,000 Hz.
    125 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • 40.2% higher mouse weight
    This mouse weighs 115 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    115 g vs 82 g
  • 92.5% lower tracking speed
    This mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 30 IPS, while the average mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 400 IPS.
    30 IPS vs 400 IPS
  • 87.5% lower wired polling rate
    This mouse has a wired polling rate of 125 Hz, while the average mouse has a wired polling rate of 1,000 Hz.
    125 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • 1 fewer onboard profiles
    This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, while the average mouse supports 1 onboard memory profiles.
    0 vs 1
  • 76% lower maximum DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 2,400 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10,000 DPI.
    2,400 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • 87.5% lower 2.4 GHz polling rate
    This mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 125 Hz, while the average mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 1,000 Hz.
    125 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • 9.8% worse value for money
    Trust Tm 270 has worse value for money than the average mouse (6.66 vs 7.3).
    6.66 vs 7.31
  • 6.8% lower user score
    User score
    7.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Trust Tm 270
    the average mouse
    Trust Tm 270 has a lower user score than the average mouse (7.49 vs 8).
    7.49 vs 8
  • 44.1% less popular
    Trust Tm 270 is less popular than the average mouse (4.43 vs 6.4).
    4.43 vs 6.38
  • 87.5% lower maximum polling rate
    This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 125 Hz, while the average mouse has a maximum polling rate of 1,000 Hz.
    125 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • 92.5% lower tracking speed
    This mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 30 IPS, while the average mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 400 IPS.
    30 IPS vs 400 IPS
  • 87.5% lower wired polling rate
    This mouse has a wired polling rate of 125 Hz, while the average mouse has a wired polling rate of 1,000 Hz.
    125 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • 76% lower maximum DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 2,400 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10,000 DPI.
    2,400 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • 87.5% lower 2.4 GHz polling rate
    This mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 125 Hz, while the average mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 1,000 Hz.
    125 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • 600 DPI higher minimum setting
    This mouse has a minimum DPI of 800 DPI, while the average mouse has a minimum DPI of 200 DPI.
    800 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • No angle snapping support
    This mouse does not support angle snapping, while the average mouse does. 54.4% of mice support angle snapping.
  • 1 fewer stored DPI steps
    This mouse stores 4 DPI steps, while the average mouse stores 5 DPI steps.
    4 vs 5
  • 1 hours longer full charge time
    This mouse reaches a full charge in 3 hours, while the average mouse reaches a full charge in 2 hours.
    3 hours vs 2 hours
  • 6 fewer programmable buttons
    This mouse has 0 programmable buttons, while the average mouse has 6 programmable buttons.
    0 vs 6
  • 40.2% higher mouse weight
    This mouse weighs 115 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    115 g vs 82 g
  • No RGB lighting
    This mouse does not have RGB lighting, while the average mouse does. 56.3% of mice have RGB lighting.
  • 33.3 mm taller mouse height
    This mouse has a height of 73 mm, while the average mouse has a height of 39.7 mm.
    73 mm vs 39.7 mm
  • 11 mm wider mouse width
    This mouse has a width of 77 mm, while the average mouse has a width of 66 mm.
    77 mm vs 66 mm
  • 0.3 m shorter cable
    This mouse has a cable length of 1.5 m, while the average mouse has a cable length of 1.8 m.
    1.5 m vs 1.8 m
  • 1 fewer onboard profiles
    This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, while the average mouse supports 1 onboard memory profiles.
    0 vs 1
  • Not suitable for gaming
    This mouse is not suitable for gaming, while the average mouse is. 76.1% of mice are suitable for gaming.

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: November 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about Trust Tm 270

  • Highly effective 57-degree vertical ergonomic design that significantly reduces wrist and arm strain
  • Eco-friendly construction made from 70% recycled plastics
  • Convenient built-in rechargeable battery that lasts up to 3 months and supports use while charging
  • Features quiet 'silent-click' buttons, making it ideal for quiet office environments
  • Good value for money as a 'performance-to-price' (F/P) product
  • Adjustable DPI settings (800–2400) allow for real-time sensitivity control

What customers don't like about Trust Tm 270

  • Durability issues reported, such as the scroll wheel failing after only a few months of use
  • Technical performance weaknesses including occasional connection drops or momentary unresponsiveness
  • Lacks Bluetooth connectivity, relying solely on a 2.4GHz USB micro receiver
  • Does not save DPI settings, often resetting to default every time the mouse is powered on
  • Sensor quality is described as average rather than professional-grade

Verdict

The Trust TM-270 is a right-handed ergonomic wireless mouse featuring an optimal 57-degree vertical angle designed to reduce wrist and arm strain. It utilizes a 2.4GHz RF connection via a storable USB micro receiver with a 10m range and an optical sensor with four adjustable DPI levels (800, 1200, 1600, and 2400). Main characteristics include its eco-friendly construction made from 70% recycled plastic, silent-click buttons, and a built-in rechargeable battery that lasts up to 3 months on a full charge. Key pros include the ability to use the mouse while charging via the included USB-C cable, a convenient 5-minute quick charge for 8 hours of use, and a dedicated DPI switching button. Some cons include its lack of a dedicated cable-only mode, as the USB receiver must remain plugged in even while charging, and a scroll wheel click that some users find slightly stiff.

Compare Trust Tm 270 with other products in the Mice category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Trust Tm 270 and other products in the Mice category

No results found