OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS

Redragon M808 Storm Lightweight RGB Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price:~£25Connectivity:wireless+wiredMaximum polling rate:1000 HzMaximum DPI:12400 DPIWeight:85 g

Redragon M808 Storm Lightweight RGB Review: Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Mice category and whether it is worth buying.

6.4

Overall score

Score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the mouse's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best mice on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 56% of models
Score components

80%

5.8

Technical Score

20%

8.9

User score

â–²Better than 56% of mice
5.8

Technical Score

Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 53% of models
Score components

36%

5.1

Performance & Sensor

22%

5.3

Controls

16%

7.0

Design

14%

9.7

Features

7%

1.4

Connectivity

5%

5.2

Battery & Charging

â–²Better than 53% of mice
8.9

User score

User score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 82% of models
Score components

70%

8.9

User ratings

30%

8.7

Number of reviews

Based on 4,431 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–²Better than 82% of mice
  • redragon-m808-storm-lightweight-rgb
  • redragon-m808-storm-lightweight-rgb
  • redragon-m808-storm-lightweight-rgb
  • redragon-m808-storm-lightweight-rgb
  • redragon-m808-storm-lightweight-rgb
  • redragon-m808-storm-lightweight-rgb
  • redragon-m808-storm-lightweight-rgb
  • redragon-m808-storm-lightweight-rgb
  • redragon-m808-storm-lightweight-rgb
redragon-m808-storm-lightweight-rgb
redragon-m808-storm-lightweight-rgb
redragon-m808-storm-lightweight-rgb
redragon-m808-storm-lightweight-rgb
redragon-m808-storm-lightweight-rgb
redragon-m808-storm-lightweight-rgb
redragon-m808-storm-lightweight-rgb
redragon-m808-storm-lightweight-rgb
redragon-m808-storm-lightweight-rgb

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Verdict

The Redragon M808 Storm is a budget-friendly gaming mouse defined by its 85g honeycomb shell and right-handed ergonomic design. It features a Pixart 3327 optical sensor with a maximum sensitivity of 12,400 DPI, 1,000Hz polling rate, and 200 IPS tracking speed. Key pros include its highly flexible 'no-drag' weave cable, 7 programmable buttons rated for 20 million clicks, and vibrant customizable RGB lighting. However, notable cons include its relatively higher weight compared to ultra-light competitors, a high lift-off distance of roughly 3mm, and software that can feel dated or clunky.

Technical Specifications of mouse Redragon M808 Storm Lightweight RGB

Technical Score
Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 53% of models
Score components:

36%

5.1

Performance & Sensor

22%

5.3

Controls

16%

7.0

Design

14%

9.7

Features

7%

1.4

Connectivity

5%

5.2

Battery & Charging

5.8
Redragon M808 Storm Lightweight RGB has a technical score of 5.8 points, which is higher than that of 52.6% of products in this category.
User score
User score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 82% of models
Score components

70%

8.9

User ratings

30%

8.7

Number of reviews

Based on 4,431 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.9
Redragon M808 Storm Lightweight RGB has a user score of 8.86 points, which is higher than that of 82.3% of products in this category.
Popularity
Popularity
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you prefer a mouse that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 80% of models
Popularity:
Redragon M808 Storm Lightweight RGB has a popularity score of 8.7 points, which is higher than that of 80.2% of products in this category.
8.7
Redragon M808 Storm Lightweight RGB has a popularity score of 8.7 points, which is higher than that of 80.2% of products in this category.
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the mouse's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a mouse that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 55% of models
Score components:

60%

6.4

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.5
Redragon M808 Storm Lightweight RGB has a value-for-money score of 7.5 points, which is higher than that of 54.6% of products in this category.
Brand name
Redragon
Maximum polling rate
1,000 Hz
Maximum polling rate
1,000 Hz
â–² Better than 28% of models
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 1,000 Hz, which is higher than 27.8% of mice and equal to 55% of mice.
Wired polling rate
1,000 Hz
Wired polling rate
1,000 Hz
â–² Better than 13% of models
Market range: <125 Hz – >1k Hz
This mouse has a wired polling rate of 1,000 Hz, which is higher than 13.2% of mice and equal to 77.4% of mice.
2.4 GHz polling rate
1,000 Hz
2.4 GHz polling rate
1,000 Hz
â–² Better than 33% of models
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 1,000 Hz, which is higher than 33.4% of mice and equal to 46.9% of mice.
Bluetooth polling rate
0 Hz
Bluetooth polling rate
0 Hz
â–¼ Worse than 36% of models
Market range: <0 Hz – >125 Hz
This mouse has a Bluetooth polling rate of 0 Hz, which is lower than 36% of mice and equal to 64% of mice.
wired only.
Show more
Connectivity
wireless+wired
Connectivity
wireless+wired
â–² Better than 57% of models
This mouse supports wireless+wired connectivity, which is more versatile than 56.8% of mice and equal to 43.3% of mice.
connection modes: wired / 2.4 GHz.
Bluetooth support
no
Bluetooth support
no
â–¼ Worse than 36% of models
This mouse does not support Bluetooth. 35.6% of mice support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
no
Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
no
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
This mouse does not support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless. 61.3% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
Receiver included
no
Receiver included
no
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
This mouse does not include a receiver. 62.3% of mice include a receiver.
Show more
Battery life
N/A
Battery capacity
700 mAh
Battery capacity
700 mAh
â–² Better than 81% of models
Market range: <300 mAh – >800 mAh
This mouse has a battery capacity of 700 mAh, which is larger than 80.9% of mice and equal to 2.7% of mice.
Battery form factor
N/A
Rechargeable battery
yes
Rechargeable battery
yes
â–² Better than 54% of models
This mouse uses a rechargeable battery. 54.2% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
Removable battery
no
Removable battery
no
â–¼ Worse than 22% of models
This mouse does not use a removable battery. 22.3% of mice use a removable battery.
Show more
N. of buttons
8
N. of buttons
8
â–² Better than 79% of models
Market range: <4 – >9
This mouse has 8 buttons, which is more than 78.5% of mice and equal to 9.6% of mice.
N. of side buttons
2
N. of side buttons
2
â–¼ Worse than 16% of models
Market range: <0 – >3
This mouse has 2 side buttons, which is more than 15% of mice and equal to 68.6% of mice.
N. of programmable buttons
7
N. of programmable buttons
7
â–² Better than 67% of models
Market range: <0 – >9
This mouse has 7 programmable buttons, which is more than 66.9% of mice and equal to 12.7% of mice.
DPI switching button
yes
DPI switching button
yes
â–² Better than 15% of models
This mouse includes a DPI switching button. 14.7% of mice include a DPI switching button.
Profile switching button
yes
Profile switching button
yes
â–² Better than 84% of models
This mouse includes a profile switching button. 84.1% of mice include a profile switching button.
Show more
Orientation
right-handed
Weight
85 g
Weight
85 g
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
Market range: <52 g – >125 g
This mouse weighs 85 g, which is heavier than 52.7% of mice and equal to 2.2% of mice.
Extra weights
0 g
Extra weights
0 g
â–¼ Worse than 5% of models
Market range: <0 g – >25 g
This mouse comes with 0 g extra weights, which is less than 4.6% of mice and equal to 95.4% of mice.
Cable length
1.8 m
Cable length
1.8 m
â–² Better than 18% of models
Market range: <1.5 m – >2 m
This mouse comes with a 1.8 m cable, which is longer than 18.4% of mice and equal to 65.2% of mice.
Cable type
paracord
Show more
Onboard memory profiles
5
Onboard memory profiles
5
â–² Better than 81% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This mouse stores 5 onboard profiles, which is more than 81.4% of mice and equal to 18.2% of mice.
Onboard memory size
?
Software name
Redragon Dragon Center
Firmware upgradable
yes
Firmware upgradable
yes
â–² Better than 22% of models
This mouse supports firmware updates. 22.5% of mice support firmware updates.
Suitable for gaming
yes
Suitable for gaming
yes
â–² Better than 24% of models
This mouse is suitable for gaming. 23.9% of mice are suitable for gaming.

Redragon M808 Storm Lightweight RGB vs the average mouse

246810TotalPerformance & SensorConnectivityBattery & ChargingControlsDesignFeatures
  • 4 more onboard profiles
    Onboard memory profiles
    5
    â–² Better than 81% of models
    Market range: <0 – >5
    This mouse stores 5 onboard profiles, while the average mouse stores 1 onboard profiles.
    5 vs 1
  • 1 more programmable buttons
    N. of programmable buttons
    7
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    Market range: <0 – >9
    This mouse has 7 programmable buttons, while the average mouse has 6 programmable buttons.
    7 vs 6
  • Usable while charging
    Use while charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This mouse can be used while charging, while the average mouse cannot. 47.5% of mice can be used while charging.
  • Profile switch button
    Profile switching button
    yes
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    This mouse includes a profile switching button, while the average mouse does not. 16% of mice include a profile switching button.
  • 2 more RGB zones
    RGB zones
    3
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <1 – >3
    This mouse has 3 RGB zones, while the average mouse has 1 RGB zones.
    3 vs 1
  • Adjustable debounce time
    Debounce time adjustable
    yes
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    This mouse supports adjustable debounce time, while the average mouse does not. 28.2% of mice support adjustable debounce time.
  • Rechargeable battery
    Rechargeable battery
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This mouse uses a rechargeable battery, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
  • 24% higher maximum DPI
    Maximum DPI
    12,400 DPI
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    Market range: <1.6k DPI – >26k DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 12400 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10000 DPI.
    12,400 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • 10.8% higher user score
    User score
    8.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Redragon M808 Storm Lightweight RGB
    the average mouse
    ★ Better than 96% of models
    Redragon M808 Storm Lightweight RGB has a higher user score than the average mouse (8.86 vs 8.000).
    8.86 vs 8
  • 24% higher maximum DPI
    Maximum DPI
    12,400 DPI
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    Market range: <1.6k DPI – >26k DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 12400 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10000 DPI.
    12,400 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • 100 DPI lower minimum setting
    Minimum DPI
    100 DPI
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    Market range: <50 DPI – >1k DPI
    This mouse goes as low as 100 DPI, while the average mouse goes as low as 200 DPI.
    100 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • Versatile connectivity
    Connectivity
    wireless+wired
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This mouse supports wireless+wired connectivity, while the average mouse supports wireless connectivity.
    connection modes: wired / 2.4 GHz.
    wireless+wired vs wireless
  • Receiver storage inside mouse
    Receiver storage in mouse
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This mouse has receiver storage inside the mouse, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice have receiver storage inside the mouse.
  • Usable while charging
    Use while charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This mouse can be used while charging, while the average mouse cannot. 47.5% of mice can be used while charging.
  • Rechargeable battery
    Rechargeable battery
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This mouse uses a rechargeable battery, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
  • Wireless charging
    Wireless charging
    yes
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    This mouse supports wireless charging, while the average mouse does not. 10.6% of mice support wireless charging.
  • 1 more programmable buttons
    N. of programmable buttons
    7
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    Market range: <0 – >9
    This mouse has 7 programmable buttons, while the average mouse has 6 programmable buttons.
    7 vs 6
  • Profile switch button
    Profile switching button
    yes
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    This mouse includes a profile switching button, while the average mouse does not. 16% of mice include a profile switching button.
  • Adjustable debounce time
    Debounce time adjustable
    yes
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    This mouse supports adjustable debounce time, while the average mouse does not. 28.2% of mice support adjustable debounce time.
  • 2 more buttons
    N. of buttons
    8
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    Market range: <4 – >9
    This mouse has 8 buttons, while the average mouse has 6 buttons.
    8 vs 6
  • 2 more RGB zones
    RGB zones
    3
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <1 – >3
    This mouse has 3 RGB zones, while the average mouse has 1 RGB zones.
    3 vs 1
  • 4 more onboard profiles
    Onboard memory profiles
    5
    â–² Better than 81% of models
    Market range: <0 – >5
    This mouse stores 5 onboard profiles, while the average mouse stores 1 onboard profiles.
    5 vs 1
  • No proprietary 2.4 GHz support
    Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This mouse does not support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless, while the average mouse does. 61.3% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
  • No automatic sleep mode
    Auto-sleep
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This mouse does not support auto-sleep, while the average mouse does. 60.5% of mice support auto-sleep.
  • No receiver included
    Receiver included
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    This mouse does not include a receiver, while the average mouse does. 62.3% of mice include a receiver.
  • 45% lower tracking speed
    Maximum tracking speed
    220 IPS
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <30 IPS – >650 IPS
    This mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 220 IPS, while the average mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 400 IPS.
    220 IPS vs 400 IPS
  • 10 million clicks shorter switch lifespan
    Switch durability
    20 million clicks
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    Market range: <5 million clicks – >90 million clicks
    This mouse has a switch durability of 20 million clicks, while the average mouse has a switch durability of 30 million clicks.
    20 million clicks vs 30 million clicks
  • No angle snapping support
    Angle snapping
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This mouse does not support angle snapping, while the average mouse does. 54.4% of mice support angle snapping.
  • 3.7% higher mouse weight
    Weight
    85 g
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    Market range: <52 g – >125 g
    This mouse weighs 85 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    85 g vs 82 g
  • 25% lower maximum acceleration
    Maximum acceleration
    30 G
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <10 G – >50 G
    This mouse has a maximum acceleration of 30 G, while the average mouse has a maximum acceleration of 40 G.
    30 G vs 40 G
  • 45% lower tracking speed
    Maximum tracking speed
    220 IPS
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <30 IPS – >650 IPS
    This mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 220 IPS, while the average mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 400 IPS.
    220 IPS vs 400 IPS
  • No angle snapping support
    Angle snapping
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This mouse does not support angle snapping, while the average mouse does. 54.4% of mice support angle snapping.
  • 25% lower maximum acceleration
    Maximum acceleration
    30 G
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <10 G – >50 G
    This mouse has a maximum acceleration of 30 G, while the average mouse has a maximum acceleration of 40 G.
    30 G vs 40 G
  • No proprietary 2.4 GHz support
    Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This mouse does not support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless, while the average mouse does. 61.3% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
  • No receiver included
    Receiver included
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    This mouse does not include a receiver, while the average mouse does. 62.3% of mice include a receiver.
  • No automatic sleep mode
    Auto-sleep
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This mouse does not support auto-sleep, while the average mouse does. 60.5% of mice support auto-sleep.
  • 10 million clicks shorter switch lifespan
    Switch durability
    20 million clicks
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    Market range: <5 million clicks – >90 million clicks
    This mouse has a switch durability of 20 million clicks, while the average mouse has a switch durability of 30 million clicks.
    20 million clicks vs 30 million clicks
  • 3.7% higher mouse weight
    Weight
    85 g
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    Market range: <52 g – >125 g
    This mouse weighs 85 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    85 g vs 82 g

Graphic comparison of Redragon M808 Storm Lightweight RGB and other products in the Mice category

No results found

Third-party reviews

Based on 4,431 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: May 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What customers like about Redragon M808 Storm Lightweight RGB?

  • Excellent value for the price tag, often described as a top budget choice.
  • Very flexible and lightweight braided cable that minimizes drag during movement.
  • Solid build quality with no noticeable creaking or rattling despite the honeycomb shell.
  • Highly customizable RGB lighting that is described as bright and clear.
  • Responsive buttons with a satisfying click feel and 20 million click durability.
  • Accurate sensor performance (PixArt 3327) suitable for entry-level and FPS gaming.

What customers dislike about Redragon M808 Storm Lightweight RGB?

  • Software is often described as clunky, dated, and sometimes buggy to use.
  • The 85g-90g weight, while 'lightweight', is heavier than some premium ultra-light competitors.
  • Hard plastic honeycomb side grips can be slippery if hands get sweaty.
  • Glossy finish on certain parts of the shell can attract fingerprints and smudges.
  • Occasional reports of reliability issues, such as the sensor or scroll wheel failing after a few months.
  • The honeycomb design is prone to collecting dust and debris inside the casing.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Compare Redragon M808 Storm Lightweight RGB with other products in the Mice category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)