OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS

Redragon M690 1 Wireless Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price:~£25Connectivity:wirelessMaximum polling rate:250 HzMaximum DPI:2400 DPIWeight:120 g

Redragon M690 1 Wireless Review: Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Mice category and whether it is worth buying.

6.0

Overall score

Score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the mouse's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best mice on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
Score components

80%

5.3

Technical Score

20%

8.9

User score

â–¼Worse than 53% of mice
5.3

Technical Score

Technical score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
Score components

36%

3.6

Performance & Sensor

22%

6.1

Controls

16%

4.1

Design

14%

7.2

Features

7%

9.6

Connectivity

5%

6.6

Battery & Charging

â–¼Worse than 60% of mice
8.9

User score

User score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 82% of models
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

8.6

Number of reviews

Based on 7,149 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–²Better than 82% of mice
  • redragon-m690-1-wireless
  • redragon-m690-1-wireless
  • redragon-m690-1-wireless
  • redragon-m690-1-wireless
  • redragon-m690-1-wireless
  • redragon-m690-1-wireless
  • redragon-m690-1-wireless
  • redragon-m690-1-wireless
  • redragon-m690-1-wireless
redragon-m690-1-wireless
redragon-m690-1-wireless
redragon-m690-1-wireless
redragon-m690-1-wireless
redragon-m690-1-wireless
redragon-m690-1-wireless
redragon-m690-1-wireless
redragon-m690-1-wireless
redragon-m690-1-wireless

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Verdict

The Redragon M690-1 is an ergonomic wireless gaming mouse featuring a Pixart 3212 optical sensor with five adjustable DPI levels (800, 1200, 1600, 2000, and 2400) and two polling rate options of 125Hz and 250Hz. Its primary characteristics include a 2.4GHz wireless connection with a 10-metre range, eight buttons (including two side buttons and a rapid-fire key), and a durable build rated for 10 million keystrokes. Key pros include its plug-and-play setup requiring no drivers, an energy-saving sleep mode that activates after 8 minutes of inactivity, and a lightweight 94g design suitable for long sessions. However, notable cons include its reliance on a single AA battery rather than being rechargeable, the lack of side button support for macOS, and a relatively low maximum DPI compared to professional-grade gaming mice.

Technical Specifications of mouse Redragon M690 1 Wireless

Technical Score
Technical score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
Score components:

36%

3.6

Performance & Sensor

22%

6.1

Controls

16%

4.1

Design

14%

7.2

Features

7%

9.6

Connectivity

5%

6.6

Battery & Charging

5.3
Redragon M690 1 Wireless has a technical score of 5.3 points, which is lower than that of 59.9% of products in this category.
User score
User score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 82% of models
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

8.6

Number of reviews

Based on 7,149 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.9
Redragon M690 1 Wireless has a user score of 8.87 points, which is higher than that of 82.4% of products in this category.
Popularity
Popularity
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you prefer a mouse that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 79% of models
Popularity:
Redragon M690 1 Wireless has a popularity score of 8.6 points, which is higher than that of 78.6% of products in this category.
8.6
Redragon M690 1 Wireless has a popularity score of 8.6 points, which is higher than that of 78.6% of products in this category.
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the mouse's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a mouse that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
Score components:

60%

6.0

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.2
Redragon M690 1 Wireless has a value-for-money score of 7.2 points, which is lower than that of 52.1% of products in this category.
Brand name
Redragon
Maximum polling rate
250 Hz
Maximum polling rate
250 Hz
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 250 Hz, which is lower than 73.8% of mice and equal to 1.8% of mice.
Wired polling rate
N/A
2.4 GHz polling rate
250 Hz
2.4 GHz polling rate
250 Hz
â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 250 Hz, which is lower than 68% of mice and equal to 2.9% of mice.
Bluetooth polling rate
?
Show more
Connectivity
wireless
Connectivity
wireless
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
This mouse supports wireless connectivity, which is more versatile than 35% of mice and equal to 21.7% of mice.
connection modes: 2.4 GHz.
Bluetooth support
no
Bluetooth support
no
â–¼ Worse than 36% of models
This mouse does not support Bluetooth. 35.6% of mice support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
yes
Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
yes
â–² Better than 39% of models
This mouse supports proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless. 38.8% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
Receiver included
yes
Receiver included
yes
â–² Better than 38% of models
This mouse includes a receiver. 37.8% of mice include a receiver.
Show more
Battery life
N/A
Battery capacity
N/A
Battery form factor
AA
Rechargeable battery
no
Rechargeable battery
no
â–¼ Worse than 46% of models
This mouse does not use a rechargeable battery. 46% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
â–² Better than 78% of models
This mouse uses a removable battery. 77.8% of mice use a removable battery.
Show more
N. of buttons
8
N. of buttons
8
â–² Better than 79% of models
Market range: <4 – >9
This mouse has 8 buttons, which is more than 78.5% of mice and equal to 9.6% of mice.
N. of side buttons
3
N. of side buttons
3
â–² Better than 84% of models
Market range: <0 – >3
This mouse has 3 side buttons, which is more than 83.8% of mice and equal to 8.6% of mice.
N. of programmable buttons
8
N. of programmable buttons
8
â–² Better than 80% of models
Market range: <0 – >9
This mouse has 8 programmable buttons, which is more than 79.8% of mice and equal to 8.7% of mice.
DPI switching button
yes
DPI switching button
yes
â–² Better than 15% of models
This mouse includes a DPI switching button. 14.7% of mice include a DPI switching button.
Profile switching button
no
Profile switching button
no
â–¼ Worse than 16% of models
This mouse does not include a profile switching button. 16% of mice include a profile switching button.
Show more
Orientation
right-handed
Weight
120 g
Weight
120 g
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
Market range: <52 g – >125 g
This mouse weighs 120 g, which is heavier than 86.2% of mice and equal to 2.2% of mice.
Extra weights
0 g
Extra weights
0 g
â–¼ Worse than 5% of models
Market range: <0 g – >25 g
This mouse comes with 0 g extra weights, which is less than 4.6% of mice and equal to 95.4% of mice.
Cable length
N/A
Cable type
N/A
Show more
Onboard memory profiles
?
Onboard memory size
0 KB
Onboard memory size
0 KB
â–¼ Worse than 13% of models
Market range: <0 KB – >128 KB
This mouse has an onboard memory size of 0 KB, which is smaller than 12.6% of mice and equal to 87.4% of mice.
no onboard memory.
Software name
Razer Synapse
Firmware upgradable
?
Suitable for gaming
yes
Suitable for gaming
yes
â–² Better than 24% of models
This mouse is suitable for gaming. 23.9% of mice are suitable for gaming.

Redragon M690 1 Wireless vs the average mouse

246810TotalPerformance & SensorConnectivityBattery & ChargingControlsDesignFeatures
  • 2 more programmable buttons
    N. of programmable buttons
    8
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    Market range: <0 – >9
    This mouse has 8 programmable buttons, while the average mouse has 6 programmable buttons.
    8 vs 6
  • Silent primary switches
    Silent primary switches
    yes
    â–² Better than 86% of models
    This mouse uses silent primary switches, while the average mouse does not. 14.1% of mice use silent primary switches.
  • 1 more side buttons
    N. of side buttons
    3
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <0 – >3
    This mouse has 3 side buttons, while the average mouse has 2 side buttons.
    3 vs 2
  • Removable battery
    Removable battery
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This mouse uses a removable battery, while the average mouse does not. 22.3% of mice use a removable battery.
  • 10.9% higher user score
    User score
    8.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Redragon M690 1 Wireless
    the average mouse
    ★ Better than 96% of models
    Redragon M690 1 Wireless has a higher user score than the average mouse (8.87 vs 8.000).
    8.87 vs 8
  • 2 more buttons
    N. of buttons
    8
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    Market range: <4 – >9
    This mouse has 8 buttons, while the average mouse has 6 buttons.
    8 vs 6
  • Receiver storage inside mouse
    Receiver storage in mouse
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This mouse has receiver storage inside the mouse, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice have receiver storage inside the mouse.
  • 10.9% higher user score
    User score
    8.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Redragon M690 1 Wireless
    the average mouse
    ★ Better than 96% of models
    Redragon M690 1 Wireless has a higher user score than the average mouse (8.87 vs 8.000).
    8.87 vs 8
  • Receiver storage inside mouse
    Receiver storage in mouse
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This mouse has receiver storage inside the mouse, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice have receiver storage inside the mouse.
  • Removable battery
    Removable battery
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This mouse uses a removable battery, while the average mouse does not. 22.3% of mice use a removable battery.
  • 2 more programmable buttons
    N. of programmable buttons
    8
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    Market range: <0 – >9
    This mouse has 8 programmable buttons, while the average mouse has 6 programmable buttons.
    8 vs 6
  • Silent primary switches
    Silent primary switches
    yes
    â–² Better than 86% of models
    This mouse uses silent primary switches, while the average mouse does not. 14.1% of mice use silent primary switches.
  • 1 more side buttons
    N. of side buttons
    3
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <0 – >3
    This mouse has 3 side buttons, while the average mouse has 2 side buttons.
    3 vs 2
  • 2 more buttons
    N. of buttons
    8
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    Market range: <4 – >9
    This mouse has 8 buttons, while the average mouse has 6 buttons.
    8 vs 6
  • 46.3% higher mouse weight
    Weight
    120 g
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <52 g – >125 g
    This mouse weighs 120 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    120 g vs 82 g
  • 75% lower maximum polling rate
    Maximum polling rate
    250 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
    This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 250 Hz, while the average mouse has a maximum polling rate of 1000 Hz.
    250 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • 92.5% lower tracking speed
    Maximum tracking speed
    30 IPS
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <30 IPS – >650 IPS
    This mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 30 IPS, while the average mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 400 IPS.
    30 IPS vs 400 IPS
  • 20 million clicks shorter switch lifespan
    Switch durability
    10 million clicks
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    Market range: <5 million clicks – >90 million clicks
    This mouse has a switch durability of 10 million clicks, while the average mouse has a switch durability of 30 million clicks.
    10 million clicks vs 30 million clicks
  • 76% lower maximum DPI
    Maximum DPI
    2,400 DPI
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <1.6k DPI – >26k DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 2400 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10000 DPI.
    2,400 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • 600 DPI higher minimum setting
    Minimum DPI
    800 DPI
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <50 DPI – >1k DPI
    This mouse has a minimum DPI of 800 DPI, while the average mouse has a minimum DPI of 200 DPI.
    800 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • 75% lower 2.4 GHz polling rate
    2.4 GHz polling rate
    250 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
    This mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 250 Hz, while the average mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 1000 Hz.
    250 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • 75% lower maximum acceleration
    Maximum acceleration
    10 G
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <10 G – >50 G
    This mouse has a maximum acceleration of 10 G, while the average mouse has a maximum acceleration of 40 G.
    10 G vs 40 G
  • 75% lower maximum polling rate
    Maximum polling rate
    250 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
    This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 250 Hz, while the average mouse has a maximum polling rate of 1000 Hz.
    250 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • 92.5% lower tracking speed
    Maximum tracking speed
    30 IPS
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <30 IPS – >650 IPS
    This mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 30 IPS, while the average mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 400 IPS.
    30 IPS vs 400 IPS
  • 76% lower maximum DPI
    Maximum DPI
    2,400 DPI
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <1.6k DPI – >26k DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 2400 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10000 DPI.
    2,400 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • 600 DPI higher minimum setting
    Minimum DPI
    800 DPI
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <50 DPI – >1k DPI
    This mouse has a minimum DPI of 800 DPI, while the average mouse has a minimum DPI of 200 DPI.
    800 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • 75% lower 2.4 GHz polling rate
    2.4 GHz polling rate
    250 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
    This mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 250 Hz, while the average mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 1000 Hz.
    250 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • 75% lower maximum acceleration
    Maximum acceleration
    10 G
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <10 G – >50 G
    This mouse has a maximum acceleration of 10 G, while the average mouse has a maximum acceleration of 40 G.
    10 G vs 40 G
  • 305 DPI coarser step size
    DPI step size
    400 DPI
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
    Market range: <50 DPI – >400 DPI
    This mouse has a DPI step size of 400 DPI, while the average mouse has a DPI step size of 95 DPI.
    400 DPI vs 95 DPI
  • 20 million clicks shorter switch lifespan
    Switch durability
    10 million clicks
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    Market range: <5 million clicks – >90 million clicks
    This mouse has a switch durability of 10 million clicks, while the average mouse has a switch durability of 30 million clicks.
    10 million clicks vs 30 million clicks
  • 46.3% higher mouse weight
    Weight
    120 g
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <52 g – >125 g
    This mouse weighs 120 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    120 g vs 82 g
  • No RGB lighting
    RGB lighting
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This mouse does not have RGB lighting, while the average mouse does. 56.3% of mice have RGB lighting.
  • 8 mm wider mouse width
    Width
    74 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
    Market range: <60 mm – >78 mm
    This mouse has a width of 74 mm, while the average mouse has a width of 66 mm.
    74 mm vs 66 mm

Graphic comparison of Redragon M690 1 Wireless and other products in the Mice category

No results found

Third-party reviews

Based on 7,149 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: May 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What customers like about Redragon M690 1 Wireless?

  • Excellent value for the price, often cited as a top budget wireless option
  • Ergonomic design with a comfortable right-handed grip and thumb rest
  • Multiple programmable buttons (up to 8) including a dedicated rapid-fire key
  • Features an 'Eco Mode' that disables RGB lighting to significantly extend battery life
  • Solid build quality with a rubber-coated surface that feels premium for its cost
  • Smooth gliding thanks to high-quality Teflon feet

What customers dislike about Redragon M690 1 Wireless?

  • Not suitable for left-handed users due to its strictly ergonomic right-handed shape
  • Latency/Input lag may be noticeable for competitive FPS gaming compared to high-end wired mice
  • Some users reported long-term reliability issues, such as scroll wheel lag or sensor failure after several weeks
  • The included charging cable is noted to be stiff and not very flexible
  • Heavier than many modern 'ultralight' gaming mice, weighing over 100g
  • Software customization can be difficult to find or unintuitive

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Compare Redragon M690 1 Wireless with other products in the Mice category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)