OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS

Corsair M65 RGB Ultra Wireless Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price:~£110Connectivity:wireless+wiredMaximum polling rate:1000 HzMaximum DPI:26000 DPIWeight:110 g

Corsair M65 RGB Ultra Wireless Review: Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Mice category and whether it is worth buying.

7.2

Overall score

Score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the mouse's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best mice on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 73% of models
Score components

80%

7.0

Technical Score

20%

8.0

User score

â–²Better than 73% of mice
7.0

Technical Score

Technical score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 72% of models
Score components

36%

6.9

Performance & Sensor

22%

8.4

Controls

16%

4.9

Design

14%

6.1

Features

7%

10

Connectivity

5%

6.3

Battery & Charging

â–²Better than 72% of mice
8.0

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
Score components

70%

8.0

User ratings

30%

7.9

Number of reviews

Based on 1,926 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 63% of mice
  • corsair-m65-rgb-ultra-wireless
  • corsair-m65-rgb-ultra-wireless
  • corsair-m65-rgb-ultra-wireless
  • corsair-m65-rgb-ultra-wireless
  • corsair-m65-rgb-ultra-wireless
  • corsair-m65-rgb-ultra-wireless
  • corsair-m65-rgb-ultra-wireless
  • corsair-m65-rgb-ultra-wireless
corsair-m65-rgb-ultra-wireless
corsair-m65-rgb-ultra-wireless
corsair-m65-rgb-ultra-wireless
corsair-m65-rgb-ultra-wireless
corsair-m65-rgb-ultra-wireless
corsair-m65-rgb-ultra-wireless
corsair-m65-rgb-ultra-wireless
corsair-m65-rgb-ultra-wireless

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Verdict

The Corsair M65 RGB Ultra Wireless is a high-performance FPS gaming mouse featuring a durable anodized aluminium frame and a state-of-the-art Marksman optical sensor with a native 26,000 DPI, 650 IPS tracking, and 50G acceleration. Key characteristics include dual-mode connectivity via sub-1ms Slipstream Wireless or Bluetooth (offering up to 120 hours of battery life), Omron optical switches for rapid response, and a unique six-axis gyro that enables programmable tilt gestures and ultra-low lift-off distance. Its main pros are the highly customizable tunable weight system (adjustable from 110g to 128g), a dedicated sniper button, and a 2,000Hz hyper-polling rate for near-instant input transmission. However, some cons include its relatively high weight compared to modern ultra-light competitors, a stiff rubber charging cable, and a wide shape that may be uncomfortable for users with smaller hands or specific grip styles.

Technical Specifications of mouse Corsair M65 RGB Ultra Wireless

Technical Score
Technical score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 72% of models
Score components:

36%

6.9

Performance & Sensor

22%

8.4

Controls

16%

4.9

Design

14%

6.1

Features

7%

10

Connectivity

5%

6.3

Battery & Charging

7.0
Corsair M65 RGB Ultra Wireless has a technical score of 7 points, which is higher than that of 72.3% of products in this category.
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
Score components

70%

8.0

User ratings

30%

7.9

Number of reviews

Based on 1,926 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.0
Corsair M65 RGB Ultra Wireless has a user score of 7.98 points, which is lower than that of 62.7% of products in this category.
Popularity
Popularity
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you prefer a mouse that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 71% of models
Popularity:
Corsair M65 RGB Ultra Wireless has a popularity score of 7.9 points, which is higher than that of 70.8% of products in this category.
7.9
Corsair M65 RGB Ultra Wireless has a popularity score of 7.9 points, which is higher than that of 70.8% of products in this category.
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the mouse's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a mouse that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 71% of models
Score components:

60%

7.2

Overall score

40%

9.9

Price

8.0
Corsair M65 RGB Ultra Wireless has a value-for-money score of 8 points, which is higher than that of 70.5% of products in this category.
Brand name
Corsair
Maximum polling rate
1,000 Hz
Maximum polling rate
1,000 Hz
â–² Better than 28% of models
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 1,000 Hz, which is higher than 27.8% of mice and equal to 55% of mice.
Wired polling rate
1,000 Hz
Wired polling rate
1,000 Hz
â–² Better than 13% of models
Market range: <125 Hz – >1k Hz
This mouse has a wired polling rate of 1,000 Hz, which is higher than 13.2% of mice and equal to 77.4% of mice.
2.4 GHz polling rate
1,000 Hz
2.4 GHz polling rate
1,000 Hz
â–² Better than 33% of models
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 1,000 Hz, which is higher than 33.4% of mice and equal to 46.9% of mice.
Bluetooth polling rate
125 Hz
Bluetooth polling rate
125 Hz
â–² Better than 68% of models
Market range: <0 Hz – >125 Hz
This mouse has a Bluetooth polling rate of 125 Hz, which is higher than 67.8% of mice and equal to 30.7% of mice.
Show more
Connectivity
wireless+wired
Connectivity
wireless+wired
â–² Better than 57% of models
This mouse supports wireless+wired connectivity, which is more versatile than 56.8% of mice and equal to 43.3% of mice.
connection modes: wired / Bluetooth / 2.4 GHz.
Bluetooth support
yes
Bluetooth support
yes
â–² Better than 65% of models
This mouse supports Bluetooth. 64.5% of mice support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
4.2
Bluetooth version
4.2
â–² Better than 71% of models
This mouse uses Bluetooth 4.2, which is newer than 71.2% of mice and equal to 2.6% of mice.
Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
yes
Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
yes
â–² Better than 39% of models
This mouse supports proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless. 38.8% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
Receiver included
yes
Receiver included
yes
â–² Better than 38% of models
This mouse includes a receiver. 37.8% of mice include a receiver.
Show more
Battery life
120 hours
Battery life
120 hours
â–² Better than 70% of models
Market range: <50 hours – >500 hours
This mouse lasts 120 hours on a charge, which is longer than 69.5% of mice and equal to 2% of mice.
Battery capacity
1,000 mAh
Battery capacity
1,000 mAh
★ Better than 94% of models
Market range: <300 mAh – >800 mAh
This mouse has a battery capacity of 1,000 mAh, which is larger than 94% of mice and equal to 3.3% of mice.
Battery form factor
integrated
Rechargeable battery
yes
Rechargeable battery
yes
â–² Better than 54% of models
This mouse uses a rechargeable battery. 54.2% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
Removable battery
no
Removable battery
no
â–¼ Worse than 22% of models
This mouse does not use a removable battery. 22.3% of mice use a removable battery.
Show more
N. of buttons
8
N. of buttons
8
â–² Better than 79% of models
Market range: <4 – >9
This mouse has 8 buttons, which is more than 78.5% of mice and equal to 9.6% of mice.
N. of side buttons
3
N. of side buttons
3
â–² Better than 84% of models
Market range: <0 – >3
This mouse has 3 side buttons, which is more than 83.8% of mice and equal to 8.6% of mice.
N. of programmable buttons
8
N. of programmable buttons
8
â–² Better than 80% of models
Market range: <0 – >9
This mouse has 8 programmable buttons, which is more than 79.8% of mice and equal to 8.7% of mice.
DPI switching button
yes
DPI switching button
yes
â–² Better than 15% of models
This mouse includes a DPI switching button. 14.7% of mice include a DPI switching button.
Profile switching button
yes
Profile switching button
yes
â–² Better than 84% of models
This mouse includes a profile switching button. 84.1% of mice include a profile switching button.
Show more
Orientation
right-handed
Weight
110 g
Weight
110 g
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
Market range: <52 g – >125 g
This mouse weighs 110 g, which is heavier than 80.4% of mice and equal to 2% of mice.
Extra weights
18 g
Extra weights
18 g
★ Better than 97% of models
Market range: <0 g – >25 g
This mouse comes with 18 g of extra weights, which is more than 97.1% of mice and equal to 0.6% of mice.
Cable length
1.8 m
Cable length
1.8 m
â–² Better than 18% of models
Market range: <1.5 m – >2 m
This mouse comes with a 1.8 m cable, which is longer than 18.4% of mice and equal to 65.2% of mice.
Cable type
rubber
Show more
Onboard memory profiles
1
Onboard memory profiles
1
â–² Better than 48% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This mouse stores 1 onboard profiles, which is more than 48% of mice and equal to 20% of mice.
Onboard memory size
?
Software name
CORSAIR iCUE
Firmware upgradable
yes
Firmware upgradable
yes
â–² Better than 22% of models
This mouse supports firmware updates. 22.5% of mice support firmware updates.
Suitable for gaming
yes
Suitable for gaming
yes
â–² Better than 24% of models
This mouse is suitable for gaming. 23.9% of mice are suitable for gaming.

Corsair M65 RGB Ultra Wireless vs the average mouse

246810TotalPerformance & SensorConnectivityBattery & ChargingControlsDesignFeatures
  • 2 more programmable buttons
    N. of programmable buttons
    8
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    Market range: <0 – >9
    This mouse has 8 programmable buttons, while the average mouse has 6 programmable buttons.
    8 vs 6
  • 2.6x higher maximum DPI
    Maximum DPI
    26,000 DPI
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <1.6k DPI – >26k DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 26000 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10000 DPI.
    26,000 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • 40 million clicks longer switch lifespan
    Switch durability
    70 million clicks
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    Market range: <5 million clicks – >90 million clicks
    This mouse offers switch durability of 70 million clicks, while the average mouse offers switch durability of 30 million clicks.
    70 million clicks vs 30 million clicks
  • Adjustable lift-off distance
    Lift-off distance adjustable
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This mouse supports adjustable lift-off distance, while the average mouse does not. 46.5% of mice support adjustable lift-off distance.
  • 62.5% higher tracking speed
    Maximum tracking speed
    650 IPS
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <30 IPS – >650 IPS
    This mouse offers a maximum tracking speed of 650 IPS, while the average mouse offers a maximum tracking speed of 400 IPS.
    650 IPS vs 400 IPS
  • Usable while charging
    Use while charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This mouse can be used while charging, while the average mouse cannot. 47.5% of mice can be used while charging.
  • 1 more side buttons
    N. of side buttons
    3
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <0 – >3
    This mouse has 3 side buttons, while the average mouse has 2 side buttons.
    3 vs 2
  • 35 hours longer battery life
    Battery life
    120 hours
    â–² Better than 70% of models
    Market range: <50 hours – >500 hours
    This mouse lasts 120 hours on a charge, while the average mouse lasts 85 hours on a charge.
    120 hours vs 85 hours
  • 2.6x higher maximum DPI
    Maximum DPI
    26,000 DPI
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <1.6k DPI – >26k DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 26000 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10000 DPI.
    26,000 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • Adjustable lift-off distance
    Lift-off distance adjustable
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This mouse supports adjustable lift-off distance, while the average mouse does not. 46.5% of mice support adjustable lift-off distance.
  • 62.5% higher tracking speed
    Maximum tracking speed
    650 IPS
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <30 IPS – >650 IPS
    This mouse offers a maximum tracking speed of 650 IPS, while the average mouse offers a maximum tracking speed of 400 IPS.
    650 IPS vs 400 IPS
  • 25% higher maximum acceleration
    Maximum acceleration
    50 G
    â–² Better than 55% of models
    Market range: <10 G – >50 G
    This mouse has a maximum acceleration of 50 G, while the average mouse has a maximum acceleration of 40 G.
    50 G vs 40 G
  • 100 DPI lower minimum setting
    Minimum DPI
    100 DPI
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    Market range: <50 DPI – >1k DPI
    This mouse goes as low as 100 DPI, while the average mouse goes as low as 200 DPI.
    100 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • 94 DPI finer step size
    DPI step size
    1 DPI
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    Market range: <50 DPI – >400 DPI
    This mouse adjusts DPI in 1 DPI steps, while the average mouse adjusts DPI in 95 DPI steps.
    1 DPI vs 95 DPI
  • Multi-device pairing
    Multi-device pairing
    yes
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    This mouse supports multi-device pairing, while the average mouse does not. 20.3% of mice support multi-device pairing.
  • Versatile connectivity
    Connectivity
    wireless+wired
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This mouse supports wireless+wired connectivity, while the average mouse supports wireless connectivity.
    connection modes: wired / Bluetooth / 2.4 GHz.
    wireless+wired vs wireless
  • Bluetooth support
    Bluetooth support
    yes
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    This mouse supports Bluetooth, while the average mouse does not. 35.5% of mice support Bluetooth.
  • Receiver storage inside mouse
    Receiver storage in mouse
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This mouse has receiver storage inside the mouse, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice have receiver storage inside the mouse.
  • Usable while charging
    Use while charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This mouse can be used while charging, while the average mouse cannot. 47.5% of mice can be used while charging.
  • 35 hours longer battery life
    Battery life
    120 hours
    â–² Better than 70% of models
    Market range: <50 hours – >500 hours
    This mouse lasts 120 hours on a charge, while the average mouse lasts 85 hours on a charge.
    120 hours vs 85 hours
  • Rechargeable battery
    Rechargeable battery
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This mouse uses a rechargeable battery, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
  • Wireless charging
    Wireless charging
    yes
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    This mouse supports wireless charging, while the average mouse does not. 10.6% of mice support wireless charging.
  • 2x larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    1,000 mAh
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    Market range: <300 mAh – >800 mAh
    This mouse has a battery capacity of 1000 mAh, while the average mouse has a battery capacity of 500 mAh.
    1,000 mAh vs 500 mAh
  • 2 more programmable buttons
    N. of programmable buttons
    8
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    Market range: <0 – >9
    This mouse has 8 programmable buttons, while the average mouse has 6 programmable buttons.
    8 vs 6
  • 40 million clicks longer switch lifespan
    Switch durability
    70 million clicks
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    Market range: <5 million clicks – >90 million clicks
    This mouse offers switch durability of 70 million clicks, while the average mouse offers switch durability of 30 million clicks.
    70 million clicks vs 30 million clicks
  • 1 more side buttons
    N. of side buttons
    3
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <0 – >3
    This mouse has 3 side buttons, while the average mouse has 2 side buttons.
    3 vs 2
  • Gesture support
    Gesture support
    yes
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    This mouse supports gesture controls, while the average mouse does not. 6.6% of mice support gesture controls.
  • Profile switch button
    Profile switching button
    yes
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    This mouse includes a profile switching button, while the average mouse does not. 16% of mice include a profile switching button.
  • 2 more buttons
    N. of buttons
    8
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    Market range: <4 – >9
    This mouse has 8 buttons, while the average mouse has 6 buttons.
    8 vs 6
  • 18 g more tuning weights
    Extra weights
    18 g
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    Market range: <0 g – >25 g
    This mouse comes with 18 g of extra weights, while the average mouse comes with 0 g of extra weights.
    18 g vs 0 g
  • Detachable cable
    Detachable cable
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This mouse comes with a detachable cable, while the average mouse does not. 43% of mice come with a detachable cable.
  • 34.1% higher mouse weight
    Weight
    110 g
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <52 g – >125 g
    This mouse weighs 110 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    110 g vs 82 g
  • 1 hours longer full charge time
    Full charge time
    3 hours
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <1.5 hours – >4 hours
    This mouse reaches a full charge in 3 hours, while the average mouse reaches a full charge in 2 hours.
    source range 2-4 h.
    3 hours vs 2 hours
  • 3.14x more expensive
    Corsair M65 RGB Ultra Wireless is more expensive than the average mouse (£110 vs £35).
    £110 vs £35
  • Thin glide feet
    Feet thickness
    0.6 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    This mouse uses 0.6 mm thick mouse feet, while the average mouse uses 0.8 mm thick mouse feet.
    0.6 mm vs 0.8 mm
  • 11 mm wider mouse width
    Width
    77 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    Market range: <60 mm – >78 mm
    This mouse has a width of 77 mm, while the average mouse has a width of 66 mm.
    77 mm vs 66 mm
  • Poor default DPI tuning
    Default DPI
    800 DPI
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    This mouse uses a default DPI of 800 DPI, while the average mouse uses a default DPI of 1000 DPI.
    800 DPI vs 1,000 DPI
  • 3.14x more expensive
    Corsair M65 RGB Ultra Wireless is more expensive than the average mouse (£110 vs £35).
    £110 vs £35
  • Poor default DPI tuning
    Default DPI
    800 DPI
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    This mouse uses a default DPI of 800 DPI, while the average mouse uses a default DPI of 1000 DPI.
    800 DPI vs 1,000 DPI
  • 1 hours longer full charge time
    Full charge time
    3 hours
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <1.5 hours – >4 hours
    This mouse reaches a full charge in 3 hours, while the average mouse reaches a full charge in 2 hours.
    source range 2-4 h.
    3 hours vs 2 hours
  • 34.1% higher mouse weight
    Weight
    110 g
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <52 g – >125 g
    This mouse weighs 110 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    110 g vs 82 g
  • Thin glide feet
    Feet thickness
    0.6 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    This mouse uses 0.6 mm thick mouse feet, while the average mouse uses 0.8 mm thick mouse feet.
    0.6 mm vs 0.8 mm
  • 11 mm wider mouse width
    Width
    77 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    Market range: <60 mm – >78 mm
    This mouse has a width of 77 mm, while the average mouse has a width of 66 mm.
    77 mm vs 66 mm

Graphic comparison of Corsair M65 RGB Ultra Wireless and other products in the Mice category

No results found

Third-party reviews

Based on 1,926 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: May 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What customers like about Corsair M65 RGB Ultra Wireless?

  • Premium build quality with a solid aluminum frame and high-quality materials.
  • Highly customizable with an adjustable weight system (110g to 128g) and eight programmable buttons.
  • Advanced sensor performance featuring the Corsair Marksman 26,000 DPI sensor for precise tracking.
  • Unique innovative features like 6-axis gyro-based tilt gestures for extra in-game commands.
  • Versatile connectivity options including sub-1ms Slipstream wireless and Bluetooth.
  • Optical switches designed to prevent double-clicking and provide fast actuation.

What customers dislike about Corsair M65 RGB Ultra Wireless?

  • Heavyweight design even at its lightest setting, which may not appeal to fans of ultra-light gaming mice.
  • Quality control issues reported by some users, specifically regarding scroll wheel failures and unresponsiveness.
  • Uncomfortable ergonomics for certain users, particularly those with a palm grip or smaller hands.
  • Resource-heavy iCUE software required for full customization, which can impact system performance.
  • Stiff rubber charging cable that is not very flexible for use during wired charging.
  • Relatively high price point compared to some other wireless gaming alternatives.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Compare Corsair M65 RGB Ultra Wireless with other products in the Mice category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)