OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS

Cherry Xtrfy M64 Wireless Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price:~£90Connectivity:wireless+wiredMaximum polling rate:1000 HzMaximum DPI:26000 DPIWeight:53 g

Cherry Xtrfy M64 Wireless Review: Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Mice category and whether it is worth buying.

7.5

Overall score

Score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the mouse's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best mice on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 78% of models
Score components

80%

7.5

Technical Score

20%

7.7

User score

â–²Better than 78% of mice
7.5

Technical Score

Technical score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 80% of models
Score components

36%

6.9

Performance & Sensor

22%

8.2

Controls

16%

9.4

Design

14%

5.2

Features

7%

9.6

Connectivity

5%

6.1

Battery & Charging

â–²Better than 80% of mice
7.7

User score

User score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
Score components

70%

8.9

User ratings

30%

5.0

Number of reviews

Based on 107 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 72% of mice
  • cherry-xtrfy-m64-wireless
  • cherry-xtrfy-m64-wireless
  • cherry-xtrfy-m64-wireless
  • cherry-xtrfy-m64-wireless
  • cherry-xtrfy-m64-wireless
  • cherry-xtrfy-m64-wireless
  • cherry-xtrfy-m64-wireless
cherry-xtrfy-m64-wireless
cherry-xtrfy-m64-wireless
cherry-xtrfy-m64-wireless
cherry-xtrfy-m64-wireless
cherry-xtrfy-m64-wireless
cherry-xtrfy-m64-wireless
cherry-xtrfy-m64-wireless

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Verdict

The Cherry Xtrfy M64 Wireless is an ultra-lightweight ergonomic gaming mouse weighing just 53g, featuring a unique ultra-low front design and a high-performance Pixart 3395 sensor with up to 26,000 DPI. Optimized for esports, it offers lag-free 2.4 GHz connectivity and a battery life of up to 75 hours, while the Pro version extends this to 90 hours and introduces an 8,000 Hz polling rate for minimal click latency. Main pros include its exceptionally comfortable hand-contoured shape, crisp Huano blue shell pink dot switches, and a convenient plug-and-play setup that requires no software for adjustments. However, notable cons include the awkwardly placed side-mounted charging port, a lack of deep software customization for precise DPI stepping, and reports of the black coating being a fingerprint magnet.

Technical Specifications of mouse Cherry Xtrfy M64 Wireless

Technical Score
Technical score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 80% of models
Score components:

36%

6.9

Performance & Sensor

22%

8.2

Controls

16%

9.4

Design

14%

5.2

Features

7%

9.6

Connectivity

5%

6.1

Battery & Charging

7.5
Cherry Xtrfy M64 Wireless has a technical score of 7.5 points, which is higher than that of 79.5% of products in this category.
User score
User score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
Score components

70%

8.9

User ratings

30%

5.0

Number of reviews

Based on 107 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.7
Cherry Xtrfy M64 Wireless has a user score of 7.71 points, which is lower than that of 71.7% of products in this category.
Popularity
Popularity
5.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you prefer a mouse that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Popularity:
Cherry Xtrfy M64 Wireless has a popularity score of 5 points, which is lower than that of 63.4% of products in this category.
5.0
Cherry Xtrfy M64 Wireless has a popularity score of 5 points, which is lower than that of 63.4% of products in this category.
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the mouse's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a mouse that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 78% of models
Score components:

60%

7.5

Overall score

40%

10

Price

8.3
Cherry Xtrfy M64 Wireless has a value-for-money score of 8.3 points, which is higher than that of 78.2% of products in this category.
Brand name
Cherry
Maximum polling rate
1,000 Hz
Maximum polling rate
1,000 Hz
â–² Better than 28% of models
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 1,000 Hz, which is higher than 27.8% of mice and equal to 55% of mice.
Wired polling rate
1,000 Hz
Wired polling rate
1,000 Hz
â–² Better than 13% of models
Market range: <125 Hz – >1k Hz
This mouse has a wired polling rate of 1,000 Hz, which is higher than 13.2% of mice and equal to 77.4% of mice.
2.4 GHz polling rate
1,000 Hz
2.4 GHz polling rate
1,000 Hz
â–² Better than 33% of models
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 1,000 Hz, which is higher than 33.4% of mice and equal to 46.9% of mice.
Bluetooth polling rate
0 Hz
Bluetooth polling rate
0 Hz
â–¼ Worse than 36% of models
Market range: <0 Hz – >125 Hz
This mouse has a Bluetooth polling rate of 0 Hz, which is lower than 36% of mice and equal to 64% of mice.
wired only.
Show more
Connectivity
wireless+wired
Connectivity
wireless+wired
â–² Better than 57% of models
This mouse supports wireless+wired connectivity, which is more versatile than 56.8% of mice and equal to 43.3% of mice.
connection modes: wired / 2.4 GHz.
Bluetooth support
no
Bluetooth support
no
â–¼ Worse than 36% of models
This mouse does not support Bluetooth. 35.6% of mice support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
yes
Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
yes
â–² Better than 39% of models
This mouse supports proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless. 38.8% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
Receiver included
yes
Receiver included
yes
â–² Better than 38% of models
This mouse includes a receiver. 37.8% of mice include a receiver.
Show more
Battery life
75 hours
Battery life
75 hours
â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
Market range: <50 hours – >500 hours
This mouse has a battery life of 75 hours, which is less than 57.8% of mice and equal to 3.7% of mice.
Battery capacity
300 mAh
Battery capacity
300 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Market range: <300 mAh – >800 mAh
This mouse has a battery capacity of 300 mAh, which is smaller than 70.3% of mice and equal to 19.9% of mice.
Battery form factor
integrated
Rechargeable battery
yes
Rechargeable battery
yes
â–² Better than 54% of models
This mouse uses a rechargeable battery. 54.2% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
Removable battery
no
Removable battery
no
â–¼ Worse than 22% of models
This mouse does not use a removable battery. 22.3% of mice use a removable battery.
Show more
N. of buttons
6
N. of buttons
6
â–¼ Worse than 37% of models
Market range: <4 – >9
This mouse has 6 buttons, which is more than 23.2% of mice and equal to 40% of mice.
N. of side buttons
2
N. of side buttons
2
â–¼ Worse than 16% of models
Market range: <0 – >3
This mouse has 2 side buttons, which is more than 15% of mice and equal to 68.6% of mice.
N. of programmable buttons
?
DPI switching button
yes
DPI switching button
yes
â–² Better than 15% of models
This mouse includes a DPI switching button. 14.7% of mice include a DPI switching button.
Profile switching button
no
Profile switching button
no
â–¼ Worse than 16% of models
This mouse does not include a profile switching button. 16% of mice include a profile switching button.
Show more
Orientation
right-handed
Weight
53 g
Weight
53 g
â–² Better than 88% of models
Market range: <52 g – >125 g
This mouse weighs 53 g, which makes it lighter than 88.3% of mice and equal to 1.4% of mice.
Extra weights
0 g
Extra weights
0 g
â–¼ Worse than 5% of models
Market range: <0 g – >25 g
This mouse comes with 0 g extra weights, which is less than 4.6% of mice and equal to 95.4% of mice.
Cable length
1.8 m
Cable length
1.8 m
â–² Better than 18% of models
Market range: <1.5 m – >2 m
This mouse comes with a 1.8 m cable, which is longer than 18.4% of mice and equal to 65.2% of mice.
Cable type
paracord
Show more
Onboard memory profiles
0
Onboard memory profiles
0
â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, which is less than 52.2% of mice and equal to 47.8% of mice.
Onboard memory size
?
Software name
N/A
Firmware upgradable
yes
Firmware upgradable
yes
â–² Better than 22% of models
This mouse supports firmware updates. 22.5% of mice support firmware updates.
Suitable for gaming
yes
Suitable for gaming
yes
â–² Better than 24% of models
This mouse is suitable for gaming. 23.9% of mice are suitable for gaming.

Cherry Xtrfy M64 Wireless vs the average mouse

246810TotalPerformance & SensorConnectivityBattery & ChargingControlsDesignFeatures
  • 50 million clicks longer switch lifespan
    Switch durability
    80 million clicks
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <5 million clicks – >90 million clicks
    This mouse offers switch durability of 80 million clicks, while the average mouse offers switch durability of 30 million clicks.
    80 million clicks vs 30 million clicks
  • 35.4% lower mouse weight
    Weight
    53 g
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    Market range: <52 g – >125 g
    This mouse weighs 53 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    53 g vs 82 g
  • 2.6x higher maximum DPI
    Maximum DPI
    26,000 DPI
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <1.6k DPI – >26k DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 26000 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10000 DPI.
    26,000 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • Adjustable lift-off distance
    Lift-off distance adjustable
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This mouse supports adjustable lift-off distance, while the average mouse does not. 46.5% of mice support adjustable lift-off distance.
  • 62.5% higher tracking speed
    Maximum tracking speed
    650 IPS
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <30 IPS – >650 IPS
    This mouse offers a maximum tracking speed of 650 IPS, while the average mouse offers a maximum tracking speed of 400 IPS.
    650 IPS vs 400 IPS
  • Usable while charging
    Use while charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This mouse can be used while charging, while the average mouse cannot. 47.5% of mice can be used while charging.
  • Adjustable debounce time
    Debounce time adjustable
    yes
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    This mouse supports adjustable debounce time, while the average mouse does not. 28.2% of mice support adjustable debounce time.
  • Rechargeable battery
    Rechargeable battery
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This mouse uses a rechargeable battery, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
  • 2.6x higher maximum DPI
    Maximum DPI
    26,000 DPI
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <1.6k DPI – >26k DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 26000 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10000 DPI.
    26,000 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • Adjustable lift-off distance
    Lift-off distance adjustable
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This mouse supports adjustable lift-off distance, while the average mouse does not. 46.5% of mice support adjustable lift-off distance.
  • 62.5% higher tracking speed
    Maximum tracking speed
    650 IPS
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <30 IPS – >650 IPS
    This mouse offers a maximum tracking speed of 650 IPS, while the average mouse offers a maximum tracking speed of 400 IPS.
    650 IPS vs 400 IPS
  • 25% higher maximum acceleration
    Maximum acceleration
    50 G
    â–² Better than 55% of models
    Market range: <10 G – >50 G
    This mouse has a maximum acceleration of 50 G, while the average mouse has a maximum acceleration of 40 G.
    50 G vs 40 G
  • 3 more stored DPI steps
    DPI steps stored
    8
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    Market range: <3 – >6
    This mouse stores 8 DPI steps, while the average mouse stores 5 DPI steps.
    8 vs 5
  • Versatile connectivity
    Connectivity
    wireless+wired
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This mouse supports wireless+wired connectivity, while the average mouse supports wireless connectivity.
    connection modes: wired / 2.4 GHz.
    wireless+wired vs wireless
  • Usable while charging
    Use while charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This mouse can be used while charging, while the average mouse cannot. 47.5% of mice can be used while charging.
  • Rechargeable battery
    Rechargeable battery
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This mouse uses a rechargeable battery, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
  • 50 million clicks longer switch lifespan
    Switch durability
    80 million clicks
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <5 million clicks – >90 million clicks
    This mouse offers switch durability of 80 million clicks, while the average mouse offers switch durability of 30 million clicks.
    80 million clicks vs 30 million clicks
  • Adjustable debounce time
    Debounce time adjustable
    yes
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    This mouse supports adjustable debounce time, while the average mouse does not. 28.2% of mice support adjustable debounce time.
  • 35.4% lower mouse weight
    Weight
    53 g
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    Market range: <52 g – >125 g
    This mouse weighs 53 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    53 g vs 82 g
  • Detachable cable
    Detachable cable
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This mouse comes with a detachable cable, while the average mouse does not. 43% of mice come with a detachable cable.
  • 3 newer release date
    Release date
    2024
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This mouse was released in 2024, while the average mouse was released in 2021.
    August 2024
    2024 vs 2021
  • 1 fewer onboard profiles
    Onboard memory profiles
    0
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <0 – >5
    This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, while the average mouse supports 1 onboard memory profiles.
    0 vs 1
  • No angle snapping support
    Angle snapping
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This mouse does not support angle snapping, while the average mouse does. 54.4% of mice support angle snapping.
  • No RGB lighting
    RGB lighting
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This mouse does not have RGB lighting, while the average mouse does. 56.3% of mice have RGB lighting.
  • 2.57x more expensive
    Cherry Xtrfy M64 Wireless is more expensive than the average mouse (£90 vs £35).
    £90 vs £35
  • 200 DPI higher minimum setting
    Minimum DPI
    400 DPI
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <50 DPI – >1k DPI
    This mouse has a minimum DPI of 400 DPI, while the average mouse has a minimum DPI of 200 DPI.
    400 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • 40% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    300 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <300 mAh – >800 mAh
    This mouse has a battery capacity of 300 mAh, while the average mouse has a battery capacity of 500 mAh.
    300 mAh vs 500 mAh
  • 10 hours shorter battery life
    Battery life
    75 hours
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    Market range: <50 hours – >500 hours
    This mouse has a battery life of 75 hours, while the average mouse has a battery life of 85 hours.
    75 hours vs 85 hours
  • 3.8% lower user score
    User score
    7.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Cherry Xtrfy M64 Wireless
    the average mouse
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    Cherry Xtrfy M64 Wireless has a lower user score than the average mouse (7.71 vs 8.000).
    7.71 vs 8
  • 2.57x more expensive
    Cherry Xtrfy M64 Wireless is more expensive than the average mouse (£90 vs £35).
    £90 vs £35
  • 3.8% lower user score
    User score
    7.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Cherry Xtrfy M64 Wireless
    the average mouse
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    Cherry Xtrfy M64 Wireless has a lower user score than the average mouse (7.71 vs 8.000).
    7.71 vs 8
  • 29% less popular
    Cherry Xtrfy M64 Wireless is less popular than the average mouse (4.95 vs 6.4).
    4.95 vs 6.38
  • No angle snapping support
    Angle snapping
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This mouse does not support angle snapping, while the average mouse does. 54.4% of mice support angle snapping.
  • 200 DPI higher minimum setting
    Minimum DPI
    400 DPI
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <50 DPI – >1k DPI
    This mouse has a minimum DPI of 400 DPI, while the average mouse has a minimum DPI of 200 DPI.
    400 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • 10 hours shorter battery life
    Battery life
    75 hours
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    Market range: <50 hours – >500 hours
    This mouse has a battery life of 75 hours, while the average mouse has a battery life of 85 hours.
    75 hours vs 85 hours
  • 40% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    300 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <300 mAh – >800 mAh
    This mouse has a battery capacity of 300 mAh, while the average mouse has a battery capacity of 500 mAh.
    300 mAh vs 500 mAh
  • No RGB lighting
    RGB lighting
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This mouse does not have RGB lighting, while the average mouse does. 56.3% of mice have RGB lighting.
  • 1 fewer onboard profiles
    Onboard memory profiles
    0
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <0 – >5
    This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, while the average mouse supports 1 onboard memory profiles.
    0 vs 1

Graphic comparison of Cherry Xtrfy M64 Wireless and other products in the Mice category

No results found

Third-party reviews

Based on 107 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: May 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What customers like about Cherry Xtrfy M64 Wireless?

  • Unique ergonomic shape with a very low front that supports a natural hand posture
  • Exceptionally lightweight design (approx. 53-55g) despite having a solid, hole-free shell
  • Excellent sensor performance using the PixArt PAW3395 for precise tracking
  • High-quality main clicks using Huano Blue Shell Pink Dot switches that are described as crisp and snappy
  • Convenient plug-and-play experience with all major settings (DPI, polling rate, debounce) adjustable directly on the mouse
  • Solid battery life, rated up to 75 hours for the standard model and 90 hours for the Pro version

What customers dislike about Cherry Xtrfy M64 Wireless?

  • Lack of companion software prevents deep customisation such as button rebinding or macros
  • Awkwardly placed charging port on the side (right) which can make the mouse cumbersome to use while wired
  • Inconsistent quality control with some users reporting creaking, flexing, or scroll wheel issues
  • The unique ergonomic shape is not 'safe' for everyone and may feel awkward for fingertip grip users
  • Limited DPI and setting granularity since users are restricted to built-in presets
  • Black coating is reported to be a fingerprint magnet and can become slippery during long sessions

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Compare Cherry Xtrfy M64 Wireless with other products in the Mice category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)