Scored using Headphones Methodology v1.0
Headphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Headphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Headphones Methodology v1.0

Skullcandy Mix Master Review | 93 Data compared

Avg. price:~£260Form factor:over-earConnectivity:wiredBattery life:N/A hoursActive noise cancellation (ANC):no

Skullcandy Mix Master Review: Compare 93 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Headphones category and whether it is worth buying.

Skullcandy Mix Master
5.9/10

Overall score

Score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the headphones' quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best headphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

5.7

Technical score

20%

6.8

User score

â–¼Worse than 66% of headphones
6.9

Value for money

Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the headphones' overall rating with their cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for headphones that offer a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

5.9

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

â–¼Worse than 79%
5.7

Technical score

Technical score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Headphones category across these key areas: Sound, Calls & Controls, Connectivity, Features, Battery, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

52%

6.2

Sound

20%

4.4

Features

10%

6.9

Design

8%

4.0

Connectivity

6%

4.6

Battery

4%

7.5

Calls & Controls

â–¼Worse than 60%
6.8

User score

User score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.7

User ratings

30%

4.9

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–¼Worse than 89%
  • skullcandy-mix-master
  • skullcandy-mix-master
  • skullcandy-mix-master
  • skullcandy-mix-master
  • skullcandy-mix-master
  • skullcandy-mix-master
  • skullcandy-mix-master
  • skullcandy-mix-master
  • skullcandy-mix-master
skullcandy-mix-master
skullcandy-mix-master
skullcandy-mix-master
skullcandy-mix-master
skullcandy-mix-master
skullcandy-mix-master
skullcandy-mix-master
skullcandy-mix-master
skullcandy-mix-master
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of pair of headphones Skullcandy Mix Master

Technical score
Technical score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Headphones category across these key areas: Sound, Calls & Controls, Connectivity, Features, Battery, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

52%

6.2

Sound

20%

4.4

Features

10%

6.9

Design

8%

4.0

Connectivity

6%

4.6

Battery

4%

7.5

Calls & Controls

5.7
User score
User score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.7

User ratings

30%

4.9

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
6.8
Popularity
Popularity
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you prefer headphones that have already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Skullcandy Mix Master has a popularity score of 4.9 points, which is lower than that of 59.5% of products in this category.
4.9
Value for money
Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the headphones' overall rating with their cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for headphones that offer a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

5.9

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

6.9
Active noise cancellation (ANC)
no
This pair of headphones does not support active noise cancellation. 27.5% of headphones support active noise cancellation.
Driver type
dynamic
Driver size
50 mm
This pair of headphones uses a driver size of 50 mm, larger driver size than 86.3% of headphones and equal to 8.2% of headphones.
Number of drivers
1
This pair of headphones uses 1 drivers, fewer drivers than 4% of headphones and equal to 96% of headphones.
Lowest frequency
20 Hz
This pair of headphones reaches a lowest frequency of 20 Hz, higher lowest frequency than 50.8% of headphones and equal to 47.3% of headphones.
Show more
Noise-canceling microphone
no
This pair of headphones does not support a noise-canceling microphone. 39% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
Can be used as a headset
yes
This pair of headphones is headset-ready, 84.8% is not. 15.2% of headphones can be used as headsets.
Number of microphones
1
This pair of headphones has 1 microphones, more microphones than 26.9% of headphones and equal to 50.9% of headphones.
Boom microphone
no
This pair of headphones does not include a boom microphone. 13.5% of headphones have a boom microphone.
Microphone SNR
?
Show more
Connectivity
wired
This pair of headphones supports wired connectivity, less flexible connectivity than 49.2% of headphones and equal to 50.8% of headphones.
Bluetooth version
N/A
Maximum Bluetooth range
N/A
Audio latency
N/A
Multipoint support
no
This pair of headphones does not support multipoint. 30.6% of headphones support multipoint.
Show more
Ambient sound mode
no
This pair of headphones does not offer ambient sound mode. 24.9% of headphones support ambient sound mode.
EQ support
no
This pair of headphones does not support EQ customization. 23.2% of headphones support EQ.
Companion app
no
This pair of headphones does not work with a companion app. 21.6% of headphones support companion apps.
Adjustable ANC levels
N/A
Voice assistant support
yes
This pair of headphones supports voice assistants. 39.2% of headphones support voice assistants.
Show more
Battery life
N/A
Battery life with ANC
N/A
Charging time
N/A
Quick charge
no
This pair of headphones does not support quick charging. 33.1% of headphones support quick charge.
Battery capacity
N/A
Show more
Brand name
Skullcandy
Form factor
over-ear
Weight
270 g
This pair of headphones weighs 270 g, heavier than 70.2% of headphones and equal to 0.9% of headphones.
Acoustic design
closed-back
Clamp force
?
Show more

Skullcandy Mix Master vs the average pair of headphones

246810TotalDesignSoundBatteryConnectivityCalls & ControlsFeatures
  • 10 mm larger driver size
    This pair of headphones uses a larger driver size than the average pair of headphones (50 mm vs 40 mm). The average headphones use a driver size of 40 mm.
    50 mm vs 40 mm
  • 0.25 % lower distortion
    This pair of headphones has a lower total harmonic distortion than the average pair of headphones (0.1 % vs 0.3 %). The average headphones have total harmonic distortion of 0.3 %.
    0.05 % vs 0.3 %
  • On-device controls
    This pair of headphones includes on-device controls, the average pair of headphones does not. 46.8% of headphones support on-device controls.
  • In-line controls
    This pair of headphones includes in-line controls, the average pair of headphones does not. 36.6% of headphones support in-line controls.
  • Foldable design
    This pair of headphones has a foldable design, the average pair of headphones does not. 48.3% of headphones are foldable.
  • Quick mic mute
    This pair of headphones includes a quick mic mute, the average pair of headphones does not. 29.3% of headphones support a mute function.
  • Dj-focused design
    This pair of headphones is designed for DJ use, the average pair of headphones is not. 2.9% of headphones are designed for DJ use.
    Marked yes because the product is explicitly described in the product summary as a DJ headphone, designed for DJ use, or intended for DJ monitoring.
  • 11 mm more spacious earcup width
    This pair of headphones offers more spacious earcup width than the average pair of headphones (55 mm vs 44 mm). The average headphones offer an inner earcup width of 44 mm.
    55 mm vs 44 mm
  • Foldable design
    This pair of headphones has a foldable design, the average pair of headphones does not. 48.3% of headphones are foldable.
  • 11 mm more spacious earcup width
    This pair of headphones offers more spacious earcup width than the average pair of headphones (55 mm vs 44 mm). The average headphones offer an inner earcup width of 44 mm.
    55 mm vs 44 mm
  • Dj-focused design
    This pair of headphones is designed for DJ use, the average pair of headphones is not. 2.9% of headphones are designed for DJ use.
    Marked yes because the product is explicitly described in the product summary as a DJ headphone, designed for DJ use, or intended for DJ monitoring.
  • 10 mm larger driver size
    This pair of headphones uses a larger driver size than the average pair of headphones (50 mm vs 40 mm). The average headphones use a driver size of 40 mm.
    50 mm vs 40 mm
  • 0.25 % lower distortion
    This pair of headphones has a lower total harmonic distortion than the average pair of headphones (0.1 % vs 0.3 %). The average headphones have total harmonic distortion of 0.3 %.
    0.05 % vs 0.3 %
  • Play while charging
    This pair of headphones can play while charging, the average pair of headphones cannot. 29.1% of headphones support play while charging.
  • On-device controls
    This pair of headphones includes on-device controls, the average pair of headphones does not. 46.8% of headphones support on-device controls.
  • In-line controls
    This pair of headphones includes in-line controls, the average pair of headphones does not. 36.6% of headphones support in-line controls.
  • Quick mic mute
    This pair of headphones includes a quick mic mute, the average pair of headphones does not. 29.3% of headphones support a mute function.
  • 23.9% higher weight
    This pair of headphones is heavier than the average pair of headphones (270 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
    270 g vs 218 g
  • 2 Hz weaker bass extension
    This pair of headphones has a higher lowest frequency than the average pair of headphones (20 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.
    20 Hz vs 18 Hz
  • No battery indicator
    This pair of headphones does not show battery level clearly, while the average pair of headphones does. 56.3% of headphones have a battery level indicator.
  • 17.2% lower user score
    User score
    6.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Skullcandy Mix Master
    the average pair of headphones
    Skullcandy Mix Master has a lower user score than the average pair of headphones (6.83 vs 8.000).
    6.83 vs 8
  • 2.89x more expensive
    Skullcandy Mix Master is more expensive than the average pair of headphones (£260 vs £90).
    £260 vs £90
  • 5 mm tighter earcup height
    This pair of headphones has tighter earcup height than the average pair of headphones (55 mm vs 60 mm). The average headphones offer an inner earcup height of 60 mm.
    55 mm vs 60 mm
  • 5.3% worse value for money
    Skullcandy Mix Master has worse value for money than the average pair of headphones (6.9 vs 7.3).
    6.9 vs 7.27
  • 6 older release date
    This pair of headphones was released earlier than the average pair of headphones (2010 vs 2016). The average headphones were released in 2016.
    December 2010
    2010 vs 2016
  • 17.2% lower user score
    User score
    6.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Skullcandy Mix Master
    the average pair of headphones
    Skullcandy Mix Master has a lower user score than the average pair of headphones (6.83 vs 8.000).
    6.83 vs 8
  • 2.89x more expensive
    Skullcandy Mix Master is more expensive than the average pair of headphones (£260 vs £90).
    £260 vs £90
  • 5.3% worse value for money
    Skullcandy Mix Master has worse value for money than the average pair of headphones (6.9 vs 7.3).
    6.9 vs 7.27
  • 23.9% higher weight
    This pair of headphones is heavier than the average pair of headphones (270 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
    270 g vs 218 g
  • 5 mm tighter earcup height
    This pair of headphones has tighter earcup height than the average pair of headphones (55 mm vs 60 mm). The average headphones offer an inner earcup height of 60 mm.
    55 mm vs 60 mm
  • 2 Hz weaker bass extension
    This pair of headphones has a higher lowest frequency than the average pair of headphones (20 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.
    20 Hz vs 18 Hz
  • No battery indicator
    This pair of headphones does not show battery level clearly, while the average pair of headphones does. 56.3% of headphones have a battery level indicator.
  • 6 older release date
    This pair of headphones was released earlier than the average pair of headphones (2010 vs 2016). The average headphones were released in 2016.
    December 2010
    2010 vs 2016

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

H
head-fi.org
08/07/2012
Summary of the review
H
head-fi.org
03/04/2012
Summary of the review
W
witchdoctor.co.nz
11/04/2012
Summary of the review
H
headphoneslab.com
01/04/2020
Summary of the review
T
theheadphonelist.com
09/06/2014
Summary of the review
W
whathifi.com
27/01/2014
Summary of the review
D
djmag.com
25/07/2012
Summary of the review
W
wired.com
06/03/2012
Summary of the review
S
stereophile.com
18/11/2011
Summary of the review
W
wired.com
06/05/2010
Summary of the review
B
bonedo.de
11/12/2013
Summary of the review
W
welt.de
12/12/2018
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
20/12/2012
Summary of the review
L
lydogbillede.dk
27/05/2015
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Skullcandy Mix Master

  • Aggressive and punchy sound signature well-suited for modern genres like hip-hop and electronic
  • Rich accessory package including a collapsible hard case, cleaning cloth, and dual cables
  • Unique DJ-specific features like 'Cue Control' (mono mixing when an earcup is twisted) and a built-in mute button
  • Ambidextrous cable inputs allowing the cord to be plugged into either the left or right earcup
  • Extremely efficient drivers that reach high volume levels easily even on portable devices
  • Secure and lightweight fit that stays in place during vigorous movement
  • Soft memory foam padding on both the earcups and the headband

What we don't like about Skullcandy Mix Master

  • Questionable build quality with frequent reports of the plastic headband cracking over time
  • Shallow earcups that can cause discomfort as ears press against the hard internal driver grilles
  • Average noise isolation that behaves more like a semi-open headphone than a fully sealed one
  • Soundstage lacks depth and spatial cues are often delivered too 'upfront'
  • Glossy plastic finish is a significant 'fingerprint magnet' and can easily show scuffs
  • High retail price compared to professional-grade alternatives from established audio brands

Verdict

The Skullcandy Mix Master is an over-ear DJ headphone featuring proprietary 50mm Mylar drivers with neodymium magnets, delivering a frequency response of 20Hz–20kHz and a sensitivity of 102dB. Its primary characteristics include professional-grade 'Cue Control' that automatically mono-mixes audio when an earcup is pivoted, a one-touch mute button for instant environment monitoring, and dual-sided detachable cable inputs. Pros include a lightweight 270g build, plush memory foam ear pillows, and a comprehensive accessory package featuring both a coiled DJ cable and a straight Mic3 cable with an inline remote. However, some users have noted cons such as a plastic-heavy construction prone to headband cracking over time, a high clamping force that may cause discomfort during long sessions, and slightly shallow ear cups that can lead to ear contact with the internal driver grilles.

Compare Skullcandy Mix Master with other products in the Headphones category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Skullcandy Mix Master and other products in the Headphones category

No results found