OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Headphones Methodology v1.0
Headphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Headphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Headphones Methodology v1.0

Kuba Disco 2 Bluetooth Review | 93 Data compared

Avg. price:~ÂŁ200Form factor:over-earConnectivity:wirelessBattery life:40 hoursActive noise cancellation (ANC):no

Kuba Disco 2 Bluetooth Review: Compare 93 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Headphones category and whether it is worth buying.

6.3/10

Overall score

Score
6.3/ 10
âś•
What it is
An overall evaluation of the headphones' quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best headphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–˛ Better than 57% of models
Score components

80%

6.3

Technical score

20%

?

User score

â–˛Better than 57% of headphones
7.3

Value for money

Value for money
7.3/ 10
âś•
What it is
An indicator that combines the headphones' overall rating with their cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for headphones that offer a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–Ľ Worse than 51% of models
Score components

70%

6.3

Overall score

30%

9.5

Price

â–ĽWorse than 51%
6.3

Technical score

Technical score
6.3/ 10
âś•
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Headphones category across these key areas: Sound, Calls & Controls, Connectivity, Features, Battery, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–˛ Better than 67% of models
Score components

52%

6.2

Sound

20%

6.3

Features

10%

5.9

Design

8%

6.8

Connectivity

6%

7.1

Battery

4%

7.5

Calls & Controls

â–˛Better than 67%
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
âś•
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–Ľ Worse than 58% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of pair of headphones Kuba Disco 2 Bluetooth

Technical score
Technical score
6.3/ 10
âś•
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Headphones category across these key areas: Sound, Calls & Controls, Connectivity, Features, Battery, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–˛ Better than 67% of models
Score components:

52%

6.2

Sound

20%

6.3

Features

10%

5.9

Design

8%

6.8

Connectivity

6%

7.1

Battery

4%

7.5

Calls & Controls

6.3
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
âś•
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–Ľ Worse than 58% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
âś•
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you prefer headphones that have already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–Ľ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
Kuba Disco 2 Bluetooth has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than that of 73.4% of products in this category.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
7.3/ 10
âś•
What it is
An indicator that combines the headphones' overall rating with their cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for headphones that offer a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–Ľ Worse than 51% of models
Score components:

70%

6.3

Overall score

30%

9.5

Price

7.3
Active noise cancellation (ANC)
no
This pair of headphones does not support active noise cancellation. 27.5% of headphones support active noise cancellation.
Driver type
dynamic
Driver size
40 mm
Market range: <10 mm – >50 mm
This pair of headphones uses a driver size of 40 mm, larger driver size than 28.6% of headphones and equal to 53.3% of headphones.
Number of drivers
1
Market range: <1 – >4
This pair of headphones uses 1 drivers, fewer drivers than 4% of headphones and equal to 96% of headphones.
Lowest frequency
20 Hz
Market range: <5 Hz – >20 Hz
This pair of headphones reaches a lowest frequency of 20 Hz, higher lowest frequency than 50.8% of headphones and equal to 47.3% of headphones.
Show more
Noise-canceling microphone
no
This pair of headphones does not support a noise-canceling microphone. 39% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
Can be used as a headset
yes
This pair of headphones is headset-ready, 84.8% is not. 15.2% of headphones can be used as headsets.
Number of microphones
1
Market range: <0 – >4
This pair of headphones has 1 microphones, more microphones than 26.9% of headphones and equal to 50.9% of headphones.
Boom microphone
no
This pair of headphones does not include a boom microphone. 13.5% of headphones have a boom microphone.
Microphone SNR
?
Show more
Connectivity
wireless
This pair of headphones supports wireless connectivity, more flexible connectivity than 50.8% of headphones and equal to 49.2% of headphones.
Bluetooth version
5
This pair of headphones uses Bluetooth version 5, newer Bluetooth version than 70.9% of headphones and equal to 13.1% of headphones.
Maximum Bluetooth range
10 m
Market range: <10 m – >15 m
This pair of headphones offers a Bluetooth range of 10 m, higher Bluetooth range than 2.7% of headphones and equal to 80.6% of headphones.
Audio latency
?
Multipoint support
no
This pair of headphones does not support multipoint. 30.6% of headphones support multipoint.
Show more
Ambient sound mode
no
This pair of headphones does not offer ambient sound mode. 24.9% of headphones support ambient sound mode.
EQ support
yes
This pair of headphones supports EQ customization. 76.8% of headphones support EQ.
Companion app
yes
This pair of headphones works with a companion app. 78.4% of headphones support companion apps.
Adjustable ANC levels
N/A
Voice assistant support
yes
This pair of headphones supports voice assistants. 39.2% of headphones support voice assistants.
Show more
Battery life
40 hours
Market range: <10 hours – >70 hours
This pair of headphones offers battery life of 40 hours, higher battery life than 62.7% of headphones and equal to 4.8% of headphones.
Battery life with ANC
N/A
Charging time
1.5 hours
Market range: <1.5 hours – >3.5 hours
This pair of headphones needs 1.5 hours to charge, lower charging time than 87.2% of headphones and equal to 7.6% of headphones.
Quick charge
no
This pair of headphones does not support quick charging. 33.1% of headphones support quick charge.
Battery capacity
380 mAh
Market range: <290 mAh – >1k mAh
This pair of headphones has a battery capacity of 380 mAh, lower battery capacity than 78.4% of headphones and equal to 0.7% of headphones.
Show more
Brand name
Kuba
Form factor
over-ear
Weight
346 g
Market range: <14 g – >340 g
This pair of headphones weighs 346 g, heavier than 90.9% of headphones and equal to 0.1% of headphones.
Acoustic design
closed-back
Clamp force
?
Show more

Kuba Disco 2 Bluetooth vs the average pair of headphones

246810TotalDesignSoundBatteryConnectivityCalls & ControlsFeatures
  • EQ customization
    This pair of headphones supports EQ customization, the average pair of headphones does not. 23.2% of headphones support EQ.
  • Companion app support
    This pair of headphones works with a companion app, the average pair of headphones does not. 21.6% of headphones support companion apps.
  • 11 dB/mW higher sensitivity
    This pair of headphones has a higher sensitivity than the average pair of headphones (113 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW). The average headphones have sensitivity of 102 dB/mW.
    113 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW
  • More flexible connectivity
    This pair of headphones offers more flexible connectivity than the average pair of headphones (wireless vs wired). The average headphones support wired connectivity.
    wireless vs wired
  • LDAC support
    This pair of headphones supports LDAC, the average pair of headphones does not. 8.1% of headphones support LDAC.
  • AptX HD support
    This pair of headphones supports aptX HD, the average pair of headphones does not. 7.6% of headphones support aptX HD.
  • On-device controls
    This pair of headphones includes on-device controls, the average pair of headphones does not. 46.8% of headphones support on-device controls.
  • In-line controls
    This pair of headphones includes in-line controls, the average pair of headphones does not. 36.6% of headphones support in-line controls.
  • 11 dB/mW higher sensitivity
    This pair of headphones has a higher sensitivity than the average pair of headphones (113 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW). The average headphones have sensitivity of 102 dB/mW.
    113 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW
  • 10 dB SPL higher sound pressure level
    This pair of headphones has a higher sound pressure level than the average pair of headphones (113 dB SPL vs 103 dB SPL). The average headphones reach a sound pressure level of 103 dB SPL.
    113 dB SPL vs 103 dB SPL
  • 0.5 hours shorter charging time
    This pair of headphones has a lower charging time than the average pair of headphones (1.5 hours vs 2 hours). The average headphones need 2 hours to charge.
    1.5 hours vs 2 hours
  • USB-C charging
    This pair of headphones uses USB-C charging, the average pair of headphones does not. 29.5% of headphones use USB Type-C.
  • 10 hours longer battery life
    This pair of headphones has a higher battery life than the average pair of headphones (40 hours vs 30 hours). The average headphones offer battery life of 30 hours.
    40 hours vs 30 hours
  • Rechargeable battery
    This pair of headphones has a rechargeable battery, the average pair of headphones does not. 47.9% of headphones have a rechargeable battery.
  • More flexible connectivity
    This pair of headphones offers more flexible connectivity than the average pair of headphones (wireless vs wired). The average headphones support wired connectivity.
    wireless vs wired
  • LDAC support
    This pair of headphones supports LDAC, the average pair of headphones does not. 8.1% of headphones support LDAC.
  • AptX HD support
    This pair of headphones supports aptX HD, the average pair of headphones does not. 7.6% of headphones support aptX HD.
  • AAC codec support
    This pair of headphones supports AAC, the average pair of headphones does not. 32.2% of headphones support AAC.
  • AptX support
    This pair of headphones supports aptX, the average pair of headphones does not. 18.4% of headphones support aptX.
  • Fast pairing support
    This pair of headphones supports fast pairing, the average pair of headphones does not. 14% of headphones support fast pairing.
  • On-device controls
    This pair of headphones includes on-device controls, the average pair of headphones does not. 46.8% of headphones support on-device controls.
  • In-line controls
    This pair of headphones includes in-line controls, the average pair of headphones does not. 36.6% of headphones support in-line controls.
  • Quick mic mute
    This pair of headphones includes a quick mic mute, the average pair of headphones does not. 29.3% of headphones support a mute function.
  • EQ customization
    This pair of headphones supports EQ customization, the average pair of headphones does not. 23.2% of headphones support EQ.
  • Companion app support
    This pair of headphones works with a companion app, the average pair of headphones does not. 21.6% of headphones support companion apps.
  • 7 newer release date
    This pair of headphones was released more recently than the average pair of headphones (2023 vs 2016). The average headphones were released in 2016.
    August 2023
    2023 vs 2016
  • 58.7% higher weight
    This pair of headphones is heavier than the average pair of headphones (346 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
    346 g vs 218 g
  • 2 Hz weaker bass extension
    This pair of headphones has a higher lowest frequency than the average pair of headphones (20 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.
    20 Hz vs 18 Hz
  • 34.5% lower battery capacity
    This pair of headphones has a lower battery capacity than the average pair of headphones (380 mAh vs 580 mAh). The average headphones have a battery capacity of 580 mAh.
    380 mAh vs 580 mAh
  • 5.87x less popular
    Kuba Disco 2 Bluetooth is less popular than the average pair of headphones (1 vs 5.9).
    1 vs 5.87
  • No neodymium magnet
    This pair of headphones does not use neodymium magnets, the average pair of headphones does. 81.9% of headphones use neodymium magnets.
  • 2.22x more expensive
    Kuba Disco 2 Bluetooth is more expensive than the average pair of headphones (ÂŁ200 vs ÂŁ90).
    ÂŁ200 vs ÂŁ90
  • 5.87x less popular
    Kuba Disco 2 Bluetooth is less popular than the average pair of headphones (1 vs 5.9).
    1 vs 5.87
  • 2.22x more expensive
    Kuba Disco 2 Bluetooth is more expensive than the average pair of headphones (ÂŁ200 vs ÂŁ90).
    ÂŁ200 vs ÂŁ90
  • 58.7% higher weight
    This pair of headphones is heavier than the average pair of headphones (346 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
    346 g vs 218 g
  • 2 Hz weaker bass extension
    This pair of headphones has a higher lowest frequency than the average pair of headphones (20 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.
    20 Hz vs 18 Hz
  • No neodymium magnet
    This pair of headphones does not use neodymium magnets, the average pair of headphones does. 81.9% of headphones use neodymium magnets.
  • 34.5% lower battery capacity
    This pair of headphones has a lower battery capacity than the average pair of headphones (380 mAh vs 580 mAh). The average headphones have a battery capacity of 580 mAh.
    380 mAh vs 580 mAh

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Brand video
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

C
canaltech.com.br
15/11/2023
Summary of the review
Kuba Disco 2 Bluetooth Review | The Bluetooth Headphone by Kuba
(Translated)Show original
T
techtudo.com.br
19/03/2024
Summary of the review
Kuba Disco 2 Bluetooth review: combining quality, durability, and value for money
(Translated)Show original
C
canaltech.com.br
15/11/2023
Summary of the review
Kuba Disco 2 Bluetooth Review: The Bluetooth Headphones by Kuba
(Translated)Show original
T
techtudo.com.br
19/03/2024
Summary of the review
Kuba Disco 2 Bluetooth review: combining quality, durability, and value for money
(Translated)Show original
T
techtudo.com.br
19/03/2024
Summary of the review
Kuba Disco 2 Bluetooth Review: Combining Quality, Durability, and Value
(Translated)Show original
C
canaltech.com.br
15/11/2023
Summary of the review
Kuba Disco 2 Bluetooth Review | The Bluetooth Headphone by Kuba
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Kuba Disco 2 Bluetooth

  • Modular design allows for easy replacement of all parts, including drivers and earpads
  • Excellent sound quality for the price, characterized by balanced mids and clear vocals
  • Physical mechanical bass slider allows users to adjust bass levels across four stages
  • High durability and build quality featuring a unique retro aesthetic with a wooden headband
  • Exceptional 5-year manufacturer's warranty
  • Improved comfort in the 'Disco 2' version compared to previous generations, featuring a more elongated arch

What customers don't like about Kuba Disco 2 Bluetooth

  • Can exert high clamping force, which some users find uncomfortable during long listening sessions, especially when wearing glasses
  • Narrow soundstage due to the intimate, closed-back presentation
  • The standard included cable is reported by some users to be fragile or prone to issues
  • Significant shipping delays have been reported for orders directly from the manufacturer
  • Lack of clear left/right indicators on the connectors
  • Sub-bass may feel lacking for 'bass heads,' even at higher mechanical settings

Verdict

The Kuba Disco 2 Bluetooth is a modular, over-ear headphone featuring 40mm drivers with a 32-ohm impedance and a wide frequency response of 20Hz to 20kHz. Its standout physical characteristic is a sustainable, flexible wooden headband paired with memory foam cushions and metal shells for passive sound isolation. Key features include an analog bass selector with four levels of adjustment, up to 40 hours of battery life, and support for high-quality codecs like aptX, aptX HD, and AAC via Bluetooth 5.0. While it offers versatile wireless and wired connectivity with a high sound pressure level of 113 dB/mW, notable drawbacks include the lack of active noise cancellation (ANC) and reported clamping pressure that may cause initial discomfort for some users.

Compare Kuba Disco 2 Bluetooth with other products in the Headphones category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Kuba Disco 2 Bluetooth and other products in the Headphones category

No results found