OVERALL
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
ALTERNATIVES

JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 Review | 93 Data compared

double-arrow
  • Avg. price: ~£25
  • Form factor: on-ear
  • Connectivity: wireless
  • Battery life: 57 hours
  • Active noise cancellation (ANC): no

JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 review. Compare 93 technical specifications and user reviews to see how it ranks among headphones and if it is worth buying.

6.2

Overall score

What it is: An overall evaluation of the headphones' quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.

When it matters: When you need a quick reference to identify the best headphones on the market.

Score components:

80.0%

6.2

Technical Score

20.0%

?

User score

Good
6.2

Technical Score

What it is: An assessment of the headphones' technical performance, covering key areas such as sound quality, noise cancelling, microphone performance, battery life, comfort, connectivity, features, and build quality.

When it matters: When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.

Score components:

52.0%

5.9

Sound

20.0%

6.0

Features

10.0%

8.3

Design

8.0%

5.3

Connectivity

6.0%

7.3

Battery

4.0%

5.8

Calls & Controls

Good
?

User score

What it is: A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.

When it matters: When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.

Score components:

70.0%

?

User reviews

30.0%

?

Popularity

  • 6.3
    Gaming

    Score components:

    35.0%

    9.0

    Audio latency

    25.0%

    1.0

    Low-latency game mode

    20.0%

    10

    Can be used as a headset

    12.0%

    1.0

    Noise-canceling microphone

    8.0%

    9.5

    Battery life

  • 5.4
    Travel

    Score components:

    28.0%

    1.0

    Active noise cancellation (ANC)

    24.0%

    9.5

    Battery life

    18.0%

    6.7

    Weight

    16.0%

    10

    Multipoint support

    14.0%

    0.0

    Ambient sound mode

  • 7.4
    Calls

    Score components:

    28.0%

    1.0

    Noise-canceling microphone

    24.0%

    10

    Can be used as a headset

    18.0%

    10

    Multipoint support

    16.0%

    9.5

    Battery life

    14.0%

    10

    Companion app

  • 5.6
    Workout

    Score components:

    28.0%

    6.7

    Weight

    24.0%

    1.0

    Water resistance

    20.0%

    4.0

    IP rating

    16.0%

    9.5

    Battery life

    12.0%

    10

    Can be used as a headset

  • No image
No image

Best prices in UK

    N/A~ £25

Best rankings

?

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).
All: ranking among all products in the database.

Verdict

The JBL Tune 520BT and Sony WH-CH520 are highly competitive budget on-ear wireless headphones featuring Bluetooth multipoint pairing and dedicated app support. The JBL Tune 520BT stands out with a 57-hour battery life, 33mm drivers for punchy Pure Bass sound, and a foldable design for portability, while the Sony WH-CH520 offers a slightly lighter 147g build, 50-hour battery life, and DSEE technology to restore compressed audio quality. Main pros for the JBL include faster charging (5 mins for 3 hours) and a more secure foldable frame, whereas the Sony excels in comfort with softer padding and superior microphone performance for calls. A notable con for both is the lack of Active Noise Cancellation (ANC), and while the JBL may feel tighter on the crown over time, the Sony lacks a folding mechanism for compact storage.

Technical Specifications of JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520

Technical Score

What it is: An assessment of the headphones' technical performance, covering key areas such as sound quality, noise cancelling, microphone performance, battery life, comfort, connectivity, features, and build quality.

When it matters: When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.

Score components:

52.0%

?

Sound

20.0%

?

Features

10.0%

?

Design

8.0%

?

Connectivity

6.0%

?

Battery

4.0%

?

Calls & Controls

6.2
JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 has a technical score of 6.18 points, which is higher than that of 73.5% of products in this category.
User score

What it is: A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.

When it matters: When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.

Score components:

70.0%

0.0

User reviews

30.0%

1.0

Popularity

?
Popularity
What it is: An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters: When you prefer headphones that have already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
1.0
JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 has a popularity of 1 points, which is lower than 72.7% of products in this category.
Ratio quality/price

What it is: An indicator that combines the headphones' overall rating with their cost.

When it matters: When you are looking for headphones that offer a strong balance of performance, features, and price.

Score components:

60.0%

6.2

Overall score

40.0%

10

Price

7.3
JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 has a quality-to-price ratio of 7.3 points, which is higher than 70.6% of products in this category.
Active noise cancellation (ANC)
What it is: Reduces background noise using active technology
When it matters: When blocking office, travel, or aircraft noise is a priority.

Importance: HIGH

no
JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 does not support active noise cancellation. 27.4% of headphones support active noise cancellation.
Driver type
What it is: Type of speaker driver technology used
When it matters: When the underlying sound character and driver technology matter to you.

Importance: MEDIUM

dynamic
Driver size
What it is: Diameter of the speaker driver unit
When it matters: When you want extra hardware context behind how the headphones may handle bass weight, scale, or overall presentation.

Importance: MEDIUM

33 mm
JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 uses a driver size of 33 mm, smaller driver size than 74.2% of headphones and equal to 0.2% of headphones.
Number of drivers
What it is: Total number of speaker drivers per earcup
When it matters: When multi-driver designs are part of your buying criteria.

Importance: LOW

1
JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 uses 1 drivers, equal to 96% of headphones.
Lowest frequency
What it is: Lowest audio frequency the headphones can reproduce
When it matters: When deeper bass extension matters for your music or movie listening.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <=10 Hz

20 Hz
JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 reaches a lowest frequency of 20 Hz, higher lowest frequency than 50.6% of headphones and equal to 47.5% of headphones.
Show more
Noise-canceling microphone
What it is: Built-in microphone reduces background noise during calls
When it matters: When you take calls in busy spaces and want your voice to stay clearer.

Importance: MEDIUM

no
JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 does not support a noise-canceling microphone. 45.6% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
Can be used as a headset
What it is: Shows whether the headphones can handle voice chat and calls in addition to normal audio playback.
When it matters: When one pair needs to cover music, calls, meetings, and gaming chat.

Importance: MEDIUM

yes
JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 is headset-ready, 84.7% is not. 15.3% of headphones can be used as headsets.
Number of microphones
What it is: Total number of built-in microphones
When it matters: When call pickup quality and beamforming support matter to you.

Importance: LOW

Good value: >=2

1
JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 has 1 microphones, more microphones than 25.9% of headphones and equal to 52.2% of headphones.
Boom microphone
What it is: Includes detachable boom microphone for voice clarity
When it matters: When you need stronger voice clarity for gaming, streaming, or work calls.

Importance: LOW

no
JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 does not include a boom microphone. 15.6% of headphones have a boom microphone.
Microphone SNR
What it is: Signal-to-noise ratio of the microphone
When it matters: When call clarity matters and you want your voice picked up more cleanly instead of buried in background hiss.

Importance: LOW

Good value: >80 dB

?
Show more
Connectivity
What it is: Available connection methods (wired, wireless, Bluetooth, etc.)
When it matters: When the headphones need to match how you listen across wired and wireless devices.

Importance: HIGH

wireless
JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 supports wireless connectivity, more flexible connectivity than 52.6% of headphones and equal to 47.4% of headphones.
Bluetooth version
What it is: Version of Bluetooth technology supported
When it matters: When wireless stability, efficiency, and feature support matter more than treating Bluetooth as a box-check spec.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=5.0

5.3
JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 uses Bluetooth version 5.3, newer Bluetooth version than 88.6% of headphones and equal to 6.5% of headphones.
Maximum Bluetooth range
What it is: Maximum wireless operating distance from source device
When it matters: When you move around rooms and want fewer dropouts from your source device.

Importance: LOW

Good value: >=10 m

10 m
JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 offers a Bluetooth range of 10 m, higher Bluetooth range than 2.6% of headphones and equal to 79.9% of headphones.
Audio latency
What it is: Delay between audio and video in wireless mode
When it matters: When you watch video or play games and need sound to stay in sync.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: <60 ms

?
Multipoint support
What it is: Supports simultaneous connections to multiple devices
When it matters: When you switch often between a phone and a laptop during the day.

Importance: MEDIUM

yes
JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 supports multipoint. 35% of headphones support multipoint.
Show more
Ambient sound mode
What it is: Allows external sounds to pass through for awareness
When it matters: When you need to stay aware of traffic, voices, or announcements.

Importance: MEDIUM

N/A
EQ support
What it is: Allows customization of sound profile via equalizer
When it matters: When the stock tuning is not enough and you want to shape bass, mids, or treble to match your taste.

Importance: MEDIUM

yes
JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 supports EQ customization. 76.8% of headphones support EQ.
Companion app
What it is: Dedicated mobile app for customization and updates
When it matters: When software customization, updates, and extra controls matter.

Importance: MEDIUM

yes
JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 works with a companion app. 55.7% of headphones support companion apps.
Adjustable ANC levels
What it is: Allows adjustment of noise cancellation intensity levels
When it matters: When you move between quiet rooms, offices, streets, and public transport and do not want one ANC setting for every situation.

Importance: LOW

Good value: >=4

N/A
Voice assistant support
What it is: Compatible with voice assistants like Siri, Alexa, or Google Assistant
When it matters: When hands-free control is part of your daily routine.

Importance: LOW

yes
JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 supports voice assistants. 39.2% of headphones support voice assistants.
Show more
Battery life
What it is: Playback time on a single charge
When it matters: When you commute, travel, or work long shifts and do not want charging breaks to interrupt listening.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >45 hours

57 hours
JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 offers battery life of 57 hours, higher battery life than 78.8% of headphones and equal to 0.1% of headphones.
Battery life with ANC
What it is: Playback time with active noise cancellation enabled
When it matters: When you plan to keep noise cancellation on for most of the day.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >40 hours

N/A
Charging time
What it is: Time required for a full battery charge
When it matters: When you often need the headphones ready again after short breaks.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <=2 hours

3 hours
JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 needs 3 hours to charge, higher charging time than 66% of headphones and equal to 21.3% of headphones.
Quick charge
What it is: Provides quick playback time with short charging period
When it matters: When a short top-up needs to deliver useful playback before you leave.

Importance: MEDIUM

yes
JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 supports quick charge. 31% of headphones support quick charge.
Battery capacity
What it is: Total energy storage of the internal battery
When it matters: When you are estimating how much battery headroom the design may have before relying only on the official runtime claim.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=720 mAh

450 mAh
JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 has a battery capacity of 450 mAh, lower battery capacity than 65.9% of headphones and equal to 2.3% of headphones.
Show more
Brand name
What it is: The manufacturer or brand of the product.
When it matters: When you prefer a specific ecosystem, support network, or design philosophy.

Importance: MEDIUM

JBL
Form factor
What it is: Overall design type of the headphones (over-ear, on-ear, in-ear, etc.)
When it matters: When comfort, portability, and isolation depend on the overall headphone style.

Importance: HIGH

on-ear
Weight
What it is: Total weight of the headphones
When it matters: When long listening sessions make wearing comfort more important.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <150 g

157 g
JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 weighs 157 g, lighter than 68.1% of headphones and equal to 0.3% of headphones.
Acoustic design
What it is: Type of acoustic design (open-back, closed-back, semi-open)
When it matters: When you need the right balance of isolation, leakage, and soundstage.

Importance: HIGH

closed-back
Clamp force
What it is: Amount of clamping pressure applied to the head
When it matters: When comfort and fit security matter during long sessions.

Importance: MEDIUM

2.7
JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 has a clamp force of 2.7, lower clamp force than 86.1% of headphones and equal to 2.4% of headphones.
Show more

JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 vs the average headphone

  • Hi-Res Audio certification
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 has Hi-Res Audio certification, the average headphone does not. 22.9% of headphones are Hi-Res Audio certified.
    What it is: Certified for high-resolution audio playback
    When it matters: When official support for high-resolution playback matters to you.

    Importance: LOW

    JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 has Hi-Res Audio certification, the average headphone does not. 22.9% of headphones are Hi-Res Audio certified.
  • EQ customization
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 supports EQ customization, the average headphone does not. 23.3% of headphones support EQ.
    What it is: Allows customization of sound profile via equalizer
    When it matters: When the stock tuning is not enough and you want to shape bass, mids, or treble to match your taste.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 supports EQ customization, the average headphone does not. 23.3% of headphones support EQ.
  • Spatial audio support
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 supports spatial audio, the average headphone does not. 30.7% of headphones support spatial audio.
    What it is: Supports immersive surround sound playback
    When it matters: When movies, games, and immersive mixes are part of your listening.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 supports spatial audio, the average headphone does not. 30.7% of headphones support spatial audio.
  • More flexible connectivity
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 offers more flexible connectivity than the average headphone (wireless vs wired). The average headphones support wired connectivity.
    What it is: Available connection methods (wired, wireless, Bluetooth, etc.)
    When it matters: When the headphones need to match how you listen across wired and wireless devices.

    Importance: HIGH

    JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 offers more flexible connectivity than the average headphone (wireless vs wired). The average headphones support wired connectivity.wireless vs wired
  • 27 hours longer battery life
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 has a higher battery life than the average headphone (57 hours vs 30 hours). The average headphones offer battery life of 30 hours.
    What it is: Playback time on a single charge
    When it matters: When you commute, travel, or work long shifts and do not want charging breaks to interrupt listening.

    Importance: HIGH

    Good value: >45 hours

    JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 has a higher battery life than the average headphone (57 hours vs 30 hours). The average headphones offer battery life of 30 hours.57 hours vs 30 hours
  • On-device controls
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 includes on-device controls, the average headphone does not. 46.8% of headphones support on-device controls.
    What it is: Physical controls available directly on headphones
    When it matters: When you need playback, volume, or call controls to be easy to reach without pulling out your phone.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 includes on-device controls, the average headphone does not. 46.8% of headphones support on-device controls.
  • 28% lower weight
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 is lighter than the average headphone (157 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
    What it is: Total weight of the headphones
    When it matters: When long listening sessions make wearing comfort more important.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    Good value: <150 g

    JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 is lighter than the average headphone (157 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.157 g vs 218 g
  • 1.6 lower clamp force
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 has a lower clamp force than the average headphone (2.7 vs 4.3). The average headphones have a clamp force of 4.3.
    What it is: Amount of clamping pressure applied to the head
    When it matters: When comfort and fit security matter during long sessions.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 has a lower clamp force than the average headphone (2.7 vs 4.3). The average headphones have a clamp force of 4.3.2.7 vs 4.3
  • 28% lower weight
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 is lighter than the average headphone (157 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
  • 1.6 lower clamp force
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 has a lower clamp force than the average headphone (2.7 vs 4.3). The average headphones have a clamp force of 4.3.
  • Foldable design
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 has a foldable design, the average headphone does not. 61% of headphones are foldable.
  • Hi-Res Audio certification
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 has Hi-Res Audio certification, the average headphone does not. 22.9% of headphones are Hi-Res Audio certified.
  • Spatial audio support
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 supports spatial audio, the average headphone does not. 30.7% of headphones support spatial audio.
  • 27 hours longer battery life
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 has a higher battery life than the average headphone (57 hours vs 30 hours). The average headphones offer battery life of 30 hours.
  • USB-C charging
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 uses USB-C charging, the average headphone does not. 29.4% of headphones use USB Type-C.
  • Rechargeable battery
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 has a rechargeable battery, the average headphone does not. 47.9% of headphones have a rechargeable battery.
  • More flexible connectivity
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 offers more flexible connectivity than the average headphone (wireless vs wired). The average headphones support wired connectivity.
  • On-device controls
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 includes on-device controls, the average headphone does not. 46.8% of headphones support on-device controls.
  • Wind noise reduction
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 reduces wind noise, the average headphone does not. 34.1% of headphones support wind noise reduction.
  • Sidetone support
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 supports sidetone, the average headphone does not. 29.7% of headphones support sidetone.
  • EQ customization
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 supports EQ customization, the average headphone does not. 23.3% of headphones support EQ.
  • 7 years newer release date
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 was released more recently than the average headphone (2,024 vs 2,017). The average headphones were released in 2,017.

Total
Overall
Design
Sound
Battery
Connectivity
Calls & Controls
Features
  • Tangle-prone cable
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 uses a tangle-prone cable, while the average headphone is easier to manage. 64.2% of headphones use a tangle-free cable.
    no tangle-free listening cable is present or specified.
  • No travel bag
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 does not include a travel bag, the average headphone does. 65.2% of headphones include a travel bag.
  • 7 mm smaller driver size
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 has smaller driver size than the average headphone (33 mm vs 40 mm). The average headphones use a driver size of 40 mm.
  • 2 Hz weaker bass extension
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 has a higher lowest frequency than the average headphone (20 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.
  • 0.2 % higher distortion
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 has a higher total harmonic distortion than the average headphone (0.5 % vs 0.3 %). The average headphones have total harmonic distortion of 0.3 %.
  • No neodymium magnet
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 does not use neodymium magnets, the average headphone does. 77.4% of headphones use neodymium magnets.
  • 15 dB lower max SPL
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 has a lower max SPL than the average headphone (95 dB vs 110 dB). The average headphones reach a max SPL of 110 dB.
  • 1 hours longer charging time
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 has a higher charging time than the average headphone (3 hours vs 2 hours). The average headphones need 2 hours to charge.
  • 25% lower battery capacity
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 has a lower battery capacity than the average headphone (450 mAh vs 600 mAh). The average headphones have a battery capacity of 600 mAh.
  • 1 hours longer charging time
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 has a higher charging time than the average headphone (3 hours vs 2 hours). The average headphones need 2 hours to charge.
    What it is: Time required for a full battery charge
    When it matters: When you often need the headphones ready again after short breaks.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    Good value: <=2 hours

    JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 has a higher charging time than the average headphone (3 hours vs 2 hours). The average headphones need 2 hours to charge.3 hours vs 2 hours
  • 7 mm smaller driver size
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 has smaller driver size than the average headphone (33 mm vs 40 mm). The average headphones use a driver size of 40 mm.
    What it is: Diameter of the speaker driver unit
    When it matters: When you want extra hardware context behind how the headphones may handle bass weight, scale, or overall presentation.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 has smaller driver size than the average headphone (33 mm vs 40 mm). The average headphones use a driver size of 40 mm.33 mm vs 40 mm
  • 2 Hz weaker bass extension
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 has a higher lowest frequency than the average headphone (20 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.
    What it is: Lowest audio frequency the headphones can reproduce
    When it matters: When deeper bass extension matters for your music or movie listening.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    Good value: <=10 Hz

    JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 has a higher lowest frequency than the average headphone (20 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.20 Hz vs 18 Hz
  • 4.65x less popular
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 is less popular than the average headphone (1.00 vs 4.646).
    What it is: An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the headphones.
    When it matters: When you prefer headphones that have already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 is less popular than the average headphone (1.00 vs 4.646).1 vs 4.65
  • 0.2 % higher distortion
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 has a higher total harmonic distortion than the average headphone (0.5 % vs 0.3 %). The average headphones have total harmonic distortion of 0.3 %.
    What it is: Percentage of harmonic distortion in audio output
    When it matters: When cleaner sound reproduction matters at louder volumes.

    Importance: LOW

    Good value: <=1%

    JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 has a higher total harmonic distortion than the average headphone (0.5 % vs 0.3 %). The average headphones have total harmonic distortion of 0.3 %.0.5 % vs 0.3 %
  • Tangle-prone cable
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 uses a tangle-prone cable, while the average headphone is easier to manage. 64.2% of headphones use a tangle-free cable.
    no tangle-free listening cable is present or specified.
    What it is: Cable designed to resist tangling
    When it matters: When you often carry wired headphones in a bag or pocket.

    Importance: LOW

    JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 uses a tangle-prone cable, while the average headphone is easier to manage. 64.2% of headphones use a tangle-free cable.
  • No travel bag
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 does not include a travel bag, the average headphone does. 65.2% of headphones include a travel bag.
    What it is: Comes with a protective carrying case or pouch
    When it matters: When protection in transit matters right out of the box.

    Importance: LOW

    JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 does not include a travel bag, the average headphone does. 65.2% of headphones include a travel bag.
  • 25% lower battery capacity
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 has a lower battery capacity than the average headphone (450 mAh vs 600 mAh). The average headphones have a battery capacity of 600 mAh.
    What it is: Total energy storage of the internal battery
    When it matters: When you are estimating how much battery headroom the design may have before relying only on the official runtime claim.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    Good value: >=720 mAh

    JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 has a lower battery capacity than the average headphone (450 mAh vs 600 mAh). The average headphones have a battery capacity of 600 mAh.450 mAh vs 600 mAh
Total
Overall
Design
Sound
Battery

Graphic comparison of JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 and

Attribute category
Attribute
No results found

Expert reviews

T
techgadgetscanada.com
15/07/2024
JBL TUNE 520BT on-ear headphones review

The JBL Tune 520BT is a solid, budget-friendly refresh of the older 510BT model, maintaining an affordable $50 USD / $69 CAD price point while introducing key performance updates. Built entirely from lightweight plastic, these on-ear headphones feature a highly portable design with earcups that swivel, tilt, and fold up easily for travel. Setting up the device is straightforward,...Read more

R
robbsutton.com
28/12/2025
JBL Tune 520BT Review: Lightweight Wireless Headphones

The JBL Tune 520BT wireless on-ear headphones provide excellent value for budget-conscious users, such as students and daily commuters, who prioritize long-lasting battery power and portability over studio-grade sound. The standout feature of these headphones is their exceptional battery life, which delivers up to 57 hours of playback time on a single charge. Additionally, a...Read more

G
goughlui.com
01/09/2025
Review, Teardown: JBL Tune 520BT Wireless On-Ear Headphones

The JBL Tune 520BT wireless on-ear headphones are evaluated as a highly competent, budget-friendly entry-level option, retailing around AU$50. In quantitative testing, the standout feature is the exceptional battery performance: while the manufacturer claims 57 hours of playtime, benchmark tests recorded an impressive 60 hours and 39 minutes of continuous playback. Built around a...Read more

T
techgearlab.com
12/12/2025
Sony WHCH520 Review | Tested & Rated

The Sony WHCH520 is a budget-friendly, entry-level pair of wireless on-ear headphones that scored a below-average 43 out of 100 in comprehensive testing, ranking near the bottom of its category. Its primary highlights are exceptional call quality and phenomenal battery performance, offering over 50 hours of playback along with a quick-charge capability that yields 1.5 hours of...Read more

T
tomsguide.com
19/04/2024
Sony WH-CH520 review

The Tom's Guide Sony WH-CH520 review highlights this $59 wireless headset as an exceptional, budget-friendly upgrade over its predecessor, the WH-CH510. Weighing only 5.1 ounces, the headset features a sleek matte finish and sturdy, lightweight construction with padded earcups that ensure a snug, secure fit. Its prominent pros include an exceptional 50-hour battery life, rapid USB-C...Read more

R
rtings.com
09/04/2024
Sony WH-CH520 Wireless Headphones Review

The Sony WH-CH520 wireless on-ear headphonesGo feature a 50-hour continuous battery life, a comfortable design, and extensive EQ customization via the companion app. They deliver balanced, customizable audio suitable for daily use, bolstered by reliable, clear voice pickup for calls. However, the headphones lack active noise cancellation (ANC), resulting in poor isolation against...Read more

T
techradar.com
21/02/2023
Sony WH-CH520 review: some of the best cheap headphones

The Sony WH-CH520 are highly affordable on-ear wireless headphones that offer exceptional value, retailing for approximately $60 / £60. The reviewer highlights their well-balanced and clear sound, which can be further enhanced using Sony’s DSEE upscaling technology and a highly effective EQ within the companion app. Notable features include an impressive 50-hour battery life and...Read more

W
whathifi.com
28/10/2024
Sony WH-CH520 review

The Sony WH-CH520 are highly affordable on-ear wireless headphones that offer exceptional value and minimal compromises for their budget price point, originally launching at £49 / $59 / AU$79. Weighing just 147g, they feature a lightweight, properly padded design that ensures a comfortable fit and lasting durability, despite having a slightly plasticky texture. Key technical...Read more

R
rtings.com
27/05/2024
JBL Tune 520BT Headphones Review

The JBL Tune 520BT Wireless are budget-friendly on-ear headphones featuring exceptional 57-hour battery life, USB-C fast charging, and a balanced, customizable sound profile via app-based EQ. They offer modern conveniences, including Bluetooth 5.3 multi-device pairing and intuitive on-ear controls. However, the, on-ear design lacks active noise cancellation, resulting in poor noise...Read more

S
soundguys.com
30/12/2024
JBL Tune 520BT review: solid on-ears

The JBL Tune 520BT offers exceptional value under $50, highlighted by an outstanding 60-hour-plus battery life and consumer-friendly sound with punchy bass. Key pros include Bluetooth Multipoint functionality and extensive app-based customization for a budget-friendly price point. However, the on-ear design features a plastic construction and high clamping force, leading to...Read more

R
rtings.com
27/05/2024
Sony WH-CH520 Wireless vs JBL Tune 520BT

The Sony WH-CH520 Wireless outperform the JBL Tune 520BT due to superior microphone performance, better build quality, and virtual soundstage support, though they have a shorter battery life. The JBL Tune 520BT, however, offers significantly longer battery life and lower video-mode latency for better media consumption. RTINGS.comThe JBL's main drawbacks are a lower-performing...Read more

G
gamestar.de
11/04/2023
New Sony headphones surprise in review with major highlights", "New Sony headphones impress in test with plenty of bright spots

The GameStar review evaluates the Sony WH-CH520 on-ear headphones and the Sony WH-CH720N over-ear headphones, highlighting them as feature-packed budget options. Out of the box, both models deliver an identical, balanced, yet flat "V" sound signature that significantly improves via custom EQ presets in the companion app. The ultra-lightweight construction (147g for the CH520 and...Read more

(Translated)Show original
T
testventure.de
18/07/2023
JBL Tune 520BT Review - Testventure (testsieger.de) | Not specified | JBL Tune 520BT Wireless On-Ear Headphones - Testsieger.de

The JBL Tune 520BT is an affordable pair of wireless on-ear headphones that delivers solid core performance and excellent value for money. They feature strong 33mm drivers, Bluetooth 5.3 connectivity, and seamless integration with the JBL Headphones app for basic adjustments like equalizer tuning. The clear standout feature is the exceptional battery life, providing up to 57 hours...Read more

(Translated)Show original
S
stereoguide.de
17/06/2023
Sony WH-CH520 Review - STEREO GUIDE

The Sony WH-CH520 is a lightweight (147g), highly budget-friendly wireless on-ear headphone that scored an overall 79% in the Stereo Guide review. Priced around €30 to €60, its standout feature is an exceptional battery life of up to 50 hours with quick-charging capabilities, alongside stable Bluetooth 5.2 connectivity that supports multipoint pairing for switching easily between...Read more

(Translated)Show original
K
kopfhoerer.de
31/03/2023
Sony WH-CH520 review on kopfhoerer.de

The Sony WH-CH520 is a stylish, lightweight, and budget-friendly on-ear wireless headphone that offers strong everyday performance at an attractive entry-level price point. Weighing under 150 grams, it features a robust plastic construction with a padded headband and swivel earcups that comfortably rest around the neck, though the frame is not foldable. Equipped with Bluetooth 5.2,...Read more

(Translated)Show original
L
leverdict.org
05/04/2025
Sony WH-CH520 Review: Full Test and User Experience

The Sony WH-CH520 is an affordable, lightweight wireless on-ear Bluetooth headset tailored for daily casual use, commuting, and multi-device multitasking. A standout feature is its exceptional 50-hour battery life, complemented by a rapid charging capability where a quick 3-minute charge delivers 1.5 hours of playback. Sound performance is highly satisfactory in quiet environments,...Read more

(Translated)Show original
L
lesnumeriques.com
15/03/2023
Sony WH-CH520 Review: Comfortable and Long-Lasting Headphones at a Low Price", "Sony WH-CH520 Review: Affordable, Comfortable Headphones with Great Ba...

The Sony WH-CH520 is an entry-level on-ear wireless headphone that replaces the older WH-CH510 with a more modern, flexible design and highly requested features like Bluetooth 5.2 multipoint pairing and compatibility with the Sony Headphones Connect app. Its standout feature is an outstanding battery life that reached nearly 59 hours in testing at 60% volume, making it perfect for...Read more

(Translated)Show original
L
leclaireur.fnac.com
06/06/2023
JBL Tune 520BT Review: Monster Battery Life and Great Bass

The JBL Tune 520BT is an affordable, lightweight (157g) on-ear wireless headphone featuring a foldable design reminiscent of older Beats Pro models. It relies on Bluetooth 5.3 to offer multipoint connectivity, basic earcup control buttons, and integration with the My JBL Headphones app for equalizer adjustments. Lab testing confirms an exceptional battery life of 55 hours and 10...Read more

(Translated)Show original
R
rtings.com
01/01/2024
Sony WH-CH520 Wireless vs. JBL Tune 520BT (Spanish Version via RTINGS.com)

The Sony WH-CH520 and JBL Tune 520BT are closely matched budget on-ear headphones featuring app support and long battery lives. The Sony model wins on build quality, a better microphone, and virtual soundstage support, but has shorter battery life and higher latency compared to its rival. Conversely, the JBL Tune 520BT offers superior power management with over 57 hours of battery,...Read more

(Translated)Show original
T
topesdegama.com
24/03/2025
Sony WH-CH520: reviews and hands-on analysis

The Sony WH-CH520 is an affordable, entry-level pair of wireless on-ear headphones that offers strong value for everyday multimedia consumption. Designed with a lightweight structure and a padded, adjustable headband, the headphones feature 30mm drivers that provide a well-balanced sound with clean mids and highs. While the audio profile can be fully customized using the Sony...Read more

(Translated)Show original
G
global.techradar.com
21/02/2023
Sony WH-CH520 review - TechRadar

The Sony WH-CH520 is a highly affordable pair of wireless on-ear headphones priced at approximately €70, designed for budget-conscious users who prioritsie sound quality over premium extras. Standout advantages include a remarkably well-balanced and detailed audio profile for the price, which can be extensively customised using the Sony Headphones app's equaliser and Clear Bass...Read more

(Translated)Show original
I
id.nl
23/03/2023
Sony WH-CH520 Review - Showing the Importance of an Equaliser

The Sony WH-CH520 is a highly recommended budget on-ear wireless headphone boasting a 50-hour battery life, durable construction, and multi-point Bluetooth, according to a review on ID.nl. While the out-of-the-box sound is flat, the review highlights that utilizing the Sony Headphones Connect app's equalizer significantly transforms the soundstage to deliver vibrant, clear audio....Read more

(Translated)Show original

Video reviews

Best alternatives

jlab-audio-studio
JLab Audio Studio

Headphones

7.3
jlab-audio-studio-wireless-anc
JLab Audio Studio Wireless ANC

Headphones

7.2
jlab-audio-studio-wireless
JLab Audio Studio Wireless

Headphones

7.0
No image
OneOdio Supereq S2

Headphones

6.9
philips-h4205
Philips H4205

Headphones

6.8
cubitt-headphones-jr
Cubitt Headphones Jr

Headphones

6.6
jbl-tune-520bt
JBL Tune 520BT

Headphones

6.5
philips-tak4206
Philips TAK4206

Headphones

5.9
edifier-wh500
Edifier WH500

Headphones

5.9
jlab-audio-jbuddies-studio
JLab Audio Jbuddies Studio

Headphones

5.8
jbl-tune-500bt
JBL Tune 500BT

Headphones

5.8
philips-tah4205xt
Philips TAH4205xt

Headphones

5.8

Compare JBL Tune 520BT Vs Sony WH CH520 with

VS
VS

Compare