OVERALL
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
ALTERNATIVES

JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT Review | 93 Data compared

double-arrow
  • Avg. price: ~£25
  • Form factor: over-ear
  • Connectivity: wireless
  • Battery life: 76 hours
  • Active noise cancellation (ANC): no

JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT review. Compare 93 technical specifications and user reviews to see how it ranks among headphones and if it is worth buying.

5.4

Overall score

What it is: An overall evaluation of the headphones' quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.

When it matters: When you need a quick reference to identify the best headphones on the market.

Score components:

80.0%

5.4

Technical Score

20.0%

?

User score

Good
5.4

Technical Score

What it is: An assessment of the headphones' technical performance, covering key areas such as sound quality, noise cancelling, microphone performance, battery life, comfort, connectivity, features, and build quality.

When it matters: When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.

Score components:

52.0%

4.5

Sound

20.0%

6.0

Features

10.0%

7.1

Design

8.0%

4.5

Connectivity

6.0%

9.1

Battery

4.0%

5.6

Calls & Controls

Good
?

User score

What it is: A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.

When it matters: When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.

Score components:

70.0%

?

User reviews

30.0%

?

Popularity

  • 6.7
    Gaming

    Score components:

    35.0%

    3.8

    Audio latency

    25.0%

    10

    Low-latency game mode

    20.0%

    10

    Can be used as a headset

    12.0%

    1.0

    Noise-canceling microphone

    8.0%

    10

    Battery life

  • 5.5
    Travel

    Score components:

    28.0%

    1.0

    Active noise cancellation (ANC)

    24.0%

    10

    Battery life

    18.0%

    6.7

    Weight

    16.0%

    10

    Multipoint support

    14.0%

    0.0

    Ambient sound mode

  • 7.5
    Calls

    Score components:

    28.0%

    1.0

    Noise-canceling microphone

    24.0%

    10

    Can be used as a headset

    18.0%

    10

    Multipoint support

    16.0%

    10

    Battery life

    14.0%

    10

    Companion app

  • 5.7
    Workout

    Score components:

    28.0%

    6.7

    Weight

    24.0%

    1.0

    Water resistance

    20.0%

    4.0

    IP rating

    16.0%

    10

    Battery life

    12.0%

    10

    Can be used as a headset

  • No image
No image

Best prices in UK

    N/A~ £25

Best rankings

?

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).
All: ranking among all products in the database.

Verdict

The JBL Tune 520BT and 720BT are both budget-friendly wireless headphones featuring Bluetooth 5.3, multipoint connectivity, and JBL Pure Bass sound. The Tune 520BT is an on-ear model with 33mm drivers and a 57-hour battery life, while the Tune 720BT is an over-ear design offering larger 40mm drivers, a superior 76-hour battery, and a detachable audio cable for wired use. Both support quick charging (5 minutes for 3 hours of play) and the JBL Headphones app for EQ customisation. Main pros include exceptional battery longevity, lightweight foldable builds, and strong bass performance. However, neither model features Active Noise Cancelling (ANC), and both have a primarily plastic construction that may lead to heat build-up or comfort issues during extended listening sessions.

Technical Specifications of JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT

Technical Score

What it is: An assessment of the headphones' technical performance, covering key areas such as sound quality, noise cancelling, microphone performance, battery life, comfort, connectivity, features, and build quality.

When it matters: When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.

Score components:

52.0%

?

Sound

20.0%

?

Features

10.0%

?

Design

8.0%

?

Connectivity

6.0%

?

Battery

4.0%

?

Calls & Controls

5.4
JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT has a technical score of 5.37 points, which is higher than that of 63.6% of products in this category.
User score

What it is: A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.

When it matters: When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.

Score components:

70.0%

0.0

User reviews

30.0%

1.0

Popularity

?
Popularity
What it is: An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters: When you prefer headphones that have already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
1.0
JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT has a popularity of 1 points, which is lower than 72.7% of products in this category.
Ratio quality/price

What it is: An indicator that combines the headphones' overall rating with their cost.

When it matters: When you are looking for headphones that offer a strong balance of performance, features, and price.

Score components:

60.0%

5.4

Overall score

40.0%

10

Price

6.8
JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT has a quality-to-price ratio of 6.8 points, which is higher than 51% of products in this category.
Active noise cancellation (ANC)
What it is: Reduces background noise using active technology
When it matters: When blocking office, travel, or aircraft noise is a priority.

Importance: HIGH

no
JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT does not support active noise cancellation. 27.4% of headphones support active noise cancellation.
Driver type
What it is: Type of speaker driver technology used
When it matters: When the underlying sound character and driver technology matter to you.

Importance: MEDIUM

dynamic
Driver size
What it is: Diameter of the speaker driver unit
When it matters: When you want extra hardware context behind how the headphones may handle bass weight, scale, or overall presentation.

Importance: MEDIUM

33 mm
JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT uses a driver size of 33 mm, smaller driver size than 74.2% of headphones and equal to 0.2% of headphones.
Number of drivers
What it is: Total number of speaker drivers per earcup
When it matters: When multi-driver designs are part of your buying criteria.

Importance: LOW

1
JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT uses 1 drivers, equal to 96% of headphones.
Lowest frequency
What it is: Lowest audio frequency the headphones can reproduce
When it matters: When deeper bass extension matters for your music or movie listening.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <=10 Hz

20 Hz
JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT reaches a lowest frequency of 20 Hz, higher lowest frequency than 50.6% of headphones and equal to 47.5% of headphones.
Show more
Noise-canceling microphone
What it is: Built-in microphone reduces background noise during calls
When it matters: When you take calls in busy spaces and want your voice to stay clearer.

Importance: MEDIUM

no
JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT does not support a noise-canceling microphone. 45.6% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
Can be used as a headset
What it is: Shows whether the headphones can handle voice chat and calls in addition to normal audio playback.
When it matters: When one pair needs to cover music, calls, meetings, and gaming chat.

Importance: MEDIUM

yes
JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT is headset-ready, 84.7% is not. 15.3% of headphones can be used as headsets.
Number of microphones
What it is: Total number of built-in microphones
When it matters: When call pickup quality and beamforming support matter to you.

Importance: LOW

Good value: >=2

1
JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT has 1 microphones, more microphones than 25.9% of headphones and equal to 52.2% of headphones.
Boom microphone
What it is: Includes detachable boom microphone for voice clarity
When it matters: When you need stronger voice clarity for gaming, streaming, or work calls.

Importance: LOW

no
JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT does not include a boom microphone. 15.6% of headphones have a boom microphone.
Microphone SNR
What it is: Signal-to-noise ratio of the microphone
When it matters: When call clarity matters and you want your voice picked up more cleanly instead of buried in background hiss.

Importance: LOW

Good value: >80 dB

?
Show more
Connectivity
What it is: Available connection methods (wired, wireless, Bluetooth, etc.)
When it matters: When the headphones need to match how you listen across wired and wireless devices.

Importance: HIGH

wireless
JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT supports wireless connectivity, more flexible connectivity than 52.6% of headphones and equal to 47.4% of headphones.
supports both wireless and wired connectivity.
Bluetooth version
What it is: Version of Bluetooth technology supported
When it matters: When wireless stability, efficiency, and feature support matter more than treating Bluetooth as a box-check spec.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=5.0

5.3
JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT uses Bluetooth version 5.3, newer Bluetooth version than 88.6% of headphones and equal to 6.5% of headphones.
Maximum Bluetooth range
What it is: Maximum wireless operating distance from source device
When it matters: When you move around rooms and want fewer dropouts from your source device.

Importance: LOW

Good value: >=10 m

10 m
JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT offers a Bluetooth range of 10 m, higher Bluetooth range than 2.6% of headphones and equal to 79.9% of headphones.
Audio latency
What it is: Delay between audio and video in wireless mode
When it matters: When you watch video or play games and need sound to stay in sync.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: <60 ms

185 ms
JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT has audio latency of 185 ms, higher audio latency than 68.2% of headphones and equal to 0.4% of headphones.
Multipoint support
What it is: Supports simultaneous connections to multiple devices
When it matters: When you switch often between a phone and a laptop during the day.

Importance: MEDIUM

yes
JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT supports multipoint. 35% of headphones support multipoint.
Show more
Ambient sound mode
What it is: Allows external sounds to pass through for awareness
When it matters: When you need to stay aware of traffic, voices, or announcements.

Importance: MEDIUM

N/A
EQ support
What it is: Allows customization of sound profile via equalizer
When it matters: When the stock tuning is not enough and you want to shape bass, mids, or treble to match your taste.

Importance: MEDIUM

yes
JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT supports EQ customization. 76.8% of headphones support EQ.
Companion app
What it is: Dedicated mobile app for customization and updates
When it matters: When software customization, updates, and extra controls matter.

Importance: MEDIUM

yes
JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT works with a companion app. 55.7% of headphones support companion apps.
Adjustable ANC levels
What it is: Allows adjustment of noise cancellation intensity levels
When it matters: When you move between quiet rooms, offices, streets, and public transport and do not want one ANC setting for every situation.

Importance: LOW

Good value: >=4

N/A
Voice assistant support
What it is: Compatible with voice assistants like Siri, Alexa, or Google Assistant
When it matters: When hands-free control is part of your daily routine.

Importance: LOW

yes
JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT supports voice assistants. 39.2% of headphones support voice assistants.
Show more
Battery life
What it is: Playback time on a single charge
When it matters: When you commute, travel, or work long shifts and do not want charging breaks to interrupt listening.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >45 hours

76 hours
JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT offers battery life of 76 hours, higher battery life than 91.4% of headphones and equal to 0.5% of headphones.
Battery life with ANC
What it is: Playback time with active noise cancellation enabled
When it matters: When you plan to keep noise cancellation on for most of the day.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >40 hours

N/A
Charging time
What it is: Time required for a full battery charge
When it matters: When you often need the headphones ready again after short breaks.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <=2 hours

2 hours
JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT needs 2 hours to charge, lower charging time than 48.5% of headphones and equal to 39.1% of headphones.
Quick charge
What it is: Provides quick playback time with short charging period
When it matters: When a short top-up needs to deliver useful playback before you leave.

Importance: MEDIUM

yes
JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT supports quick charge. 31% of headphones support quick charge.
Battery capacity
What it is: Total energy storage of the internal battery
When it matters: When you are estimating how much battery headroom the design may have before relying only on the official runtime claim.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=720 mAh

450 mAh
JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT has a battery capacity of 450 mAh, lower battery capacity than 65.9% of headphones and equal to 2.3% of headphones.
Show more
Brand name
What it is: The manufacturer or brand of the product.
When it matters: When you prefer a specific ecosystem, support network, or design philosophy.

Importance: MEDIUM

JBL
Form factor
What it is: Overall design type of the headphones (over-ear, on-ear, in-ear, etc.)
When it matters: When comfort, portability, and isolation depend on the overall headphone style.

Importance: HIGH

over-ear
Weight
What it is: Total weight of the headphones
When it matters: When long listening sessions make wearing comfort more important.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <150 g

157 g
JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT weighs 157 g, lighter than 68.1% of headphones and equal to 0.3% of headphones.
Acoustic design
What it is: Type of acoustic design (open-back, closed-back, semi-open)
When it matters: When you need the right balance of isolation, leakage, and soundstage.

Importance: HIGH

closed-back
Clamp force
What it is: Amount of clamping pressure applied to the head
When it matters: When comfort and fit security matter during long sessions.

Importance: MEDIUM

5.8
JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT has a clamp force of 5.8, higher clamp force than 82.1% of headphones and equal to 5.7% of headphones.
Show more

JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT vs the average headphone

  • EQ customization
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT supports EQ customization, the average headphone does not. 23.3% of headphones support EQ.
    What it is: Allows customization of sound profile via equalizer
    When it matters: When the stock tuning is not enough and you want to shape bass, mids, or treble to match your taste.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT supports EQ customization, the average headphone does not. 23.3% of headphones support EQ.
  • 46 hours longer battery life
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT has a higher battery life than the average headphone (76 hours vs 30 hours). The average headphones offer battery life of 30 hours.
    What it is: Playback time on a single charge
    When it matters: When you commute, travel, or work long shifts and do not want charging breaks to interrupt listening.

    Importance: HIGH

    Good value: >45 hours

    JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT has a higher battery life than the average headphone (76 hours vs 30 hours). The average headphones offer battery life of 30 hours.76 hours vs 30 hours
  • More flexible connectivity
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT offers more flexible connectivity than the average headphone (wireless vs wired). The average headphones support wired connectivity.
    supports both wireless and wired connectivity.
    What it is: Available connection methods (wired, wireless, Bluetooth, etc.)
    When it matters: When the headphones need to match how you listen across wired and wireless devices.

    Importance: HIGH

    JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT offers more flexible connectivity than the average headphone (wireless vs wired). The average headphones support wired connectivity.wireless vs wired
  • On-device controls
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT includes on-device controls, the average headphone does not. 46.8% of headphones support on-device controls.
    What it is: Physical controls available directly on headphones
    When it matters: When you need playback, volume, or call controls to be easy to reach without pulling out your phone.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT includes on-device controls, the average headphone does not. 46.8% of headphones support on-device controls.
  • 28% lower weight
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT is lighter than the average headphone (157 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
    What it is: Total weight of the headphones
    When it matters: When long listening sessions make wearing comfort more important.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    Good value: <150 g

    JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT is lighter than the average headphone (157 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.157 g vs 218 g
  • USB-C charging
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT uses USB-C charging, the average headphone does not. 29.4% of headphones use USB Type-C.
    What it is: Uses USB-C connector for charging or data
    When it matters: When you want to charge with the same cable family used by your phone, tablet, laptop, or other daily devices.

    Importance: LOW

    JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT uses USB-C charging, the average headphone does not. 29.4% of headphones use USB Type-C.
  • Sidetone support
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT supports sidetone, the average headphone does not. 29.7% of headphones support sidetone.
    What it is: Lets users hear their own voice during calls
    When it matters: When long calls matter and you do not want to sound unnaturally loud in your own ears while speaking.

    Importance: LOW

    JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT supports sidetone, the average headphone does not. 29.7% of headphones support sidetone.
  • Quick mic mute
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT includes a quick mic mute, the average headphone does not. 33.5% of headphones support a mute function.
    What it is: Ability to mute microphone during calls
    When it matters: When you need to silence the mic quickly during meetings or multiplayer games.

    Importance: LOW

    JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT includes a quick mic mute, the average headphone does not. 33.5% of headphones support a mute function.
  • 28% lower weight
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT is lighter than the average headphone (157 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
  • 46 hours longer battery life
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT has a higher battery life than the average headphone (76 hours vs 30 hours). The average headphones offer battery life of 30 hours.
  • USB-C charging
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT uses USB-C charging, the average headphone does not. 29.4% of headphones use USB Type-C.
  • Rechargeable battery
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT has a rechargeable battery, the average headphone does not. 47.9% of headphones have a rechargeable battery.
  • Play while charging
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT can play while charging, the average headphone cannot. 55.9% of headphones support play while charging.
  • More flexible connectivity
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT offers more flexible connectivity than the average headphone (wireless vs wired). The average headphones support wired connectivity.
  • On-device controls
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT includes on-device controls, the average headphone does not. 46.8% of headphones support on-device controls.
  • Sidetone support
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT supports sidetone, the average headphone does not. 29.7% of headphones support sidetone.
  • Quick mic mute
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT includes a quick mic mute, the average headphone does not. 33.5% of headphones support a mute function.
  • EQ customization
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT supports EQ customization, the average headphone does not. 23.3% of headphones support EQ.
  • 7 years newer release date
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT was released more recently than the average headphone (2,024 vs 2,017). The average headphones were released in 2,017.

Total
Overall
Design
Battery
Connectivity
Calls & Controls
Features
  • 1.5 higher clamp force
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT has a higher clamp force than the average headphone (5.8 vs 4.3). The average headphones have a clamp force of 4.3.
  • 6 mm tighter earcup height
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT has tighter earcup height than the average headphone (54 mm vs 60 mm). The average headphones offer an inner earcup height of 60 mm.
  • 11 mm tighter earcup width
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT has tighter earcup width than the average headphone (32 mm vs 43 mm). The average headphones offer an inner earcup width of 43 mm.
  • Tangle-prone cable
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT uses a tangle-prone cable, while the average headphone is easier to manage. 64.2% of headphones use a tangle-free cable.
    no tangle-free listening cable is present or specified.
  • No travel bag
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT does not include a travel bag, the average headphone does. 65.2% of headphones include a travel bag.
  • 7 mm smaller driver size
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT has smaller driver size than the average headphone (33 mm vs 40 mm). The average headphones use a driver size of 40 mm.
  • 2 Hz weaker bass extension
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT has a higher lowest frequency than the average headphone (20 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.
  • No neodymium magnet
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT does not use neodymium magnets, the average headphone does. 77.4% of headphones use neodymium magnets.
  • 15 dB lower max SPL
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT has a lower max SPL than the average headphone (95 dB vs 110 dB). The average headphones reach a max SPL of 110 dB.
  • 25% lower battery capacity
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT has a lower battery capacity than the average headphone (450 mAh vs 600 mAh). The average headphones have a battery capacity of 600 mAh.
  • 57.5 ms higher audio latency
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT has a higher audio latency than the average headphone (185 ms vs 127.5 ms). The average headphones have audio latency of 127.5 ms.
  • 7 mm smaller driver size
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT has smaller driver size than the average headphone (33 mm vs 40 mm). The average headphones use a driver size of 40 mm.
    What it is: Diameter of the speaker driver unit
    When it matters: When you want extra hardware context behind how the headphones may handle bass weight, scale, or overall presentation.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT has smaller driver size than the average headphone (33 mm vs 40 mm). The average headphones use a driver size of 40 mm.33 mm vs 40 mm
  • 57.5 ms higher audio latency
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT has a higher audio latency than the average headphone (185 ms vs 127.5 ms). The average headphones have audio latency of 127.5 ms.
    What it is: Delay between audio and video in wireless mode
    When it matters: When you watch video or play games and need sound to stay in sync.

    Importance: HIGH

    Good value: <60 ms

    JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT has a higher audio latency than the average headphone (185 ms vs 127.5 ms). The average headphones have audio latency of 127.5 ms.185 ms vs 127.5 ms
  • 2 Hz weaker bass extension
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT has a higher lowest frequency than the average headphone (20 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.
    What it is: Lowest audio frequency the headphones can reproduce
    When it matters: When deeper bass extension matters for your music or movie listening.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    Good value: <=10 Hz

    JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT has a higher lowest frequency than the average headphone (20 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.20 Hz vs 18 Hz
  • 1.5 higher clamp force
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT has a higher clamp force than the average headphone (5.8 vs 4.3). The average headphones have a clamp force of 4.3.
    What it is: Amount of clamping pressure applied to the head
    When it matters: When comfort and fit security matter during long sessions.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT has a higher clamp force than the average headphone (5.8 vs 4.3). The average headphones have a clamp force of 4.3.5.8 vs 4.3
  • 6 mm tighter earcup height
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT has tighter earcup height than the average headphone (54 mm vs 60 mm). The average headphones offer an inner earcup height of 60 mm.
    What it is: Internal height of the earcup cavity
    When it matters: When larger ears need enough space inside the earcups.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT has tighter earcup height than the average headphone (54 mm vs 60 mm). The average headphones offer an inner earcup height of 60 mm.54 mm vs 60 mm
  • 11 mm tighter earcup width
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT has tighter earcup width than the average headphone (32 mm vs 43 mm). The average headphones offer an inner earcup width of 43 mm.
    What it is: Internal width of the earcup cavity
    When it matters: When earcup fit affects comfort and pressure around your ears.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT has tighter earcup width than the average headphone (32 mm vs 43 mm). The average headphones offer an inner earcup width of 43 mm.32 mm vs 43 mm
  • 4.65x less popular
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT is less popular than the average headphone (1.00 vs 4.646).
    What it is: An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the headphones.
    When it matters: When you prefer headphones that have already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT is less popular than the average headphone (1.00 vs 4.646).1 vs 4.65
  • Tangle-prone cable
    JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT uses a tangle-prone cable, while the average headphone is easier to manage. 64.2% of headphones use a tangle-free cable.
    no tangle-free listening cable is present or specified.
    What it is: Cable designed to resist tangling
    When it matters: When you often carry wired headphones in a bag or pocket.

    Importance: LOW

    JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT uses a tangle-prone cable, while the average headphone is easier to manage. 64.2% of headphones use a tangle-free cable.
Total
Overall
Design
Sound
Battery
Connectivity

Graphic comparison of JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT and

Attribute category
Attribute
No results found

Third-party reviews

What customers like about JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT?

  • Exceptional battery life: Users report the 720BT (up to 76 hours) and 520BT (up to 57 hours) easily last several days or weeks of casual use.
  • Great value for money: Frequently highlighted as the best affordable options for average listeners.
  • Powerful bass: Both models feature JBL's 'Pure Bass' sound, which users find punchy and suitable for genres like pop and hip-hop.
  • App customisation: Access to the JBL Headphones app allows users to fine-tune audio with a parametric EQ.
  • Reliable connectivity: Multipoint Bluetooth 5.3 is praised for its stability and ability to switch seamlessly between two devices.
  • Portability: Both designs are lightweight and fold flat for easy travel storage.

What customers dislike about JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT?

  • Comfort issues: Many users find the clamping force too high, particularly for those with larger heads or who wear glasses.
  • No Active Noise Cancellation (ANC): Both models rely on passive isolation, which users note is poor for blocking out bus engines or loud office environments.
  • Build materials: The all-plastic construction is sometimes described as feeling cheap or less durable over time.
  • Inconsistent microphone: While functional for calls, some users report a 'boxy' or 'thin' sound quality in noisy environments.
  • Small ear cups: Users of the 720BT (over-ear) occasionally find the cups too small, leading to ear fatigue after an hour.

Expert reviews

C
consumerreports.org
N/A
JBL Tune 720BT Headphone Review - Consumer Reports Would you like a side-by-side feature comparison of these two models to see which one fits your bud...

The Consumer Reports review of the JBL Tune 720BT highlights "very good" sound quality with notable bass, supported by an impressive 76-hour battery life and decent passive noise isolation. However, the review identifies significant drawbacks, including a "boomy" bass, a "grainy" midrange, and limited comfort due to small earcups and heat buildup.

R
robbsutton.com
28/12/2025
JBL Tune 720BT Review: Wireless Comfort with Incredible Bass & 76H Battery

The JBL Tune 720BT is a mid-range pair of wireless over-ear headphones that delivers a strong balance of comfort and sound performance. Built with a lightweight, matte black foldable design and plush ear cushions, it provides a fatigue-free fit that is highly portable. For audio performance, the headphones feature Bluetooth 5.3 for steady multi-device connectivity alongside JBL Pure...Read more

T
techgearlab.com
12/12/2025
JBL Tune 720 BT Review | Tested & Rated - TechGearLab

The JBL Tune 720 BTGo wireless headphones are a mixed and generally uninspired budget offering that struggles to compete effectively with cheaper alternatives on the market. On the positive side, these headphones boast an exceptional, industry-leading battery life of 75 hours of continuous playback and deliver some of the clearest, crispest phone calls in their group, easily...Read more

T
techgadgetscanada.com
15/07/2024
JBL TUNE 520BT on-ear headphones review JBL Tune 720BT Reviews

The JBL Tune 520BT is a budget-friendly wireless on-ear headphone refresh that retails for $50 USD ($69 CAD). It features an all-plastic, lightweight, and foldable design with swiveling earcups and physical playback controls on the right side. Equipped with 33mm drivers and utilizing Bluetooth 5.3, the headphones deliver a surprisingly rich bass and balanced sound quality that...Read more

G
goughlui.com
01/09/2025
Review, Teardown: JBL Tune 520BT Wireless On-Ear Headphones

The JBL Tune 520BT is a budget-friendly set of wireless on-ear headphones that balances impressive battery performance with a "no-frills" feature set. A standout achievement in testing was its 60-hour and 39-minute runtime, which actually exceeded the advertised 57 hours, and its fast-charging capability provides three hours of play from just five minutes of power. Despite its 33mm...Read more

S
soundguys.com
30/12/2024
JBL Tune 520BT review: solid on-ears - SoundGuys

The JBL Tune 520BT wireless on-ear headphonesGo offer exceptional value, featuring a 60-plus hour battery life, robust audio quality, and modern features like Bluetooth Multipoint and app support. SoundGuys praises these budget headphones for high-scoring performance that rivals more expensive alternatives. However, the build quality relies on cheap, lightweight plastic, and the...Read more

R
rtings.com
27/05/2024
JBL Tune 520BT Headphones Review - RTINGS.com

The JBL Tune 520BT Wireless are budget-friendly, lightweight on-ear headphones featuring exceptional battery life, a balanced sound profile, and comprehensive app-based EQ customization. Their design includes practical physical controls and multi-device pairing for everyday, portable use. However, they lack Active Noise Cancellation (ANC), resulting in poor isolation, and suffer...Read more

T
testventure.de
20/03/2023
JBL Tune 720BT Bluetooth Headphones Review - Testventure

The JBL Tune 720BT is a budget-friendly pair of over-ear Bluetooth 5.3 headphones evaluated as a solid choice for entry-level users, earning a rating of 4.1 out of 5 stars. The reviewer highlighted its high-quality construction, comfortable ear padding that adapts well to the head, and a lightweight design of 220 grams. Its standout features are a phenomenal battery life of up to 76...Read more

(Translated)Show original
C
computerbild.de
22/07/2023
JBL Tune 720BT Review: The Best Over-Ear Headphones Under 100 Euros?

The JBL Tune 720BT over-ear headphones offer a budget-friendly audio option, delivering a comfortable, secure fit despite a slightly stiff faux-leather finish on the ear padding. It scores highly for usability due to an intuitive four-button physical control layout on the right ear cup and seamless integration with the comprehensive "JBL Headphones" smartphone app, which includes a...Read more

(Translated)Show original
T
testventure.de
18/07/2023
JBL Tune 520BT Review - Testventure

However, the headphones suffer from several noticeable drawbacks. The primary negative point is the poor microphone quality, which callers described as tinny, scratchy, and noisy, making the voice transmission fluctuate in volume. While the overall audio reproduction is good for the under €60 price point, the headphones lack high-end brilliance, sound slightly tinny at the top end,...Read more

(Translated)Show original
T
test-achats.be
2023 (Latest Update)
JBL TUNE 520BT Review - Testachats", "JBL TUNE 520BT Test - Testachats

The JBL TUNE 520BT is an on-ear wireless headphone weighing 158 grams that features Bluetooth 5.3 connectivity with multipoint support, allowing it to connect to two devices simultaneously. It is a highly budget-friendly option priced as low as €26.50 on online platforms like Amazon Belgium, Fnac, and MediaMarkt. While full laboratory scores for sound quality and battery life are...Read more

(Translated)Show original
L
lesnumeriques.com
26/08/2024
JBL Tune 720BT Review: Long Battery Life, But Lacking Precision", "JBL Tune 720BT Review: Durable, But Lacks Audio Accuracy

The JBL Tune 720BT is an entry-level wireless headset that receives a 3 out of 5 rating for offering exceptional battery life but very little innovation compared to its predecessor, the 710BT. On the positive side, the headset is incredibly user-friendly and features full physical button controls, Bluetooth 5.2 multipoint pairing, and highly responsive operation. It is also...Read more

(Translated)Show original
L
leclaireur.fnac.com
16/06/2023
JBL Tune 720BT Lab Test: An affordable and efficient headset

The JBL Tune 720BT is an affordable, entry-level wireless Bluetooth headphone marketed under €80, scoring 3 out of 5 stars in the Labo Fnac evaluation. The technical testing highlights a highly uneven audio performance that heavily prioritizes low frequencies at the expense of midrange and treble clarity. Specifically, the device earned a 7.4 out of 10 for frequency response and a 7...Read more

(Translated)Show original
L
leclaireur.fnac.com
06/06/2023
JBL Tune 520BT Review: Monster Battery Life and Solid Bass

The Labo Fnac review of the JBL Tune 520BT awards these budget wireless on-ear headphones a 3 out of 5-star rating, highlighting an exceptional battery life but a heavily colored sound profile. On the positive side, the lab measured a massive battery runtime of 55 hours and 10 minutes (close to JBL's 57-hour claim) and noted a quick-charge feature where a 5-minute charge yields 3...Read more

(Translated)Show original

Video reviews

Best alternatives

ugreen-hitune-max5c
Ugreen Hitune MAX5c

Headphones

8.3
beribes-wh305b
Beribes WH305b

Headphones

7.9
qcy-h3-lite
QCY H3 Lite

Headphones

7.9
eggel-live
Eggel Live

Headphones

7.9
boat-rockerz-512-anc
boAt Rockerz 512 ANC

Headphones

7.6
oraimo-boompop-n
Oraimo Boompop N

Headphones

7.5
boult-audio-anchor
Boult Audio Anchor

Headphones

7.0
energy-sistem-harmony-anc
Energy Sistem Harmony ANC

Headphones

6.9
boult-audio-fluid-x-pro
Boult Audio Fluid X Pro

Headphones

6.9
blaupunkt-bh61-moksha
Blaupunkt BH61 Moksha

Headphones

6.8
portronics-muff-m3
Portronics Muff M3

Headphones

6.8
anker-soundcore-life-2-neo
Anker Soundcore Life 2 Neo

Headphones

6.5

Compare JBL Tune 520BT Vs JBL Tune 720BT with

VS
VS

Compare