Scored using Headphones Methodology v1.0
Headphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Headphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Headphones Methodology v1.0

Focal Listen Review | 93 Data compared

Avg. price:~£180Form factor:over-earConnectivity:wirelessBattery life:20 hoursActive noise cancellation (ANC):no

Focal Listen Review: Compare 93 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Headphones category and whether it is worth buying.

Focal Listen
6.2/10

Overall score

Score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the headphones' quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best headphones on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

6.2

Technical score

20%

?

User score

▲Better than 50% of headphones
7.2

Value for money

Value for money
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the headphones' overall rating with their cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for headphones that offer a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.2

Overall score

30%

9.6

Price

▼Worse than 59%
6.2

Technical score

Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Headphones category across these key areas: Sound, Calls & Controls, Connectivity, Features, Battery, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

52%

7.1

Sound

20%

4.4

Features

10%

6.2

Design

8%

5.1

Connectivity

6%

4.6

Battery

4%

8.0

Calls & Controls

▲Better than 63%
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • focal-listen
focal-listen
Where to buy
    N/A~ £180
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of pair of headphones Focal Listen

Technical score
Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Headphones category across these key areas: Sound, Calls & Controls, Connectivity, Features, Battery, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

52%

7.1

Sound

20%

4.4

Features

10%

6.2

Design

8%

5.1

Connectivity

6%

4.6

Battery

4%

8.0

Calls & Controls

6.2
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you prefer headphones that have already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Focal Listen has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than that of 73.4% of products in this category.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the headphones' overall rating with their cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for headphones that offer a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

6.2

Overall score

30%

9.6

Price

7.2
Active noise cancellation (ANC)
no
This pair of headphones does not support active noise cancellation. 27.5% of headphones support active noise cancellation.
Driver type
dynamic
Driver size
40 mm
This pair of headphones uses a driver size of 40 mm, larger driver size than 28.6% of headphones and equal to 53.3% of headphones.
Number of drivers
1
This pair of headphones uses 1 drivers, fewer drivers than 4% of headphones and equal to 96% of headphones.
Lowest frequency
5 Hz
This pair of headphones reaches a lowest frequency of 5 Hz, lower lowest frequency than 86.3% of headphones and equal to 10.8% of headphones.
Show more
Noise-canceling microphone
yes
This pair of headphones supports a noise-canceling microphone. 61.1% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
Can be used as a headset
yes
This pair of headphones is headset-ready, 84.8% is not. 15.2% of headphones can be used as headsets.
Number of microphones
2
This pair of headphones has 2 microphones, more microphones than 77.9% of headphones and equal to 8.9% of headphones.
Boom microphone
no
This pair of headphones does not include a boom microphone. 13.5% of headphones have a boom microphone.
Microphone SNR
?
Show more
Connectivity
wireless
This pair of headphones supports wireless connectivity, more flexible connectivity than 50.8% of headphones and equal to 49.2% of headphones.
Bluetooth version
4.1
This pair of headphones uses Bluetooth version 4.1, newer Bluetooth version than 62.3% of headphones and equal to 5.4% of headphones.
Maximum Bluetooth range
15 m
This pair of headphones offers a Bluetooth range of 15 m, higher Bluetooth range than 84.9% of headphones and equal to 6.2% of headphones.
Audio latency
181 ms
This pair of headphones has audio latency of 181 ms, higher audio latency than 67.3% of headphones.
Multipoint support
no
This pair of headphones does not support multipoint. 30.6% of headphones support multipoint.
Show more
Ambient sound mode
no
This pair of headphones does not offer ambient sound mode. 24.9% of headphones support ambient sound mode.
EQ support
no
This pair of headphones does not support EQ customization. 23.2% of headphones support EQ.
Companion app
no
This pair of headphones does not work with a companion app. 21.6% of headphones support companion apps.
Adjustable ANC levels
N/A
Voice assistant support
yes
This pair of headphones supports voice assistants. 39.2% of headphones support voice assistants.
Show more
Battery life
20 hours
This pair of headphones offers battery life of 20 hours, lower battery life than 65.1% of headphones and equal to 8.3% of headphones.
Battery life with ANC
N/A
Charging time
3 hours
This pair of headphones needs 3 hours to charge, higher charging time than 66.7% of headphones and equal to 20.8% of headphones.
Quick charge
no
This pair of headphones does not support quick charging. 33.1% of headphones support quick charge.
Battery capacity
500 mAh
This pair of headphones has a battery capacity of 500 mAh, lower battery capacity than 55.3% of headphones and equal to 9.4% of headphones.
Show more
Brand name
Focal
Form factor
over-ear
Weight
281 g
This pair of headphones weighs 281 g, heavier than 74.5% of headphones and equal to 0.3% of headphones.
Acoustic design
closed-back
Clamp force
6
This pair of headphones has a clamp force of 6, higher clamp force than 88.7% of headphones and equal to 1.2% of headphones.
Show more

Focal Listen vs the average pair of headphones

246810TotalDesignSoundBatteryConnectivityCalls & ControlsFeatures
  • Hi-Res Audio certification
    This pair of headphones has Hi-Res Audio certification, the average pair of headphones does not. 23.1% of headphones are Hi-Res Audio certified.
  • 13 Hz lower bass extension
    This pair of headphones has a lower lowest frequency than the average pair of headphones (5 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.
    5 Hz vs 18 Hz
  • More flexible connectivity
    This pair of headphones offers more flexible connectivity than the average pair of headphones (wireless vs wired). The average headphones support wired connectivity.
    wireless vs wired
  • Clear call microphone
    This pair of headphones offers a clear call microphone, while the average pair of headphones does not. 39% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
  • In-line controls
    This pair of headphones includes in-line controls, the average pair of headphones does not. 36.6% of headphones support in-line controls.
  • 5 dB/mW higher sensitivity
    This pair of headphones has a higher sensitivity than the average pair of headphones (107 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW). The average headphones have sensitivity of 102 dB/mW.
    107 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW
  • 5 m longer Bluetooth range
    This pair of headphones has a higher Bluetooth range than the average pair of headphones (15 m vs 10 m). The average headphones offer a Bluetooth range of 10 m.
    15 m vs 10 m
  • Foldable design
    This pair of headphones has a foldable design, the average pair of headphones does not. 48.3% of headphones are foldable.
  • Foldable design
    This pair of headphones has a foldable design, the average pair of headphones does not. 48.3% of headphones are foldable.
  • Hi-Res Audio certification
    This pair of headphones has Hi-Res Audio certification, the average pair of headphones does not. 23.1% of headphones are Hi-Res Audio certified.
  • 13 Hz lower bass extension
    This pair of headphones has a lower lowest frequency than the average pair of headphones (5 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.
    5 Hz vs 18 Hz
  • 5 dB/mW higher sensitivity
    This pair of headphones has a higher sensitivity than the average pair of headphones (107 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW). The average headphones have sensitivity of 102 dB/mW.
    107 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW
  • 19 dB SPL higher sound pressure level
    This pair of headphones has a higher sound pressure level than the average pair of headphones (122 dB SPL vs 103 dB SPL). The average headphones reach a sound pressure level of 103 dB SPL.
    122 dB SPL vs 103 dB SPL
  • 2,000 Hz higher treble extension
    This pair of headphones has a higher highest frequency than the average pair of headphones (22,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz). The average headphones reach a highest frequency of 20,000 Hz.
    22,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz
  • 12 dB higher max SPL
    This pair of headphones has a higher max SPL than the average pair of headphones (122 dB vs 110 dB). The average headphones reach a max SPL of 110 dB.
    122 dB vs 110 dB
  • Play while charging
    This pair of headphones can play while charging, the average pair of headphones cannot. 29.1% of headphones support play while charging.
  • Rechargeable battery
    This pair of headphones has a rechargeable battery, the average pair of headphones does not. 47.9% of headphones have a rechargeable battery.
  • More flexible connectivity
    This pair of headphones offers more flexible connectivity than the average pair of headphones (wireless vs wired). The average headphones support wired connectivity.
    wireless vs wired
  • 5 m longer Bluetooth range
    This pair of headphones has a higher Bluetooth range than the average pair of headphones (15 m vs 10 m). The average headphones offer a Bluetooth range of 10 m.
    15 m vs 10 m
  • NFC pairing
    This pair of headphones supports NFC pairing, the average pair of headphones does not. 11.7% of headphones support NFC pairing.
  • AptX support
    This pair of headphones supports aptX, the average pair of headphones does not. 18.4% of headphones support aptX.
  • Multipoint connections
    This pair of headphones supports multipoint connections, while the average pair of headphones does not. 30.2% of headphones support multipoint connections.
    supports multipoint for up to 2 devices.
  • Clear call microphone
    This pair of headphones offers a clear call microphone, while the average pair of headphones does not. 39% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
  • In-line controls
    This pair of headphones includes in-line controls, the average pair of headphones does not. 36.6% of headphones support in-line controls.
  • 1 more microphones
    This pair of headphones has more microphones than the average pair of headphones (2 vs 1). The average headphones have 1 microphones.
    2 vs 1
  • 1 hours longer charging time
    This pair of headphones has a higher charging time than the average pair of headphones (3 hours vs 2 hours). The average headphones need 2 hours to charge.
    3 hours vs 2 hours
  • 28.9% higher weight
    This pair of headphones is heavier than the average pair of headphones (281 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
    281 g vs 218 g
  • 1.7 higher clamp force
    This pair of headphones has a higher clamp force than the average pair of headphones (6 vs 4.3). The average headphones have a clamp force of 4.3.
    6 vs 4.3
  • 10 hours shorter battery life
    This pair of headphones has a lower battery life than the average pair of headphones (20 hours vs 30 hours). The average headphones offer battery life of 30 hours.
    20 hours vs 30 hours
  • 31 ms higher audio latency
    This pair of headphones has a higher audio latency than the average pair of headphones (181 ms vs 150 ms). The average headphones have audio latency of 150 ms.
    181 ms vs 150 ms
  • 5.87x less popular
    Focal Listen is less popular than the average pair of headphones (1 vs 5.9).
    1 vs 5.87
  • 6 mm tighter earcup width
    This pair of headphones has tighter earcup width than the average pair of headphones (38 mm vs 44 mm). The average headphones offer an inner earcup width of 44 mm.
    38 mm vs 44 mm
  • 4 mm tighter earcup height
    This pair of headphones has tighter earcup height than the average pair of headphones (56 mm vs 60 mm). The average headphones offer an inner earcup height of 60 mm.
    56 mm vs 60 mm
  • 5.87x less popular
    Focal Listen is less popular than the average pair of headphones (1 vs 5.9).
    1 vs 5.87
  • 2x more expensive
    Focal Listen is more expensive than the average pair of headphones (£180 vs £90).
    £180 vs £90
  • 28.9% higher weight
    This pair of headphones is heavier than the average pair of headphones (281 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
    281 g vs 218 g
  • 1.7 higher clamp force
    This pair of headphones has a higher clamp force than the average pair of headphones (6 vs 4.3). The average headphones have a clamp force of 4.3.
    6 vs 4.3
  • 6 mm tighter earcup width
    This pair of headphones has tighter earcup width than the average pair of headphones (38 mm vs 44 mm). The average headphones offer an inner earcup width of 44 mm.
    38 mm vs 44 mm
  • 4 mm tighter earcup height
    This pair of headphones has tighter earcup height than the average pair of headphones (56 mm vs 60 mm). The average headphones offer an inner earcup height of 60 mm.
    56 mm vs 60 mm
  • 1 hours longer charging time
    This pair of headphones has a higher charging time than the average pair of headphones (3 hours vs 2 hours). The average headphones need 2 hours to charge.
    3 hours vs 2 hours
  • 10 hours shorter battery life
    This pair of headphones has a lower battery life than the average pair of headphones (20 hours vs 30 hours). The average headphones offer battery life of 30 hours.
    20 hours vs 30 hours
  • 13.8% lower battery capacity
    This pair of headphones has a lower battery capacity than the average pair of headphones (500 mAh vs 580 mAh). The average headphones have a battery capacity of 580 mAh.
    500 mAh vs 580 mAh
  • 31 ms higher audio latency
    This pair of headphones has a higher audio latency than the average pair of headphones (181 ms vs 150 ms). The average headphones have audio latency of 150 ms.
    181 ms vs 150 ms

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
Booredatwork.com
≈ estimated
20/06/2016
Hands-on review · sound, build and design
Verdict
Focal Listen is recommended for its clear sound, premium build and looks, with a few small drawbacks.
9.0
WhatGear
≈ estimated
29/05/2017
Short review · sound, comfort and design
Verdict
Focal Listen delivers good all-round sound, a comfortable fit and a premium feel for everyday listening.
Shop video
Overview video

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

techradar.com
08/07/2016
Hands-on review · Over-ear headphones
Verdict
The Focal Listen is a balanced, well-built headphone with great isolation and a spacious sound, though its rubber headband gets uncomfortable after a few hours.
whathifi.com
02/03/2017
Hands-on review · Portable over-ear headphones
Verdict
The Focal Listen is a sensible pick for commuting, with detailed, smooth sound and strong volume, though it lacks some punch and aggression.
headphone.guru
28/11/2017
Hands-on review · Over-ear headphones
Verdict
The Focal Listen is a comfortable, lightweight headphone with a smooth, wide sound that suits on-the-go listening, though its treble drops off early.
uk.pcmag.com
24/06/2016
Hands-on test · Over-ear headphones
Verdict
The Focal Listen suits audiophiles who want balanced, accurate sound and comfort on long sessions, but bass lovers will want more punch.
soundguys.com
15/06/2016
Hands-on test · Closed-back headphones
Verdict
The Focal Listen sounds great, with good bass and isolation for commuters, but its plain look and awkward cable let it down.
pcmag.com
24/06/2016
Listening test · Over-ear headphones
Verdict
The Focal Listen is a balanced, accurate over-ear pair that suits audiophiles, though bass lovers will want a punchier sound.
majorhifi.com
13/09/2016
Listening test · Mobile headphones
Verdict
The Focal Listen is a comfortable, well-built mobile headphone with a bright, detailed sound, but bass fans will find it lacking.
headfonia.com
19/10/2017
Listening review · Mobile headphones
Verdict
The Focal Listen is an easy-to-drive mobile headphone with a relaxed, enjoyable sound and a wide stage, but it isn't very detailed.
soundandvision.com
31/03/2018
Listening review · Over-ear headphones
Verdict
The Focal Listen is a light, well-isolated over-ear pair with plentiful bass, though it can sound too bright on harsh recordings.
digitaltrends.com
04/08/2016
Listening test · Balanced over-ears
Verdict
The Focal Listen is a balanced, comfortable over-ear pair that handles hip-hop, pop and orchestral music evenly, but it has no volume control.
lesnumeriques.com
29/09/2016
Lab test · Portable closed-back headphones
Verdict
The Focal Listen has surprisingly faithful bass and a wide stereo stage with very good passive isolation, but its headband is less comfortable and it lacks volume control.
L
leclaireur.fnac.com
29/11/2016
Summary of the review
diisign.com
29/11/2016
Hands-on review · Wired portable headphones
Verdict
The Focal Listen is a neutral, detailed wired commuter headphone that is hard to beat at its price if sound quality comes first.
johncouscous.com
08/12/2016
Hands-on review · Portable headphones
Verdict
The Focal Listen is a good travel headphone, with precise sound, strong noise isolation on the metro and a sturdy build, though its plastic finish scratches easily.
L
lesnumeriques.com
21/09/2017
Summary of the review
L
leclaireur.fnac.com
28/01/2018
Summary of the review
O
on-mag.fr
26/02/2018
Summary of the review
A
audioduvillage.fr
29/11/2018
Summary of the review
maison-et-domotique.com
30/11/2016
Hands-on review · Portable headphones
Verdict
The Focal Listen is a comfortable, well-balanced portable headphone with natural bass, though its rigid headband can squeeze large heads.
T
thmmagazine.fr
16/11/2016
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Focal Listen

  • Balanced and natural sound signature with impressive vocal clarity
  • Excellent passive noise isolation for closed-back headphones
  • Durable, sturdy build quality featuring a flexible headband
  • Great spatial imaging and soundstage for a closed-back design
  • Replaceable, detachable cables included in the package
  • High sensitivity makes them easy to drive from mobile devices

What customers don't like about Focal Listen

  • High clamping force can feel too tight or cause discomfort during long sessions
  • Lack of sufficient padding on the headband can lead to pressure on the scalp
  • W-shaped frequency response may result in slightly piercing or sibilant highs
  • Bass may feel restrained or lack 'impact' for listeners who prefer heavy low-end
  • Awkward placement of the inline remote/microphone module on the cable
  • Ear pads may be too small for users with larger-than-average ears

Verdict

The Focal Listen is a premium closed-back headphone designed for mobility, featuring 40mm Mylar/Titanium drivers that deliver a balanced and dynamic sound signature with a frequency response of 5Hz to 22kHz. It is highly efficient for portable use with a 32-ohm impedance and 122dB sensitivity, ensuring high volume levels even from smartphones. Key characteristics include 22mm thick heat-sensitive memory foam ear cushions for superior passive isolation and a foldable, lightweight design (approximately 10 oz) for easy travel. Main pros consist of exceptional vocal clarity, impressive stereo separation for a closed-back model, and a robust build quality that withstands daily wear. However, some users report cons such as a high initial clamping force that may cause discomfort during long sessions, ear pads that run small for those with larger ears, and a slight lack of high-frequency detail compared to open-back alternatives.

Compare Focal Listen with other products in the Headphones category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Focal Listen and other products in the Headphones category

No results found