OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Headphones Methodology v1.0
Headphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Headphones Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Headphones Methodology v1.0

Beyerdynamic DJ 300 Pro X Club Review | 93 Data compared

Avg. price:~£160Form factor:on-ear/over-earConnectivity:wiredBattery life:N/A hoursActive noise cancellation (ANC):no

Beyerdynamic DJ 300 Pro X Club Review: Compare 93 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Headphones category and whether it is worth buying.

6.0

Overall score

Score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the headphones' quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best headphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
Score components

80%

5.7

Technical score

20%

7.3

User score

â–¼Worse than 59% of headphones
5.7

Technical score

Technical score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Headphones category across these key areas: Sound, Calls & Controls, Connectivity, Features, Battery, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
Score components

52%

6.8

Sound

20%

4.0

Features

10%

6.4

Design

8%

4.6

Connectivity

6%

4.0

Battery

4%

3.8

Calls & Controls

â–¼Worse than 59% of headphones
7.3

User score

User score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
Score components

70%

8.6

User ratings

30%

4.2

Number of reviews

Based on 42 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 80% of headphones
  • beyerdynamic-dj-300-pro-x-club
  • beyerdynamic-dj-300-pro-x-club
  • beyerdynamic-dj-300-pro-x-club
  • beyerdynamic-dj-300-pro-x-club
  • beyerdynamic-dj-300-pro-x-club
  • beyerdynamic-dj-300-pro-x-club
  • beyerdynamic-dj-300-pro-x-club
  • beyerdynamic-dj-300-pro-x-club
  • beyerdynamic-dj-300-pro-x-club
beyerdynamic-dj-300-pro-x-club
beyerdynamic-dj-300-pro-x-club
beyerdynamic-dj-300-pro-x-club
beyerdynamic-dj-300-pro-x-club
beyerdynamic-dj-300-pro-x-club
beyerdynamic-dj-300-pro-x-club
beyerdynamic-dj-300-pro-x-club
beyerdynamic-dj-300-pro-x-club
beyerdynamic-dj-300-pro-x-club

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of pair of headphones Beyerdynamic DJ 300 Pro X Club

Technical score
Technical score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Headphones category across these key areas: Sound, Calls & Controls, Connectivity, Features, Battery, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
Score components:

52%

6.8

Sound

20%

4.0

Features

10%

6.4

Design

8%

4.6

Connectivity

6%

4.0

Battery

4%

3.8

Calls & Controls

5.7
User score
User score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
Score components

70%

8.6

User ratings

30%

4.2

Number of reviews

Based on 42 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.3
Popularity
Popularity
4.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you prefer headphones that have already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Popularity:
Beyerdynamic DJ 300 Pro X Club has a popularity score of 4.2 points, which is lower than that of 64.6% of products in this category.
4.2
Value for money
Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the headphones' overall rating with their cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for headphones that offer a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
Score components:

60%

6.0

Overall score

40%

9.7

Price

7.1
Active noise cancellation (ANC)
no
Active noise cancellation (ANC)
no
â–¼ Worse than 27% of models
This pair of headphones does not support active noise cancellation. 27.5% of headphones support active noise cancellation.
Driver type
dynamic
Driver size
45 mm
Driver size
45 mm
â–² Better than 84% of models
Market range: <10 mm – >50 mm
This pair of headphones uses a driver size of 45 mm, larger driver size than 83.7% of headphones and equal to 2.4% of headphones.
Number of drivers
1
Number of drivers
1
â–¼ Worse than 4% of models
Market range: <1 – >4
This pair of headphones uses 1 drivers, fewer drivers than 4% of headphones and equal to 96% of headphones.
Lowest frequency
5 Hz
Lowest frequency
5 Hz
â–² Better than 86% of models
Market range: <5 Hz – >20 Hz
This pair of headphones reaches a lowest frequency of 5 Hz, lower lowest frequency than 86.3% of headphones and equal to 10.8% of headphones.
Show more
Noise-canceling microphone
no
Noise-canceling microphone
no
â–¼ Worse than 39% of models
This pair of headphones does not support a noise-canceling microphone. 39% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
Can be used as a headset
no
Can be used as a headset
no
â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
This pair of headphones is not headset-ready, while 15.1% is. 84.9% of headphones can be used as headsets.
Number of microphones
0
Number of microphones
0
â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
Market range: <0 – >4
This pair of headphones has 0 microphones, fewer microphones than 73.2% of headphones and equal to 26.9% of headphones.
Boom microphone
no
Boom microphone
no
â–¼ Worse than 14% of models
This pair of headphones does not include a boom microphone. 13.5% of headphones have a boom microphone.
Microphone SNR
N/A
Show more
Connectivity
wired
Connectivity
wired
â–¼ Worse than 49% of models
This pair of headphones supports wired connectivity, less flexible connectivity than 49.2% of headphones and equal to 50.8% of headphones.
Bluetooth version
N/A
Maximum Bluetooth range
N/A
Audio latency
N/A
Multipoint support
no
Multipoint support
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This pair of headphones does not support multipoint. 30.6% of headphones support multipoint.
Show more
Ambient sound mode
no
Ambient sound mode
no
â–¼ Worse than 25% of models
This pair of headphones does not offer ambient sound mode. 24.9% of headphones support ambient sound mode.
EQ support
no
EQ support
no
â–¼ Worse than 23% of models
This pair of headphones does not support EQ customization. 23.2% of headphones support EQ.
Companion app
no
Companion app
no
â–¼ Worse than 22% of models
This pair of headphones does not work with a companion app. 21.6% of headphones support companion apps.
Adjustable ANC levels
N/A
Voice assistant support
no
Voice assistant support
no
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
This pair of headphones does not support voice assistants. 60.9% of headphones support voice assistants.
Show more
Battery life
N/A
Battery life with ANC
N/A
Charging time
N/A
Quick charge
no
Quick charge
no
â–¼ Worse than 33% of models
This pair of headphones does not support quick charging. 33.1% of headphones support quick charge.
Battery capacity
N/A
Show more
Brand name
Beyerdynamic
Form factor
on-ear/over-ear
Weight
288 g
Weight
288 g
â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
Market range: <14 g – >340 g
This pair of headphones weighs 288 g, heavier than 76.9% of headphones and equal to 0.3% of headphones.
Acoustic design
closed-back
Clamp force
6
Clamp force
6
â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
Market range: <2.5 – >6.1
This pair of headphones has a clamp force of 6, higher clamp force than 88.7% of headphones and equal to 1.2% of headphones.
Show more

Beyerdynamic DJ 300 Pro X Club vs the average pair of headphones

246810TotalDesignSoundBatteryConnectivityCalls & ControlsFeatures
  • 13 Hz lower bass extension
    Lowest frequency
    5 Hz
    â–² Better than 86% of models
    Market range: <5 Hz – >20 Hz
    This pair of headphones has a lower lowest frequency than the average pair of headphones (5 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.
    5 Hz vs 18 Hz
  • 5 mm larger driver size
    Driver size
    45 mm
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <10 mm – >50 mm
    This pair of headphones uses a larger driver size than the average pair of headphones (45 mm vs 40 mm). The average headphones use a driver size of 40 mm.
    45 mm vs 40 mm
  • 13 dB/mW higher sensitivity
    Sensitivity
    115 dB/mW
    â–² Better than 89% of models
    Market range: <94 dB/mW – >115 dB/mW
    This pair of headphones has a higher sensitivity than the average pair of headphones (115 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW). The average headphones have sensitivity of 102 dB/mW.
    115 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW
  • 0.25 % lower distortion
    THD (Total Harmonic Distortion)
    0.05 %
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    Market range: <0.08 % – >3 %
    This pair of headphones has a lower total harmonic distortion than the average pair of headphones (0.1 % vs 0.3 %). The average headphones have total harmonic distortion of 0.3 %.
    0.05 % vs 0.3 %
  • 15,000 Hz higher treble extension
    Highest frequency
    35,000 Hz
    â–² Better than 81% of models
    Market range: <20k Hz – >40k Hz
    This pair of headphones has a higher highest frequency than the average pair of headphones (35000 Hz vs 20000 Hz). The average headphones reach a highest frequency of 20000 Hz.
    35,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz
  • Direct 3.5 mm plug
    Has a 3.5mm male connector
    yes
    â–² Better than 60% of models
    This pair of headphones includes a direct 3.5 mm plug, the average pair of headphones does not. 39.8% of headphones have a 3.5 mm male connector.
  • Foldable design
    Foldable
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This pair of headphones has a foldable design, the average pair of headphones does not. 48.3% of headphones are foldable.
  • Dj-focused design
    Designed for DJ use
    yes
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    This pair of headphones is designed for DJ use, the average pair of headphones is not. 2.9% of headphones are designed for DJ use.
    Explicit DJ-oriented model or product line.
  • Foldable design
    Foldable
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This pair of headphones has a foldable design, the average pair of headphones does not. 48.3% of headphones are foldable.
  • Dj-focused design
    Designed for DJ use
    yes
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    This pair of headphones is designed for DJ use, the average pair of headphones is not. 2.9% of headphones are designed for DJ use.
    Explicit DJ-oriented model or product line.
  • 13 Hz lower bass extension
    Lowest frequency
    5 Hz
    â–² Better than 86% of models
    Market range: <5 Hz – >20 Hz
    This pair of headphones has a lower lowest frequency than the average pair of headphones (5 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.
    5 Hz vs 18 Hz
  • 5 mm larger driver size
    Driver size
    45 mm
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <10 mm – >50 mm
    This pair of headphones uses a larger driver size than the average pair of headphones (45 mm vs 40 mm). The average headphones use a driver size of 40 mm.
    45 mm vs 40 mm
  • 13 dB/mW higher sensitivity
    Sensitivity
    115 dB/mW
    â–² Better than 89% of models
    Market range: <94 dB/mW – >115 dB/mW
    This pair of headphones has a higher sensitivity than the average pair of headphones (115 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW). The average headphones have sensitivity of 102 dB/mW.
    115 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW
  • 0.25 % lower distortion
    THD (Total Harmonic Distortion)
    0.05 %
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    Market range: <0.08 % – >3 %
    This pair of headphones has a lower total harmonic distortion than the average pair of headphones (0.1 % vs 0.3 %). The average headphones have total harmonic distortion of 0.3 %.
    0.05 % vs 0.3 %
  • 15,000 Hz higher treble extension
    Highest frequency
    35,000 Hz
    â–² Better than 81% of models
    Market range: <20k Hz – >40k Hz
    This pair of headphones has a higher highest frequency than the average pair of headphones (35000 Hz vs 20000 Hz). The average headphones reach a highest frequency of 20000 Hz.
    35,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz
  • 12 dB SPL higher sound pressure level
    Sound pressure level
    115 dB SPL
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    Market range: <94 dB SPL – >115 dB SPL
    This pair of headphones has a higher sound pressure level than the average pair of headphones (115 dB SPL vs 103 dB SPL). The average headphones reach a sound pressure level of 103 dB SPL.
    115 dB SPL vs 103 dB SPL
  • 12 dB higher max SPL
    Max SPL
    122 dB
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <95 dB – >126 dB
    This pair of headphones has a higher max SPL than the average pair of headphones (122 dB vs 110 dB). The average headphones reach a max SPL of 110 dB.
    122 dB vs 110 dB
  • Direct 3.5 mm plug
    Has a 3.5mm male connector
    yes
    â–² Better than 60% of models
    This pair of headphones includes a direct 3.5 mm plug, the average pair of headphones does not. 39.8% of headphones have a 3.5 mm male connector.
  • 9 newer release date
    Release date
    2025
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This pair of headphones was released more recently than the average pair of headphones (2025 vs 2016). The average headphones were released in 2016.
    October 2025
    2025 vs 2016
  • No voice assistant support
    Voice assistant support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This pair of headphones does not support voice assistants, the average pair of headphones does. 60.8% of headphones support voice assistants.
  • 32.1% higher weight
    Weight
    288 g
    â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
    Market range: <14 g – >340 g
    This pair of headphones is heavier than the average pair of headphones (288 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
    288 g vs 218 g
  • Not headset-ready
    Can be used as a headset
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    This pair of headphones is not headset-ready, while the average pair of headphones is. 84.8% of headphones can be used as headsets.
  • 1.7 higher clamp force
    Clamp force
    6
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <2.5 – >6.1
    This pair of headphones has a higher clamp force than the average pair of headphones (6 vs 4.3). The average headphones have a clamp force of 4.3.
    6 vs 4.3
  • No battery indicator
    Battery level indicator
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This pair of headphones does not show battery level clearly, while the average pair of headphones does. 56.3% of headphones have a battery level indicator.
  • 1 fewer microphones
    Number of microphones
    0
    â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
    Market range: <0 – >4
    This pair of headphones has fewer microphones than the average pair of headphones (0 vs 1). The average headphones have 1 microphones.
    0 vs 1
  • 10% lower user score
    User score
    7.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Beyerdynamic DJ 300 Pro X Club
    the average pair of headphones
    Beyerdynamic DJ 300 Pro X Club has a lower user score than the average pair of headphones (7.27 vs 8.000).
    7.27 vs 8
  • 77.8% more expensive
    Beyerdynamic DJ 300 Pro X Club is more expensive than the average pair of headphones (£160 vs £90).
    £160 vs £90
  • 10% lower user score
    User score
    7.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Beyerdynamic DJ 300 Pro X Club
    the average pair of headphones
    Beyerdynamic DJ 300 Pro X Club has a lower user score than the average pair of headphones (7.27 vs 8.000).
    7.27 vs 8
  • 77.8% more expensive
    Beyerdynamic DJ 300 Pro X Club is more expensive than the average pair of headphones (£160 vs £90).
    £160 vs £90
  • 40.9% less popular
    Beyerdynamic DJ 300 Pro X Club is less popular than the average pair of headphones (4.17 vs 5.9).
    4.17 vs 5.87
  • 1.9% worse value for money
    Beyerdynamic DJ 300 Pro X Club has worse value for money than the average pair of headphones (7.13 vs 7.3).
    7.13 vs 7.27
  • 32.1% higher weight
    Weight
    288 g
    â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
    Market range: <14 g – >340 g
    This pair of headphones is heavier than the average pair of headphones (288 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
    288 g vs 218 g
  • 1.7 higher clamp force
    Clamp force
    6
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <2.5 – >6.1
    This pair of headphones has a higher clamp force than the average pair of headphones (6 vs 4.3). The average headphones have a clamp force of 4.3.
    6 vs 4.3
  • No battery indicator
    Battery level indicator
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This pair of headphones does not show battery level clearly, while the average pair of headphones does. 56.3% of headphones have a battery level indicator.
  • Not headset-ready
    Can be used as a headset
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    This pair of headphones is not headset-ready, while the average pair of headphones is. 84.8% of headphones can be used as headsets.
  • 1 fewer microphones
    Number of microphones
    0
    â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
    Market range: <0 – >4
    This pair of headphones has fewer microphones than the average pair of headphones (0 vs 1). The average headphones have 1 microphones.
    0 vs 1
  • No voice assistant support
    Voice assistant support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This pair of headphones does not support voice assistants, the average pair of headphones does. 60.8% of headphones support voice assistants.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

H
headphonecheck.com
17/02/2026
Summary of the review
Beyerdynamic DJ 300 PRO X Review - headphonecheck.com
H
happymag.tv
17/03/2026
Summary of the review
Beyerdynamic DJ 300 PRO X Club review - Happy Mag
K
kopfhoerer.de
15/04/2026
Summary of the review
Beyerdynamic DT 300 PRO X Review
(Translated)Show original
S
soundandgo.com
18/02/2026
Summary of the review
beyerdynamic DJ 300 PRO X Review – 2-in-1 DJ Headphones Test
(Translated)Show original
F
fazemag.de
02/01/2026
Summary of the review
Review: Beyerdynamic DJ 300 Pro X – Are you more of an over-ear or on-ear person?", "Test: Beyerdynamic DJ 300 Pro X – Do you prefer over-ear or on-ea...
(Translated)Show original
P
profesionaldj.es
06/02/2026
Summary of the review
beyerdynamic dj 300 pro x club - Headphones - Professional DJ
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on 42 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Beyerdynamic DJ 300 Pro X Club

  • Versatile 2-in-1 design allows easy switching between on-ear and over-ear configurations
  • Durable and robust modular construction with many user-replaceable parts (pads, headband, cables)
  • Punchy and deep bass response specifically tuned for electronic music and DJ monitoring
  • Strong passive noise isolation, making them effective for loud club environments
  • Dual-sided connectivity allows the locking cable to be plugged into either the left or right earcup
  • Accurate spatial imaging and detail retrieval suitable for studio production work
  • Lightweight build (approx. 300g) relative to its professional durability

What we don't like about Beyerdynamic DJ 300 Pro X Club

  • High clamping force can cause discomfort or ear fatigue during extended listening sessions
  • Premium price point is considered high compared to established competitors like the Sennheiser HD-25
  • Sound signature is less ideal for non-electronic genres, specifically rock and metal
  • Some users find the upper-mids/highs to be overly assertive or 'crispy' in certain tracks
  • On-ear configuration is reported to be noticeably less comfortable than the over-ear mode
  • Lack of active noise cancellation (ANC) and Bluetooth, which may limit appeal for casual users

Verdict

The Beyerdynamic DJ 300 PRO X CLUB is a versatile 2-in-1 professional DJ headphone system featuring a modular design that allows for rapid switching between on-ear and over-ear configurations. It is equipped with custom 45 mm dynamic drivers that deliver a powerful frequency response of 5 Hz to 35,000 Hz, achieving a maximum SPL of 122 dB in on-ear mode for high-volume club environments and 117 dB in over-ear mode for focused studio work. Key characteristics include a 48 Ω nominal impedance, a 1.5 m detachable lockable cable that connects to either earcup, and a robust foldable frame with customizable silver forks. Main pros include its exceptional modularity with replaceable components for long-term sustainability, impressive passive noise isolation of 20 dB, and detailed, distortion-free sound reproduction. Potential cons include a substantial clamping force of 6–7 N that may cause discomfort during extended sessions, and the lack of active noise cancellation.

Compare Beyerdynamic DJ 300 Pro X Club with other products in the Headphones category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Beyerdynamic DJ 300 Pro X Club and other products in the Headphones category

No results found