OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Gamingpro Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£660VRAM:8 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):290 W

Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Gamingpro Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Gamingpro
7.0/10

Overall score

Score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
Score components

90%

6.9

Technical score

10%

8.2

User score

â–¼Worse than 52% of graphics cards
7.0

Value for money

Value for money
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
Score components

70%

7.0

Overall score

30%

7.0

Price

â–¼Worse than 62%
6.9

Technical score

Technical score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
Score components

44%

5.9

Performance

24%

6.2

Memory

12%

8.0

Power & Cooling

11%

9.5

Platform & Features

5%

7.8

Design

4%

9.2

Connectivity & Media

â–¼Worse than 52%
8.2

User score

User score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 64% of models
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

6.8

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–²Better than 64%
  • palit-geforce-rtx-3070-ti-gamingpro
  • palit-geforce-rtx-3070-ti-gamingpro
  • palit-geforce-rtx-3070-ti-gamingpro
  • palit-geforce-rtx-3070-ti-gamingpro
palit-geforce-rtx-3070-ti-gamingpro
palit-geforce-rtx-3070-ti-gamingpro
palit-geforce-rtx-3070-ti-gamingpro
palit-geforce-rtx-3070-ti-gamingpro
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Gamingpro

Technical score
Technical score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
Score components:

44%

5.9

Performance

24%

6.2

Memory

12%

8.0

Power & Cooling

11%

9.5

Platform & Features

5%

7.8

Design

4%

9.2

Connectivity & Media

6.9
User score
User score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 64% of models
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

6.8

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.2
Popularity
Popularity
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 64% of models
Popularity:
Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Gamingpro has a popularity score of 6.8 points, which is higher than that of 64.1% of products in this category.
6.8
Value for money
Value for money
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
Score components:

70%

7.0

Overall score

30%

7.0

Price

7.0
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
14,900 points
Market range: <4k points – >34k points
This graphics card scores 14,900 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is higher than 51.1% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
8,780 points
Market range: <0 points – >25k points
This graphics card scores 8,780 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 51.8% of graphics cards and equal to 0.3% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
22,492 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 22,492 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 53.6% of graphics cards and equal to 0.3% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
11,101 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 11,101 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 56.4% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
?
Show more
VRAM
8 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 8 GB of VRAM, which is less than 57.5% of graphics cards and equal to 25.1% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6X
GDDR version
GDDR6X
This graphics card uses GDDR6X memory, which is newer than on 56.7% of graphics cards and equal to 22.7% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
Market range: <64 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 49.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.9% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
608 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 608 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 63.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.5% of graphics cards and equal to 47.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
16.2 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 16.2 Gbps, which is slower than on 58.4% of graphics cards and equal to 2% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
290 W
Market range: <60 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 290 W, which is higher than that of 70.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.6% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
289 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card draws 289 W under peak load, which is higher than 68.9% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
750 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 750 W PSU, which is higher than that of 64.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 17.1% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
290 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 290 W, which is higher than that of 66.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.2% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
290 W
Show more
Size
294x 112x 60 mm
This graphics card measures 294x112x 60 mm, which is larger than 52.7% of graphics cards and equal in size to 0.4% of graphics cards.
Length
294 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
This graphics card is 294 mm long, which is longer than 53.7% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.5% of graphics cards.
Height
112 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 112 mm tall, which is shorter than 76.5% of graphics cards and equal in height to 3.1% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2.7 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2.7 slot/s, which is wider than 65% of graphics cards and equal in width to 2.3% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,500 g
Market range: <500 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 1,500 g, which is heavier than 73% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 1.3% of graphics cards.
Show more

Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Gamingpro vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 32 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (96 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    96 vs 64
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 35.7% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (608 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    608 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 13 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (112 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    112 mm vs 125 mm
  • 8 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (48 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    48 vs 40
  • 8 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (48 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    48 vs 40
  • 48 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (192 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    192 vs 144
  • Includes LHR limiter
    This graphics card includes an LHR limiter, the average graphics card does not.
  • 2.4% higher user score
    User score
    8.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Gamingpro
    the average graphics card
    Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Gamingpro has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.19 vs 8.000).
    8.19 vs 8
  • 32 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (96 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    96 vs 64
  • 8 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (48 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    48 vs 40
  • 8 more ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has more ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (48 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    48 vs 40
  • 48 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (192 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    192 vs 144
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 35.7% higher memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a higher memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (608 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    608 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • Includes LHR limiter
    This graphics card includes an LHR limiter, the average graphics card does not.
  • 13 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (112 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    112 mm vs 125 mm
  • 29.3% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1770 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,770 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 60% larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (8 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    8 nm vs 5 nm
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 18% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1575 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,575 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 34.9% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (290 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    290 W vs 215 W
  • 32.1% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1188 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,188 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 29.3% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1770 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,770 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 18% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1575 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,575 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 10.9% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (339.8 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    339.8 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 32.1% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1188 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,188 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 83.3% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (4 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    4 MB vs 24 MB
  • 60% larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (8 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    8 nm vs 5 nm
  • 2 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2021 vs 2023).
    May 2021
    2,021 vs 2,023
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (7 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    7 vs 8
  • 32.9% larger GPU die
    This graphics card has a higher GPU die size than the average graphics card (392 mm² vs 295 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 295 mm².
    392 mm² vs 295 mm²
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    5 vs 6
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 34.9% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (290 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    290 W vs 215 W
  • 15.4% higher PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a higher PSU requirement than the average graphics card (750 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    750 W vs 650 W
  • 28.9% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (290 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    290 W vs 225 W
  • 5.6 dB noisier under load
    This graphics card has a higher load noise level than the average graphics card (41 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
    41 dB vs 35.4 dB
  • 0.2 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (2.7 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2.7 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 46.9% heavier card weight
    This graphics card is heavier than the average graphics card (1500 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
    1,500 g vs 1,021 g

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

G
guru3d.com
10/06/2021
Summary of the review
Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GamingPRO review (Conclusion) - Guru3D Helpful Notes: The links above are specifically for the non-OC "GamingPro" model as r...
G
guru3d.com
10/06/2021
Summary of the review
Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GamingPRO review If you need help evaluating this graphics card further, I can provide you with benchmark performance compar...

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Gamingpro

  • Solid 1440p gaming performance with high frame rates in modern titles
  • Efficient cooling system that keeps temperatures stable during long sessions
  • Clean, professional aesthetic with subtle ARGB lighting that isn't over-the-top
  • Good build quality featuring a solid heatsink and metal backplate
  • Generally more affordable and provides better availability than premium brands

What we don't like about Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Gamingpro

  • Fan noise can be noticeable and high-pitched under heavy load
  • The 8GB of VRAM is seen as a potential bottleneck for future high-resolution gaming
  • Bundled 'ThunderMaster' software is often described as clunky or visually dated
  • Lack of onboard memory for RGB settings means the software must stay running
  • Average overclocking headroom compared to higher-end models like the GameRock series

Verdict

The Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GamingPro is an Ampere-based graphics card featuring 6,144 CUDA cores, a base clock of 1575 MHz, and a boost clock of 1770 MHz. It is equipped with 8GB of high-speed GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 608.3 GB/s of bandwidth to handle demanding 1440p gaming. This triple-fan model utilizes TurboFan 3.0 with 2-ball bearings and 0-dB tech for semi-passive cooling, alongside a 'Triple A' die-casting plate kit for structural rigidity and heat dissipation. Main pros include solid thermal performance, customizable ARGB lighting via ThunderMaster software, and excellent ray tracing capabilities with DLSS support. However, notable cons include its relatively high power draw of 290W, a moderate noise level of around 41 dBA under load, and limited VRAM capacity for higher 4K resolutions.

Compare Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Gamingpro with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Gamingpro and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found