OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

Palit GeForce RTX 2060 Super Dual Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£440VRAM:8 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):160 W

Palit GeForce RTX 2060 Super Dual Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

Palit GeForce RTX 2060 Super Dual
6.3/10

Overall score

Score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 70% of models
Score components

90%

6.1

Technical score

10%

8.2

User score

▼Worse than 70% of graphics cards
6.9

Value for money

Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 65% of models
Score components

70%

6.3

Overall score

30%

8.2

Price

▼Worse than 65%
6.1

Technical score

Technical score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 72% of models
Score components

44%

4.6

Performance

24%

5.6

Memory

12%

8.4

Power & Cooling

11%

8.9

Platform & Features

5%

9.4

Design

4%

5.9

Connectivity & Media

▼Worse than 72%
8.2

User score

User score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 64% of models
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

6.2

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
▲Better than 64%
  • palit-geforce-rtx-2060-super-dual
  • palit-geforce-rtx-2060-super-dual
  • palit-geforce-rtx-2060-super-dual
  • palit-geforce-rtx-2060-super-dual
  • palit-geforce-rtx-2060-super-dual
palit-geforce-rtx-2060-super-dual
palit-geforce-rtx-2060-super-dual
palit-geforce-rtx-2060-super-dual
palit-geforce-rtx-2060-super-dual
palit-geforce-rtx-2060-super-dual
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card Palit GeForce RTX 2060 Super Dual

Technical score
Technical score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 72% of models
Score components:

44%

4.6

Performance

24%

5.6

Memory

12%

8.4

Power & Cooling

11%

8.9

Platform & Features

5%

9.4

Design

4%

5.9

Connectivity & Media

6.1
User score
User score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 64% of models
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

6.2

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.2
Popularity
Popularity
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 60% of models
Popularity:
Palit GeForce RTX 2060 Super Dual has a popularity score of 6.2 points, which is higher than that of 60% of products in this category.
6.2
Value for money
Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 65% of models
Score components:

70%

6.3

Overall score

30%

8.2

Price

6.9
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
8,828 points
Market range: <4k points – >34k points
This graphics card scores 8,828 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 75.2% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
5,199 points
Market range: <0 points – >25k points
This graphics card scores 5,199 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 72.2% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
13,503 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 13,503 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 77.3% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
6,703 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 6,703 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 76.6% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
7.18 TFLOPS
Market range: <4.38 TFLOPS – >57.42 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 7.18 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 80.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.3% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
8 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 8 GB of VRAM, which is less than 57.5% of graphics cards and equal to 25.1% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
Market range: <64 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 49.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.9% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
448 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 448 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 41.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 11% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
3
This graphics card supports PCIe 3, which is older than on 77.7% of graphics cards and equal to 20.3% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
3
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 3 displays, which is fewer than 91.8% of graphics cards and equal to 5.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
1
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 1 DisplayPort outputs, which is fewer than 88.7% of graphics cards and equal to 8.6% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.5% of graphics cards and equal to 47.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
8.1 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 8.1 Gbps, which is slower than on 65% of graphics cards and equal to 22.7% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
160 W
Market range: <60 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 160 W, which is lower than that of 68% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.8% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
175 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card draws 175 W under peak load, which is lower than 65.5% of graphics cards and equal to 0.8% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
550 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 550 W PSU, which is lower than that of 62.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 13.3% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
175 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 175 W, which is lower than that of 66.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.2% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
175 W
Show more
Size
235x 112x 40 mm
Length
235 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
This graphics card is 235 mm long, which is shorter than 79.2% of graphics cards and equal in length to 1% of graphics cards.
Height
112 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 112 mm tall, which is shorter than 76.5% of graphics cards and equal in height to 3.1% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 42.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
800 g
Market range: <500 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 800 g, which is lighter than 70.8% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 1.2% of graphics cards.
Show more

Palit GeForce RTX 2060 Super Dual vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 128 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (272 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    272 vs 144
  • 50 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (235 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    235 mm vs 285 mm
  • 25.6% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (160 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    160 W vs 215 W
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 13 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (112 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    112 mm vs 125 mm
  • 15.4% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (550 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    550 W vs 650 W
  • 1 more DVI outputs
    This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
    1 vs 0
  • 6 °C higher thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a higher thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (89 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    89 °C vs 95 °C
  • 1.9% higher user score
    User score
    8.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Palit GeForce RTX 2060 Super Dual
    the average graphics card
    Palit GeForce RTX 2060 Super Dual has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.16 vs 8.000).
    8.16 vs 8
  • 128 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (272 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    272 vs 144
  • 1 more DVI outputs
    This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
    1 vs 0
  • 25.6% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (160 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    160 W vs 215 W
  • 15.4% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (550 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    550 W vs 650 W
  • 6 °C higher thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a higher thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (89 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    89 °C vs 95 °C
  • 50 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (235 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    235 mm vs 285 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 13 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (112 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    112 mm vs 125 mm
  • 34.1% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1650 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,650 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 2.4x larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (12 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    12 nm vs 5 nm
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 23.4% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1470 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,470 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • No fan stop
    This graphics card does not support fan stop, the average graphics card does.
  • 41.1% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (224.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    224.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 26.3% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (14000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    14,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 5% worse value for money
    Palit GeForce RTX 2060 Super Dual has worse value for money than the average graphics card (6.86 vs 7.2).
    6.86 vs 7.2
  • 34.1% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1650 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,650 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 23.4% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1470 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,470 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 41.1% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (224.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    224.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 35.3% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (105.6 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    105.6 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 68.2% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (7.2 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    7.18 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 48 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (136 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    136 vs 184
  • 6 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (34 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    34 vs 40
  • 6 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (34 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    34 vs 40
  • 40.4% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (13503 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    13,503 points vs 22,653 points
  • 39.9% lower gaming score
    This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (8828 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    8,828 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 43.3% lower ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a lower ray tracing score than the average graphics card (5199 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    5,199 points vs 9,166 points
  • 68.8% lower compute throughput
    This graphics card has a lower compute throughput than the average graphics card (7.2 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
    7.18 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS
  • 44.5% lower compute score
    This graphics card has a lower compute score than the average graphics card (6703 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
    6,703 points vs 12,074 points
  • 54.2% lower FP64 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP64 performance than the average graphics card (0.2 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
    0.22 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
  • 2,176 fewer FP32 units
    This graphics card has fewer FP32 units than the average graphics card (2,176 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
    2,176 vs 4,352
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 26.3% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (14000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    14,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 83.3% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (4 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    4 MB vs 24 MB
  • 50% smaller L1 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L1 cache than the average graphics card (64 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
    64 vs 128
  • 2.4x larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (12 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    12 nm vs 5 nm
  • Older PCIe version
    This graphics card supports an older PCIe version than the average graphics card (3 vs 4).
    3.0 vs 4.0
  • 4 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2019 vs 2023).
    July 2019
    2,019 vs 2,023
  • Worse SAM support
    This graphics card offers worse SAM support than the average graphics card (no vs yes).
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (7 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    7 vs 8
  • 50.8% larger GPU die
    This graphics card has a higher GPU die size than the average graphics card (445 mm² vs 295 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 295 mm².
    445 mm² vs 295 mm²
  • 52.8% fewer transistors
    This graphics card has fewer transistors than the average graphics card (10800 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    10,800 million vs 22,900 million
  • 2 fewer DisplayPort outputs
    This graphics card has fewer DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
    1 vs 3
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 1 fewer displays supported
    This graphics card supports fewer displays than the average graphics card (3 vs 4). The average graphics card supports 4 displays.
    3 vs 4
  • No AV1 decoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 decoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • Older HDMI version
    This graphics card supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.0b vs 2.1).
    2.0b vs 2.1
  • Older HDCP version
    This graphics card supports an older HDCP version than the average graphics card (2.2 vs 2.3).
    2.2 vs 2.3
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • No fan stop
    This graphics card does not support fan stop, the average graphics card does.
  • 6.1 dB noisier under load
    This graphics card has a higher load noise level than the average graphics card (41.5 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
    41.5 dB vs 35.4 dB
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Palit GeForce RTX 2060 Super Dual

  • Excellent value for money and performance-to-price ratio
  • Strong 1080p and capable 1440p gaming performance
  • Reliable cooling with a dual-fan design that keeps temps stable under load
  • Supports modern features like Ray Tracing and DLSS
  • Compact dual-slot form factor fits easily in most desktop cases
  • Generally quiet operation according to many user reports

What we don't like about Palit GeForce RTX 2060 Super Dual

  • Plasticky build quality and lack of a premium aesthetic
  • Can run hot (up to 80°C+) in poorly ventilated cases or summer conditions
  • Fans do not always have an idle/zero-RPM mode on this specific 'Dual' model
  • Older architecture compared to current RTX 30/40 series cards
  • Some users report audible fan noise when the card is under 100% load

Verdict

The Palit GeForce RTX 2060 Super Dual is a high-performance Turing-based graphics card featuring 2,176 CUDA cores, a base clock of 1470 MHz, and a boost clock of 1650 MHz. It is equipped with 8GB of GDDR6 VRAM on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448 GB/s bandwidth to support smooth 1080p and 1440p gaming with real-time ray tracing and DLSS capabilities. Main pros include its expanded memory over the original 2060, a compact dual-slot design with 90mm axial fans for efficient cooling, and a solid 175W TDP that balances power and performance. However, some users note that the fans can become audible under heavy loads and its plastic shroud lacks the premium feel found on high-end models.

Compare Palit GeForce RTX 2060 Super Dual with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Palit GeForce RTX 2060 Super Dual and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found