Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£340VRAM:6 GBMemory bus width:128 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):70 W

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

5.5/10

Overall score

Score
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

5.1

Technical score

10%

8.6

User score

â–¼Worse than 81% of graphics cards
6.4

Value for money

Value for money
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

5.5

Overall score

30%

8.7

Price

â–¼Worse than 83%
5.1

Technical score

Technical score
5.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

3.5

Performance

24%

3.0

Memory

12%

8.1

Power & Cooling

11%

9.4

Platform & Features

5%

9.6

Design

4%

9.2

Connectivity & Media

â–¼Worse than 82%
8.6

User score

User score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

7.5

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–²Better than 73%
  • No image
No image
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050

Technical score
Technical score
5.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

3.5

Performance

24%

3.0

Memory

12%

8.1

Power & Cooling

11%

9.4

Platform & Features

5%

9.6

Design

4%

9.2

Connectivity & Media

5.1
User score
User score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

7.5

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.6
Popularity
Popularity
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 has a popularity score of 7.5 points, which is higher than that of 70% of products in this category.
7.5
Value for money
Value for money
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

5.5

Overall score

30%

8.7

Price

6.4
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
7,000 points
This graphics card scores 7,000 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 80.4% of graphics cards and equal to 0.4% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
3,600 points
This graphics card scores 3,600 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 77% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
12,522 points
This graphics card scores 12,522 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 80.2% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
6,787 points
This graphics card scores 6,787 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 75.8% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
9.11 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 9.11 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 76.7% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
6 GB
This graphics card has 6 GB of VRAM, which is less than 82.6% of graphics cards and equal to 5.2% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
128 bit
This graphics card uses a 128 bit memory bus, which is narrower than that of 69.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 26% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
224 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 224 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is lower than that of 83.8% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.6% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x8
This graphics card uses x8 PCIe lanes, which is fewer than 76.7% of graphics cards and equal to 22.2% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.5% of graphics cards and equal to 47.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
8.1 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 8.1 Gbps, which is slower than on 65% of graphics cards and equal to 22.7% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
70 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 70 W, which is lower than that of 93.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.6% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
130 W
This graphics card draws 130 W under peak load, which is lower than 80.8% of graphics cards and equal to 3.4% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
550 W
This graphics card recommends a 550 W PSU, which is lower than that of 62.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 13.3% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
130 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 130 W, which is lower than that of 81.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 3.4% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
130 W
Show more
Size
242x 112x 40 mm
Length
242 mm
This graphics card is 242 mm long, which is shorter than 73.1% of graphics cards and equal in length to 1.7% of graphics cards.
Height
112 mm
This graphics card is 112 mm tall, which is shorter than 76.5% of graphics cards and equal in height to 3.1% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 42.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
800 g
This graphics card weighs 800 g, which is lighter than 70.8% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 1.2% of graphics cards.
Show more

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 67.4% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (70 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    70 W vs 215 W
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 13 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (112 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    112 mm vs 125 mm
  • 43 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (242 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    242 mm vs 285 mm
  • 15.4% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (550 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    550 W vs 650 W
  • 42.2% lower board power limit
    This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (130 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    130 W vs 225 W
  • 1 more DVI outputs
    This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
    1 vs 0
  • Includes LHR limiter
    This graphics card includes an LHR limiter, the average graphics card does not.
  • 7% higher user score
    User score
    8.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050
    the average graphics card
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.56 vs 8.000).
    8.56 vs 8
  • Includes LHR limiter
    This graphics card includes an LHR limiter, the average graphics card does not.
  • 1 more DVI outputs
    This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
    1 vs 0
  • 67.4% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (70 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    70 W vs 215 W
  • 15.4% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (550 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    550 W vs 650 W
  • 42.2% lower board power limit
    This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (130 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    130 W vs 225 W
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 13 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (112 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    112 mm vs 125 mm
  • 43 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (242 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    242 mm vs 285 mm
  • 128 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    128 bit vs 256 bit
  • 6 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (6 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    6 GB vs 12 GB
  • 29.1% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1777 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,777 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 2 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3
  • 20 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (20 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    20 vs 40
  • 104 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (80 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    80 vs 184
  • 62.7% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (142.2 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    142.2 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 20 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (20 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    20 vs 40
  • 11.8% worse value for money
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 has worse value for money than the average graphics card (6.44 vs 7.2).
    6.44 vs 7.2
  • 29.1% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1777 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,777 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 20 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (20 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    20 vs 40
  • 104 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (80 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    80 vs 184
  • 62.7% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (142.2 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    142.2 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 20 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (20 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    20 vs 40
  • 65.2% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (56.9 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    56.86 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 32 fewer ROPs
    This graphics card has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (32 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    32 vs 64
  • 19.2% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1552 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,552 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 59.7% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (9.1 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    9.1 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 64 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (80 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    80 vs 144
  • 44.7% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (12522 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    12,522 points vs 22,653 points
  • 52.3% lower gaming score
    This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (7000 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    7,000 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 60.7% lower ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a lower ray tracing score than the average graphics card (3600 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    3,600 points vs 9,166 points
  • 69.4% lower FP16 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP16 performance than the average graphics card (9.1 TFLOPS vs 29.7 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.725 TFLOPS.
    9.1 TFLOPS vs 29.725 TFLOPS
  • 70.8% lower FP64 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP64 performance than the average graphics card (0.1 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
    0.14 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
  • 60.4% lower compute throughput
    This graphics card has a lower compute throughput than the average graphics card (9.1 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
    9.11 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS
  • 43.8% lower compute score
    This graphics card has a lower compute score than the average graphics card (6787 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
    6,787 points vs 12,074 points
  • 128 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    128 bit vs 256 bit
  • 6 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (6 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    6 GB vs 12 GB
  • 50% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (224 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    224 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 26.3% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (14000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    14,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 91.7% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (2 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    2 MB vs 24 MB
  • 60% larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (8 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    8 nm vs 5 nm
  • Fewer PCIe lanes
    This graphics card has fewer PCIe lanes than the average graphics card (x8 vs x16). The average graphics card has x16 PCIe lanes.
    x8 vs x16
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (7 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    7 vs 8
  • 1 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2022 vs 2023).
    January 2022
    2,022 vs 2,023
  • 47.6% fewer transistors
    This graphics card has fewer transistors than the average graphics card (12000 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    12,000 million vs 22,900 million
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    5 vs 6
  • 2 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3
  • 7 °C higher idle temperature
    This graphics card has a higher idle temperature than the average graphics card (44 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    44 °C vs 37 °C

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
tomshardware.com
03/02/2022
Summary of the review
E
eurogamer.net
26/01/2022
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
15/02/2024
Summary of the review
K
kitguru.net
26/01/2022
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
26/01/2022
Summary of the review
T
trustedreviews.com
26/01/2022
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.com
26/01/2022
Summary of the review
T
techspot.com
26/01/2022
Summary of the review
C
custompc.com
04/10/2023
Summary of the review
R
rockpapershotgun.com
04/03/2022
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
26/01/2022
Summary of the review
E
eurogamer.net
26/01/2022
Summary of the review
P
pcmag.com
26/01/2022
Summary of the review
G
gamingtrend.com
26/01/2022
Summary of the review
D
digitalfoundry.net
26/01/2022
Summary of the review
C
computerbase.de
26/01/2022
Summary of the review
C
computerbild.de
28/01/2022
Summary of the review
P
pausehardware.com
25/02/2024
Summary of the review
G
global.techradar.com
28/01/2022
Summary of the review
F
frandroid.com
26/01/2022
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050

  • Capable 1080p gaming performance, hitting 60fps in most AAA titles at medium to high settings.
  • Access to Nvidia features like DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), which significantly boosts frame rates in supported games.
  • Low power consumption (130W for the 8GB version and 70W for the 6GB version), making it energy efficient.
  • Available in low-profile and slot-powered variants (6GB model), ideal for small form factor (SFF) builds and office PC upgrades.
  • Hardware-accelerated ray tracing support, which is rare at this budget entry level.
  • Includes modern video encoders (NVENC) for streaming and video editing benefits.
  • The 8GB VRAM version provides decent longevity for high-texture 1080p gaming compared to older 4GB or 6GB cards.

What we don't like about NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050

  • Poor price-to-performance ratio; often criticized for being overpriced compared to more powerful alternatives like the AMD RX 6600.
  • Performance is often viewed as a 'side-grade' rather than an upgrade for owners of older cards like the GTX 1070 or GTX 1660 Ti.
  • The 6GB version is significantly cut down, offering about 20-30% less performance than the original 8GB model.
  • Ray tracing performance is too weak for high-end effects, frequently requiring DLSS just to maintain playable frame rates.
  • Struggles at resolutions higher than 1080p, with 1440p performance often falling below playable levels in modern games.
  • Limited memory bandwidth (128-bit on 8GB, 96-bit on 6GB) can bottleneck performance in more demanding tasks.
  • Inconsistent performance across different game titles compared to older, higher-tier cards like the RTX 2060.

Verdict

The Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 is an entry-level graphics card based on the Ampere architecture, featuring 2,560 CUDA cores, 8GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, and a 130W TDP. It delivers solid 1080p gaming performance and serves as a significant upgrade from older GTX series cards by offering modern features like 2nd Gen Ray Tracing cores and 3rd Gen Tensor cores for DLSS AI upscaling. Main advantages include its low power consumption, support for HDMI 2.1, and accessibility to the full RTX software suite at a budget price point. However, it is primarily limited by its 128-bit memory interface which can bottleneck performance at higher resolutions, and it faces strong competition from AMD's Radeon RX 6600, which often provides better raw frame rates for a similar price.

Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found