OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

MSI GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming X Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£180VRAM:4 GBMemory bus width:128 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):75 W

MSI GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming X Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

MSI GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming X
4.8/10

Overall score

Score
4.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
Score components

90%

4.4

Technical score

10%

8.9

User score

â–¼Worse than 89% of graphics cards
6.3

Value for money

Value for money
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
Score components

70%

4.8

Overall score

30%

9.6

Price

â–¼Worse than 85%
4.4

Technical score

Technical score
4.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
Score components

44%

2.9

Performance

24%

2.1

Memory

12%

8.9

Power & Cooling

11%

7.9

Platform & Features

5%

8.2

Design

4%

6.6

Connectivity & Media

â–¼Worse than 91%
8.9

User score

User score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 82% of models
Score components

70%

9.2

User ratings

30%

8.3

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–²Better than 82%
  • msi-geforce-gtx-1650-gaming-x
msi-geforce-gtx-1650-gaming-x
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card MSI GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming X

Technical score
Technical score
4.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
Score components:

44%

2.9

Performance

24%

2.1

Memory

12%

8.9

Power & Cooling

11%

7.9

Platform & Features

5%

8.2

Design

4%

6.6

Connectivity & Media

4.4
User score
User score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 82% of models
Score components

70%

9.2

User ratings

30%

8.3

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.9
Popularity
Popularity
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 77% of models
Popularity:
MSI GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming X has a popularity score of 8.3 points, which is higher than that of 77.3% of products in this category.
8.3
Value for money
Value for money
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
Score components:

70%

4.8

Overall score

30%

9.6

Price

6.3
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
3,531 points
Market range: <4k points – >34k points
This graphics card scores 3,531 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 91.8% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
0 points
Market range: <0 points – >25k points
This graphics card scores 0 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 83.2% of graphics cards and equal to 16.8% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
9,000 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 9,000 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 86.7% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
3,037 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 3,037 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 90.3% of graphics cards and equal to 0.4% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
3.33 TFLOPS
Market range: <4.38 TFLOPS – >57.42 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 3.33 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 92% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
4 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 4 GB of VRAM, which is less than 88% of graphics cards and equal to 6% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR5/GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
128 bit
Market range: <64 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 128 bit memory bus, which is narrower than that of 69.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 26% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
128 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 128 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is lower than that of 92.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.7% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
3
This graphics card supports PCIe 3, which is older than on 77.7% of graphics cards and equal to 20.3% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12
This graphics card supports DirectX 12, which is older than on 81.8% of graphics cards and equal to 16.9% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
3
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 3 displays, which is fewer than 91.8% of graphics cards and equal to 5.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
2
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 2 DisplayPort outputs, which is fewer than 79.1% of graphics cards and equal to 9.5% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.5% of graphics cards and equal to 47.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
8.1 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 8.1 Gbps, which is slower than on 65% of graphics cards and equal to 22.7% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
75 W
Market range: <60 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 75 W, which is lower than that of 90.8% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.7% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
85 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card draws 85 W under peak load, which is lower than 91.4% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
300 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 300 W PSU, which is lower than that of 94.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.5% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
91 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 91 W, which is lower than that of 91.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
85 W
Show more
Size
245x 127x 39 mm
Length
245 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
This graphics card is 245 mm long, which is shorter than 71.8% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.8% of graphics cards.
Height
127 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 127 mm tall, which is taller than 53.5% of graphics cards and equal in height to 1.2% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 42.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
585 g
Market range: <500 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 585 g, which is lighter than 88.3% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more

MSI GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming X vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 65.1% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (75 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    75 W vs 215 W
  • 53.8% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (300 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    300 W vs 650 W
  • 59.6% lower board power limit
    This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (91 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    91 W vs 225 W
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 14.3% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2000 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,000 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 40 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (245 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    245 mm vs 285 mm
  • 11.6% higher user score
    User score
    8.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    MSI GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming X
    the average graphics card
    MSI GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming X has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.93 vs 8.000).
    8.93 vs 8
  • 2.94x cheaper
    MSI GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming X is cheaper than the average graphics card (£180 vs £530).
    £180 vs £530
  • 11.6% higher user score
    User score
    8.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    MSI GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming X
    the average graphics card
    MSI GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming X has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.93 vs 8.000).
    8.93 vs 8
  • 2.94x cheaper
    MSI GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming X is cheaper than the average graphics card (£180 vs £530).
    £180 vs £530
  • 14.3% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2000 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,000 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 65.1% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (75 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    75 W vs 215 W
  • 53.8% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (300 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    300 W vs 650 W
  • 59.6% lower board power limit
    This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (91 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    91 W vs 225 W
  • 6.4 dB quieter under load
    This graphics card has a lower load noise level than the average graphics card (29 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
    29 dB vs 35.4 dB
  • 61.4% lower peak power draw
    This graphics card has a lower peak power draw than the average graphics card (85 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    85 W vs 220 W
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 40 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (245 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    245 mm vs 285 mm
  • 42.7% lighter card weight
    This graphics card is lighter than the average graphics card (585 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
    585 g vs 1,021 g
  • 128 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    128 bit vs 256 bit
  • 8 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (4 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    4 GB vs 12 GB
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • 26 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (14 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    14 vs 40
  • 25.7% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1860 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,860 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 128 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (56 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    56 vs 184
  • 2.4x larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (12 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    12 nm vs 5 nm
  • 72.7% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (104.2 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    104.2 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 15% worse value for money
    MSI GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming X has worse value for money than the average graphics card (6.26 vs 7.2).
    6.26 vs 7.2
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • 26 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (14 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    14 vs 40
  • 25.7% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1860 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,860 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 128 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (56 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    56 vs 184
  • 72.7% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (104.2 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    104.2 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 63.5% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (59.5 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    59.52 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 144 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    0 vs 144
  • 32 fewer ROPs
    This graphics card has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (32 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    32 vs 64
  • 85.2% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (3.3 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    3.33 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 22.7% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1485 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,485 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 60.3% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (9000 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    9,000 points vs 22,653 points
  • 75.9% lower gaming score
    This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (3531 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    3,531 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 74.8% lower compute score
    This graphics card has a lower compute score than the average graphics card (3037 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
    3,037 points vs 12,074 points
  • 77.6% lower FP16 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP16 performance than the average graphics card (6.7 TFLOPS vs 29.7 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.725 TFLOPS.
    6.67 TFLOPS vs 29.725 TFLOPS
  • 81.3% lower FP64 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP64 performance than the average graphics card (0.1 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
    0.09 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
  • 3,456 fewer FP32 units
    This graphics card has fewer FP32 units than the average graphics card (896 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
    896 vs 4,352
  • 85.5% lower compute throughput
    This graphics card has a lower compute throughput than the average graphics card (3.3 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
    3.33 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS
  • 97.2% lower INT8 performance
    This graphics card has a lower INT8 performance than the average graphics card (6.7 TOPS vs 242 TOPS). The average graphics card has INT8 performance of 242 TOPS.
    6.7 TOPS vs 242 TOPS
  • 128 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    128 bit vs 256 bit
  • 8 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (4 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    4 GB vs 12 GB
  • 71.4% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (128 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    128 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 57.9% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (8000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    8,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 95.8% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (1 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    1 MB vs 24 MB
  • 50% smaller L1 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L1 cache than the average graphics card (64 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
    64 vs 128
  • 2.4x larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (12 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    12 nm vs 5 nm
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No ray tracing
    This graphics card does not support ray tracing, the average graphics card does.
  • Older PCIe version
    This graphics card supports an older PCIe version than the average graphics card (3 vs 4).
    3.0 vs 4.0
  • No AI upscalers
    This graphics card does not support AI upscalers, the average graphics card does.
  • 4 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2019 vs 2023).
    April 2019
    2,019 vs 2,023
  • Worse SAM support
    This graphics card offers worse SAM support than the average graphics card (no vs yes).
  • Lower VRS tier
    This graphics card supports a lower VRS tier than the average graphics card (Tier 1 vs Tier 2).
    Tier 1 vs Tier 2
  • Older DirectX version
    This graphics card supports an older DirectX version than the average graphics card (12 vs 12 Ultimate).
    12 vs 12 Ultimate
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (6 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    6 vs 8
  • No sampler feedback
    This graphics card does not support sampler feedback, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 79.5% fewer transistors
    This graphics card has fewer transistors than the average graphics card (4700 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    4,700 million vs 22,900 million
  • Older FSR version
    This graphics card supports an older FSR version than the average graphics card (3 vs 3.1).
    3.0 vs 3.1
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 1 fewer displays supported
    This graphics card supports fewer displays than the average graphics card (3 vs 4). The average graphics card supports 4 displays.
    3 vs 4
  • No AV1 decoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 decoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 1 fewer DisplayPort outputs
    This graphics card has fewer DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (2 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
    2 vs 3
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • Older HDMI version
    This graphics card supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.0b vs 2.1).
    2.0b vs 2.1
  • Older HDCP version
    This graphics card supports an older HDCP version than the average graphics card (2.2 vs 2.3).
    2.2 vs 2.3
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (4 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    4 vs 6
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • No backplate
    This graphics card does not include a backplate, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

O
overclockersclub.com
02/05/2019
Summary of the review
MSI GTX 1650 GAMING X 4G: Conclusion TweakTown
P
pcper.com
25/04/2019
Summary of the review
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Review - Featuring MSI
G
guru3d.com
24/04/2019
Summary of the review
MSI GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming X Review
O
overclockersclub.com
02/05/2019
Summary of the review
MSI GTX 1650 GAMING X 4G Review
L
lanoc.org
01/05/2019
Summary of the review
MSI GTX 1650 Gaming X - LanOC Reviews
T
techpowerup.com
23/04/2019
Summary of the review
MSI GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming X 4 GB Review - TechPowerUp
T
tektick.com
25/07/2019
Summary of the review
MSI GTX 1650 Gaming X vs Ventus XS OC - TekTick
G
guru3d.com
24/04/2019
Summary of the review
MSI GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming X Review - www.guru3d.com
G
ginjfo.com
26/04/2019
Summary of the review
GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming X 4G de MSI, le test complet
(Translated)Show original
C
cowcotland.com
29/04/2019
Summary of the review
Test carte graphique MSI GTX 1650 Gaming XGo to product viewer dialogue for this item. : Une question de tarif
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about MSI GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming X

  • Extremely quiet operation during gaming thanks to Twin Frozr 7 thermal design
  • Excellent power efficiency with a low TDP, making it suitable for older or OEM systems
  • Features 'Zero Frozr' technology which stops fans during low-load tasks for silent use
  • Solid 1080p gaming performance for popular e-Sports titles like Fortnite and League of Legends
  • Good build quality and premium aesthetics compared to other budget-tier cards
  • Capable of decent overclocking, reaching stable speeds around 1950-2040 MHz

What we don't like about MSI GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming X

  • Poor price-to-performance ratio compared to competitors like the AMD RX 570 or the newer 1650 Super
  • Requires a 6-pin external power connector, unlike some other GTX 1650 models that run solely on PCIe slot power
  • Lacks a backplate, which some users feel detracts from the 'premium' branding
  • Limited to 4GB of GDDR5 VRAM, which is considered insufficient for modern demanding games at high settings
  • No built-in RGB lighting for users who prefer customizable aesthetics

Verdict

The MSI GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming X is a budget-oriented graphics card built on the NVIDIA Turing architecture, featuring 896 CUDA cores and a factory-overclocked boost clock of 1860 MHz. It is equipped with 4GB of GDDR5 memory on a 128-bit bus with an 8 Gbps effective speed, utilizing a custom PCB and MSI's signature Twin Frozr 7 thermal design with dual Torx 3.0 fans for superior cooling. Main advantages include exceptionally quiet operation thanks to Zero Frozr technology, high energy efficiency, and solid 1080p performance for esports and popular titles. However, it requires an additional 6-pin power connector unlike standard 75W models, lacks a backplate, and has historically faced criticism for its high launch price relative to performance competitors like the RX 570.

Compare MSI GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming X with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of MSI GeForce GTX 1650 Gaming X and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found