OVERALL

ALTERNATIVES

SPECS

VS AVERAGE

REVIEWS

GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti G1 Gaming Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£130VRAM:4 GBMemory bus width:128 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):75 W

GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti G1 Gaming Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti G1 Gaming

4.6/10

▼Worse than 91% of graphics cards

6.1

▼Worse than 89%

4.1

▼Worse than 93%

8.8

▲Better than 78%

2.0
Gaming
Gaming
2.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Evaluates core hardware and software specifications for gaming performance.
When it matters
When you want to play demanding mobile games, 3D titles, or run graphics-intensive apps smoothly.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
45.0%
1.0
Floating-point performance
25.0%
2.3
VRAM
20.0%
1.0
Ray tracing cores / units
10.0%
7.6
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4.5
Video editing
Video editing
4.5/ 10
✕
What it is
Evaluates core hardware and software specifications for video editing performance.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this graphics-cards meets your specific video editing needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
35.0%
7.0
AV1 encode
30.0%
2.3
VRAM
20.0%
1.0
Floating-point performance
15.0%
7.6
PCI Express (PCIe) version
2.0
1080p
1080p
2.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Evaluates core hardware and software specifications for 1080p performance.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this graphics-cards meets your specific 1080p needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
55.0%
1.0
Floating-point performance
25.0%
2.3
VRAM
10.0%
1.0
Ray tracing cores / units
10.0%
7.6
PCI Express (PCIe) version
1.7
1440p
1440p
1.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Evaluates core hardware and software specifications for 1440p performance.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this graphics-cards meets your specific 1440p needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
50.0%
1.0
Floating-point performance
30.0%
2.3
VRAM
15.0%
1.0
Ray tracing cores / units
5.0%
7.6
PCI Express (PCIe) version
1.8
4K
4K
1.8/ 10
✕
What it is
Evaluates core hardware and software specifications for 4k performance.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this graphics-cards meets your specific 4k needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
40.0%
1.0
Floating-point performance
35.0%
2.3
VRAM
20.0%
1.0
Ray tracing cores / units
5.0%
7.6
PCI Express (PCIe) version

Best prices

Check price

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti G1 Gaming

4.6

Show more

Hide

Performance

2.2

Show more

Hide

3DMark Time Spy benchmark score

3DMark Port Royal score

PassMark (G3D) result

PassMark (DirectCompute) result

Floating-point performance

Show more

Memory

1.9

Show more

Hide

VRAM

Memory type

GDDR5

GDDR version

Memory bus width

Maximum memory bandwidth

Show more

Platform & Features

7.5

Show more

Hide

PCI Express (PCIe) version

PCIe lanes

DirectX version

Vulkan version

OpenGL version

Show more

Connectivity & Media

7.3

Show more

Hide

Max displays supported

Max digital resolution

DisplayPort outputs

DisplayPort version

DisplayPort link rates

Show more

Power & Cooling

8.9

Show more

Hide

Thermal Design Power (TDP)

Power consumption while under peak load

Recommended PSU wattage

Board power limit

PCIe power spec

75 W

Show more

Design

9.7

Show more

Hide

Size

Length

Height

Slot width

Weight

Show more

GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti G1 Gaming vs the average graphics card

Why is GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti G1 Gaming better than the average graphics card?

Show more

Hide

65.1% lower TDP
This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (75 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
75 W vs 215 W
53.8% lower PSU requirement
This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (300 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
300 W vs 650 W
66 mm shorter card length
This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (219 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
219 mm vs 285 mm
0.5 slot/s slimmer design
This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
More compact card size
This graphics card is more compact than the average graphics card (219x118 x 40 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm). The average graphics card has a size of 285x127 x 52 mm.
219x118 x 40 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm
1 more DVI outputs
This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
1 vs 0
4.08x cheaper
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti G1 Gaming is cheaper than the average graphics card (£130 vs £530).
£130 vs £530
33.3% lower board power limit
This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (150 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
150 W vs 225 W

4.08x cheaper
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti G1 Gaming is cheaper than the average graphics card (£130 vs £530).
£130 vs £530
9.9% higher user score
User score
8.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti G1 Gaming
the average graphics card
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti G1 Gaming has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.79 vs 8.000).
8.79 vs 8

0.1% faster VRAM clock
This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1752 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
1,752 MHz vs 1,750 MHz

55.3% smaller GPU die
This graphics card has a lower GPU die size than the average graphics card (132 mm² vs 295 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 295 mm².
132 mm² vs 295 mm²

1 more DVI outputs
This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
1 vs 0

65.1% lower TDP
This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (75 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
75 W vs 215 W
53.8% lower PSU requirement
This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (300 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
300 W vs 650 W
33.3% lower board power limit
This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (150 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
150 W vs 225 W
8.4 dB quieter under load
This graphics card has a lower load noise level than the average graphics card (27 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
27 dB vs 35.4 dB
65.9% lower peak power draw
This graphics card has a lower peak power draw than the average graphics card (75 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
75 W vs 220 W
50% lower idle power draw
This graphics card has a lower idle power draw than the average graphics card (6 W vs 12 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 12 W.
6 W vs 12 W
7 °C lower idle temperature
This graphics card has a lower idle temperature than the average graphics card (30 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
30 °C vs 37 °C

66 mm shorter card length
This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (219 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
219 mm vs 285 mm
0.5 slot/s slimmer design
This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
More compact card size
This graphics card is more compact than the average graphics card (219x118 x 40 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm). The average graphics card has a size of 285x127 x 52 mm.
219x118 x 40 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm
7 mm lower card height
This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (118 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
118 mm vs 125 mm

Why is GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti G1 Gaming worse than the average graphics card?

Show more

Hide

39.9% lower boost clock speed
This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1506 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
1,506 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
128 bit narrower memory bus
This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
128 bit vs 256 bit
8 GB less VRAM
This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (4 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
4 GB vs 12 GB
34 fewer compute units
This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (6 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
6 vs 40
40 fewer ray tracing cores
This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
0 vs 40
2.8x larger process node
This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (14 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
14 nm vs 5 nm
136 fewer TMUs
This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (48 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
48 vs 184
81.4% lower texture rate
This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (71 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
71.04 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s

17% worse value for money
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti G1 Gaming has worse value for money than the average graphics card (6.15 vs 7.2).
6.15 vs 7.2

39.9% lower boost clock speed
This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1506 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
1,506 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
34 fewer compute units
This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (6 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
6 vs 40
40 fewer ray tracing cores
This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
0 vs 40
136 fewer TMUs
This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (48 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
48 vs 184
81.4% lower texture rate
This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (71 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
71.04 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
73.2% lower pixel rate
This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (43.7 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
43.7 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
28.9% lower base clock speed
This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1366 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
1,366 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
144 fewer AI cores
This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
0 vs 144
32 fewer ROPs
This graphics card has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (32 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
32 vs 64
90.7% lower FP32 performance
This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (2.1 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
2.1 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
73.5% lower PassMark score
This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (5998 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
5,998 points vs 22,653 points
84% lower gaming score
This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (2349 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
2,349 points vs 14,678.5 points
89.9% lower compute throughput
This graphics card has a lower compute throughput than the average graphics card (2.3 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
2.32 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS
78% lower compute score
This graphics card has a lower compute score than the average graphics card (2659 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
2,659 points vs 12,074 points
85.4% lower FP64 performance
This graphics card has a lower FP64 performance than the average graphics card (0.1 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
0.07 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
3,584 fewer FP32 units
This graphics card has fewer FP32 units than the average graphics card (768 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
768 vs 4,352
99.1% lower INT8 performance
This graphics card has a lower INT8 performance than the average graphics card (2.1 TOPS vs 242 TOPS). The average graphics card has INT8 performance of 242 TOPS.
2.1 TOPS vs 242 TOPS

128 bit narrower memory bus
This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
128 bit vs 256 bit
8 GB less VRAM
This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (4 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
4 GB vs 12 GB
75% lower memory bandwidth
This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (112.1 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
112.1 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
63.1% slower memory speed
This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (7008 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
7,008 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
95.8% smaller L2 cache
This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (1 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
1 MB vs 24 MB
62.5% smaller L1 cache
This graphics card has fewer L1 cache than the average graphics card (48 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
48 vs 128

2.8x larger process node
This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (14 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
14 nm vs 5 nm
No DLSS support
This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
No ray tracing
This graphics card does not support ray tracing, the average graphics card does.
Older PCIe version
This graphics card supports an older PCIe version than the average graphics card (3 vs 4).
3.0 vs 4.0
7 older
This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2016 vs 2023).
October 2016
2,016 vs 2,023
No AI upscalers
This graphics card does not support AI upscalers, the average graphics card does.
No mesh shaders
This graphics card does not support mesh shaders, the average graphics card does.
No vs yes
Worse SAM support
This graphics card offers worse SAM support than the average graphics card (no vs yes).
Older encoder generation
This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (4 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
4.0 vs 8
Older DirectX version
This graphics card supports an older DirectX version than the average graphics card (12 vs 12 Ultimate).
12 vs 12 Ultimate
No sampler feedback
This graphics card does not support sampler feedback, the average graphics card does.
No vs yes
85.6% fewer transistors
This graphics card has fewer transistors than the average graphics card (3300 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
3,300 million vs 22,900 million

2 fewer DisplayPort outputs
This graphics card has fewer DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
1 vs 3
No AV1 encoding
This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
No vs yes
No AV1 decoding
This graphics card does not support AV1 decoding, the average graphics card does.
No vs yes
Narrower encode codec support
This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
Narrower decode codec support
This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
H.264/H.265/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
Older HDMI version
This graphics card supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.0b vs 2.1).
2.0b vs 2.1
Older HDCP version
This graphics card supports an older HDCP version than the average graphics card (2.2 vs 2.3).
2.2 vs 2.3
2 fewer monitors per output type
This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
1 vs 3
Older NVDEC generation
This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (3 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
3 vs 6

1 fewer fans
This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
2 vs 3
No dual BIOS
This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

uk.pcmag.com

31/10/2016

Summary of the review

Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1050 Ti G1 Gaming 4G - PCMag UK

The Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1050 Ti G1 Gaming 4G is a budget-oriented graphics card launched at $169.99 that premiumises its entry-level positioning through an expanded feature set. For roughly $30 more than stock configurations, it brings highly attractive aesthetic and performance extras like customizable RGB lighting, a sturdy metal backplate, a binned GPU chip, and a dual-fan cooling system that uses counter-rotating blades to maximize airflow. Operating via Gigabyte's Xtreme Gaming Engine software, users can easily access one-click overclocking, monitor statistics, and manage custom fan curves or LED setups. Structurally, this dual-slot card spans 9 inches long and includes one dual-link DVI port, three HDMI 3.0 ports, one DisplayPort connector, and a single six-pin power connector, alongside support for Nvidia G-Sync anti-tearing technology and a three-year warranty. Performance testing highlights several clear pros and cons for this specific hardware layout. On the positive side (Pros), the card achieved a high boost clock of approximately 1,772MHz in benchmarks—comfortably outpacing Nvidia's base specification of 1,392MHz—and successfully delivered smooth 1080p gaming alongside playable 1440p frame rates at modest graphical settings. On the negative...

guru3d.com

01/12/2016

Summary of the review

Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1050 Ti G1 Gaming OC Review (Page 39) - Guru3D

The Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1050 Ti G1 Gaming OC is a capable entry-level graphics card optimized for 1080p gaming, featuring 4GB of GDDR5 graphics memory that provides valuable breathing room for modern textures. Built on Nvidia's GP107 Pascal architecture, it exhibits excellent power efficiency with a low thermal design power (TDP) of approximately 75 Watts. Gigabyte has enhanced this budget GPU with a fully customized PCB, a sleek visual aesthetic complete with an integrated LED system, and a highly effective Windforce 2X cooler. In terms of tweaking, the card offers reliable and stable manual overclocking capabilities, allowing users to easily hit a boost frequency of roughly 1900 MHz and a memory speed of 8 Gbps before running into Nvidia's hardware restrictions. Pros and Cons Pros: Silent Operation: The fans remain passive below 60°C and spin at low RPMs under load, operating inaudibly at around 33 dBA with zero coil whine. Thermal Performance: The custom Windforce 2X cooling system keeps GPU load temperatures impressively low at under 65°C. Low Power Usage: Minimal energy consumption makes it highly efficient and easy to...

tech-critter.com

25/10/2016

Summary of the review

Gigabyte GTX 1050 Ti G1 GAMING 4G Review - Tech Critter

The Gigabyte GTX 1050 Ti G1 Gaming 4G is a highly capable entry-level graphics card based on the 16 nm process technology, featuring 4 GB of GDDR5 memory and a 128-bit memory bus. Tested on an Intel Core i7 4790K rig, it consistently averages 30 fps on demanding AAA titles at 1080p high settings. It delivers an impressive default boost clock of 1987 MHz and boasts high overclocking headroom, safely pushing up to 2151 MHz on the core and 8008 MHz on the memory clock. This overclocking has zero impact on temperatures, staying at a cool 40°C idle and 60°C under load thanks to the WindForce cooler's alternate-spinning fan design, which can lower load temps to 53°C at maximum speed. The card stands out for several visual and functional enhancements, though it carries a few distinct drawbacks. Its pros include an exceptionally solid build quality anchored by a protective metal backplate, ultra-silent fan operation, and robust cooling performance. It also integrates an extra 6-pin power connector for enhanced overclocking stability, alongside a unique "Fan Stop" LED indicator and RGB customization...

guru3d.com

01/12/2016

Summary of the review

Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1050 Ti G1 Gaming OC Review - Guru3D

Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1050 Ti G1 Gaming OC Review The Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB OC Edition is an entry-level, budget-oriented graphics card based on Nvidia's Pascal architecture and built on a highly efficient 14nm FinFET process. Equipped with the GP107-400 GPU, it features 768 shader processors, 48 TMUs, 32 ROPs, and 4 GB of GDDR5 memory running on a 128-bit bus with a bandwidth of 112 GB/s. Key pros include its exceptional power efficiency, maintaining a low 75W Thermal Design Power (TDP). Furthermore, Gigabyte enhances the base specs with a factory-overclocked tweak, a custom PCB, and a specialized cooling system that provides robust overclocking headroom up to the 1.9 or 2.0 GHz GPU Boost frequency marker. Despite these technical advantages, the card faces notable regional pricing challenges that serve as its primary con. While designed to target a highly competitive and affordable $139 US segment, regional inflation pushes real-market retail prices up to $169.99 in the US and €189 in the EU. This pricing discrepancy forces it into a tougher competitive landscape against AMD alternatives. Additionally, while the...

pcmag.com

25/10/2016

Summary of the review

Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1050 Ti G1 Gaming 4G Review - PCMag

The PCMag review highlights the Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1050 Ti G1 Gaming 4G as a feature-rich, entry-level card offering exceptional cooling with the Windforce 2X system, solid overclocking potential via a 6-pin connector, and high-quality construction featuring RGB lighting and a metal backplate. While it offers great 1080p performance, the card carries a higher price tag than base models and is ultimately outmatched in raw performance by the AMD Radeon RX 470, making its premium features a harder sell.

hardwareluxx.de

08/12/2016

Summary of the review

Von ASUS bis Zotac: Vier Modelle der GeForce GTX 1050 Ti im Test

Review Overview and Specifications This review evaluates four premium, factory-overclocked partner models of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti: the ASUS ROG Strix OC, Gigabyte G1 Gaming, MSI Gaming X, and ZOTAC OC Edition. Built on the 14 nm "Pascal" GP107 architecture, these cards target budget-conscious gamers looking for smooth Full HD (1080p) performance under the €200 price point. ASUS, Gigabyte, and ZOTAC push the envelope with identical factory overclocks, raising the baseline frequencies to a 1,392 MHz base clock and a 1,506 MHz boost clock. In contrast, MSI chooses a slightly lower core clock setup (1,379 MHz base / 1,493 MHz boost) but compensates by uniquely factory-overclocking its video memory to 1,777 MHz to slightly increase bandwidth. Pros and Cons Pros: Excellent price-to-performance ratio for entry-level builds. Highly energy-efficient operation resulting in low power consumption. Strong 1080p execution capable of handling contemporary games seamlessly. Tailored, quiet dual-fan cooling solutions designed by individual partners. Competitive and narrow price structure between €170 and €179. Cons: Severe performance drops when attempting to run games at higher resolutions. Complete lack of SLI or...

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.

Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti G1 Gaming

Excellent cooling performance with the Windforce 2X system and semi-passive silent fans
High build quality featuring a metal backplate for added rigidity
Good overclocking headroom, often reaching effective boost clocks near 2000MHz
Very low power consumption and supports ultra-silent operation under low load
Generous connectivity options including three HDMI ports, one DisplayPort, and one DVI-D
Aesthetic features such as customisable RGB lighting on the shroud

What we don't like about GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti G1 Gaming

Requires an additional 6-pin power connector, unlike some other GTX 1050 Ti models
Performance is limited by a low power limit setting, which can restrict NVIDIA Boost clocks
Relatively high price point compared to entry-level 1050 Ti variants
4GB of VRAM and lack of modern features like DLSS make it outdated for demanding 2026 AAA titles
Some users reported the plastic fan shroud feels slightly flimsy despite the metal backplate

Verdict

The Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1050 Ti G1 Gaming is a factory-overclocked card featuring 768 CUDA cores and 4GB of GDDR5 memory on a 128-bit bus, achieving boost clocks of up to 1506 MHz in OC mode. It distinguishes itself with the Windforce 2X cooling system, featuring dual alternate-spinning 90mm fans and customizable 16.8M RGB lighting, while uniquely requiring a single 6-pin power connector for enhanced overclocking stability compared to standard 75W TDP models. Main pros include its highly efficient and silent cooling performance, the inclusion of a protective metal backplate, and an versatile output array of three HDMI 2.0b ports, one DisplayPort 1.4, and one DVI-D port. However, it is held back by its aging Pascal architecture that lacks support for modern features like Ray Tracing and DLSS, and its current performance is limited to 1080p gaming at lower settings in modern AAA titles.

Best alternatives

GIGABYTE Radeon RX 580 Gaming 8GB

Graphics cards

Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 580 8GB

Graphics cards

ASUS GeForce Dual RTX 2070

Graphics cards

AMD Radeon RX 580

Graphics cards

ASUS Turbo GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

Graphics cards

Sapphire Nitro Radeon RX 580 8GB

Graphics cards

MSI Radeon RX 580 Armor 8GB

Graphics cards

ASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 OC 8GB

Graphics cards

ASRock Phantom Gaming D Radeon RX 580 OC 8GB

Graphics cards

PowerColor Red Dragon Radeon RX 580 8GB

Graphics cards

Sapphire Nitro Radeon RX 590 Special Edition

Graphics cards

MSI Radeon RX 580

Graphics cards

See best alternatives in Buying Guide

Compare GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti G1 Gaming with other products in the Graphics cards category

Graphic comparison of GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti G1 Gaming and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found