Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0

Xiaomi Mi Band Pulse Review | 171 Data compared

Avg. price:~£9Battery life:12 daysScreen size:N/A inchHeart rate monitor:yesGPS:noWaterproof depth rating:1 m

Xiaomi Mi Band Pulse Review: Compare 171 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

6.5

Overall score

Score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the fitness tracker's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best fitness trackers on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

6.5

Technical score

20%

?

User score

â–¼Worse than 73% of fitness-trackers
6.5

Technical score

Technical score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

20%

7.1

Sports & Navigation

20%

5.3

Battery

18%

7.3

Health

18%

4.6

Display

8%

7.6

Smart Features

8%

7.7

App & Wellness

4%

7.2

Connectivity

4%

7.7

Design & Durability

â–¼Worse than 72% of fitness-trackers
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £9

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker Xiaomi Mi Band Pulse

Technical score
Technical score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

20%

7.1

Sports & Navigation

20%

5.3

Battery

18%

7.3

Health

18%

4.6

Display

8%

7.6

Smart Features

8%

7.7

App & Wellness

4%

7.2

Connectivity

4%

7.7

Design & Durability

6.5
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Xiaomi Mi Band Pulse has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than 58.7% of fitness trackers.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

6.5

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.5
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
This fitness tracker supports heart rate monitoring. 40.2% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Resting heart rate
yes
Resting heart rate
yes
This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate. 52.6% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
?
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support irregular heart rate alerts. 12.4% of fitness trackers support irregular heart rate alerts.
Blood oxygen sensor
no
Blood oxygen sensor
no
This fitness tracker does not have a blood oxygen sensor. 25.4% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
GPS
no
GPS
no
This fitness tracker does not have GPS. 11% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
no
Satellite systems supported
no
This fitness tracker supports no satellite systems which is less versatile than that of 12.2% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 87.8% of fitness trackers.
no satellite positioning support.
GNSS bands supported
no
GNSS bands supported
no
This fitness tracker does not support advanced GNSS bands. 8.9% of fitness trackers support advanced GNSS bands.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
This fitness tracker does not support Galileo. 4.9% of fitness trackers support Galileo.
Acquires GPS faster
no
Acquires GPS faster
no
This fitness tracker does not support faster GPS acquisition. 8.1% of fitness trackers support faster GPS acquisition.
Show more
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
This fitness tracker supports notifications. 27.5% of fitness trackers support notifications.
Vibrating alerts
yes
Vibrating alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports vibration alerts. 16.3% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
Call control
no
Call control
no
This fitness tracker does not support call controls. 41.8% of fitness trackers support call controls.
Call answering
no
Call answering
no
This fitness tracker does not support call answering. 1% of fitness trackers support call answering.
Calendar sync
no
Calendar sync
no
This fitness tracker does not support calendar sync. 20.3% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Show more
Activity reports
yes
Activity reports
yes
This fitness tracker supports activity reports. 5.7% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
Goal setting
?
Achievements
no
Achievements
no
This fitness tracker does not support achievements. 76.2% of fitness trackers support achievements.
Inactivity alerts
?
Coaching
no
Coaching
no
This fitness tracker does not support coaching. 34% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Show more
Bluetooth version
4
Bluetooth version
4
This fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4 which is newer than in 5.1% of fitness trackers and equal to that in 51.3% of fitness trackers.
Maximum Bluetooth range
10 m
Maximum Bluetooth range
10 m
This fitness tracker offers a Bluetooth range of 10 m which is higher than that of 14.9% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 63.4% of fitness trackers.
NFC
no
NFC
no
This fitness tracker does not have NFC. 13% of fitness trackers have NFC.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This fitness tracker does not support Wi-Fi. 1.8% of fitness trackers support Wi-Fi.
Wi-Fi version
no
Wi-Fi version
no
This fitness tracker does not support modern Wi-Fi. 1% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
no Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Battery life
12 days
Battery life
12 days
This fitness tracker offers a battery life of 12 days which is longer than that of 55% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 4.5% of fitness trackers.
source range 10-14 days.
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life in power-saving mode
N/A
Battery capacity
45 mAh
Battery capacity
45 mAh
This fitness tracker has a battery capacity of 45 mAh which is lower than that of 90.1% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 0.7% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Display
no
Display
no
This fitness tracker does not have a display. 76.4% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
N/A
Display type
N/A
Screen resolution
N/A
Pixel density
?
Show more
Form factor
wristband
Hybrid design
no
Hybrid design
no
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.4% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
no
Designed for kids
no
This fitness tracker is not designed for kids. 2.4% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
yes
Replaceable watch band
yes
This fitness tracker has a replaceable watch band. 25.6% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
Band width
?
Show more

Xiaomi Mi Band Pulse vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSports & NavigationBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart FeaturesDesign & DurabilityApp & Wellness
  • Lower resting heart rate
    Resting heart rate
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate, while the average fitness tracker does not. 47.7% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
  • Phone finder support
    Find my phone
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports phone finding, while the average fitness tracker does not. 49.3% of fitness trackers support phone finding.
  • Branded damage-resistant glass
    Has branded damage-resistant glass
    yes
    This fitness tracker uses branded damage-resistant glass, while the average fitness tracker does not. 22.2% of fitness trackers use branded damage-resistant glass.
    Corning Gorilla Glass.
  • 46% lighter
    Thickness
    13.5 g mm
    This fitness tracker is lighter than the average fitness tracker (13.5 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
    13.5 g vs 25 g
  • 2 mm thinner design
    Thickness
    9 mm
    This fitness tracker is thinner than the average fitness tracker (9 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
    9 mm vs 11 mm
  • Built-in route tracker
    Has a route tracker
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports route tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 49.8% of fitness trackers support route tracking.
    Uses connected phone GPS for route maps.
  • 7.78x cheaper
    Xiaomi Mi Band Pulse is cheaper than the average fitness tracker (£9 vs £70).
    £9 vs £70
  • 2 days longer battery life
    Battery life
    12 days
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery life than the average fitness tracker (12 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    source range 10-14 days.
    12 days vs 10 days
  • 7.78x cheaper
    Xiaomi Mi Band Pulse is cheaper than the average fitness tracker (£9 vs £70).
    £9 vs £70
  • Lower resting heart rate
    Resting heart rate
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate, while the average fitness tracker does not. 47.7% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
  • 2 days longer battery life
    Battery life
    12 days
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery life than the average fitness tracker (12 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    source range 10-14 days.
    12 days vs 10 days
  • Branded damage-resistant glass
    Has branded damage-resistant glass
    yes
    This fitness tracker uses branded damage-resistant glass, while the average fitness tracker does not. 22.2% of fitness trackers use branded damage-resistant glass.
    Corning Gorilla Glass.
  • Phone finder support
    Find my phone
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports phone finding, while the average fitness tracker does not. 49.3% of fitness trackers support phone finding.
  • Gesture control
    Gesture control
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports gesture controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 40.8% of fitness trackers support gesture controls.
  • 46% lighter
    Thickness
    13.5 g mm
    This fitness tracker is lighter than the average fitness tracker (13.5 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
    13.5 g vs 25 g
  • 2 mm thinner design
    Thickness
    9 mm
    This fitness tracker is thinner than the average fitness tracker (9 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
    9 mm vs 11 mm
  • Points-based system
    Points-based system
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports a points-based system, while the average fitness tracker does not. 38.6% of fitness trackers support a points-based system.
    Uses PAI.
  • No automatic activity detection
    Automatic activity detection
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support automatic activity detection, while the average fitness tracker does. 52% of fitness trackers support automatic activity detection.
  • No exercise tagging
    Exercise tagging
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support exercise tagging, while the average fitness tracker does. 58.4% of fitness trackers support exercise tagging.
  • 0.5 hours longer charging time
    Charging time
    2 hours
    This fitness tracker has a higher charging time than the average fitness tracker (2 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    2 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • 59.1% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    45 mAh
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (45 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    45 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • 49 m lower waterproof depth rating
    Waterproof depth rating
    1 m
    This fitness tracker has a lower waterproof depth rating than the average fitness tracker (1 m vs 50 m). The average fitness tracker has a waterproof depth rating of 50 m.
    1 m vs 50 m
  • Limited ip rating
    IP rating
    IP67
    This fitness tracker has a lower IP rating than the average fitness tracker (IP67 vs IP68). The average fitness tracker has an IP rating of IP68.
    IP67 vs IP68
  • No personalization options
    Can be personalised
    no
    This fitness tracker cannot be personalized, while the average fitness tracker can. 79.9% of fitness trackers can be personalized.
  • No stopwatch
    Stopwatch
    no
    This fitness tracker does not have a stopwatch, while the average fitness tracker does. 59.7% of fitness trackers have a stopwatch.
  • 5.07x less popular
    Xiaomi Mi Band Pulse has a lower popularity than the average fitness tracker (1 vs 5.1).
    1 vs 5.07
  • 5.2% worse value for money
    Xiaomi Mi Band Pulse has a lower value-for-money score than the average fitness tracker (7.52 vs 7.9).
    7.52 vs 7.92
  • 0.5 hours longer charging time
    Charging time
    2 hours
    This fitness tracker has a higher charging time than the average fitness tracker (2 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    2 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • 59.1% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    45 mAh
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (45 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    45 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • No display
    Display
    no
    This fitness tracker does not have a display, while the average fitness tracker does. 76.1% of fitness trackers have a display.
  • No stopwatch
    Stopwatch
    no
    This fitness tracker does not have a stopwatch, while the average fitness tracker does. 59.7% of fitness trackers have a stopwatch.
  • 49 m lower waterproof depth rating
    Waterproof depth rating
    1 m
    This fitness tracker has a lower waterproof depth rating than the average fitness tracker (1 m vs 50 m). The average fitness tracker has a waterproof depth rating of 50 m.
    1 m vs 50 m
  • Limited ip rating
    IP rating
    IP67
    This fitness tracker has a lower IP rating than the average fitness tracker (IP67 vs IP68). The average fitness tracker has an IP rating of IP68.
    IP67 vs IP68
  • 10 °C higher minimum operating temperature
    Min operating temperature
    -10 °C
    This fitness tracker has a higher minimum operating temperature than the average fitness tracker (-10 °C vs 0 °C). The average fitness tracker supports a minimum operating temperature of 0 °C.
    -10 °C vs 0 °C
  • No personalization options
    Can be personalised
    no
    This fitness tracker cannot be personalized, while the average fitness tracker can. 79.9% of fitness trackers can be personalized.
  • No achievements
    Achievements
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support achievements, while the average fitness tracker does. 75.8% of fitness trackers support achievements.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

N
neowin.net
26/01/2016
Summary of the review
G
gadfit.com
10/12/2015
Summary of the review
B
bee-outdoors.co.uk
14/03/2016
Summary of the review
G
goughlui.com
28/05/2016
Summary of the review
A
androidheadlines.com
22/04/2016
Summary of the review
W
wareable.com
13/01/2016
Summary of the review
T
techadvisor.com
02/12/2015
Summary of the review
F
fitness-factory.net
22/02/2016
Summary of the review
T
tchgdns.de
20/12/2015
Summary of the review
F
frandroid.com
09/06/2016
Summary of the review
T
trentejours.com
16/05/2016
Summary of the review
D
domotiquetechnoseb27.com
02/03/2016
Summary of the review
E
endomorfun.fr
06/06/2016
Summary of the review
B
bxnxg.com
12/07/2017
Summary of the review
F
frandroid.com
12/11/2015
Summary of the review
S
saggiamente.com
17/12/2015
Summary of the review
A
andreagaleazzi.com
21/12/2015
Summary of the review
N
nextgentech.it
23/04/2016
Summary of the review
M
mifans.nl
22/07/2014
Summary of the review
A
androidworld.nl
29/10/2014
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
15/03/2016
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What we like about Xiaomi Mi Band Pulse

  • Excellent value for money, often cited as one of the most affordable trackers with a heart rate sensor.
  • Long battery life, lasting up to 30 days on a single charge.
  • Lightweight and comfortable design, suitable for all-day wear and sleep.
  • IP67 water resistance, allowing for use in rain or during showers.
  • Simple and easy-to-use interface with a reliable companion app (Mi Fit).

What we don't like about Xiaomi Mi Band Pulse

  • Inaccurate step counting, with reports of both underestimating and overestimating distances.
  • Unreliable heart rate monitoring, especially during intense exercise or movement.
  • Limited functionality compared to modern trackers, lacking a screen and advanced smart features.
  • Silicone band durability issues, with users reporting the strap wearing out or scuffing quickly.
  • Difficulties in initial pairing with some smartphones, particularly certain iPhone models.

Verdict

The Xiaomi Mi Band Pulse (also known as Mi Band 1S) is an ultra-lightweight, budget-friendly fitness tracker featuring an added optical heart rate sensor for real-time and sleep-based monitoring. It packs a 45mAh battery offering up to 30 days of standby life, IP67 water resistance, and Bluetooth 4.0 connectivity within a 5.5g pebble-shaped sensor. Its main pros include its highly affordable price point, impressive battery longevity, and compact, comfortable design that integrates well with both Android and iOS via the Mi Fit app. However, it lacks a built-in display, relying instead on three LED indicators, and its heart rate monitoring is primarily designed for stationary readings rather than continuous tracking during high-intensity exercise.

Compare Xiaomi Mi Band Pulse with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Xiaomi Mi Band Pulse and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found