Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0

Spark Activity Tracker Review | 171 Data compared

Avg. price:~£130Battery life:7 daysScreen size:1.18 inchHeart rate monitor:yesGPS:yesWaterproof depth rating:50 m

Spark Activity Tracker Review: Compare 171 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

7.4

Overall score

Score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the fitness tracker's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best fitness trackers on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

7.4

Technical score

20%

?

User score

▲Better than 63% of fitness-trackers
7.4

Technical score

Technical score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

20%

9.6

Sports & Navigation

20%

4.5

Battery

18%

8.1

Health

18%

6.6

Display

8%

6.9

Smart Features

8%

8.5

App & Wellness

4%

8.7

Connectivity

4%

8.9

Design & Durability

▲Better than 66% of fitness-trackers
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £130

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker Spark Activity Tracker

Technical score
Technical score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

20%

9.6

Sports & Navigation

20%

4.5

Battery

18%

8.1

Health

18%

6.6

Display

8%

6.9

Smart Features

8%

8.5

App & Wellness

4%

8.7

Connectivity

4%

8.9

Design & Durability

7.4
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Spark Activity Tracker has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than 58.7% of fitness trackers.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

7.4

Overall score

40%

9.8

Price

8.1
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
This fitness tracker supports heart rate monitoring. 40.2% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Resting heart rate
?
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
?
Irregular heart rate alerts
?
Blood oxygen sensor
no
Blood oxygen sensor
no
This fitness tracker does not have a blood oxygen sensor. 25.4% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
This fitness tracker has GPS. 89.5% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
no
Satellite systems supported
no
This fitness tracker supports no satellite systems which is less versatile than that of 12.2% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 87.8% of fitness trackers.
no satellite positioning support.
GNSS bands supported
yes
GNSS bands supported
yes
This fitness tracker supports advanced GNSS bands. 91.7% of fitness trackers support advanced GNSS bands.
supports GNSS L1 band.
Galileo support
?
Acquires GPS faster
yes
Acquires GPS faster
yes
This fitness tracker supports faster GPS acquisition. 92.4% of fitness trackers support faster GPS acquisition.
QuickGPS support claimed.
Show more
Notifications
?
Vibrating alerts
yes
Vibrating alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports vibration alerts. 16.3% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
Call control
no
Call control
no
This fitness tracker does not support call controls. 41.8% of fitness trackers support call controls.
Call answering
?
Calendar sync
no
Calendar sync
no
This fitness tracker does not support calendar sync. 20.3% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Show more
Activity reports
yes
Activity reports
yes
This fitness tracker supports activity reports. 5.7% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
Goal setting
yes
Goal setting
yes
This fitness tracker supports goal setting. 2.4% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Achievements
?
Inactivity alerts
?
Coaching
no
Coaching
no
This fitness tracker does not support coaching. 34% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Show more
Bluetooth version
4
Bluetooth version
4
This fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4 which is newer than in 5.1% of fitness trackers and equal to that in 51.3% of fitness trackers.
Maximum Bluetooth range
?
NFC
no
NFC
no
This fitness tracker does not have NFC. 13% of fitness trackers have NFC.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This fitness tracker does not support Wi-Fi. 1.8% of fitness trackers support Wi-Fi.
Wi-Fi version
no
Wi-Fi version
no
This fitness tracker does not support modern Wi-Fi. 1% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
no Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Battery life
7 days
Battery life
7 days
This fitness tracker offers a battery life of 7 days which is shorter than that of 53.5% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 22.8% of fitness trackers.
Battery life with GPS on
?
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life in power-saving mode
?
Battery capacity
?
Show more
Display
yes
Display
yes
This fitness tracker has a display. 24.1% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
1.18 inch
Screen size
1.18 inch
This fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.18 inch which is larger than that of 61.5% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 0.7% of fitness trackers.
Display type
?
Screen resolution
N/A
Pixel density
?
Show more
Form factor
clip-on
Hybrid design
no
Hybrid design
no
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.4% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
no
Designed for kids
no
This fitness tracker is not designed for kids. 2.4% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
yes
Replaceable watch band
yes
This fitness tracker has a replaceable watch band. 25.6% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
Band width
23.7 mm
Show more

Spark Activity Tracker vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSports & NavigationBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart FeaturesDesign & DurabilityApp & Wellness
  • 22.2% higher screen brightness
    Screen brightness
    550 nits
    This fitness tracker has a higher screen brightness than the average fitness tracker (550 nits vs 450 nits). The average fitness tracker has screen brightness of 450 nits.
    550 nits vs 450 nits
  • Tracks HRV
    HRV tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports HRV tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 9.9% of fitness trackers support HRV tracking.
  • Built-in GPS
    GPS
    yes
    This fitness tracker has GPS, while the average fitness tracker does not. 11% of fitness trackers have GPS.
  • Multi-sport mode
    Multi-sport mode
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports multi-sport mode, while the average fitness tracker does not. 6.3% of fitness trackers support multi-sport mode.
  • Tracks elevation
    Elevation tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports elevation tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 27.4% of fitness trackers support elevation tracking.
    Elevation via GPS
  • 54.7% lighter
    Thickness
    11.33 g mm
    This fitness tracker is lighter than the average fitness tracker (11.3 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
    11.33 g vs 25 g
  • Built-in gyroscope
    Gyroscope
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a gyroscope, while the average fitness tracker does not. 26.5% of fitness trackers have a gyroscope.
  • Windows compatible
    Compatible with Windows
    yes
    This fitness tracker is compatible with Windows, while the average fitness tracker is not. 22.3% of fitness trackers are compatible with Windows.
    Via TomTom Sports Connect.
  • Tracks HRV
    HRV tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports HRV tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 9.9% of fitness trackers support HRV tracking.
  • Fertile window notifications
    Displays fertile window notifications
    yes
    This fitness tracker displays fertile window notifications, while the average fitness tracker does not. 24.1% of fitness trackers display fertile window notifications.
  • 22.2% higher screen brightness
    Screen brightness
    550 nits
    This fitness tracker has a higher screen brightness than the average fitness tracker (550 nits vs 450 nits). The average fitness tracker has screen brightness of 450 nits.
    550 nits vs 450 nits
  • 0.14 inch larger screen size
    Screen size
    1.18 inch
    This fitness tracker has a higher screen size than the average fitness tracker (1.2 inch vs 1.04 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.04 inch.
    1.18 inch vs 1.04 inch
  • Windows compatible
    Compatible with Windows
    yes
    This fitness tracker is compatible with Windows, while the average fitness tracker is not. 22.3% of fitness trackers are compatible with Windows.
    Via TomTom Sports Connect.
  • Mac OS X compatible
    Compatible with Mac OS X
    yes
    This fitness tracker is compatible with Mac OS X, while the average fitness tracker is not. 28.8% of fitness trackers are compatible with Mac OS X.
    Via USB sync point.
  • Music playback
    Music playback
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports music playback, while the average fitness tracker does not. 1.4% of fitness trackers support music playback.
    Only on music-capable variants with onboard storage.
  • Voice feedback
    Voice feedback
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports voice feedback, while the average fitness tracker does not. 2.3% of fitness trackers support voice feedback.
    Voice coaching works through paired Bluetooth headphones.
  • Camera remote control
    Camera remote control
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports camera remote control, while the average fitness tracker does not. 38.9% of fitness trackers support camera remote control.
    Supports remote camera operation.
  • 54.7% lighter
    Thickness
    11.33 g mm
    This fitness tracker is lighter than the average fitness tracker (11.3 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
    11.33 g vs 25 g
  • Water intake tracking
    Water intake tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports water intake tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 42% of fitness trackers support water intake tracking.
  • Points-based system
    Points-based system
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports a points-based system, while the average fitness tracker does not. 38.6% of fitness trackers support a points-based system.
    Uses Spark Points.
  • 1.5 hours longer charging time
    Charging time
    3 hours
    This fitness tracker has a higher charging time than the average fitness tracker (3 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    3 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • 3 days shorter battery life
    Battery life
    7 days
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (7 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    7 days vs 10 days
  • Not compatible with smart scales
    Compatible with smart scales
    no
    This fitness tracker is not compatible with smart scales, while the average fitness tracker is. 68.1% of fitness trackers are compatible with smart scales.
  • 5.07x less popular
    Spark Activity Tracker has a lower popularity than the average fitness tracker (1 vs 5.1).
    1 vs 5.07
  • 85.7% more expensive
    Spark Activity Tracker is more expensive than the average fitness tracker (£130 vs £70).
    £130 vs £70
  • 5.07x less popular
    Spark Activity Tracker has a lower popularity than the average fitness tracker (1 vs 5.1).
    1 vs 5.07
  • 85.7% more expensive
    Spark Activity Tracker is more expensive than the average fitness tracker (£130 vs £70).
    £130 vs £70
  • 1.5 hours longer charging time
    Charging time
    3 hours
    This fitness tracker has a higher charging time than the average fitness tracker (3 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    3 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • 3 days shorter battery life
    Battery life
    7 days
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (7 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    7 days vs 10 days
  • Not compatible with smart scales
    Compatible with smart scales
    no
    This fitness tracker is not compatible with smart scales, while the average fitness tracker is. 68.1% of fitness trackers are compatible with smart scales.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

C
courier-journal.com
13/12/2013
Summary of the review
F
fitbottomedgirls.com
19/02/2014
Summary of the review
E
eiswuerfelimschuh.de
30/03/2016
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
04/09/2015
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
21/01/2016
Summary of the review
F
fitnessmodern.de
24/12/2023
Summary of the review
A
avguide.ch
13/07/2016
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
2019 (Mis à jour)
Summary of the review
0
01net.com
Date non spécifiée
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
24/10/2015
Summary of the review
M
medium.com
03/12/2017
Summary of the review
A
andreagaleazzi.com
03/02/2016
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
15/04/2020
Summary of the review
S
suzannebrummel.com
17/12/2016
Summary of the review
F
fitsociety.nl
15/01/2016
Summary of the review
I
id.nl
13/03/2016
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What we like about Spark Activity Tracker

  • Extremely easy to set up and use, taking less than five minutes from unboxing to wearing.
  • Highly affordable compared to other trackers, often priced around $59.95.
  • Waterproof up to 100 feet, making it safe for swimming or accidental washes.
  • No charging required; it runs on a replaceable battery that lasts approximately six months.
  • Seamless integration with the SparkPeople online community and reward system for motivation.
  • Versatile clip-on design that can be worn on waistbands, shoes, or bras.

What we don't like about Spark Activity Tracker

  • Lack of direct smartphone syncing; the device must be synced via a USB receiver to a computer.
  • Software and syncing process can be 'buggy' or slow at times.
  • Hardware is described as basic or 'clunky,' lacking a high-density data display on the device itself.
  • The clip can be too tight, making it difficult to attach to thicker fabrics like sweatpants.
  • Not suitable for 'data junkies' who want to view detailed metrics like live heart rate directly on the tracker.

Verdict

The Spark Activity Tracker, notably the TomTom Spark 3 series, is a versatile GPS multisport watch featuring a 1.3-inch monochrome LCD display and a 110mAh rechargeable battery providing up to 3 weeks of tracking or 11 hours with GPS. Key characteristics include 24/7 activity monitoring for steps, sleep, and heart rate, along with specialized modes for running, cycling, swimming (waterproof up to 40m/5 ATM), and gym workouts. Main pros include its accurate standalone GPS for phone-free route tracking, 3GB of internal music storage for up to 500 songs, and a highly secure, comfortable strap design. However, notable cons include a non-touchscreen interface that uses a potentially confusing four-way directional pad, a bulky hardware profile that may be awkward on smaller wrists, and a companion app that is often cited as slow to sync and less intuitive than competitors.

Compare Spark Activity Tracker with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Spark Activity Tracker and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found