OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v3.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Fitness trackers Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v3.0

Jawbone UP3 review: 163 specs compared

Avg. price:~£160Battery life:7 daysScreen size:N/A inchHeart rate monitor:yesGPS:noWaterproof depth rating:?

Jawbone UP3 Review: Compare 163 technical specifications and 42 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

Jawbone UP3
6.5/10

Overall score

Score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
Score components

35%

6.2

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

6.2

Reviews score

10%

5.6

Sentiment score

â–¼Worse than 92% of fitness trackers
7.5

Value for money

Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
Score components

70%

6.5

Overall score

30%

9.7

Price

â–¼Worse than 96%
6.2

Technical score

Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
Score components

20%

7.1

Sports

20%

4.3

Battery

18%

7.5

Health

18%

4.0

Display

8%

6.0

Smart functions

8%

9.7

Wellness

4%

7.4

Connectivity

4%

7.7

Design

â–¼Worse than 84%
6.2

Reviews score

Reviews score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.2 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models

6.2

Mark 7.0 is below the typical mark 7.6 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

6.6

Average grade

20%

8.8

Popularity

Grades by review (42)
30 reviews: 14 with a printed score, 16 estimated from the review. 12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 88%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • jawbone-up3
  • jawbone-up3
  • jawbone-up3
  • jawbone-up3
  • jawbone-up3
  • jawbone-up3
  • jawbone-up3
  • jawbone-up3
  • jawbone-up3
jawbone-up3
jawbone-up3
jawbone-up3
jawbone-up3
jawbone-up3
jawbone-up3
jawbone-up3
jawbone-up3
jawbone-up3
Where to buy
    N/A~ £160
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the Jawbone UP3

Based on 10 · 12

Sleep tracking and the app shine, but heart rate readings disappoint and reviewers split on battery and comfort.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker Jawbone UP3

Technical score
Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
Score components:

20%

7.1

Sports

20%

4.3

Battery

18%

7.5

Health

18%

4.0

Display

8%

6.0

Smart functions

8%

9.7

Wellness

4%

7.4

Connectivity

4%

7.7

Design

6.2
Reviews score
6.2
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
Score components:

70%

6.5

Overall score

30%

9.7

Price

7.5
Heart rate monitor
yes
This fitness tracker supports heart rate monitoring. 36.2% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Resting heart rate
yes
This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate. 47.5% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support high and low heart rate alerts. 36.5% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support irregular heart rate alerts. 13.7% of fitness trackers support irregular heart rate alerts.
Blood oxygen sensor
no
This fitness tracker does not have a blood oxygen sensor. 32.2% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
What reviewers say
GPS
no
This fitness tracker does not have GPS. 12.7% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
no
This fitness tracker supports no satellite systems which is less versatile than that of 14.4% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 85.6% of fitness trackers.
GNSS bands supported
no
This fitness tracker does not support advanced GNSS bands. 8.4% of fitness trackers support advanced GNSS bands.
Galileo support
no
This fitness tracker does not support Galileo. 5.6% of fitness trackers support Galileo.
Acquires GPS faster
no
This fitness tracker does not support faster GPS acquisition. 8.1% of fitness trackers support faster GPS acquisition.
Show more
Notifications
no
This fitness tracker does not support notifications. 72.7% of fitness trackers support notifications.
Vibrating alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports vibration alerts. 14.3% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
Call control
no
This fitness tracker does not support call controls. 40.8% of fitness trackers support call controls.
Call answering
no
This fitness tracker does not support call answering. 0.9% of fitness trackers support call answering.
Calendar sync
no
This fitness tracker does not support calendar sync. 20.5% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Show more
Activity reports
yes
This fitness tracker supports activity reports. 5% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
Goal setting
yes
This fitness tracker supports goal setting. 2.5% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Achievements
yes
This fitness tracker supports achievements. 23.8% of fitness trackers support achievements.
Inactivity alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports inactivity alerts. 21.4% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
Coaching
yes
This fitness tracker supports coaching. 64% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Smart Coach support.
Show more
What reviewers say
Bluetooth version
4
This fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4 which is newer than in 4.6% of fitness trackers and equal to that in 47% of fitness trackers.
Maximum Bluetooth range
?
NFC
no
This fitness tracker does not have NFC. 11.8% of fitness trackers have NFC.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This fitness tracker does not support Wi-Fi. 2.5% of fitness trackers support Wi-Fi.
Wi-Fi version
no
This fitness tracker does not support modern Wi-Fi. 0.9% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
Show more
Battery life
7 days
Market range: <5 days – >180 days
This fitness tracker offers a battery life of 7 days which is shorter than that of 56.1% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 21.9% of fitness trackers.
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery life in training mode
?
Power-saving battery life
N/A
Battery capacity
38 mAh
Market range: <45 mAh – >225 mAh
This fitness tracker has a battery capacity of 38 mAh which is lower than that of 92.4% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 0.6% of fitness trackers.
Show more
What reviewers say
Display
no
This fitness tracker does not have a display. 74.2% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
N/A
Display type
N/A
Screen resolution
N/A
Pixel density
N/A
Show more
What reviewers say
Form factor
wristband
Hybrid design
no
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.1% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
no
This fitness tracker is not designed for kids. 3.3% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
no
This fitness tracker does not have a replaceable watch band. 77.1% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
Band width
12.2 mm
Show more
What reviewers say

Jawbone UP3 vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSportsBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart functionsDesignWellness
  • 0.5 hours shorter charging time
    This fitness tracker has a lower charging time than the average fitness tracker (1 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    1 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • Coaching features
    This fitness tracker supports coaching, while the average fitness tracker does not. 36.3% of fitness trackers support coaching.
    Smart Coach support.
  • Built-in temperature sensor
    This fitness tracker has a temperature sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 13.4% of fitness trackers have a temperature sensor.
    Skin or ambient temperature sensor.
  • Tracks skin temperature
    This fitness tracker supports skin temperature tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 15.3% of fitness trackers support skin temperature tracking.
    Tracks skin temperature trends.
  • Tracks calorie intake
    This fitness tracker supports calorie intake tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 38.4% of fitness trackers support calorie intake tracking.
  • Water intake tracking
    This fitness tracker supports water intake tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 40.9% of fitness trackers support water intake tracking.
  • 1.7 mm thinner design
    This fitness tracker is thinner than the average fitness tracker (9.3 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
    9.3 mm vs 11 mm
  • EDA sensor
    This fitness tracker has an EDA sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 5.9% of fitness trackers have an EDA sensor.
    Galvanic skin response sensor.
  • Built-in temperature sensor
    This fitness tracker has a temperature sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 13.4% of fitness trackers have a temperature sensor.
    Skin or ambient temperature sensor.
  • Tracks skin temperature
    This fitness tracker supports skin temperature tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 15.3% of fitness trackers support skin temperature tracking.
    Tracks skin temperature trends.
  • EDA sensor
    This fitness tracker has an EDA sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 5.9% of fitness trackers have an EDA sensor.
    Galvanic skin response sensor.
  • Sweat tracking
    This fitness tracker supports sweat tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 6.8% of fitness trackers support sweat tracking.
    Tracks perspiration via galvanic skin response.
  • 7 more stored activities
    This fitness tracker has more stored activities than the average fitness tracker (14 vs 7). The average fitness tracker stores 7 activities.
    14 vs 7
  • 0.5 hours shorter charging time
    This fitness tracker has a lower charging time than the average fitness tracker (1 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    1 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • 1.7 mm thinner design
    This fitness tracker is thinner than the average fitness tracker (9.3 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
    9.3 mm vs 11 mm
  • Coaching features
    This fitness tracker supports coaching, while the average fitness tracker does not. 36.3% of fitness trackers support coaching.
    Smart Coach support.
  • Tracks calorie intake
    This fitness tracker supports calorie intake tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 38.4% of fitness trackers support calorie intake tracking.
  • Water intake tracking
    This fitness tracker supports water intake tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 40.9% of fitness trackers support water intake tracking.
  • No pace measurement
    This fitness tracker does not support pace measurement, while the average fitness tracker does. 62.9% of fitness trackers support pace measurement.
  • No notifications
    This fitness tracker does not support notifications, while the average fitness tracker does. 72.3% of fitness trackers support notifications.
  • 69.6% smaller battery capacity
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (38 mAh vs 125 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 125 mAh of battery capacity.
    38 mAh vs 125 mAh
  • No phone finder
    This fitness tracker does not support phone finding, while the average fitness tracker does. 50.9% of fitness trackers support phone finding.
  • 3 days shorter battery life
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (7 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    7 days vs 10 days
  • 15.1% lower review score
    Reviews score
    6.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.2 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models

    6.2

    Mark 7.0 is below the typical mark 7.6 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    6.6

    Average grade

    20%

    8.8

    Popularity

    Grades by review (42)
    30 reviews: 14 with a printed score, 16 estimated from the review. 12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    6.2 vs 7.3
  • 29.1% lower sentiment score
    5.6 vs 7.9
  • No replaceable watch band
    This fitness tracker does not have a replaceable watch band, while the average fitness tracker does. 76.8% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
  • 15.1% lower review score
    Reviews score
    6.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.2 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models

    6.2

    Mark 7.0 is below the typical mark 7.6 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    6.6

    Average grade

    20%

    8.8

    Popularity

    Grades by review (42)
    30 reviews: 14 with a printed score, 16 estimated from the review. 12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    6.2 vs 7.3
  • 29.1% lower sentiment score
    5.6 vs 7.9
  • 2.29x more expensive
    Jawbone UP3 is more expensive than the average fitness tracker (£160 vs £70).
    £160 vs £70
  • 7.9% worse value for money
    Jawbone UP3 has a lower value-for-money score than the average fitness tracker (7.48 vs 8.1).
    7.48 vs 8.07
  • No pace measurement
    This fitness tracker does not support pace measurement, while the average fitness tracker does. 62.9% of fitness trackers support pace measurement.
  • No route tracker
    This fitness tracker does not support route tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 52.3% of fitness trackers support route tracking.
  • 69.6% smaller battery capacity
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (38 mAh vs 125 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 125 mAh of battery capacity.
    38 mAh vs 125 mAh
  • 3 days shorter battery life
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (7 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    7 days vs 10 days
  • No display
    This fitness tracker does not have a display, while the average fitness tracker does. 73.9% of fitness trackers have a display.
  • Old Bluetooth version
    This fitness tracker supports an older Bluetooth version than the average fitness tracker (4 vs 4.1). The average fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4.1.
    4 vs 4.1
  • No notifications
    This fitness tracker does not support notifications, while the average fitness tracker does. 72.3% of fitness trackers support notifications.
  • No phone finder
    This fitness tracker does not support phone finding, while the average fitness tracker does. 50.9% of fitness trackers support phone finding.
  • No stopwatch
    This fitness tracker does not have a stopwatch, while the average fitness tracker does. 60.5% of fitness trackers have a stopwatch.
  • No replaceable watch band
    This fitness tracker does not have a replaceable watch band, while the average fitness tracker does. 76.8% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
  • 20.8% heavier
    This fitness tracker is heavier than the average fitness tracker (29 g vs 24 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 24 g.
    29 g vs 24 g

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
Sarah Moran Nutrition
≈ estimated
19/05/2016
Long-term test · 3 months of daily use
Verdict
Jawbone UP3's smart coach is its standout feature, but the heart rate data offers little real insight for everyday use.
7.0
ToysForUs
≈ estimated
05/05/2016
Long-term test · about 10 months of use and warranty replacement
Verdict
Jawbone UP3 has great software, but the rubber band fails early and needs a warranty replacement.
8.0
Tim Ngwena
≈ estimated
18/01/2016
Long-term review · app, food scanning and sleep coaching
Verdict
Jawbone UP3 is a favourite wearable overall, though food scanning and some app glitches disappoint.
8.0
GadgetsToUse
≈ estimated
06/12/2015
Usage review · one month of wear
Verdict
Jawbone UP3 is a good health-tracking band for those who value data over a display, though it is uncomfortable to sleep in.
4.0
Amit Bhawani
≈ estimated
16/10/2015
Hands-on review · heart rate, sleep and app tests
Verdict
Jawbone UP3 is an interesting tracker with continuous heart rate, but it is overpriced for what it offers; we'd pick a rival instead.
5.0
Techy Agent
≈ estimated
06/06/2015
Hands-on review · one week of use, app and sensors
Verdict
Jawbone UP3 has a strong app and sleek design, but cheaper trackers may offer better value.
4.0
Andrew OHara
≈ estimated
05/05/2015
Hands-on review · comparison with UP2, UP24 and UP Move
Verdict
Jawbone UP3 is best skipped for now, as its new sensors do nothing yet and the UP2 is the better buy.
9.0
MrTechtalk
≈ estimated
28/07/2017
Unboxing and setup · about a week of nightly use
Verdict
Jawbone UP3 is a comfortable, discreet tracker with long battery life and useful Apple Health integration; we clearly recommend it.
8.0
Intellect Digest
≈ estimated
18/09/2015
First look · unboxing and first impressions
Verdict
Jawbone UP3 is a stylish, well-built tracker for anyone who wants a trendy band rather than a bulky one.
Overview video
Overview video
Hands-on video, no verdict

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

6.9
cnet.com
✓ explicit
01/05/2015
Two-week test · Heart rate band
Verdict
The Jawbone UP3 is a tiny, low-key band with an excellent app, but without a screen or workout heart rate, it is hard to justify over the UP2.
7.0
pcmag.com
✓ explicit
07/07/2015
Hands-on review · Sleep and coaching
Verdict
The Jawbone UP3 is a slim, comfortable band with a strong app and Smart Coach, but its very short charging cable and limited heart rate tracking hold it back.
8.0
pocket-lint.com
✓ explicit
30/06/2015
Hands-on review · Sleep and activity
Verdict
The Jawbone UP3 is a stylish tracker with detailed sleep analysis, but it lacks live heart rate and makes you enter workout details yourself.
8.0
techadvisor.com
≈ estimated
17/09/2015
Long-term review · Resting heart rate
Verdict
The Jawbone UP3 suits people who want resting heart rate and REM sleep data, though it can't track height climbed.
6.0
techradar.com
✓ explicit
07/02/2018
Hands-on test · Fitness tracker
Verdict
The Jawbone UP3 has a secure, watch-style band and a strong sleep tracker, but Jawbone has left wearables, so future app updates are unlikely.
6.0
expertreviews.co.uk
✓ explicit
08/12/2015
Hands-on test · Heart rate band
Verdict
The Jawbone UP3 has the best tracker app around, but its missing display, faulty hardware and poor bike-ride tracking hold it back.
6.0
Gearbrain
✓ explicit
19/10/2016
Expert review · Casual tracker
Verdict
The Jawbone UP3 is a stylish band for casual users, with a week-long battery and no display, but athletes who want live heart rate should look elsewhere.
7.0
wareable.com
≈ estimated
18/09/2015
Hands-on review · Passive heart rate
Verdict
The Jawbone UP3 is a stylish tracker with a week-long battery that gained passive heart rate readings after an update, but still can't track heart rate in real time.
6.0
digitalcitizen.life
✓ explicit
12/01/2016
Personal review · Casual tracker
Verdict
The Jawbone UP3 suits casual users who want step and sleep tracking, but its fiddly clasp, stiff charger and lack of a clock face are frustrating.
7.0
trustedreviews.com
✓ explicit
11/09/2015
Long-term test · Updated clasp
Verdict
The Jawbone UP3 is a sleek tracker with a useful coach and strong app support, but its heart-rate sensor is underused, so the UP2 is still the one to pick.
5.0
cravingtech.com
≈ estimated
29/08/2015
Hands-on review · Sleep and heart rate
Verdict
The Jawbone UP3 is a slim, comfortable tracker for steps and sleep, but without live heart rate readings it falls behind rivals.
6.0
thenextweb.com
≈ estimated
27/06/2015
Hands-on test · Daily wear
Verdict
The Jawbone UP3 gives useful app insights, such as sleep tips, but its buckle kept springing open and dropping off the wrist.
T
theverge.com
23/04/2015
✓ explicit
6.6
Summary of the review
Jawbone Up3 review
G
gizmodo.com
14/05/2015
≈ estimated
3.0
Summary of the review
Jawbone UP3 Review: A Fitness Fiasco
5.0
chip.de
≈ estimated
09/07/2015
Hands-on test · Heart-rate band
Verdict
The Jawbone UP3 has a strong app and fairly accurate step counting, but its heart-rate sensor measures only once a day, at rest.
8.0
lesnumeriques.com
≈ estimated
04/07/2015
Hands-on test · Sleep tracking
Verdict
The Jawbone UP3 is a small, easy tracker with detailed sleep data, held back by an awkward clasp and a sleep mode you must switch on yourself.
5.0
frandroid.com
✓ explicit
20/09/2023
Hands-on test · Activity tracker
Verdict
The Jawbone UP3 tracks sleep well with clear charts, but it's a weak pick for sport, since heart rate is only read on waking.
6.0
stuffi.fr
≈ estimated
29/07/2015
Hands-on test · Sleep tracking
Verdict
The Jawbone UP3 suits people who want detailed night-time sleep data and a daily coach, but not those who need heart rate tracked during exercise.
6.8
01net.com
✓ explicit
06/07/2015
Hands-on test · Heart rate sensor
Verdict
The Jawbone UP3 is a slim, simple band, but its heart-rate and sleep readings seemed off in testing and it measures distance less accurately than the UP24.
7.0
le-reviewer.blogspot.com
≈ estimated
20/08/2017
Hands-on review · Activity band
Verdict
The Jawbone UP3 is a seven-day activity band with good sleep tracking, but you must log activities and meals yourself, which gets tedious quickly.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Jawbone UP3

  • Sleek and stylish design that resembles jewelry more than a tech gadget
  • Comprehensive and highly rated companion app featuring 'Smart Coach' insights
  • Superior sleep tracking that captures light, deep, and REM sleep cycles
  • Lightweight and comfortable enough for all-day and overnight wear
  • Solid battery life lasting approximately 5 to 7 days on a single charge

What customers don't like about Jawbone UP3

  • No on-device display, requiring a smartphone to check all stats and progress
  • Fiddly and insecure clasp design that can be difficult to adjust or prone to falling off
  • Limited heart rate monitoring that only tracks resting heart rate, not active or on-demand
  • Proprietary magnetic charging cable is short and can be difficult to align properly
  • Lack of full waterproofing, making it unsuitable for swimming or bathing
  • Occasional Bluetooth pairing and syncing issues with both Android and iOS devices

Verdict

The Jawbone UP3 is a lightweight, screenless fitness tracker weighing 29g and measuring 220 x 12.2 x 9.3mm, featuring a medical-grade hypoallergenic rubber strap and anodized aluminum construction. It utilizes an advanced multi-sensor platform—including a tri-axis accelerometer and bioimpedance sensors for heart rate, respiration, and galvanic skin response—to provide detailed tracking of steps, calories, and advanced sleep stages like REM. Key advantages include its stylish, discreet 'jewelry-like' design, a battery life of up to 7 days, and the highly-regarded Smart Coach app that offers personalized health insights. However, it lacks an on-device display and GPS, does not support on-demand or continuous heart rate monitoring during exercise, and has a fiddly, sometimes insecure clasp mechanism.

Compare Jawbone UP3 with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Jawbone UP3 and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found