OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Drawing tablets Methodology v1.0
Drawing tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Drawing tablets Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Drawing tablets Methodology v1.0

HUION Kamvas Studio 24 Review | 66 Data compared

Avg. price:~£2,460Type:standalone drawing tabletActive drawing area:156132 mm²Resolution:2560x1440Pen pressure levels:8192Report rate:300 RPS

HUION Kamvas Studio 24 Review: Compare 66 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Drawing tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

8.4

Overall score

Score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the drawing tablet's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best drawing tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 97% of models
Score components

90%

8.4

Technical score

10%

?

User score

★Better than 97% of drawing-tablets
8.4

Technical score

Technical score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Drawing tablets category across these key areas: Form Factor, Display & Color, Pen & Input, Connectivity, Controls & Extras.
When it matters
When you want to compare drawing tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 96% of models
Score components

50%

9.4

Pen & Input

40%

7.9

Display & Color

4%

6.0

Form Factor

3%

7.2

Connectivity

3%

3.0

Controls & Extras

★Better than 96% of drawing-tablets
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the drawing tablet.
When it matters
When you want to know how a drawing tablet performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £2,460

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of drawing tablet HUION Kamvas Studio 24

Technical score
Technical score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Drawing tablets category across these key areas: Form Factor, Display & Color, Pen & Input, Connectivity, Controls & Extras.
When it matters
When you want to compare drawing tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 96% of models
Score components:

50%

9.4

Pen & Input

40%

7.9

Display & Color

4%

6.0

Form Factor

3%

7.2

Connectivity

3%

3.0

Controls & Extras

8.4
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the drawing tablet.
When it matters
When you want to know how a drawing tablet performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the drawing tablet.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
HUION Kamvas Studio 24 has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than 65% of drawing tablets.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the drawing tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a drawing tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
Score components:

60%

8.4

Overall score

40%

1.0

Price

6.2
Type
standalone drawing tablet
Display
yes
Display
yes
â–² Better than 52% of models
This drawing tablet has a display. This feature is present on 47.9% of drawing tablets.
10-point touch display.
Compatibility
Windows
Wireless capability
yes
Wireless capability
yes
â–² Better than 82% of models
This drawing tablet supports wireless use. This feature is present on 18% of drawing tablets.
Bluetooth 5.2.
Weight
8,700 g
Weight
8,700 g
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Market range: <250 g – >5.5k g
This drawing tablet weighs 8,700 g, heavier than 99.5% of drawing tablets.
Show more
Active drawing area
156,132 mm²
Active drawing area
156,132 mm²
★ Better than 95% of models
Market range: <15.5k mm² – >127.8k mm²
This drawing tablet offers an active drawing area of 156,132 mm², larger than that of 94.7% of drawing tablets and equal to that of 2.7% of drawing tablets.
526.85 x 296.35 mm.
Screen size
23.8 inch
Screen size
23.8 inch
â–² Better than 86% of models
Market range: <11.6 inch – >23.8 inch
This drawing tablet has a screen size of 23.8 inch, larger than that of 86% of drawing tablets and equal to that of 10.8% of drawing tablets.
Resolution
2560x1440
Resolution
2560x1440
â–² Better than 82% of models
This drawing tablet has a display resolution of 2560x1440, higher than that of 82% of drawing tablets and equal to that of 5.2% of drawing tablets.
Pixel density
123 ppi
Pixel density
123 ppi
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
Market range: <102 ppi – >239 ppi
This drawing tablet has a pixel density of 123 ppi, lower than that of 79.6% of drawing tablets and equal to that of 5.4% of drawing tablets.
Typical brightness
220 nits
Typical brightness
220 nits
â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
Market range: <220 nits – >310 nits
This drawing tablet has a typical brightness of 220 nits, lower than that of 57.1% of drawing tablets and equal to that of 34.1% of drawing tablets.
Show more
Stylus included
yes
Stylus included
yes
Category Benchmark
This drawing tablet comes with a stylus. This feature is present on 100% of drawing tablets.
Two pens included.
Pen technology
EMR (battery-free)
Pen technology
EMR (battery-free)
â–² Better than 5% of models
This drawing tablet uses EMR (battery-free) pen technology, more advanced than that of 4.6% of drawing tablets and equal to that of 95.4% of drawing tablets.
PenTech 3+.
Pen pressure levels
8,192
Pen pressure levels
8,192
â–¼ Worse than 15% of models
Market range: <8.2k – >16.4k
This drawing tablet supports 8,192 pen pressure levels, more than 9.3% of drawing tablets and equal to 75.8% of drawing tablets.
Pen resolution
5,080 LPI
Pen resolution
5,080 LPI
â–² Better than 6% of models
Market range: <5.1k LPI – >5.1k LPI
This drawing tablet supports a pen resolution of 5,080 LPI, higher than that of 5.7% of drawing tablets and equal to that of 94.3% of drawing tablets.
Report rate
300 RPS
Report rate
300 RPS
★ Better than 92% of models
Market range: <200 RPS – >290 RPS
This drawing tablet has a report rate of 300 RPS, higher than that of 92.3% of drawing tablets and equal to that of 7.1% of drawing tablets.
Show more
Bluetooth connectivity
yes
Bluetooth connectivity
yes
â–² Better than 87% of models
This drawing tablet supports Bluetooth. This feature is present on 12.6% of drawing tablets.
USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-C) ports
0
USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-C) ports
0
â–¼ Worse than 17% of models
Market range: <0 – >1
This drawing tablet has 0 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-C) ports, fewer than 17.4% of drawing tablets and equal to 82.6% of drawing tablets.
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-C) ports
0
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-C) ports
0
â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
Market range: <0 – >2
This drawing tablet has 0 USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-C) ports, fewer than 51.8% of drawing tablets and equal to 48.2% of drawing tablets.
USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A) ports
0
USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A) ports
0
â–¼ Worse than 1% of models
Market range: <0 – >0
This drawing tablet has 0 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A) ports, fewer than 1.1% of drawing tablets and equal to 99% of drawing tablets.
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A) ports
0
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A) ports
0
â–¼ Worse than 2% of models
Market range: <0 – >0
This drawing tablet has 0 USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A) ports, fewer than 1.6% of drawing tablets and equal to 98.4% of drawing tablets.
Show more
N. of express keys
0
N. of express keys
0
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
Market range: <0 – >10
This drawing tablet has 0 express keys, fewer than 71.6% of drawing tablets and equal to 28.4% of drawing tablets.
N. of dials
0
N. of dials
0
â–¼ Worse than 22% of models
Market range: <0 – >1
This drawing tablet has 0 dials, fewer than 21.6% of drawing tablets and equal to 78.4% of drawing tablets.
Stand included
yes
Stand included
yes
â–² Better than 71% of models
This drawing tablet comes with a stand. This feature is present on 29.5% of drawing tablets.
Fold-out legs
?
Pen stand included
yes
Pen stand included
yes
â–² Better than 41% of models
This drawing tablet comes with a pen stand. This feature is present on 58.9% of drawing tablets.
Show more

HUION Kamvas Studio 24 vs the average drawing tablet

246810TotalForm FactorDisplay & ColorPen & InputConnectivityControls & Extras
  • 115,368 mm² larger work area
    Active drawing area
    156,132 mm²
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    Market range: <15.5k mm² – >127.8k mm²
    This drawing tablet has a larger active drawing area than the average drawing tablet (156132 mm² vs 40764 mm²). The average drawing tablet offers an active drawing area of 40764 mm².
    526.85 x 296.35 mm.
    156,132 mm² vs 40,764 mm²
  • 28.8% higher report rate
    Report rate
    300 RPS
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    Market range: <200 RPS – >290 RPS
    This drawing tablet has a higher report rate than the average drawing tablet (300 RPS vs 233 RPS). The average drawing tablet has a report rate of 233 RPS.
    300 RPS vs 233 RPS
  • 8.2 inch larger display
    Screen size
    23.8 inch
    â–² Better than 86% of models
    Market range: <11.6 inch – >23.8 inch
    This drawing tablet has a larger screen than the average drawing tablet (23.8 inch vs 15.6 inch). The average drawing tablet has a screen size of 15.6 inch.
    23.8 inch vs 15.6 inch
  • 8 % wider Adobe RGB coverage
    Adobe RGB coverage
    100 %
    ★ Better than 99% of models
    Market range: <72 % – >99 %
    This drawing tablet covers more Adobe RGB than the average drawing tablet (100 % vs 92 %). The average drawing tablet covers 92 % of Adobe RGB.
    100 % vs 92 %
  • Supports touch input
    Touch support
    yes
    â–² Better than 89% of models
    This drawing tablet supports touch input, while the average drawing tablet does not. 11.1% of drawing tablets support touch input.
    10-point touch.
  • Fully laminated display
    Full lamination
    yes
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    This drawing tablet has full lamination, while the average drawing tablet does not. 39% of drawing tablets have full lamination.
  • Anti-reflection coating
    Anti-reflection coating
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This drawing tablet has an anti-reflection coating, while the average drawing tablet does not. 47.7% of drawing tablets have an anti-reflection coating.
    Etched anti-glare glass.
  • Integrated display
    Display
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This drawing tablet has a display, while the average drawing tablet does not. 48.2% of drawing tablets have a display.
    10-point touch display.
  • Integrated display
    Display
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This drawing tablet has a display, while the average drawing tablet does not. 48.2% of drawing tablets have a display.
    10-point touch display.
  • Supports wireless use
    Wireless capability
    yes
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    This drawing tablet supports wireless use, while the average drawing tablet does not. 18.5% of drawing tablets support wireless use.
    Bluetooth 5.2.
  • Newer release
    Release date
    2023
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This drawing tablet was released more recently than the average drawing tablet.
    2,023 vs 2,021
  • 115,368 mm² larger work area
    Active drawing area
    156,132 mm²
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    Market range: <15.5k mm² – >127.8k mm²
    This drawing tablet has a larger active drawing area than the average drawing tablet (156132 mm² vs 40764 mm²). The average drawing tablet offers an active drawing area of 40764 mm².
    526.85 x 296.35 mm.
    156,132 mm² vs 40,764 mm²
  • 8.2 inch larger display
    Screen size
    23.8 inch
    â–² Better than 86% of models
    Market range: <11.6 inch – >23.8 inch
    This drawing tablet has a larger screen than the average drawing tablet (23.8 inch vs 15.6 inch). The average drawing tablet has a screen size of 15.6 inch.
    23.8 inch vs 15.6 inch
  • 8 % wider Adobe RGB coverage
    Adobe RGB coverage
    100 %
    ★ Better than 99% of models
    Market range: <72 % – >99 %
    This drawing tablet covers more Adobe RGB than the average drawing tablet (100 % vs 92 %). The average drawing tablet covers 92 % of Adobe RGB.
    100 % vs 92 %
  • Fully laminated display
    Full lamination
    yes
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    This drawing tablet has full lamination, while the average drawing tablet does not. 39% of drawing tablets have full lamination.
  • Anti-reflection coating
    Anti-reflection coating
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This drawing tablet has an anti-reflection coating, while the average drawing tablet does not. 47.7% of drawing tablets have an anti-reflection coating.
    Etched anti-glare glass.
  • 1 % wider DCI-P3 coverage
    DCI-P3 coverage
    95 %
    â–² Better than 55% of models
    Market range: <88 % – >99 %
    This drawing tablet covers more DCI-P3 than the average drawing tablet (95 % vs 94 %). The average drawing tablet covers 94 % of DCI-P3.
    95 % vs 94 %
  • 28.8% higher report rate
    Report rate
    300 RPS
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    Market range: <200 RPS – >290 RPS
    This drawing tablet has a higher report rate than the average drawing tablet (300 RPS vs 233 RPS). The average drawing tablet has a report rate of 233 RPS.
    300 RPS vs 233 RPS
  • Supports touch input
    Touch support
    yes
    â–² Better than 89% of models
    This drawing tablet supports touch input, while the average drawing tablet does not. 11.1% of drawing tablets support touch input.
    10-point touch.
  • 5.3% lighter pen
    Pen weight
    12.5 g
    â–² Better than 60% of models
    Market range: <10 g – >16 g
    This drawing tablet includes a lighter pen than the average drawing tablet (12.5 g vs 13.2 g). The average drawing tablet pen weighs 13.2 g.
    12.5 g vs 13.2 g
  • Supports Bluetooth
    Bluetooth connectivity
    yes
    â–² Better than 87% of models
    This drawing tablet supports Bluetooth, while the average drawing tablet does not. 13% of drawing tablets support Bluetooth.
  • 1 more HDMI ports
    HDMI ports
    1
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    Market range: <0 – >1
    This drawing tablet has more HDMI ports than the average drawing tablet (1 vs 0). The average drawing tablet has 0 HDMI ports.
    1 vs 0
  • Includes 3.5 mm jack
    3.5 mm audio jack
    yes
    â–² Better than 89% of models
    This drawing tablet includes a 3.5 mm audio jack, while the average drawing tablet does not. 11.5% of drawing tablets include a 3.5 mm audio jack.
    Includes two 3.5 mm audio jacks plus a separate mic jack.
  • Stand included
    Stand included
    yes
    â–² Better than 71% of models
    This drawing tablet comes with a stand, while the average drawing tablet does not. 29.8% of drawing tablets come with a stand.
  • 25.9% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    123 ppi
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <102 ppi – >239 ppi
    This drawing tablet has a lower pixel density than the average drawing tablet (123 ppi vs 166 ppi). The average drawing tablet has a pixel density of 166 ppi.
    123 ppi vs 166 ppi
  • 30 nits dimmer display
    Typical brightness
    220 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
    Market range: <220 nits – >310 nits
    This drawing tablet has lower typical brightness than the average drawing tablet (220 nits vs 250 nits). The average drawing tablet has a typical brightness of 250 nits.
    220 nits vs 250 nits
  • 11.76x heavier design
    Weight
    8,700 g
    â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
    Market range: <250 g – >5.5k g
    This drawing tablet is heavier than the average drawing tablet (8700 g vs 740 g). The average drawing tablet weighs 740 g.
    8,700 g vs 740 g
  • 6 fewer express keys
    N. of express keys
    0
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    Market range: <0 – >10
    This drawing tablet has fewer express keys than the average drawing tablet (0 vs 6). The average drawing tablet has 6 express keys.
    0 vs 6
  • 1 fewer USB-C 3.2 Gen 1 ports
    USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-C) ports
    0
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <0 – >2
    This drawing tablet has fewer USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-C) ports than the average drawing tablet (0 vs 1). The average drawing tablet has 1 USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-C) ports.
    0 vs 1
  • 225.1 mm bulkier body
    Width
    581.9 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
    Market range: <211 mm – >567 mm
    This drawing tablet is wider than the average drawing tablet (581.9 mm vs 356.8 mm). The average drawing tablet is 356.8 mm wide.
    581.9 mm vs 356.8 mm
  • 76.1 mm thicker body
    Thickness
    86.6 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 100% of models
    Market range: <7.5 mm – >26 mm
    This drawing tablet is thicker than the average drawing tablet (86.6 mm vs 10.5 mm). The average drawing tablet is 10.5 mm thick.
    Without stand.
    86.6 mm vs 10.5 mm
  • 15.38x more expensive
    HUION Kamvas Studio 24 is more expensive than the average drawing tablet (£2,460 vs £160).
    £2,460 vs £160
  • 15.38x more expensive
    HUION Kamvas Studio 24 is more expensive than the average drawing tablet (£2,460 vs £160).
    £2,460 vs £160
  • 22.8% worse value for money
    HUION Kamvas Studio 24 has a lower value-for-money score than the average drawing tablet (6.19 vs 7.6).
    6.19 vs 7.6
  • 6.16x less popular
    HUION Kamvas Studio 24 has a lower popularity than the average drawing tablet (1 vs 6.2).
    1 vs 6.16
  • 11.76x heavier design
    Weight
    8,700 g
    â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
    Market range: <250 g – >5.5k g
    This drawing tablet is heavier than the average drawing tablet (8700 g vs 740 g). The average drawing tablet weighs 740 g.
    8,700 g vs 740 g
  • 225.1 mm bulkier body
    Width
    581.9 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
    Market range: <211 mm – >567 mm
    This drawing tablet is wider than the average drawing tablet (581.9 mm vs 356.8 mm). The average drawing tablet is 356.8 mm wide.
    581.9 mm vs 356.8 mm
  • 76.1 mm thicker body
    Thickness
    86.6 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 100% of models
    Market range: <7.5 mm – >26 mm
    This drawing tablet is thicker than the average drawing tablet (86.6 mm vs 10.5 mm). The average drawing tablet is 10.5 mm thick.
    Without stand.
    86.6 mm vs 10.5 mm
  • 138.7 mm taller body
    Height
    361.7 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
    Market range: <139.2 mm – >359 mm
    This drawing tablet is taller than the average drawing tablet (361.7 mm vs 223 mm). The average drawing tablet is 223 mm tall.
    Without stand.
    361.7 mm vs 223 mm
  • 25.9% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    123 ppi
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <102 ppi – >239 ppi
    This drawing tablet has a lower pixel density than the average drawing tablet (123 ppi vs 166 ppi). The average drawing tablet has a pixel density of 166 ppi.
    123 ppi vs 166 ppi
  • 30 nits dimmer display
    Typical brightness
    220 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
    Market range: <220 nits – >310 nits
    This drawing tablet has lower typical brightness than the average drawing tablet (220 nits vs 250 nits). The average drawing tablet has a typical brightness of 250 nits.
    220 nits vs 250 nits
  • 10 fewer touch points
    Touch points
    10
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    Market range: <0 – >10
    This drawing tablet supports fewer touch points than the average drawing tablet (10 vs 0). The average drawing tablet supports 0 touch points.
    10 vs 0
  • 1 fewer USB-C 3.2 Gen 1 ports
    USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-C) ports
    0
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <0 – >2
    This drawing tablet has fewer USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-C) ports than the average drawing tablet (0 vs 1). The average drawing tablet has 1 USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-C) ports.
    0 vs 1
  • 6 fewer express keys
    N. of express keys
    0
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    Market range: <0 – >10
    This drawing tablet has fewer express keys than the average drawing tablet (0 vs 6). The average drawing tablet has 6 express keys.
    0 vs 6
  • 9.29x higher power consumption
    Power consumption
    65 W
    â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
    Market range: <0.3 W – >31 W
    This drawing tablet uses more power than the average drawing tablet (65 W vs 7 W). The average drawing tablet uses 7 W of power.
    Maximum power-on rating.
    65 W vs 7 W

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Third-party reviews

What we like about HUION Kamvas Studio 24

  • Powerful all-in-one performance with 12th gen Intel i7 processor and 32GB RAM for heavy multi-tasking
  • Large 24-inch 2.5K display provides a crisp, expansive drawing area
  • Highly responsive drawing experience with PenTech 3.0, comparable to industry leaders like Wacom
  • Excellent connectivity options including six USB-A ports, HDMI, and DisplayPort
  • Effective 10-point capacitive touch support for Windows finger gestures

What we don't like about HUION Kamvas Studio 24

  • Ergonomics can be clumsy; the dual-foot stand requires manual adjustment of both feet to change positions
  • Internal audio quality is poor due to the speakers being located on the back of the device
  • Included peripherals (Bluetooth keyboard and mouse) feel budget-friendly and lack required AAA batteries
  • Lacks native USB-C ports, requiring adapters for modern USB-C accessories
  • Potential palm rejection issues where resting a hand may accidentally pull out Windows UI panels

Verdict

The Huion Kamvas Studio 24 is a 23.8-inch standalone all-in-one pen computer powered by an Intel Core i7-12700F processor, NVIDIA GTX 1650 graphics, 32GB of DDR4 RAM, and a 1TB SSD. Its primary characteristic is a laminated 2.5K QHD (2560 x 1440) IPS touchscreen display with anti-glare etched glass and 99% sRGB color gamut coverage. Main pros include its powerful workstation capabilities that eliminate the need for an external PC, 10-point capacitive multi-touch support for intuitive navigation, and the inclusion of two battery-free pens (PW550 and PW550S) featuring PenTech 3.0+ technology with 8,192 pressure levels. However, notable cons include its bulky 8.7kg weight that limits portability, a relatively low maximum brightness of 220 nits, and a lack of dedicated USB-C ports for modern peripheral connectivity.

Compare HUION Kamvas Studio 24 with other products in the Drawing tablets category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of HUION Kamvas Studio 24 and other products in the Drawing tablets category

No results found