OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Wi-Fi extenders Methodology v1.0
Wi-Fi extenders Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Wi-Fi extenders Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Wi-Fi extenders Methodology v1.0

Tenda A301 Review | 63 Data compared

Avg. price:~£20Wi-Fi version:Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)Wi-Fi speed:300 MbpsCoverage area:120 m²

Tenda A301 Review: Compare 63 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Wi-Fi extenders category and whether it is worth buying.

4.2

Overall score

Score
4.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the Wi-Fi extender's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to spot the best Wi‑Fi extenders overall.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
Score components

80%

3.5

Technical score

20%

7.2

User score

â–¼Worse than 98% of wi-fi-extenders
3.5

Technical score

Technical score
3.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Wi-Fi extenders category across these key areas: Wi-Fi Performance, Network & Security, Ports, Setup & Management, Hardware & Deployment.
When it matters
When you want to compare Wi‑Fi extenders based on speed, coverage, ports, and wireless features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
Score components

40%

2.1

Wi-Fi Performance

30%

2.6

Network & Security

12%

8.7

Setup & Management

10%

5.7

Hardware & Deployment

8%

3.3

Ports

â–¼Worse than 96% of wi-fi-extenders
7.2

User score

User score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the Wi-Fi extender.
When it matters
When you want to know how a Wi‑Fi extender performs in daily use and how reliably it maintains a stable connection over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
Score components

70%

7.4

User ratings

30%

6.7

Number of reviews

Based on 701 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 88% of wi-fi-extenders
  • tenda-a301
  • tenda-a301
  • tenda-a301
  • tenda-a301
  • tenda-a301
  • tenda-a301
  • tenda-a301
tenda-a301
tenda-a301
tenda-a301
tenda-a301
tenda-a301
tenda-a301
tenda-a301

Best prices

    N/A~ £20

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of Wi-Fi extender Tenda A301

Technical score
Technical score
3.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Wi-Fi extenders category across these key areas: Wi-Fi Performance, Network & Security, Ports, Setup & Management, Hardware & Deployment.
When it matters
When you want to compare Wi‑Fi extenders based on speed, coverage, ports, and wireless features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
Score components:

40%

2.1

Wi-Fi Performance

30%

2.6

Network & Security

12%

8.7

Setup & Management

10%

5.7

Hardware & Deployment

8%

3.3

Ports

3.5
User score
User score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the Wi-Fi extender.
When it matters
When you want to know how a Wi‑Fi extender performs in daily use and how reliably it maintains a stable connection over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
Score components

70%

7.4

User ratings

30%

6.7

Number of reviews

Based on 701 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.2
Popularity
Popularity
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the Wi-Fi extender.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a Wi‑Fi extender that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 52% of models
Popularity:
Tenda A301 has a popularity score of 6.7 points, which is higher than 52% of Wi-Fi extenders.
6.7
Value for money
Value for money
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the Wi-Fi extender's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a Wi‑Fi extender with a good balance between performance and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
Score components:

60%

4.2

Overall score

40%

10

Price

5.9
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
This wi-fi extender supports Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), less advanced than 91.2% of Wi-Fi extenders and equal to 8.8% of Wi-Fi extenders.
Wi-Fi bands
Single-band
Wi-Fi bands
Single-band
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
This wi-fi extender supports Single-band, less versatile than 90.2% of Wi-Fi extenders and equal to 9.8% of Wi-Fi extenders.
6 GHz band support
no
6 GHz band support
no
â–¼ Worse than 6% of models
This wi-fi extender does not support the 6 GHz band. 5.9% of Wi-Fi extenders support the 6 GHz band.
Wi-Fi speed
300 Mbps
Wi-Fi speed
300 Mbps
â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
Market range: <733 Mbps – >5.4k Mbps
This wi-fi extender reaches 300 Mbps Wi-Fi speed, slower than 92.2% of Wi-Fi extenders and equal to 7.8% of Wi-Fi extenders.
Max speed 2.4 GHz
300 Mbps
Max speed 2.4 GHz
300 Mbps
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
Market range: <300 Mbps – >600 Mbps
This wi-fi extender reaches 300 Mbps on 2.4 GHz, slower than 61.8% of Wi-Fi extenders and equal to 36.3% of Wi-Fi extenders.
Show more
Ethernet backhaul
no
Ethernet backhaul
no
â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
This wi-fi extender does not support Ethernet backhaul. 51.6% of Wi-Fi extenders support Ethernet backhaul.
Mesh compatibility
N/A
Mesh standard
N/A
Roaming feature
no
Roaming feature
no
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
This wi-fi extender does not support roaming. 83.3% of Wi-Fi extenders support roaming.
802.11k support
no
802.11k support
no
â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
This wi-fi extender does not support 802.11k. 77% of Wi-Fi extenders support 802.11k.
Show more
N. of LAN ports
1
N. of LAN ports
1
â–¼ Worse than 16% of models
Market range: <1 – >2
This wi-fi extender has 1 LAN port/s, more than 9.8% of Wi-Fi extenders and equal to 74.5% of Wi-Fi extenders.
Ethernet port speed
0.1 Gbps
Ethernet port speed
0.1 Gbps
â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
Market range: <0.1 Gbps – >2.5 Gbps
This wi-fi extender offers 0.1 Gbps Ethernet speed, slower than 75.5% of Wi-Fi extenders and equal to 21.6% of Wi-Fi extenders.
N. of USB ports
0
N. of USB ports
0
â–¼ Worse than 3% of models
Market range: <0 – >0
This wi-fi extender has 0 USB port/s, fewer than 2.9% of Wi-Fi extenders and equal to 97.1% of Wi-Fi extenders.
PoE standard
N/A
Dedicated smartphone app
yes
Dedicated smartphone app
yes
â–² Better than 16% of models
This wi-fi extender comes with a dedicated smartphone app. 15.7% of Wi-Fi extenders come with a dedicated smartphone app.
Web UI management
yes
Web UI management
yes
â–² Better than 2% of models
This wi-fi extender has a web management interface. 2% of Wi-Fi extenders have a web management interface.
Web UI at re.tenda.cn.
Automatic firmware updates
no
Automatic firmware updates
no
â–¼ Worse than 46% of models
This wi-fi extender does not have automatic firmware updates. 46.1% of Wi-Fi extenders have automatic firmware updates.
LED control
yes
LED control
yes
â–² Better than 15% of models
This wi-fi extender has LED control. 14.7% of Wi-Fi extenders have LED control.
Physical LED button.
Buttons present
wps, reset
Show more
Mounting type
wall-plug
Portable design
yes
Portable design
yes
â–² Better than 34% of models
This wi-fi extender has a portable design. 34.3% of Wi-Fi extenders have a portable design.
Height
80 mm
Height
80 mm
â–² Better than 65% of models
Market range: <38 mm – >190 mm
This wi-fi extender is 80 mm tall, shorter than 64.7% of Wi-Fi extenders and equal to 4.9% of Wi-Fi extenders.
Width
57.9 mm
Width
57.9 mm
★ Better than 92% of models
Market range: <61.5 mm – >170 mm
This wi-fi extender is 57.9 mm wide, narrower than 92.2% of Wi-Fi extenders.
Thickness
45 mm
Thickness
45 mm
â–² Better than 56% of models
Market range: <34 mm – >76.2 mm
This wi-fi extender is 45 mm thick, thinner than 55.9% of Wi-Fi extenders and equal to 2% of Wi-Fi extenders.
39.2 mm and 48 mm also appear in some sources.
Show more

Tenda A301 vs the average Wi-Fi extender

246810TotalWi-Fi PerformanceNetwork & SecurityPortsSetup & ManagementHardware & Deployment
  • 5.7 W lower power consumption
    Operating power consumption
    3.8 W
    â–² Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <3.57 W – >15.2 W
    This wi-fi extender uses less power than the average Wi-Fi extender (3.8 W vs 9.5 W). The average Wi-Fi extender uses 9.5 W of power.
    3.8 W vs 9.5 W
  • 67.5% lighter
    Weight
    91 g
    ★ Better than 98% of models
    Market range: <130 g – >600 g
    This wi-fi extender is lighter than the average Wi-Fi extender (91 g vs 280 g). The average Wi-Fi extender weighs 280 g.
    91 g vs 280 g
  • 3.5x cheaper
    Tenda A301 is cheaper than the average Wi-Fi extender (£20 vs £70).
    £20 vs £70
  • 23.5 mm narrower width
    Width
    57.9 mm
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    Market range: <61.5 mm – >170 mm
    This wi-fi extender is narrower than the average Wi-Fi extender (57.9 mm vs 81.4 mm). The average Wi-Fi extender has a width of 81.4 mm.
    57.9 mm vs 81.4 mm
  • 3.5x cheaper
    Tenda A301 is cheaper than the average Wi-Fi extender (£20 vs £70).
    £20 vs £70
  • 5.7 W lower power consumption
    Operating power consumption
    3.8 W
    â–² Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <3.57 W – >15.2 W
    This wi-fi extender uses less power than the average Wi-Fi extender (3.8 W vs 9.5 W). The average Wi-Fi extender uses 9.5 W of power.
    3.8 W vs 9.5 W
  • 67.5% lighter
    Weight
    91 g
    ★ Better than 98% of models
    Market range: <130 g – >600 g
    This wi-fi extender is lighter than the average Wi-Fi extender (91 g vs 280 g). The average Wi-Fi extender weighs 280 g.
    91 g vs 280 g
  • 23.5 mm narrower width
    Width
    57.9 mm
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    Market range: <61.5 mm – >170 mm
    This wi-fi extender is narrower than the average Wi-Fi extender (57.9 mm vs 81.4 mm). The average Wi-Fi extender has a width of 81.4 mm.
    57.9 mm vs 81.4 mm
  • No Ethernet backhaul
    Ethernet backhaul
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    This wi-fi extender does not support Ethernet backhaul, while the average Wi-Fi extender does. 51.1% of Wi-Fi extenders support Ethernet backhaul.
  • No Mesh Wi-Fi support
    Mesh Wi-Fi support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    This wi-fi extender does not support mesh Wi-Fi, while the average Wi-Fi extender does. 65% of Wi-Fi extenders support mesh Wi-Fi.
  • 83.1% slower Wi-Fi speed
    Wi-Fi speed
    300 Mbps
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
    Market range: <733 Mbps – >5.4k Mbps
    This wi-fi extender reaches slower Wi-Fi speed than the average Wi-Fi extender (300 Mbps vs 1775 Mbps). The average Wi-Fi extender reaches 1775 Mbps Wi-Fi speed.
    300 Mbps vs 1,775 Mbps
  • No WPA3 support
    WPA3 support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
    This wi-fi extender does not support WPA3, while the average Wi-Fi extender does. 56.7% of Wi-Fi extenders support WPA3.
  • No QoS support
    QoS support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This wi-fi extender does not support QoS, while the average Wi-Fi extender does. 52.4% of Wi-Fi extenders support QoS.
  • No MU-MIMO support
    MU-MIMO
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
    This wi-fi extender does not support MU-MIMO, while the average Wi-Fi extender does. 71.8% of Wi-Fi extenders support MU-MIMO.
  • No roaming support
    Mesh Wi-Fi support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    This wi-fi extender does not support roaming, while the average Wi-Fi extender does. 82.5% of Wi-Fi extenders support roaming.
  • No 802.11r support
    Mesh Wi-Fi support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    This wi-fi extender does not support 802.11r, while the average Wi-Fi extender does. 57.3% of Wi-Fi extenders support 802.11r.
  • 35.4% worse value for money
    Tenda A301 has a lower value-for-money score than the average Wi-Fi extender (5.95 vs 8.1).
    5.95 vs 8.05
  • 11.4% lower user score
    User score
    7.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the Wi-Fi extender.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a Wi‑Fi extender performs in daily use and how reliably it maintains a stable connection over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Tenda A301
    the average Wi-Fi extender
    Tenda A301 has a lower user score than the average Wi-Fi extender (7.18 vs 8.000).
    7.18 vs 8
  • No Mesh Wi-Fi support
    Mesh Wi-Fi support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    This wi-fi extender does not support mesh Wi-Fi, while the average Wi-Fi extender does. 65% of Wi-Fi extenders support mesh Wi-Fi.
  • 83.1% slower Wi-Fi speed
    Wi-Fi speed
    300 Mbps
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
    Market range: <733 Mbps – >5.4k Mbps
    This wi-fi extender reaches slower Wi-Fi speed than the average Wi-Fi extender (300 Mbps vs 1775 Mbps). The average Wi-Fi extender reaches 1775 Mbps Wi-Fi speed.
    300 Mbps vs 1,775 Mbps
  • No MU-MIMO support
    MU-MIMO
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
    This wi-fi extender does not support MU-MIMO, while the average Wi-Fi extender does. 71.8% of Wi-Fi extenders support MU-MIMO.
  • Limited band support
    Wi-Fi bands
    Single-band
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    This wi-fi extender supports less versatile Wi-Fi bands than the average Wi-Fi extender (Single-band vs Dual-band). The average Wi-Fi extender supports Dual-band Wi-Fi bands.
    Single-band vs Dual-band
  • No beamforming support
    Beamforming
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This wi-fi extender does not support beamforming, while the average Wi-Fi extender does. 82.5% of Wi-Fi extenders support beamforming.
  • 150 Mbps slower 2.4 GHz speed
    Max speed 2.4 GHz
    300 Mbps
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    Market range: <300 Mbps – >600 Mbps
    This wi-fi extender reaches a slower 2.4 GHz speed than the average Wi-Fi extender (300 Mbps vs 450 Mbps). The average Wi-Fi extender reaches 450 Mbps on 2.4 GHz.
    300 Mbps vs 450 Mbps
  • 20% smaller coverage area
    Coverage area
    120 m²
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <93 m² – >260 m²
    This wi-fi extender covers a smaller area than the average Wi-Fi extender (120 m² vs 150 m²). The average Wi-Fi extender covers 150 m².
    Tenda official rating: over 120 m2
    120 m² vs 150 m²
  • No band steering
    Band steering
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    This wi-fi extender does not have band steering, while the average Wi-Fi extender does. 65% of Wi-Fi extenders have band steering.
    Single-band only.
  • Outdated Wi-Fi standard
    Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    This wi-fi extender supports a less advanced Wi-Fi version than the average Wi-Fi extender (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average Wi-Fi extender supports Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • 3 dBm weaker transmit power
    Transmit power
    20 dBm
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    Market range: <20 dBm – >30 dBm
    This wi-fi extender has lower transmit power than the average Wi-Fi extender (20 dBm vs 23 dBm). The average Wi-Fi extender has 23 dBm of transmit power.
    20 dBm vs 23 dBm
  • 21 fewer connected devices
    Max connected devices
    10
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <15 – >128
    This wi-fi extender supports fewer connected devices than the average Wi-Fi extender (10 vs 31). The average Wi-Fi extender supports up to 31 connected devices.
    10 vs 31
  • Limited channel support
    Channel width support
    40 + 20
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    This wi-fi extender supports narrower channel widths than the average Wi-Fi extender (40 + 20 vs 80 + 40 + 20). The average Wi-Fi extender supports 80 + 40 + 20 channel widths.
    40 + 20 vs 80 + 40 + 20
  • 1 dBi lower antenna gain
    Antenna gain
    3 dBi
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    Market range: <2 dBi – >5.97 dBi
    This wi-fi extender has lower antenna gain than the average Wi-Fi extender (3 dBi vs 4 dBi). The average Wi-Fi extender has 4 dBi antenna gain.
    3 dBi vs 4 dBi
  • Basic QAM level
    QAM level
    64-QAM
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    This wi-fi extender uses a less advanced QAM level than the average Wi-Fi extender (64-QAM vs 256-QAM). The average Wi-Fi extender uses 256-QAM QAM.
    64-QAM vs 256-QAM
  • No Ethernet backhaul
    Ethernet backhaul
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    This wi-fi extender does not support Ethernet backhaul, while the average Wi-Fi extender does. 51.1% of Wi-Fi extenders support Ethernet backhaul.
  • No WPA3 support
    WPA3 support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
    This wi-fi extender does not support WPA3, while the average Wi-Fi extender does. 56.7% of Wi-Fi extenders support WPA3.
  • No QoS support
    QoS support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This wi-fi extender does not support QoS, while the average Wi-Fi extender does. 52.4% of Wi-Fi extenders support QoS.
  • No roaming support
    Mesh Wi-Fi support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    This wi-fi extender does not support roaming, while the average Wi-Fi extender does. 82.5% of Wi-Fi extenders support roaming.
  • No 802.11r support
    Mesh Wi-Fi support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    This wi-fi extender does not support 802.11r, while the average Wi-Fi extender does. 57.3% of Wi-Fi extenders support 802.11r.
  • No 802.11k support
    Mesh Wi-Fi support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    This wi-fi extender does not support 802.11k, while the average Wi-Fi extender does. 76.2% of Wi-Fi extenders support 802.11k.
  • No IPv6 support
    IPv6 support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    This wi-fi extender does not support IPv6, while the average Wi-Fi extender does. 85.3% of Wi-Fi extenders support IPv6.
  • 90% slower Ethernet speed
    Ethernet port speed
    0.1 Gbps
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    Market range: <0.1 Gbps – >2.5 Gbps
    This wi-fi extender offers slower Ethernet speed than the average Wi-Fi extender (0.1 Gbps vs 1 Gbps). The average Wi-Fi extender offers 1 Gbps Ethernet speed.
    0.1 Gbps vs 1 Gbps
  • 75% less RAM
    RAM capacity
    64 MB
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <64 MB – >512 MB
    This wi-fi extender has less RAM than the average Wi-Fi extender (64 MB vs 256 MB). The average Wi-Fi extender has 256 MB of RAM.
    64 MB vs 256 MB
  • 5 older release date
    Release date
    2015
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This wi-fi extender was released earlier than the average Wi-Fi extender (2015 vs 2020). The average Wi-Fi extender was released in 2020.
    October 2015
    2015 vs 2020

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

E
eteknix.com
25/10/2015
Summary of the review
Tenda A301 Wireless N300 Universal Range Extender Review

Third-party reviews

Based on 701 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Tenda A301

  • Extremely affordable price point compared to mesh systems
  • Quick and easy setup, often taking less than five minutes via WPS
  • Compact wall-plug design that saves space
  • Includes a Fast Ethernet port for connecting wired devices like Smart TVs
  • Intelligent signal indicator light helps find optimal placement
  • Beamforming technology helps focus signal towards connected devices

What we don't like about Tenda A301

  • Supports only the older 2.4GHz Wi-Fi 4 (N300) standard
  • Frequent reports of connection drops and needing periodic reboots
  • Actual range coverage may be significantly less than manufacturer claims
  • Significant reduction in internet speed when connected through the extender
  • Does not support modern features like MU-MIMO or Mesh networking
  • Build quality can feel somewhat fragile according to some users

Verdict

The Tenda A301 is a compact N300 wireless range extender designed to eliminate dead zones by providing single-band 2.4GHz speeds up to 300Mbps across approximately 1,200 square feet. It features two external omni-directional antennas, a fast 10/100Mbps Ethernet port for wired connectivity, and supports both repeater and access point modes. Key advantages include a simple three-step setup process facilitated by a dedicated WPS button and an intelligent signal indicator that uses color-coded LEDs to help users find the optimal placement. However, it lacks support for the faster 5GHz band, its Ethernet port is not Gigabit-capable, and some users report significant speed drops and frequent connection stability issues over long distances.

Compare Tenda A301 with other products in the Wi-Fi extenders category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Tenda A301 and other products in the Wi-Fi extenders category

No results found