OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Wet-Dry Vacuums Methodology v1.0
Wet-Dry Vacuums Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Wet-Dry Vacuums Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Wet-Dry Vacuums Methodology v1.0

Roborock F25 RT-2 Review | 43 Data compared

Avg. price:~£170Suction pressure:20 kPaCapacity:0.72 LPower:?Noise level:74 dBWeight:4 kg

Roborock F25 RT-2 Review: Compare 43 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Wet-Dry Vacuums category and whether it is worth buying.

7.2

Overall score

Score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of products in the Wet-Dry Vacuums category, based on technical analysis and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference for identifying the best products in the Wet-Dry Vacuums category.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 87% of models
Score components

80%

6.9

Technical score

20%

8.4

User score

▲Better than 87% of wet-dry-vacuums
6.9

Technical score

Technical score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Wet-Dry Vacuums category across these key areas: Performance, Battery, Design & Mobility, Filter & Accessories.
When it matters
When you want to compare products in the Wet-Dry Vacuums category by technical performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 82% of models
Score components

40%

6.9

Performance

22%

8.1

Design & Mobility

20%

5.5

Filter & Accessories

18%

6.9

Battery

▲Better than 82% of wet-dry-vacuums
8.4

User score

User score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total review volume for products in the Wet-Dry Vacuums category.
When it matters
When you want to know how products in the Wet-Dry Vacuums category perform in everyday use and how reliable owners find them over time.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 67% of models
Score components

70%

8.0

User ratings

30%

9.3

Number of reviews

Based on 3,040 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
▲Better than 67% of wet-dry-vacuums
  • roborock-f25-rt-2
  • roborock-f25-rt-2
  • roborock-f25-rt-2
  • roborock-f25-rt-2
  • roborock-f25-rt-2
  • roborock-f25-rt-2
  • roborock-f25-rt-2
  • roborock-f25-rt-2
  • roborock-f25-rt-2
roborock-f25-rt-2
roborock-f25-rt-2
roborock-f25-rt-2
roborock-f25-rt-2
roborock-f25-rt-2
roborock-f25-rt-2
roborock-f25-rt-2
roborock-f25-rt-2
roborock-f25-rt-2

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of wet-dry vacuum Roborock F25 RT-2

Technical score
Technical score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Wet-Dry Vacuums category across these key areas: Performance, Battery, Design & Mobility, Filter & Accessories.
When it matters
When you want to compare products in the Wet-Dry Vacuums category by technical performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 82% of models
Score components:

40%

6.9

Performance

22%

8.1

Design & Mobility

20%

5.5

Filter & Accessories

18%

6.9

Battery

6.9
User score
User score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total review volume for products in the Wet-Dry Vacuums category.
When it matters
When you want to know how products in the Wet-Dry Vacuums category perform in everyday use and how reliable owners find them over time.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 67% of models
Score components

70%

8.0

User ratings

30%

9.3

Number of reviews

Based on 3,040 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.4
Popularity
Popularity
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by products in the Wet-Dry Vacuums category.
When it matters
When you prefer products in the Wet-Dry Vacuums category that have been chosen and reviewed by many other buyers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 83% of models
Popularity:
Roborock F25 RT-2 has a popularity score of 9.3 points, which is higher than 82.7% of products in this category.
9.3
Value for money
Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the overall score of products in the Wet-Dry Vacuums category with their prices.
When it matters
When you are comparing products in the Wet-Dry Vacuums category and want a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 81% of models
Score components:

60%

7.2

Overall score

40%

9.6

Price

7.9
Power
?
Variable power
yes
Variable power
yes
▲ Better than 65% of models
This wet-dry vacuum has adjustable suction power. This feature is present on 35% of wet-dry vacuums.
Capacity
0.72 L
Capacity
0.72 L
▼ Worse than 76% of models
Market range: <0.7 L – >30 L
This wet-dry vacuum has a tank capacity of 0.72 L, which is smaller than that of 76.2% of wet-dry vacuums and the same as that of 10.9% of wet-dry vacuums.
Noise level
74 dB
Noise level
74 dB
▲ Better than 67% of models
Market range: <70 dB – >80 dB
This wet-dry vacuum operates at a noise level of 74 dB, which is lower than that of 67.4% of wet-dry vacuums and the same as that of 7.4% of wet-dry vacuums.
Suction pressure
20 kPa
Suction pressure
20 kPa
▲ Better than 55% of models
Market range: <11.5 kPa – >24 kPa
This wet-dry vacuum has a suction pressure of 20 kPa, which is higher than that of 55% of wet-dry vacuums and the same as that of 15.6% of wet-dry vacuums.
Show more
Cordless
yes
Cordless
yes
▲ Better than 71% of models
This wet-dry vacuum supports cordless operation. This feature is present on 29.6% of wet-dry vacuums.
Battery type
Li-ion
Battery runtime
40 minutes
Battery runtime
40 minutes
▲ Better than 42% of models
Market range: <25 minutes – >65 minutes
This wet-dry vacuum offers 40 minutes of battery runtime, which is longer than that of 42% of wet-dry vacuums and the same length as that of 18% of wet-dry vacuums.
Charging time
3.5 hours
Charging time
3.5 hours
▲ Better than 88% of models
Market range: <3.5 hours – >4.5 hours
This wet-dry vacuum charges in 3.5 hours, a time shorter than that of 87.8% of wet-dry vacuums and the same as that of 6.1% of wet-dry vacuums.
Battery voltage
21.6 V
Battery voltage
21.6 V
▼ Worse than 36% of models
Market range: <18 V – >25.9 V
This wet-dry vacuum has a battery voltage of 21.6 V, which is higher than that of 17% of wet-dry vacuums and the same as that of 47.5% of wet-dry vacuums.
Show more
Power cable length
N/A
Operating radius
N/A
Bagless
yes
Bagless
yes
▲ Better than 34% of models
This wet-dry vacuum is bagless. This feature is present on 66.5% of wet-dry vacuums.
Tank material
plastic
Tank material
plastic
▼ Worse than 42% of models
This wet-dry vacuum uses plastic for its tank, which is less durable than the tank materials used by 41.6% of wet-dry vacuums and comparable in durability to those used by 58.4% of them.
Power cable holder
yes
Power cable holder
yes
▲ Better than 35% of models
This wet-dry vacuum has a holder for the power cord. This feature is present on 65.5% of wet-dry vacuums.
Show more
N. of filters
1
N. of filters
1
▼ Worse than 76% of models
Market range: <1 – >3
This wet-dry vacuum has 1 filters, fewer than 75.7% of wet-dry vacuums and the same number as 24.3% of wet-dry vacuums.
HEPA filter
yes
HEPA filter
yes
▲ Better than 58% of models
This wet-dry vacuum includes a HEPA filter. This feature is present on 41.9% of wet-dry vacuums.
Washable filter
yes
Washable filter
yes
▲ Better than 8% of models
This wet-dry vacuum includes a washable filter. This feature is present on 92% of wet-dry vacuums.
Automatic filter cleaning
no
Automatic filter cleaning
no
▼ Worse than 9% of models
This wet-dry vacuum does not have automatic filter cleaning. This feature is present on 9.4% of wet-dry vacuums.
Flexible hose
no
Flexible hose
no
▼ Worse than 73% of models
This wet-dry vacuum does not include a flexible hose. This feature is present on 72.9% of wet-dry vacuums.
Show more

Roborock F25 RT-2 vs the average wet-dry vacuum

246810TotalPerformanceBatteryDesign & MobilityFilter & Accessories
  • Cordless operation
    Cordless
    yes
    ▲ Better than 71% of models
    This wet-dry vacuum supports cordless operation; the average wet-dry vacuum requires a power cord.
  • Adjustable power
    Variable power
    yes
    ▲ Better than 65% of models
    This wet-dry vacuum has adjustable suction power; the average wet-dry vacuum does not have adjustable suction power.
  • Includes a HEPA filter
    HEPA filter
    yes
    ▲ Better than 58% of models
    This wet-dry vacuum includes a HEPA filter; the average wet-dry vacuum does not include a HEPA filter.
  • 29.8% lighter
    Weight
    4 kg
    ▲ Better than 88% of models
    Market range: <3.79 kg – >9.1 kg
    40% lighter: this wet-dry vacuum is lighter than the average wet-dry vacuum (4 kg vs 5.7 kg).
    4 kg vs 5.7 kg
  • Battery level indicator
    Battery level indicator
    yes
    ▲ Better than 72% of models
    This wet-dry vacuum has a battery-level indicator; the average wet-dry vacuum does not have a battery-level indicator.
  • 0.5 hours less charging time
    Charging time
    3.5 hours
    ▲ Better than 88% of models
    Market range: <3.5 hours – >4.5 hours
    This wet-dry vacuum takes 3.5 hours to charge; the average wet-dry vacuum takes 4 hours to charge.
    3.5 hours vs 4 hours
  • 2 kPa more suction pressure
    Suction pressure
    20 kPa
    ▲ Better than 55% of models
    Market range: <11.5 kPa – >24 kPa
    This wet-dry vacuum has a suction pressure of 20 kPa; the average wet-dry vacuum has a suction pressure of 18 kPa.
    20 kPa vs 18 kPa
  • 2 dB less operating noise
    Noise level
    74 dB
    ▲ Better than 67% of models
    Market range: <70 dB – >80 dB
    This wet-dry vacuum operates at a noise level of 74 dB; the average wet-dry vacuum operates at a noise level of 76 dB.
    74 dB vs 76 dB
  • 4.9% higher user score
    User score
    8.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews with the total review volume for products in the Wet-Dry Vacuums category.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how products in the Wet-Dry Vacuums category perform in everyday use and how reliable owners find them over time.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Roborock F25 RT-2
    the average wet-dry vacuum
    Roborock F25 RT-2 has a higher user score than the average wet-dry vacuum (8.40 vs 8.000).
    8.4 vs 8
  • 41.7% more popular
    Roborock F25 RT-2 is more popular than the average wet-dry vacuum (9.32 vs 6.6).
    9.32 vs 6.58
  • 5.9% better value for money
    Roborock F25 RT-2 offers better value for money than the average wet-dry vacuum (7.92 vs 7.5).
    7.92 vs 7.48
  • Adjustable power
    Variable power
    yes
    ▲ Better than 65% of models
    This wet-dry vacuum has adjustable suction power; the average wet-dry vacuum does not have adjustable suction power.
  • 2 kPa more suction pressure
    Suction pressure
    20 kPa
    ▲ Better than 55% of models
    Market range: <11.5 kPa – >24 kPa
    This wet-dry vacuum has a suction pressure of 20 kPa; the average wet-dry vacuum has a suction pressure of 18 kPa.
    20 kPa vs 18 kPa
  • 2 dB less operating noise
    Noise level
    74 dB
    ▲ Better than 67% of models
    Market range: <70 dB – >80 dB
    This wet-dry vacuum operates at a noise level of 74 dB; the average wet-dry vacuum operates at a noise level of 76 dB.
    74 dB vs 76 dB
  • Cordless operation
    Cordless
    yes
    ▲ Better than 71% of models
    This wet-dry vacuum supports cordless operation; the average wet-dry vacuum requires a power cord.
  • Battery level indicator
    Battery level indicator
    yes
    ▲ Better than 72% of models
    This wet-dry vacuum has a battery-level indicator; the average wet-dry vacuum does not have a battery-level indicator.
  • 0.5 hours less charging time
    Charging time
    3.5 hours
    ▲ Better than 88% of models
    Market range: <3.5 hours – >4.5 hours
    This wet-dry vacuum takes 3.5 hours to charge; the average wet-dry vacuum takes 4 hours to charge.
    3.5 hours vs 4 hours
  • 29.8% lighter
    Weight
    4 kg
    ▲ Better than 88% of models
    Market range: <3.79 kg – >9.1 kg
    40% lighter: this wet-dry vacuum is lighter than the average wet-dry vacuum (4 kg vs 5.7 kg).
    4 kg vs 5.7 kg
  • 13.5% less external volume
    Volume
    63,800 cm³
    ▲ Better than 73% of models
    Market range: <41.2k cm³ – >109k cm³
    This wet-dry vacuum has a volume of 63800 cm³; the average wet-dry vacuum has a volume of 73724.2 cm³.
    63,800 cm³ vs 73,724.2 cm³
  • Includes a HEPA filter
    HEPA filter
    yes
    ▲ Better than 58% of models
    This wet-dry vacuum includes a HEPA filter; the average wet-dry vacuum does not include a HEPA filter.
  • 14.28 L less tank capacity
    Capacity
    0.72 L
    ▼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <0.7 L – >30 L
    This wet-dry vacuum has a tank capacity of 0.7 L; the average wet-dry vacuum has a tank capacity of 15 L.
    0.72 L vs 15 L
  • 1,500 mAh less battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    2,500 mAh
    ▼ Worse than 84% of models
    Market range: <2.5k mAh – >5k mAh
    This wet-dry vacuum has a battery capacity of 2500 mAh; the average wet-dry vacuum has a battery capacity of 4000 mAh.
    2,500 mAh vs 4,000 mAh
  • No rigid extension tubes
    Rigid extension tubes
    no
    ▼ Worse than 68% of models
    This wet-dry vacuum does not include rigid extension tubes; the average wet-dry vacuum includes rigid extension tubes.
  • No universal floor nozzle
    Universal floor nozzle
    no
    ▼ Worse than 70% of models
    This wet-dry vacuum does not include a universal floor nozzle; the average wet-dry vacuum includes a universal floor nozzle.
  • 1 fewer filters
    N. of filters
    1
    ▼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <1 – >3
    This wet-dry vacuum has fewer filters than the average wet-dry vacuum (1 vs 2).
    1 vs 2
  • 2 fewer wheels
    Number of wheels
    2
    ▼ Worse than 73% of models
    Market range: <2 – >4
    This wet-dry vacuum has fewer wheels than the average wet-dry vacuum (2 vs 4).
    2 vs 4
  • No crevice nozzle
    Flat crevice nozzle
    no
    ▼ Worse than 73% of models
    This wet-dry vacuum does not include a flat crevice nozzle; the average wet-dry vacuum includes a flat crevice nozzle.
  • No flexible hose
    Flexible hose
    no
    ▼ Worse than 73% of models
    This wet-dry vacuum does not include a flexible hose; the average wet-dry vacuum includes a flexible hose.
  • 30.8% more expensive
    Roborock F25 RT-2 is more expensive than the average wet-dry vacuum (£170 vs £130).
    £170 vs £130
  • 14.28 L less tank capacity
    Capacity
    0.72 L
    ▼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <0.7 L – >30 L
    This wet-dry vacuum has a tank capacity of 0.7 L; the average wet-dry vacuum has a tank capacity of 15 L.
    0.72 L vs 15 L
  • 1,500 mAh less battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    2,500 mAh
    ▼ Worse than 84% of models
    Market range: <2.5k mAh – >5k mAh
    This wet-dry vacuum has a battery capacity of 2500 mAh; the average wet-dry vacuum has a battery capacity of 4000 mAh.
    2,500 mAh vs 4,000 mAh
  • 2 fewer wheels
    Number of wheels
    2
    ▼ Worse than 73% of models
    Market range: <2 – >4
    This wet-dry vacuum has fewer wheels than the average wet-dry vacuum (2 vs 4).
    2 vs 4
  • No rigid extension tubes
    Rigid extension tubes
    no
    ▼ Worse than 68% of models
    This wet-dry vacuum does not include rigid extension tubes; the average wet-dry vacuum includes rigid extension tubes.
  • No universal floor nozzle
    Universal floor nozzle
    no
    ▼ Worse than 70% of models
    This wet-dry vacuum does not include a universal floor nozzle; the average wet-dry vacuum includes a universal floor nozzle.
  • 1 fewer filters
    N. of filters
    1
    ▼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <1 – >3
    This wet-dry vacuum has fewer filters than the average wet-dry vacuum (1 vs 2).
    1 vs 2
  • No flexible hose
    Flexible hose
    no
    ▼ Worse than 73% of models
    This wet-dry vacuum does not include a flexible hose; the average wet-dry vacuum includes a flexible hose.
  • No crevice nozzle
    Flat crevice nozzle
    no
    ▼ Worse than 73% of models
    This wet-dry vacuum does not include a flat crevice nozzle; the average wet-dry vacuum includes a flat crevice nozzle.
  • No blower function
    Blowing attachment
    no
    ▼ Worse than 64% of models
    This wet-dry vacuum does not include a blowing attachment; the average wet-dry vacuum includes a blowing attachment.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

G
gadgetguy.com.au
16/10/2025
Summary of the review
Roborock F25 RT review: Mopping without the hassle
T
theaureview.com
22/12/2025
Summary of the review
The Roborock F25 RT Wet and Dry Vacuum provides a no-fuss floor clean
T
testit.de
13/07/2026
Summary of the review
Roborock F25 Review - testit.de
(Translated)Show original
T
tomshw.it
11/03/2025
Summary of the review
Roborock F25 RT review: The affordable floor washer that fits anywhere
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on 3,040 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: August 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Roborock F25 RT-2

  • Powerful 20,000Pa suction that cleans up wet and dry messes efficiently in one step
  • Effective 90°C hot water roller washing and hot air self-cleaning system that prevents odors
  • 180° lay-flat design allows it to glide smoothly under low furniture
  • Dual edge-to-edge cleaning roller gets exceptionally close to baseboards and corners
  • Zero-tangle jaw scraper system effectively prevents pet and human hair from wrapping around the roller
  • Generous clean and dirty water tank capacities reduce the frequency of refills and emptying
  • Lightweight frame compared to higher-end models, making it agile and easy to maneuver

What we don't like about Roborock F25 RT-2

  • Comparatively short battery life (around 30-35 minutes) which may not suffice for large homes
  • The self-cleaning cycle and hot air drying functions can be quite loud
  • Lacks a detailed LED battery percentage screen, using a basic bar indicator instead
  • Does not include advanced features found on higher tiers, such as an LED headlight, auto-propelling wheels, or a dedicated solution tank
  • Struggles to remove heavy, deeply dried-on stains or grout line grime without multiple passes
  • The horizontal, base-mounted clean water tank design makes it difficult to visually eyeball remaining water levels
  • Opening and cleaning the dirty water tank can require a bit of force and manual effort to clear out trapped hair

Verdict

The Roborock F25 RT-2 is a versatile, cordless wet-dry vacuum and mop combo that delivers 20,000 Pa of suction power along with a 450 RPM roller rotation speed and 20 Newtons of downward pressure to clear tough floor stains. Its standout features include a 180-degree FlatReach design with a slim 12.5 cm profile for cleaning under furniture, a 70-degree swivel head, <1 mm dual-sided edge-to-edge cleaning, and an 870 ml clean water tank paired with a 720 ml dirty water tank. Main pros highlight the TÜV-certified JawScrapers zero-tangle system for pet hair, a lightweight 4.0 kg frame with optimized rolling wheels for fluid movement, and an automated 90°C high-temperature self-washing and hot-air flash drying dock that provides hands-free maintenance. However, notable cons include its relatively short 35-to-40-minute runtime depending on the power mode, a lack of an automatic power-off when stood completely upright, a noisy self-cleaning process that can reach up to 85 dB, and the potential to leave behind foam streaks or water residue if the drying cycle is interrupted.

Compare Roborock F25 RT-2 with other products in the Wet-Dry Vacuums category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Roborock F25 RT-2 and other products in the Wet-Dry Vacuums category

No results found