OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS

Rowenta RO3927 Review | 52 Data compared

Avg. price:~£60Suction power (AW):?Battery runtime:N/A minutesCapacity:3 LWeight:3.85 kg

Rowenta RO3927 Review: Compare 52 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Vacuum Cleaners category and whether it is worth buying.

5.8

Overall score

Score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the vacuum cleaner's quality, based on technical analysis and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference for identifying the best vacuum cleaners on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 98% of models
Score components

80%

5.8

Technical Score

20%

?

User score

▼Worse than 98% of vacuum-cleaners
5.8

Technical Score

Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the vacuum cleaner's technical performance across six key areas: performance, battery and power supply, filtration, attachments, design, and smart features.
When it matters
When you want to compare vacuum cleaners by cleaning performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 93% of models
Score components

28%

6.3

Performance

22%

4.0

Battery

18%

8.6

Filtration

14%

5.2

Attachments

10%

5.9

Design

8%

4.0

Smart features

▼Worse than 93% of vacuum-cleaners
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £60
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Verdict

The Rowenta Compact Power RO3927 is a corded cylinder bagged vacuum cleaner designed for dry household cleaning across carpets and hard floors. It features a 900W maximum low-consumption motor (750W typical power input), an integrated multi-surface brush, a 3-litre Hygiene+ dust bag capacity, and a three-stage advanced filtration system capable of capturing 99.98% of dust and allergens. Key advantages include its lightweight build at just 3.85 kg, an extensive 8.8-metre operating radius with an automatic 6.2-metre cable rewind mechanism, and an airtight, mess-free bag removal system. However, the appliance suffers from a high operational noise level of 79 dB, does not include on-board storage slots for its smaller attachment nozzles, and some users report poor maneuverability due to its three-wheel configuration tracking unevenly.

Technical Specifications of vacuum cleaner Rowenta RO3927

Technical Score
Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the vacuum cleaner's technical performance across six key areas: performance, battery and power supply, filtration, attachments, design, and smart features.
When it matters
When you want to compare vacuum cleaners by cleaning performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 93% of models
Score components:

28%

6.3

Performance

22%

4.0

Battery

18%

8.6

Filtration

14%

5.2

Attachments

10%

5.9

Design

8%

4.0

Smart features

5.8
Rowenta RO3927 has a technical score of 5.8 points, which is lower than 93.1% of vacuum cleaners.
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you prefer a vacuum cleaner that has been chosen and reviewed by many other buyers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
Rowenta RO3927 has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than 61.7% of vacuum cleaners.
1.0
Rowenta RO3927 has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than 61.7% of vacuum cleaners.
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the vacuum cleaner's overall score with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a vacuum cleaner with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 96% of models
Score components:

60%

5.8

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.1
Rowenta RO3927 has a value-for-money score of 7.1 points, which is lower than 92.5% of vacuum cleaners.
Suction power (AW)
?
Suction power (kPa)
19 kPa
Suction power (kPa)
19 kPa
▼ Worse than 54% of models
Market range: <11 kPa – >30 kPa
This vacuum cleaner has a suction pressure of 19 kPa, which is lower than that of 54.3% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 3.7% of vacuum cleaners.
Airflow
27 L/s
Airflow
27 L/s
▼ Worse than 56% of models
Market range: <16.5 L/s – >52 L/s
This vacuum cleaner delivers 27 L/s airflow, which is lower than that of 56% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 8% of vacuum cleaners.
Motor type
effitech
Power consumption
750 W
Power consumption
750 W
▼ Worse than 69% of models
Market range: <165 W – >899 W
This vacuum cleaner draws 750 W, which is higher than the power consumption of 69.3% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 6.6% of vacuum cleaners.
Show more
Cordless
no
Cordless
no
▼ Worse than 50% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not work cordlessly. 49.5% of vacuum cleaners offer cordless operation.
Battery runtime
N/A
Charging time
N/A
Battery capacity
N/A
Battery voltage
N/A
Show more
Filter class
hepa
Filter class
hepa
▼ Worse than 38% of models
This vacuum cleaner uses filter class hepa, which is more advanced than the class used by 16% of vacuum cleaners and the same as the class used by 46% of vacuum cleaners.
Minimum overall efficiency
99.98%
Minimum overall efficiency
99.98%
▲ Better than 79% of models
Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
This vacuum cleaner reaches 99.98% minimum overall efficiency, which is higher than that of 78.6% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 5.6% of vacuum cleaners.
Suitable for allergy sufferers
yes
Suitable for allergy sufferers
yes
▲ Better than 18% of models
This vacuum cleaner is suitable for allergy sufferers. 82.4% of vacuum cleaners are allergy-friendly.
Capacity
3 L
Capacity
3 L
▲ Better than 81% of models
Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
This vacuum cleaner has a dust capacity of 3 L, which is larger than that of 80.6% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 4.1% of vacuum cleaners.
Bagless
no
Bagless
no
▼ Worse than 79% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not use a bagless design. 78.6% of vacuum cleaners use this setup.
Show more
Main brush type
classic
Roller type
none
Anti-tangle brush
no
Anti-tangle brush
no
▼ Worse than 26% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include an anti-tangle brush. 25.7% of vacuum cleaners include this feature.
Mini motorized brush
no
Mini motorized brush
no
▼ Worse than 27% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a mini motorized brush. 26.9% of vacuum cleaners include this attachment.
Suitable for pet owners
no
Suitable for pet owners
no
▼ Worse than 72% of models
This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for pet owners. 72% of vacuum cleaners handle pet hair well.
Show more
Vacuum type
canister
Weight
3.85 kg
Weight
3.85 kg
▼ Worse than 54% of models
Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
This vacuum cleaner weighs 3.85 kg, which is greater than the weight of 54% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 0.2% of vacuum cleaners.
2-in-1 design
no
2-in-1 design
no
▼ Worse than 53% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not offer a 2-in-1 design. 53% of vacuum cleaners offer this flexible format.
Self-standing
no
Self-standing
no
▼ Worse than 19% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not stand on its own. 18.9% of vacuum cleaners offer this convenience.
Adjustable tube height
yes
Adjustable tube height
yes
▲ Better than 53% of models
This vacuum cleaner includes adjustable tube height. 47.4% of vacuum cleaners offer this ergonomic feature.
Show more
Auto suction adjustment
no
Auto suction adjustment
no
▼ Worse than 20% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not support automatic suction adjustment. 19.9% of vacuum cleaners support this feature.
Dust particle sensor
no
Dust particle sensor
no
▼ Worse than 8% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a dust particle sensor. 8% of vacuum cleaners include this feature.
LED display
no
LED display
no
▼ Worse than 26% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include an LED display. 25.9% of vacuum cleaners include this interface feature.
Nozzle light
no
Nozzle light
no
▼ Worse than 43% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a nozzle light. 43.4% of vacuum cleaners include this visibility feature.
Mopping support
no
Mopping support
no
▼ Worse than 4% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not support mopping. 3.7% of vacuum cleaners support this multi-function feature.

Rowenta RO3927 vs the average vacuum cleaner

246810TotalPerformanceBatteryFiltrationAttachmentsDesignSmart features
  • 0.03 % higher filtration efficiency
    Minimum overall efficiency
    99.98 %
    ▲ Better than 79% of models
    Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
    This vacuum cleaner has higher filtration efficiency than the average vacuum cleaner (100 % vs 99.95 %).
    99.98 % vs 99.95 %
  • Includes full bin indicator
    Full bin indicator
    yes
    ▲ Better than 73% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a full bin indicator, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 867 mm shorter body
    Height
    233 mm
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    Market range: <290 mm – >1.2k mm
    This vacuum cleaner is shorter than the average vacuum cleaner (233 mm vs 1100 mm).
    233 mm vs 1,100 mm
  • 2 L larger dust container
    Capacity
    3 L
    ▲ Better than 81% of models
    Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
    This vacuum cleaner has a larger dust capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (3 L vs 1 L).
    3 L vs 1 L
  • Adjustable tube height
    Adjustable tube height
    yes
    ▲ Better than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner has adjustable tube height, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 2.5x cheaper
    Rowenta RO3927 is cheaper than the average vacuum cleaner (£60 vs £150).
    £60 vs £150
  • 2.5x cheaper
    Rowenta RO3927 is cheaper than the average vacuum cleaner (£60 vs £150).
    £60 vs £150
  • 0.03 % higher filtration efficiency
    Minimum overall efficiency
    99.98 %
    ▲ Better than 79% of models
    Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
    This vacuum cleaner has higher filtration efficiency than the average vacuum cleaner (100 % vs 99.95 %).
    99.98 % vs 99.95 %
  • Includes full bin indicator
    Full bin indicator
    yes
    ▲ Better than 73% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a full bin indicator, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 2 L larger dust container
    Capacity
    3 L
    ▲ Better than 81% of models
    Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
    This vacuum cleaner has a larger dust capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (3 L vs 1 L).
    3 L vs 1 L
  • 867 mm shorter body
    Height
    233 mm
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    Market range: <290 mm – >1.2k mm
    This vacuum cleaner is shorter than the average vacuum cleaner (233 mm vs 1100 mm).
    233 mm vs 1,100 mm
  • Adjustable tube height
    Adjustable tube height
    yes
    ▲ Better than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner has adjustable tube height, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Not pet-hair friendly
    Suitable for pet owners
    no
    ▼ Worse than 72% of models
    This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for pet owners, the average vacuum cleaner is.
  • No handheld conversion
    2-in-1 design
    no
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not have a 2-in-1 design, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • No bagless design
    Bagless
    no
    ▼ Worse than 79% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not use a bagless design, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • No soft dusting brush
    Soft dusting brush
    no
    ▼ Worse than 73% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not include a soft dusting brush, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • No cyclonic technology
    Cyclonic technology
    no
    ▼ Worse than 71% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not use cyclonic technology, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • More operating noise
    Noise level (Min-Max)
    79-79 dB
    ▼ Worse than 51% of models
    Market range: <65 dB – >83 dB
    This vacuum cleaner is noisier than the average vacuum cleaner (79-79 dB vs 77-77 dB).
    79-79 dB vs 77-77 dB
  • 149 mm deeper body
    Depth
    414 mm
    ▼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <170 mm – >440 mm
    This vacuum cleaner is deeper than the average vacuum cleaner (414 mm vs 265 mm).
    414 mm vs 265 mm
  • 150 W higher power consumption
    Power consumption
    750 W
    ▼ Worse than 69% of models
    Market range: <165 W – >899 W
    This vacuum cleaner draws more power than the average vacuum cleaner (750 W vs 600 W).
    750 W vs 600 W
  • 8.2% worse value for money
    Rowenta RO3927 offers worse value for money than the average vacuum cleaner (7.07 vs 7.6).
    7.07 vs 7.65
  • No cyclonic technology
    Cyclonic technology
    no
    ▼ Worse than 71% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not use cyclonic technology, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • More operating noise
    Noise level (Min-Max)
    79-79 dB
    ▼ Worse than 51% of models
    Market range: <65 dB – >83 dB
    This vacuum cleaner is noisier than the average vacuum cleaner (79-79 dB vs 77-77 dB).
    79-79 dB vs 77-77 dB
  • 150 W higher power consumption
    Power consumption
    750 W
    ▼ Worse than 69% of models
    Market range: <165 W – >899 W
    This vacuum cleaner draws more power than the average vacuum cleaner (750 W vs 600 W).
    750 W vs 600 W
  • 1 kPa lower suction pressure
    Suction power (kPa)
    19 kPa
    ▼ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <11 kPa – >30 kPa
    This vacuum cleaner has lower suction pressure than the average vacuum cleaner (19 kPa vs 20 kPa).
    19 kPa vs 20 kPa
  • 0.8 L/s lower airflow
    Airflow
    27 L/s
    ▼ Worse than 56% of models
    Market range: <16.5 L/s – >52 L/s
    This vacuum cleaner delivers lower airflow than the average vacuum cleaner (27 L/s vs 27.8 L/s).
    27 L/s vs 27.8 L/s
  • No bagless design
    Bagless
    no
    ▼ Worse than 79% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not use a bagless design, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • Not pet-hair friendly
    Suitable for pet owners
    no
    ▼ Worse than 72% of models
    This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for pet owners, the average vacuum cleaner is.
  • No soft dusting brush
    Soft dusting brush
    no
    ▼ Worse than 73% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not include a soft dusting brush, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • No handheld conversion
    2-in-1 design
    no
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not have a 2-in-1 design, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • 149 mm deeper body
    Depth
    414 mm
    ▼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <170 mm – >440 mm
    This vacuum cleaner is deeper than the average vacuum cleaner (414 mm vs 265 mm).
    414 mm vs 265 mm
  • Older release date
    Release date
    2017
    ▼ Worse than 84% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This vacuum cleaner has an older release date than the average vacuum cleaner (2017 vs 2021).
    2017 vs 2021
  • 16 mm wider body
    Width
    281 mm
    ▼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <229 mm – >350 mm
    This vacuum cleaner is wider than the average vacuum cleaner (281 mm vs 265 mm).
    281 mm vs 265 mm
  • 6.4% higher weight
    Weight
    3.85 kg
    ▼ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
    This vacuum cleaner is heavier than the average vacuum cleaner (3.9 kg vs 3.62 kg).
    3.85 kg vs 3.62 kg

Graphic comparison of Rowenta RO3927 and other vacuum cleaners

No results found

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Rowenta RO3927?

  • High suction power, particularly effective on hard floors
  • Compact and lightweight design (approx. 3.85 kg) for easy storage
  • Large 3-litre dust bag capacity despite its small size
  • Effective 3-level HEPA filtration system (captures 99.98% of dust)
  • Includes useful accessories like a 2-in-1 crevice tool
  • Good value for money as an affordable entry-level model

What customers dislike about Rowenta RO3927?

  • High noise levels during operation (up to 73-77 dB)
  • Poor performance on high-pile carpets and rugs
  • Limited maneuverability; some users report it can move sideways or 'tippy'
  • Short power cord and limited operating radius for larger homes
  • Bag replacement and suction control dial can feel unintuitive
  • Plastic accessories can feel lower in quality compared to the main unit

Compare Rowenta RO3927 with other vacuum cleaners

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)