OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v3.0
Tablets Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Tablets Methodology v3.0

Sony VAIO Tap 11 WiFi (4GB + 512GB) review: 168 specs compared

Avg. price:~£1,020RAM capacity:4 GBInternal storage:512 GBScreen size:11.6 inchesChipset:?

Sony VAIO Tap 11 WiFi (4GB + 512GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and 25 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

6.5/10

Overall score

Score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 69% of models
Score components

35%

6.0

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

6.0

Reviews score

10%

?

Sentiment scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 6.9, the mark of a weaker model in this category

▼Worse than 69% of tablets
6.1

Value for money

Value for money
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components

70%

6.5

Overall score

30%

5.1

Price

▼Worse than 99%
6.0

Technical score

Technical score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 54% of models
Score components

22%

6.6

Performance

20%

4.8

Display

16%

6.7

Camera

14%

4.4

Battery

12%

6.2

Connectivity

8%

7.6

Software

5%

5.6

Design

3%

6.9

Audio

▼Worse than 54%
6.0

Reviews score

Reviews score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 67% of models

6.0

Mark 7.6 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

7.3

Average grade

20%

8.6

Popularity

Grades by review (25)
16 reviews: 9 with a printed score, 7 estimated from the review. 9 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
▼Worse than 67%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £1,020
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Other versions:
4GB + 512GB4GB + 128GB4GB + 256GB

What reviewers say about the Sony VAIO Tap 11 WiFi (4GB + 512GB)

Based on 15 · 11

Reviewers admire the sleek design and sharp screen, but agree battery life is short and the trackpad disappoints.
Praised
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Sony VAIO Tap 11 WiFi (4GB + 512GB)

Technical score
Technical score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 54% of models
Score components:

22%

6.6

Performance

20%

4.8

Display

16%

6.7

Camera

14%

4.4

Battery

12%

6.2

Connectivity

8%

7.6

Software

5%

5.6

Design

3%

6.9

Audio

6.0
Reviews score
6.0
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components:

70%

6.5

Overall score

30%

5.1

Price

6.1
RAM capacity
4 GB
Market range: <1 GB – >8 GB
This tablet has 4 GB of RAM, which is more than 47.2% of tablets and equal to 17.8% of tablets.
Process node
22 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 22 nm process, which is larger than 57.9% of tablets and equal to 7.2% of tablets.
Internal storage
512 GB
Market range: <16 GB – >256 GB
This tablet has 512 GB of internal storage, which is more than 92.5% of tablets and equal to 5.3% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core score
?
Chipset
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen resolution
1920×1080
This tablet has a 1920×1080 screen, which is less sharp than 61.1% of tablets and equal to 2.6% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet has a 60 Hz screen, which is smoother than 0.1% of tablets and equal to 73.4% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
190 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 190 ppi, which is lower than 65.1% of tablets and equal to 1.4% of tablets.
Display glass type
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical stabilisation. 0.4% of tablets offer this.
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a rear camera with 8 MP resolution, which is higher than 36.4% of tablets and equal to 31.9% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
?
Main camera aperture
?
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet has 1xx optical zoom, which is stronger than 18.2% of tablets and equal to 80.9% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
3,800 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has 3,800 mAh battery capacity, which is smaller than 90.4% of tablets and equal to 0.1% of tablets.
Charging speed
39 W
Market range: <10 W – >45 W
This tablet charges at 39 W, which is faster than 80% of tablets and equal to 0.3% of tablets.
Battery life
4 hours
Market range: <7 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 4 hours, which is shorter than that of 98% of tablets and equal to that of 1% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets offer this.
Fast charging
yes
This tablet supports fast charging. 43.2% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
LTE support
no
This tablet does not have built-in LTE. 42.9% of tablets offer this.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet connects to Wi-Fi. 0.2% of tablets offer this.
GPS
yes
This tablet has built-in GPS. 17.1% of tablets offer this.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G. 8.1% of tablets offer this.
NFC
yes
This tablet includes NFC. 89.3% of tablets offer this.
Show more
Operating system
Windows
This tablet uses the Windows operating system, which is less advanced than the one used by 84.2%.
Update support duration
long
This tablet offers long update support, which is longer than the support period of 80% of tablets and equal to that of 20% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet supports direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets offer this.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not support app tracking protection. 28.4% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
IP rating
not rated
This tablet's IP rating is not rated, which is less protected than 16.5% of tablets and the same as 83.6% of tablets.
Weight
780 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 780 g, which is heavier than 93.3% of tablets and equal to 0.5% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.7% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Number of microphones
2
Market range: <1 – >3
This tablet has a microphone array of 2, which is more than 55.1% of tablets and equal to 32.7% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.3% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
?
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer this.
Show more

Sony VAIO Tap 11 WiFi (4GB + 512GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftwareDesignAudio
  • 8x more internal storage
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (512 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet has 64 GB of internal storage.
    512 GB vs 64 GB
  • 1.5 inches larger screen
    This tablet has a larger screen than the average tablet (11.6 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet measures 10.1 inches.
    11.6 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses SSD storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    SSD vs eMMC
  • 2.17x faster charging
    This tablet charges faster than the average tablet (39 W vs 18 W). The average tablet charges at 18 W.
    39 W vs 18 W
  • Longer update support
    This tablet offers longer update support than the average tablet (long vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    long vs medium
  • Includes NFC
    This tablet includes NFC, while the average tablet does not. 10.8% of tablets include NFC.
  • Includes anti-reflection coating
    This tablet has anti-reflection coating, the average tablet does not. 24.6% of tablets use anti-reflection coating.
  • Monitors battery health
    This tablet monitors battery health, while the average tablet does not. 36.7% of tablets monitor battery health.
  • 8x more internal storage
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (512 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet has 64 GB of internal storage.
    512 GB vs 64 GB
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses SSD storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    SSD vs eMMC
  • Supports multithreading
    This tablet supports multithreading, while the average tablet does not. 9.9% of tablets support multithreading.
  • 16 more GPU execution units
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (20 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    20 vs 4
  • 30.8% faster GPU clock
    This tablet runs its GPU faster than the average tablet (850 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet runs its GPU at 650 MHz.
    850 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • 43% more memory bandwidth
    This tablet has more memory bandwidth than the average tablet (21.3 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has 14.9 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
    21.3 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • More advanced memory type
    This tablet uses more advanced memory than the average tablet (DDR3L vs LPDDR3).
    DDR3L vs LPDDR3
  • More advanced graphics
    This tablet has more advanced graphics than the average tablet (Intel HD Graphics 4200 vs Mali-G51).
    Intel HD Graphics 4,200 vs Mali-G51
  • 1.5 inches larger screen
    This tablet has a larger screen than the average tablet (11.6 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet measures 10.1 inches.
    11.6 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • Includes anti-reflection coating
    This tablet has anti-reflection coating, the average tablet does not. 24.6% of tablets use anti-reflection coating.
  • 240 Hz higher PWM dimming frequency
    This tablet has a higher PWM dimming frequency than the average tablet (240 Hz vs 0 Hz). The average tablet has PWM dimming frequency of 0 Hz.
    240 Hz vs 0 Hz
  • Supports manual ISO
    This tablet supports manual ISO, while the average tablet does not. 45.9% of tablets support manual ISO.
  • 2.17x faster charging
    This tablet charges faster than the average tablet (39 W vs 18 W). The average tablet charges at 18 W.
    39 W vs 18 W
  • Monitors battery health
    This tablet monitors battery health, while the average tablet does not. 36.7% of tablets monitor battery health.
  • Includes NFC
    This tablet includes NFC, while the average tablet does not. 10.8% of tablets include NFC.
  • Faster USB ports
    This tablet has faster USB ports than the average tablet (USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2).
    USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2.0
  • Supports HDMI output
    This tablet supports HDMI output, while the average tablet does not. 49.8% of tablets offer this.
    micro-HDMI port
  • Longer update support
    This tablet offers longer update support than the average tablet (long vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    long vs medium
  • Stylus included
    This tablet includes a stylus, while the average tablet does not. 17.2% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports drawing
    This tablet is suitable for drawing, while the average tablet is not. 40% of tablets are suitable for drawing.
  • 1 more microphones
    This tablet has more microphones than the average tablet (2 vs 1). The average tablet's microphone count is 1.
    2 vs 1
  • 6 hours shorter battery life
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (4 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    4 hours vs 10 hours
  • No USB-C port
    This tablet does not have a USB Type-C port, while the average tablet does. 54% of tablets have one.
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has fewer CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 8). The average tablet has 8 CPU threads.
    4 vs 8
  • 42.4% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a smaller battery capacity than the average tablet (3,800 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    3,800 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Windows vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Windows vs Android
  • 102 nits dimmer screen
    This tablet is dimmer than the average tablet (299 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits.
    299 nits vs 401 nits
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • 101 nits lower typical brightness
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (299 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    299 nits vs 400 nits
  • 14.3% lower review score
    Reviews score
    6.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▼ Worse than 67% of models

    6.0

    Mark 7.6 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.3

    Average grade

    20%

    8.6

    Popularity

    Grades by review (25)
    16 reviews: 9 with a printed score, 7 estimated from the review. 9 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    6.0 vs 7.0
  • 3.92x more expensive
    Sony VAIO Tap 11 WiFi (4GB + 512GB) is more expensive than the average tablet (£1,020 vs £260).
    £1,020 vs £260
  • 23.9% worse value for money
    Sony VAIO Tap 11 WiFi (4GB + 512GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (6.1 vs 7.6).
    6.1 vs 7.55
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has fewer CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 8). The average tablet has 8 CPU threads.
    4 vs 8
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    This tablet does not support big.LITTLE architecture, while the average tablet does. 51.7% of tablets support big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 6 years older
    This tablet was released earlier than the average tablet (2013 vs 2019). The average tablet was released in 2019.
    October 2013
    2013 vs 2019
  • 57.1% larger process node
    This tablet has a larger process node than the average tablet (22 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet is built on 14 nm.
    22 nm vs 14 nm
  • 266 MHz slower RAM speed
    This tablet has a lower RAM speed than the average tablet (1,600 MHz vs 1,866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1,866 MHz.
    1,600 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • 22.4% lower multi-core score
    This tablet has a lower multi-core score than the average tablet (1,468 points vs 1,891 points). The average tablet scores 1,891 points in multi-core tests.
    1,468 points vs 1,891 points
  • 102 nits dimmer screen
    This tablet is dimmer than the average tablet (299 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits.
    299 nits vs 401 nits
  • 101 nits lower typical brightness
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (299 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    299 nits vs 400 nits
  • Less vivid contrast
    This tablet has less contrast than the average tablet (841:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    841:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 14% softer screen detail
    This tablet has softer screen detail than the average tablet (190 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has a pixel density of 221 ppi.
    190 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • Less sharp display
    This tablet has a less sharp screen than the average tablet (1920×1080 vs 1920×1200).
    1,920×1,080 vs 1,920×1,200
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • No HDR photo mode
    This tablet does not have HDR photo mode, the average tablet does. 79.8% of tablets support HDR photo mode.
  • No burst mode
    This tablet does not support burst mode, the average tablet does. 60.6% of tablets support burst mode.
  • No backside-illuminated sensor
    This tablet does not have a BSI sensor, while the average tablet does. 52.6% of tablets have a BSI sensor.
  • 6 hours shorter battery life
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (4 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    4 hours vs 10 hours
  • 42.4% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a smaller battery capacity than the average tablet (3,800 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    3,800 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • No USB-C port
    This tablet does not have a USB Type-C port, while the average tablet does. 54% of tablets have one.
  • Older Wi-Fi standard
    This tablet has an older Wi-Fi standard than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This tablet has an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4 vs 5).
    4 vs 5
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Windows vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Windows vs Android
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61.4% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • No camera and mic privacy
    This tablet does not support camera and mic privacy, while the average tablet does. 56.6% of tablets offer this.
  • No full-page screenshots
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 53% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • 59.2% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (780 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    780 g vs 490 g
  • 1.9 mm thicker
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (9.9 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8 mm thick.
    9.9 mm vs 8 mm
  • 129.5 mm wider
    This tablet is wider than the average tablet (304.8 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    304.8 mm vs 175.3 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

6.9
theverge.com
✓ explicit
06/11/2013
Hands-on review · Windows 8 hybrid
Verdict
The Sony VAIO Tap 11 is very thin, with a bright screen and decent typing, but its loose keyboard and tiny desktop buttons make it awkward.
8.0
cnet.com
✓ explicit
15/10/2013
Lab review · Slim Windows tablet
Verdict
The Sony VAIO Tap 11 is thinner and lighter than the Surface Pro 2 with a larger screen, but its wireless keyboard and narrow stand are awkward on your lap.
7.0
pcmag.com
✓ explicit
14/11/2013
Lab review · Windows 8 tablet
Verdict
The Sony VAIO Tap 11 is one of the thinnest Windows 8 tablets and has a full-size USB port, but its slow processor and short battery hold it back.
6.0
techradar.com
✓ explicit
07/11/2013
Full review · Core i5 tablet
Verdict
The Sony VAIO Tap 11 is extremely thin, with a responsive keyboard cover and strong Photoshop performance, but its battery and rough port flaps hold it back.
9.0
windowscentral.com
≈ estimated
19/10/2013
Hands-on test · Windows 8 hybrid
Verdict
The Sony VAIO Tap 11 is a capable Windows 8 tablet with a crisp screen and natural colors, but its battery lasts only about four hours.
5.0
laptopmag.com
✓ explicit
14/10/2013
Lab test · Thin Windows hybrid
Verdict
The Sony VAIO Tap 11 is a thin tablet with a sharp screen and accurate pen, but its short battery and awkward keyboard setup hold it back.
7.0
slashgear.com
≈ estimated
15/10/2013
Hands-on test · Full Windows tablet
Verdict
The Sony VAIO Tap 11 is a slim, light full Windows tablet with a bright screen, best for people who need desktop programs on the go.
8.0
mobiletechreview.com
≈ estimated
01/01/2014
Lab test · Windows 8 tablet
Verdict
The Sony VAIO Tap 11 is a thin, light Windows tablet with a vivid screen and a keyboard that feels standard, though it is not the fastest or longest-lasting.
8.0
trustedreviews.com
≈ estimated
05/09/2013
Hands-on review · Slim Windows tablet
Verdict
The Sony VAIO Tap 11 is a slim, lightweight Windows tablet with a sharp screen, but its magnetic keyboard feels less secure and the pen has no holder.
6.0
expertreviews.co.uk
✓ explicit
03/12/2013
Lab test · Windows 8 hybrid
Verdict
The Sony VAIO Tap 11 has a responsive, good-quality screen, but its flat keyboard, short battery and weaker performance leave it behind the Surface Pro 2.
8.0
pocket-lint.com
✓ explicit
20/12/2013
Hands-on review · Laptop-style tablet
Verdict
The Sony VAIO Tap 11 is a responsive, slim tablet best suited as a laptop replacement, but its flimsy keyboard and size hold it back for casual use.
6.0
stuff.tv
≈ estimated
05/09/2013
Hands-on test · Windows 8 slate
Verdict
The Sony VAIO Tap 11 is a very slim Windows 8 tablet with a crisp 11-inch screen, but its magnetic keyboard works only with this tablet.
U
uk.pcmag.com
15/05/2014
≈ estimated
8.0
Summary of the review
Sony VAIO Tap 11 - PCMag UK
8.2
notebookcheck.com
✓ explicit
18/12/2013
Lab test · Thin Windows tablet
Verdict
The Sony VAIO Tap 11 is a thin Windows tablet for mobile office work rather than performance fans, held back by its small battery and speed drops under heavy load.
8.0
tvtech.it
≈ estimated
17/03/2014
Video review · Hybrid tablet
Verdict
The Sony VAIO Tap 11 is a Windows tablet whose keyboard doubles as a display cover, handy for switching between touch use and PC work.
7.0
fwd.nl
✓ explicit
21/05/2014
Hands-on test · Windows 8.1 hybrid
Verdict
The Sony VAIO Tap 11 is a Windows 8.1 hybrid with a strong rear camera and good keys, but its 5 to 6 hour battery life and special charger hold it back.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Sony VAIO Tap 11 WiFi (4GB + 512GB)

  • Exceptionally thin and lightweight design, making it highly portable
  • Outstanding 1080p Triluminos IPS display with vibrant colors and great viewing angles
  • Includes both a wireless keyboard cover and an active digitizer stylus in the base price
  • Highly adjustable, firm kickstand that supports numerous viewing angles
  • Built-in IR blaster and Remote Control app for managing home entertainment devices

What customers don't like about Sony VAIO Tap 11 WiFi (4GB + 512GB)

  • Mediocre battery life, typically lasting between 3 to 5 hours depending on usage
  • Poor 'lapability' due to the narrow, slender kickstand and free-floating keyboard
  • Keyboard trackpad is often reported as unresponsive or cramped
  • Inconvenient keyboard charging method that requires it to be docked, preventing simultaneous use
  • WiFi connectivity issues reported by some users, including slow speeds or dropped signals

Verdict

The Sony VAIO Tap 11 is a remarkably slim Windows tablet featuring an 11.6-inch Full HD (1920 x 1080) Triluminos touchscreen display, 4GB of RAM, and a spacious 512GB SSD. Its design highlights include a built-in adjustable kickstand, a detachable wireless keyboard that doubles as a protective cover, and an included digitiser pen for precise note-taking. Key advantages are its lightweight 1.7lb chassis, vibrant display quality, and the inclusion of full-size ports like USB 3.0 and micro-HDMI, which are rare for its size. However, common drawbacks include a relatively short battery life of approximately 4 to 5 hours, a somewhat temperamental trackpad on the thin keyboard, and performance that may lag during intensive multitasking compared to thicker rivals.

Compare Sony VAIO Tap 11 WiFi (4GB + 512GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Sony VAIO Tap 11 WiFi (4GB + 512GB) and other tablets

No results found