OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Tablets Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 12 2 Cellular (3GB + 64GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~ÂŁ660RAM capacity:3 GBInternal storage:64 GBScreen size:12.2 inchesChipset:Qualcomm Snapdragon 800

Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 12 2 Cellular (3GB + 64GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

6.2

Overall score

Score
6.2/ 10
âś•
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–Ľ Worse than 52% of models
Score components

90%

6.1

Technical score

10%

6.9

User score

â–ĽWorse than 52% of tablets
6.1

Technical score

Technical score
6.1/ 10
âś•
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–˛ Better than 50% of models
Score components

22%

6.2

Performance

20%

5.9

Display

16%

6.8

Camera

14%

5.5

Battery

12%

6.6

Connectivity

8%

5.9

Software & Features

5%

5.2

Design

3%

5.5

Audio & Multimedia

â–˛Better than 50% of tablets
6.9

User score

User score
6.9/ 10
âś•
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–Ľ Worse than 87% of models
Score components

70%

8.0

User ratings

30%

4.3

Number of reviews

No reviews for this version.

Check reviews from other versions.

â–ĽWorse than 87% of tablets
  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ ÂŁ660

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
3GB + 32GBCheck price
Other versions:
3GB + 64GB
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 12 2 Cellular (3GB + 64GB)

Technical score
Technical score
6.1/ 10
âś•
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–˛ Better than 50% of models
Score components:

22%

6.2

Performance

20%

5.9

Display

16%

6.8

Camera

14%

5.5

Battery

12%

6.6

Connectivity

8%

5.9

Software & Features

5%

5.2

Design

3%

5.5

Audio & Multimedia

6.1
User score
User score
6.9/ 10
âś•
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–Ľ Worse than 87% of models
Score components

70%

8.0

User ratings

30%

4.3

Number of reviews

No reviews for this version.

Check reviews from other versions.

6.9
Popularity
Popularity
4.3/ 10
âś•
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–Ľ Worse than 54% of models
Popularity:
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 12 2 Cellular (3GB + 64GB) has a popularity of 4.3 points, which is higher than 53% of Tablets.
4.3
Value for money
Value for money
6.4/ 10
âś•
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–Ľ Worse than 83% of models
Score components:

60%

6.2

Overall score

40%

7.0

Price

6.4
RAM capacity
3 GB
RAM capacity
3 GB
â–Ľ Worse than 52% of models
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 3 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 52.4% of tablets and equal to that of 8.5% of tablets.
Process node
28 nm
Process node
28 nm
â–Ľ Worse than 65% of models
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 28 nm process node, which is larger than the node size used in 64.7% of tablets and equal to the node used in 17.8% of tablets.
Internal storage
64 GB
Internal storage
64 GB
â–Ľ Worse than 43% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 64 GB which is larger than the storage of 39.5% of tablets and equal to that of 17.1% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
?
Chipset
Qualcomm Snapdragon 800
Chipset
Qualcomm Snapdragon 800
â–˛ Better than 64% of models
This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 chipset, which is more advanced than the chipsets in 64.1% of tablets and equal to those in 1.3% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
2560Ă—1600
Screen resolution
2560Ă—1600
â–˛ Better than 78% of models
This tablet has a screen resolution of 2560Ă—1600 which is higher than that of 77.6% of tablets and equal to that of 10.1% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Refresh rate
60 Hz
â–Ľ Worse than 26% of models
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
TFT LCD
Display type
TFT LCD
â–Ľ Worse than 90% of models
This tablet uses a TFT LCD display type. 89.9% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
247 ppi
Pixel density
247 ppi
â–˛ Better than 67% of models
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 247 ppi which is higher than that of 67% of tablets and equal to that of 0.3% of tablets.
Display glass type
?
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
Optical image stabilization
no
Category Benchmark
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
â–˛ Better than 37% of models
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 8 MP which is higher than that of 36.5% of tablets and equal to that of 31.8% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
2 MP
Front camera megapixels
2 MP
â–Ľ Worse than 54% of models
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 2 MP which is lower than in 53.6% of tablets and equal to that in 25.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.4
Main camera aperture
f/2.4
â–Ľ Worse than 70% of models
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.4 which is narrower than that of 69.8% of tablets and equal to that of 17.6% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
Optical zoom
1xx
â–˛ Better than 18% of models
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
9,500 mAh
Battery capacity
9,500 mAh
â–˛ Better than 85% of models
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 9,500 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 84.8% of tablets and equal to those in 0.4% of tablets.
Charging speed
10.6 W
Charging speed
10.6 W
â–Ľ Worse than 60% of models
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 10.6 W which is slower than in 60.5% of tablets and equal to speeds in 0.4% of tablets.
Battery life
10 hours
Battery life
10 hours
â–Ľ Worse than 40% of models
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 10 hours, which is longer than that of 39.1% of tablets and equal to that of 20.5% of tablets.
internet usage
Wireless charging
no
Wireless charging
no
â–Ľ Worse than 2% of models
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
no
Fast charging
no
â–Ľ Worse than 50% of models
This tablet does not support fast charging. 49.7% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
yes
LTE support
yes
â–˛ Better than 37% of models
This tablet supports LTE. 36.8% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Category Benchmark
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
â–˛ Better than 17% of models
This tablet supports GPS. 17.3% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
5G connectivity
no
â–Ľ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
NFC
no
â–Ľ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Android
Operating system
Android
â–˛ Better than 23% of models
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.3%.
Update support duration
short
Update support duration
short
â–Ľ Worse than 53% of models
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.7% of tablets and equal to that of 47.3% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
no
Direct OS updates
no
â–Ľ Worse than 80% of models
This tablet does not receive direct OS updates. 79.7% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
On-device AI
no
â–Ľ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
App tracking protection
no
â–Ľ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
IP rating
not rated
â–Ľ Worse than 16% of models
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
740 g
Weight
740 g
â–Ľ Worse than 91% of models
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 740 g which is heavier than 90.8% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.2% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
Backlit keyboard
no
â–Ľ Worse than 10% of models
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
Keyboard accessory
yes
â–˛ Better than 16% of models
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
?
aptX Adaptive
no
aptX Adaptive
no
â–Ľ Worse than 7% of models
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
no
Dolby Atmos support
no
â–Ľ Worse than 31% of models
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
N. of speakers
2
â–Ľ Worse than 29% of models
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.9% of tablets.
FM radio
no
FM radio
no
â–Ľ Worse than 19% of models
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 12 2 Cellular (3GB + 64GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • More capable chipset
    Chipset
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 800
    â–˛ Better than 64% of models
    This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 2.1 inches larger screen size
    Screen size
    12.2 inches
    â–˛ Better than 89% of models
    Market range: <7 inches – >12 inches
    This tablet has a higher screen size than the average tablet (12.2 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    12.2 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 44.4% larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    9,500 mAh
    â–˛ Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
    This tablet has a higher battery capacity than the average tablet (9500 mAh vs 6580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6580 mAh.
    9,500 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • Higher screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    2560Ă—1600
    â–˛ Better than 78% of models
    This tablet has a higher screen resolution than the average tablet (2560Ă—1600 vs 1920Ă—1200). The average tablet resolution is 1920Ă—1200.
    2560Ă—1600 vs 1920Ă—1200
  • Better GPU
    GPU model
    Adreno 330
    â–˛ Better than 75% of models
    This tablet uses the Adreno 330 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Adreno 330 vs Mali-G51
  • Better main-camera video
    Video recording (main camera)
    1080 x 60 fps
    â–˛ Better than 80% of models
    This tablet supports better main-camera video recording than the average tablet (1080x60 fps vs 1080x30 fps). The average tablet supports 1080x30 fps main-camera video recording.
    1080x60 fps vs 1080x30 fps
  • Allows manual focus
    Manual focus
    yes
    â–˛ Better than 63% of models
    This tablet allows manual focus control, the average tablet does not. 37.2% of tablets include manual focus.
  • Allows manual ISO
    Manual ISO
    yes
    â–˛ Better than 54% of models
    This tablet allows manual ISO adjustment, the average tablet does not. 46% of tablets feature manual ISO.
  • More capable chipset
    Chipset
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 800
    â–˛ Better than 64% of models
    This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Better GPU
    GPU model
    Adreno 330
    â–˛ Better than 75% of models
    This tablet uses the Adreno 330 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Adreno 330 vs Mali-G51
  • 15% higher CPU speed
    CPU speed
    2.3 GHz
    â–˛ Better than 65% of models
    Market range: <1.2 GHz – >3.2 GHz
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (2.3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    2.3 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 2 more CPU threads
    CPU threads
    8
    â–˛ Better than 50% of models
    Market range: <2 – >12
    This tablet has more CPU threads than the average tablet (8 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    8 vs 6
  • 2.1 inches larger screen size
    Screen size
    12.2 inches
    â–˛ Better than 89% of models
    Market range: <7 inches – >12 inches
    This tablet has a higher screen size than the average tablet (12.2 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    12.2 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • Higher screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    2560Ă—1600
    â–˛ Better than 78% of models
    This tablet has a higher screen resolution than the average tablet (2560Ă—1600 vs 1920Ă—1200). The average tablet resolution is 1920Ă—1200.
    2560Ă—1600 vs 1920Ă—1200
  • 10.3% higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    247 ppi
    â–˛ Better than 67% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a higher pixel density than the average tablet (247 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    247 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • 26 ppi higher screen sharpness
    Screen sharpness
    247 ppi
    â–˛ Better than 67% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a higher screen sharpness than the average tablet (247 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    247 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • Better main-camera video
    Video recording (main camera)
    1080 x 60 fps
    â–˛ Better than 80% of models
    This tablet supports better main-camera video recording than the average tablet (1080x60 fps vs 1080x30 fps). The average tablet supports 1080x30 fps main-camera video recording.
    1080x60 fps vs 1080x30 fps
  • Allows manual focus
    Manual focus
    yes
    â–˛ Better than 63% of models
    This tablet allows manual focus control, the average tablet does not. 37.2% of tablets include manual focus.
  • Allows manual ISO
    Manual ISO
    yes
    â–˛ Better than 54% of models
    This tablet allows manual ISO adjustment, the average tablet does not. 46% of tablets feature manual ISO.
  • Supports slow-motion recording
    Slow-motion recording
    yes
    â–˛ Better than 63% of models
    This tablet supports slow-motion recording, the average tablet does not. 37.5% of tablets offer slow-mo.
  • Includes flash
    Flash
    yes
    â–˛ Better than 55% of models
    This tablet features a built-in flash, the average tablet does not. 45.2% of tablets include a flash.
  • 44.4% larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    9,500 mAh
    â–˛ Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
    This tablet has a higher battery capacity than the average tablet (9500 mAh vs 6580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6580 mAh.
    9,500 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • Newer USB version
    USB version
    USB 3.2 Gen 1
    â–˛ Better than 77% of models
    This tablet supports a newer USB version than the average tablet (USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2). The average tablet uses USB USB 2.0.
    USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2.0
  • Suitable for drawing
    Suitable for drawing
    yes
    â–˛ Better than 59% of models
    This tablet is suitable for drawing, the average tablet is not. 41% of tablets are suitable for drawing.
  • Inferior display type
    Display type
    TFT LCD
    â–Ľ Worse than 90% of models
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (TFT LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    TFT LCD vs IPS LCD
  • No USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    no
    â–Ľ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    â–Ľ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • 3 MP lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    2 MP
    â–Ľ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    2 MP vs 5 MP
  • Does not receive direct OS updates
    Direct OS updates
    no
    â–Ľ Worse than 80% of models
    This tablet does not support direct OS updates, the average tablet does. 79.7% of tablets support direct OS updates.
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    Front camera aperture
    f/2.4
    â–Ľ Worse than 70% of models
    This tablet has a worse front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.4 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 front camera aperture.
    f/2.4 vs f/2.2
  • 51% heavier
    Weight
    740 g
    â–Ľ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <315 g – >730 g
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (740 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    740 g vs 490 g
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    Picture-in-picture
    no
    â–Ľ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • 2.54x more expensive
    Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 12 2 Cellular (3GB + 64GB) is more expensive than the average tablet (ÂŁ660 vs ÂŁ260).
    ÂŁ660 vs ÂŁ260
  • 16.2% lower user score
    User score
    6.9/ 10
    âś•
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–Ľ
    â–Ľ
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 12 2 Cellular
    the average tablet
    Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 12 2 Cellular (3GB + 64GB) has a lower user score than the average tablet (6.89 vs 8.000).
    6.89 vs 8
  • 10.3% worse value for money
    Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 12 2 Cellular (3GB + 64GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (6.43 vs 7.1).
    6.43 vs 7.1
  • 2x larger process node
    Process node
    28 nm
    â–Ľ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
    This tablet uses a larger process node than the average tablet (28 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    28 nm vs 14 nm
  • 1 GB less RAM
    RAM capacity
    3 GB
    â–Ľ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (3 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    3 GB vs 4 GB
  • 266 MHz slower RAM speed
    RAM speed
    1,600 MHz
    â–Ľ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <800 MHz – >6.4k MHz
    This tablet has a lower RAM speed than the average tablet (1600 MHz vs 1866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1866 MHz.
    1,600 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • 14.1% lower memory bandwidth
    Memory bandwidth
    12.8 GB/s
    â–Ľ Worse than 57% of models
    Market range: <4.26 GB/s – >60 GB/s
    This tablet has a lower memory bandwidth than the average tablet (12.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    12.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • Inferior display type
    Display type
    TFT LCD
    â–Ľ Worse than 90% of models
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (TFT LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    TFT LCD vs IPS LCD
  • 50% lower touch sampling rate
    Touch sampling rate
    60 Hz
    â–Ľ Worse than 58% of models
    Market range: <60 Hz – >300 Hz
    This tablet has a lower touch sampling rate than the average tablet (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average tablet has touch sampling rate of 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 18 nits lower typical brightness
    Typical brightness
    382 nits
    â–Ľ Worse than 64% of models
    Market range: <300 nits – >600 nits
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (382 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    382 nits vs 400 nits
  • 3 MP lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    2 MP
    â–Ľ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    2 MP vs 5 MP
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    Front camera aperture
    f/2.4
    â–Ľ Worse than 70% of models
    This tablet has a worse front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.4 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 front camera aperture.
    f/2.4 vs f/2.2
  • No BSI sensor
    BSI sensor
    no
    â–Ľ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a BSI sensor, the average tablet has one. 52.6% of tablets use BSI sensors for better low-light shots.
  • No timelapse video
    Timelapse video
    no
    â–Ľ Worse than 58% of models
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets include timelapse modes.
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    Main camera aperture
    f/2.4
    â–Ľ Worse than 70% of models
    This tablet has a worse main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.4 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 main camera aperture.
    f/2.4 vs f/2.2
  • 41.1% slower charging speed
    Charging speed
    10.6 W
    â–Ľ Worse than 60% of models
    Market range: <10 W – >60 W
    This tablet supports slower charging than the average tablet (10.6 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    10.6 W vs 18 W
  • No USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    no
    â–Ľ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    4.0
    â–Ľ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet uses an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    4.0 vs 5.0
  • No face recognition
    Face recognition
    no
    â–Ľ Worse than 56% of models
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56% of tablets support face recognition.
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    â–Ľ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • Does not receive direct OS updates
    Direct OS updates
    no
    â–Ľ Worse than 80% of models
    This tablet does not support direct OS updates, the average tablet does. 79.7% of tablets support direct OS updates.
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    Picture-in-picture
    no
    â–Ľ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • No camera/mic privacy toggles
    Camera/mic privacy
    no
    â–Ľ Worse than 56% of models
    This tablet lacks camera and microphone privacy toggles, the average tablet includes them. 56.2% of tablets offer these toggles.
  • No full-page screenshots
    Full-page screenshots
    no
    â–Ľ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 52.5% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • No location privacy controls
    Location privacy
    no
    â–Ľ Worse than 76% of models
    This tablet does not offer location privacy controls, the average tablet does. 76.5% of tablets include location privacy features.
  • No dark mode
    Dark mode
    no
    â–Ľ Worse than 57% of models
    This tablet does not support dark mode, the average tablet does. 57.2% of tablets have dark mode.
  • 51% heavier
    Weight
    740 g
    â–Ľ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <315 g – >730 g
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (740 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    740 g vs 490 g
  • 95.6 mm taller
    Width
    295.6 mm
    â–Ľ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <123.8 mm – >274 mm
    This tablet is taller than the average tablet (295.6 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200.0 mm tall.
    295.6 mm vs 200.0 mm
  • 5 older release date
    Release date
    2014
    â–Ľ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This tablet is an older model than the average tablet (2014 vs 2019).
    January 2014
    2014 vs 2019
  • 28.7 mm wider
    Width
    204.0 mm
    â–Ľ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <123.8 mm – >274 mm
    This tablet is wider than the average tablet (204 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    204.0 mm vs 175.3 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
techradar.com
30/06/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 12.2 review - Page 4
T
trustedreviews.com
26/02/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 12.2 Review - Trusted Reviews
T
techradar.com
30/06/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 12.2 review - TechRadar
A
avforums.com
24/05/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy TabPRO 12.2 Tablet Review
T
thegadgetman.org.uk
23/07/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 12.2 - Size is sometimes everything! - The Gadget Man Would you like me to find specific technical comparisons between the LTE...
C
cnet.com
03/02/2014
Summary of the review
Hey, business users, the Samsung Galaxy TabPro could be your next tablet - CNET
P
pcwelt.de
17/04/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 12.2 im Test - PC-WELT
(Translated)Show original
N
notebookcheck.com
11/05/2024
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 12.2 (Zusammenfassung externer Tests)
(Translated)Show original
C
connect.de
05/03/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 12.2 im ersten Test
(Translated)Show original
Q
quechoisir.org
18/05/2014
Summary of the review
Test Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 12.2
(Translated)Show original
A
androidplanet.nl
22/10/2026
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 12.2 - Android Planet
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

What we like about Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 12 2 Cellular (3GB + 64GB)

  • Large 12.2-inch high-resolution display (2560x1600) provides excellent clarity for reading, spreadsheets, and media.
  • Powerful multitasking with Multi Window feature allows running up to four apps simultaneously.
  • Impressive battery life for its size, often lasting an entire workday or more with light to medium use.
  • Fast and responsive performance due to the 2.3GHz quad-core processor in the LTE/Cellular model.
  • Lightweight and thin design makes it relatively portable despite the massive screen size.
  • Expandable storage available via a microSD slot supporting up to 64GB.

What we don't like about Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 12 2 Cellular (3GB + 64GB)

  • Large physical footprint can be cumbersome to hold for long periods and may feel bulky to some users.
  • High initial price point compared to smaller tablets or some laptops.
  • Build quality feels less than premium due to plastic construction and occasional creaking.
  • Software bloatware from Samsung and the 'TouchWiz' interface can lead to occasional lag and unremovable apps.
  • Charging process is relatively slow, taking several hours to reach full capacity.
  • Lack of integrated stylus (S-Pen) support, which is only available on the nearly identical Galaxy Note Pro 12.2.

Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 12.2 Cellular is a large-format Android tablet featuring a 12.2-inch WQXGA Super Clear LCD display with a resolution of 2560 x 1600 pixels. Designed for productivity, this model is equipped with 3GB of RAM, 64GB of internal storage (expandable via microSD), and is powered by a Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 chipset for LTE connectivity. Its main advantages include an expansive screen ideal for four-app multitasking, a massive 9,500mAh battery providing long usage times, and useful professional software like Hancom Office. However, its significant size and weight of approximately 740g can make it unwieldy for one-handed use, and critics have noted a less-than-premium build quality that can sometimes creak under pressure.

Compare Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 12 2 Cellular (3GB + 64GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 12 2 Cellular (3GB + 64GB) and other tablets

No results found