OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Tablets Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 7 0 P3110 WiFi (1GB + 32GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£220RAM capacity:1 GBInternal storage:32 GBScreen size:7 inchesChipset:TI OMAP 4430

Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 7 0 P3110 WiFi (1GB + 32GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

5.1

Overall score

Score
5.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
Score components

90%

4.7

Technical score

10%

9.1

User score

â–¼Worse than 85% of tablets
4.7

Technical score

Technical score
4.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
Score components

22%

4.0

Performance

20%

4.1

Display

16%

6.1

Camera

14%

2.8

Battery

12%

5.6

Connectivity

8%

6.0

Software & Features

5%

6.4

Design

3%

4.8

Audio & Multimedia

â–¼Worse than 95% of tablets
9.1

User score

User score
9.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 90% of models
Score components

70%

8.7

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

No reviews for this version.

Check reviews from other versions.

★Better than 90% of tablets
  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £220

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
1GB + 16GBCheck price1GB + 16GBCheck price1GB + 8GBCheck price
Other versions:
1GB + 32GB1GB + 32GB1GB + 8GB1GB + 16GB
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 7 0 P3110 WiFi (1GB + 32GB)

Technical score
Technical score
4.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
Score components:

22%

4.0

Performance

20%

4.1

Display

16%

6.1

Camera

14%

2.8

Battery

12%

5.6

Connectivity

8%

6.0

Software & Features

5%

6.4

Design

3%

4.8

Audio & Multimedia

4.7
User score
User score
9.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 90% of models
Score components

70%

8.7

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

No reviews for this version.

Check reviews from other versions.

9.1
Popularity
Popularity
10.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 92% of models
Popularity:
Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 7 0 P3110 WiFi (1GB + 32GB) has a user popularity of 10 points, which is lower than 91.8% of Tablets.
10
Value for money
Value for money
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
Score components:

60%

5.1

Overall score

40%

9.4

Price

6.4
RAM capacity
1 GB
RAM capacity
1 GB
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 1 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 77.8% of tablets and equal to that of 19.3% of tablets.
Process node
45 nm
Process node
45 nm
â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 45 nm process node, which is larger than the node size used in 94.9% of tablets and equal to the node used in 4.4% of tablets.
Internal storage
32 GB
Internal storage
32 GB
â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 32 GB which is smaller than the storage of 60.5% of tablets and equal to that of 18% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
?
Chipset
TI OMAP 4430
Chipset
TI OMAP 4430
â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
This tablet uses the TI OMAP 4430 chipset, which is less advanced than the chipsets in 68.4% of tablets and equal to those in 2.1% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
1024×600
Screen resolution
1024×600
â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
This tablet has a screen resolution of 1024×600 which is lower than that of 92.8% of tablets and equal to that of 6.2% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Refresh rate
60 Hz
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
Display type
IPS LCD
â–² Better than 17% of models
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
170 ppi
Pixel density
170 ppi
â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 170 ppi which is lower than that of 76.5% of tablets and equal to that of 4.8% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass
â–² Better than 45% of models
This tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass display glass which is stronger than that on 45.4% of tablets and equal to that on 32.7% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
Optical image stabilization
no
Category Benchmark
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
?
Front camera megapixels
0.3 MP
Front camera megapixels
0.3 MP
â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 0.3 MP which is lower than in 93% of tablets and equal to that in 7% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
?
Optical zoom
1xxx
Optical zoom
1xx
â–² Better than 18% of models
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
4,000 mAh
Battery capacity
4,000 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 4,000 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 84.6% of tablets and equal to those in 4.5% of tablets.
Charging speed
10 W
Charging speed
10 W
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 10 W which is slower than in 61% of tablets and equal to speeds in 33.2% of tablets.
Battery life
7 hours
Battery life
7 hours
â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 7 hours, which is shorter than that of 85.4% of tablets and equal to that of 5.5% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
Wireless charging
no
â–¼ Worse than 2% of models
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
no
Fast charging
no
â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
This tablet does not support fast charging. 49.7% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
no
LTE support
no
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
This tablet does not support LTE. 63.3% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Category Benchmark
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
â–² Better than 17% of models
This tablet supports GPS. 17.3% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
5G connectivity
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
NFC
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Android
Operating system
Android
â–² Better than 23% of models
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.3%.
Update support duration
short
Update support duration
short
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.7% of tablets and equal to that of 47.3% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
Direct OS updates
yes
â–² Better than 20% of models
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
On-device AI
no
â–¼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
App tracking protection
no
â–¼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
IP rating
not rated
â–¼ Worse than 16% of models
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
344 g
Weight
344 g
â–² Better than 83% of models
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 344 g which is lighter than 82.8% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.4% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
Backlit keyboard
no
â–¼ Worse than 10% of models
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
Keyboard accessory
yes
â–² Better than 16% of models
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
1
Number of microphones
1
â–¼ Worse than 45% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This tablet includes 1 microphones, which is more than in 0.2% of tablets and equal to the number in 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
aptX Adaptive
no
â–¼ Worse than 7% of models
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
no
Dolby Atmos support
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
N. of speakers
2
â–¼ Worse than 29% of models
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.9% of tablets.
FM radio
no
FM radio
no
â–¼ Worse than 19% of models
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 7 0 P3110 WiFi (1GB + 32GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • Allows manual ISO
    Manual ISO
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This tablet allows manual ISO adjustment, the average tablet does not. 46% of tablets feature manual ISO.
  • 29.8% lighter
    Weight
    344 g
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    Market range: <315 g – >730 g
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (344 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    344 g vs 490 g
  • More capable chipset
    Chipset
    TI OMAP 4430
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This tablet uses the TI OMAP 4430 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    TI OMAP 4,430 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 52.9 mm narrower
    Width
    122.4 mm
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <123.8 mm – >274 mm
    This tablet is narrower than the average tablet (122.4 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    122.4 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • 4 points higher iFixit repairability score
    Repairability score (iFixit)
    8 points
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    Market range: <0 points – >10 points
    This tablet has a higher repairability score than the average tablet (8 points vs 4 points). The average tablet repairability score is 4 points.
    8 points vs 4 points
  • 77.6 mm shorter
    Width
    122.4 mm
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <123.8 mm – >274 mm
    This tablet is shorter than the average tablet (122.4 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200.0 mm tall.
    122.4 mm vs 200.0 mm
  • 13.9% higher user score
    User score
    9.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 7 0 P3110 WiFi
    the average tablet
    Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 7 0 P3110 WiFi (1GB + 32GB) has a higher user score than the average tablet (9.11 vs 8.000).
    9.11 vs 8
  • 2.08x more popular
    Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 7 0 P3110 WiFi (1GB + 32GB) is more popular than the average tablet (10 vs 4.8).
    10 vs 4.81
  • 13.9% higher user score
    User score
    9.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 7 0 P3110 WiFi
    the average tablet
    Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 7 0 P3110 WiFi (1GB + 32GB) has a higher user score than the average tablet (9.11 vs 8.000).
    9.11 vs 8
  • 2.08x more popular
    Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 7 0 P3110 WiFi (1GB + 32GB) is more popular than the average tablet (10 vs 4.8).
    10 vs 4.81
  • More capable chipset
    Chipset
    TI OMAP 4430
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This tablet uses the TI OMAP 4430 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    TI OMAP 4,430 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 4 more GPU execution units
    GPU execution units
    8
    â–² Better than 68% of models
    Market range: <2 – >24
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (8 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    8 vs 4
  • Allows manual ISO
    Manual ISO
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This tablet allows manual ISO adjustment, the average tablet does not. 46% of tablets feature manual ISO.
  • 29.8% lighter
    Weight
    344 g
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    Market range: <315 g – >730 g
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (344 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    344 g vs 490 g
  • 52.9 mm narrower
    Width
    122.4 mm
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <123.8 mm – >274 mm
    This tablet is narrower than the average tablet (122.4 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    122.4 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • 4 points higher iFixit repairability score
    Repairability score (iFixit)
    8 points
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    Market range: <0 points – >10 points
    This tablet has a higher repairability score than the average tablet (8 points vs 4 points). The average tablet repairability score is 4 points.
    8 points vs 4 points
  • 77.6 mm shorter
    Width
    122.4 mm
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <123.8 mm – >274 mm
    This tablet is shorter than the average tablet (122.4 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200.0 mm tall.
    122.4 mm vs 200.0 mm
  • 4.7 MP lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    0.3 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (0.3 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    0.3 MP vs 5 MP
  • No USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • 3 GB less RAM
    RAM capacity
    1 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (1 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    1 GB vs 4 GB
  • 50% lower CPU speed
    CPU speed
    1 GHz
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    Market range: <1.2 GHz – >3.2 GHz
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 3 hours shorter battery life
    Battery life
    7 hours
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (7 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    7 hours vs 10 hours
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    1024×600
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    This tablet has a lower screen resolution than the average tablet (1024×600 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet has a resolution of 1920×1200.
    1024×600 vs 1920×1200
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • 39.2% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    4,000 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
    This tablet has a lower battery capacity than the average tablet (4000 mAh vs 6580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6580 mAh.
    4,000 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • 10.8% worse value for money
    Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 7 0 P3110 WiFi (1GB + 32GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (6.41 vs 7.1).
    6.41 vs 7.1
  • 3 GB less RAM
    RAM capacity
    1 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (1 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    1 GB vs 4 GB
  • 50% lower CPU speed
    CPU speed
    1 GHz
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    Market range: <1.2 GHz – >3.2 GHz
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 3.21x larger process node
    Process node
    45 nm
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
    This tablet uses a larger process node than the average tablet (45 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    45 nm vs 14 nm
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    CPU threads
    2
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <2 – >12
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (2 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    2 vs 6
  • Worse GPU
    GPU model
    PowerVR SGX540
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    This tablet uses the PowerVR SGX540 GPU, while the average tablet uses the stronger Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    PowerVR SGX540 vs Mali-G51
  • 1,199 MHz slower RAM speed
    RAM speed
    667 MHz
    â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
    Market range: <800 MHz – >6.4k MHz
    This tablet has a lower RAM speed than the average tablet (667 MHz vs 1866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1866 MHz.
    667 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    big.LITTLE Architecture
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This tablet does not use a big.LITTLE architecture, the average tablet does. 51.3% of tablets use a big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 57% lower memory bandwidth
    Memory bandwidth
    6.4 GB/s
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <4.26 GB/s – >60 GB/s
    This tablet has a lower memory bandwidth than the average tablet (6.4 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    6.4 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 50% less storage
    Internal storage
    32 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
    This tablet has less internal storage than the average tablet (32 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    32 GB vs 64 GB
  • Older DDR memory version
    DDR memory version
    LPDDR2
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This tablet uses an older DDR memory version than the average tablet (LPDDR2 vs LPDDR3). The average tablet uses DDR version LPDDR3.
    LPDDR2 vs LPDDR3
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    1024×600
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    This tablet has a lower screen resolution than the average tablet (1024×600 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet has a resolution of 1920×1200.
    1024×600 vs 1920×1200
  • 3.1 inches smaller screen size
    Screen size
    7 inches
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <7 inches – >12 inches
    This tablet has a lower screen size than the average tablet (7 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    7 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • Lower contrast ratio
    Contrast ratio
    250:1
    â–¼ Worse than 100% of models
    This tablet has a lower contrast ratio than the average tablet (250:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    250:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 24.1% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    170 ppi
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (170 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    170 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • 51 nits lower peak brightness
    Peak brightness
    350 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
    Market range: <320 nits – >750 nits
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (350 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    350 nits vs 401 nits
  • 51 ppi lower screen sharpness
    Screen sharpness
    170 ppi
    â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a lower screen sharpness than the average tablet (170 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    170 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • 50% lower touch sampling rate
    Touch sampling rate
    60 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    Market range: <60 Hz – >300 Hz
    This tablet has a lower touch sampling rate than the average tablet (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average tablet has touch sampling rate of 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 4.7 MP lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    0.3 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (0.3 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    0.3 MP vs 5 MP
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus in video
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • Worse main-camera video
    Video recording (main camera)
    720 x 30 fps
    â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
    This tablet supports worse main-camera video recording than the average tablet (720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps). The average tablet supports 1080x30 fps main-camera video recording.
    720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps
  • No burst mode
    Serial shot / Burst mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet does not support burst mode, the average tablet does. 60.5% of tablets support burst mode.
  • No BSI sensor
    BSI sensor
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a BSI sensor, the average tablet has one. 52.6% of tablets use BSI sensors for better low-light shots.
  • No timelapse video
    Timelapse video
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets include timelapse modes.
  • 3 hours shorter battery life
    Battery life
    7 hours
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (7 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    7 hours vs 10 hours
  • 39.2% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    4,000 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
    This tablet has a lower battery capacity than the average tablet (4000 mAh vs 6580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6580 mAh.
    4,000 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • 44.4% slower charging speed
    Charging speed
    10 W
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <10 W – >60 W
    This tablet supports slower charging than the average tablet (10 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    10 W vs 18 W
  • No USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • No LTE support
    LTE support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    3.0
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    This tablet uses an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (3 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    3.0 vs 5.0
  • Older Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This tablet uses an older Wi-Fi version than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average tablet uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • No cellular module
    Cellular module
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • Fewer Wi-Fi bands
    Wi-Fi bands
    2.4GHz
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    This tablet supports fewer Wi-Fi bands than the average tablet (2.4GHz vs 2.4GHz/5GHz). The average tablet supports 2.4GHz/5GHz Wi-Fi bands.
    2.4GHz vs 2.4GHz/5GHz
  • No HDMI output
    HDMI output
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This tablet does not have an HDMI output, the average tablet does. 50.1% of tablets support HDMI output.
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • No split-screen
    Split-screen support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This tablet does not support split-screen, the average tablet does. 72.4% of tablets support split-screen.
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    Picture-in-picture
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • No camera/mic privacy toggles
    Camera/mic privacy
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This tablet lacks camera and microphone privacy toggles, the average tablet includes them. 56.2% of tablets offer these toggles.
  • No multi-user mode
    User score
    9.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 7 0 P3110 WiFi
    the average tablet
    Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 7 0 P3110 WiFi (1GB + 32GB) does not support multi-user mode, the average tablet does. 73.6% of tablets allow multiple user profiles.
  • No full-page screenshots
    Full-page screenshots
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 52.5% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • No location privacy controls
    Location privacy
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    This tablet does not offer location privacy controls, the average tablet does. 76.5% of tablets include location privacy features.
  • No dark mode
    Dark mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
    This tablet does not support dark mode, the average tablet does. 57.2% of tablets have dark mode.
  • 2.5 mm thicker
    Thickness
    10.5 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <6.1 mm – >11.5 mm
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (10.5 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    10.5 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • 7 older release date
    Release date
    2012
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This tablet is an older model than the average tablet (2012 vs 2019).
    April 2012
    2012 vs 2019

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

H
hothardware.com
14/06/2012
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 10-inch and 7-inch Review
D
deviceguru.com
10/12/2012
Summary of the review
An in-depth Galaxy Tab 2 7.0 review - DeviceGuru
M
mobiletechreview.com
15/05/2012
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 7.0 Review
E
expertreviews.co.uk
01/04/2015
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 7.0 review - Expert Reviews
L
laptopmag.com
10/04/2012
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 7.0 Review - Laptop Mag
C
cnet.com
27/08/2012
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 (7.0) review - CNET
T
techradar.com
31/05/2012
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 7.0 review - TechRadar
R
reviewed.com
11/05/2012
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 7.0 Tablet Review - Reviewed
P
pcworld.com
23/04/2012
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 7.0 Review: A Low-Cost, Full-Featured Android Tablet - PCWorld
T
theverge.com
11/04/2012
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 7.0 review - The Verge
W
whathifi.com
06/12/2012
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 7.0 review
T
trustedreviews.com
29/02/2012
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 7.0 Review
U
uk.pcmag.com
16/05/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 (7.0) - PCMag UK
H
hifitest.de
18/10/2012
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 7.0 - Tablets im Test
(Translated)Show original
C
computerbild.de
23/04/2013
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 7.0: Test der Sieben-Zoll-Version
(Translated)Show original
P
pcwelt.de
27/07/2012
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 7.0 im Test
(Translated)Show original
C
computerwoche.de
25/09/2012
Summary of the review
Tablet und Smartphone in einem: Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 7.0 im Test
(Translated)Show original
C
connect.de
04/09/2012
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 7.0 im Test - Connect
(Translated)Show original
C
chip.de
20/06/2012
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 & 7.0 - Doppel-Test
(Translated)Show original
0
01net.com
15/02/2012
Summary of the review
Fiche technique Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 (7.0)
(Translated)Show original
M
margxt.fr
28/12/2020
Summary of the review
[TEST] Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 7.0
(Translated)Show original
F
frandroid.com
29/07/2013
Summary of the review
Test de la Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 7.0
(Translated)Show original
T
tablette-tactile.net
20/06/2012
Summary of the review
Test de la Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 7.0 (P3110)
(Translated)Show original
L
lesnumeriques.com
23/05/2012
Summary of the review
Test Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 7.0 - Capable d'afficher Android ET TouchWiz avec fluidité
(Translated)Show original
T
tweakers.net
09/08/2012
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 7.0 - Review - Tweakers
(Translated)Show original
P
portablegear.nl
21/02/2012
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 review - PortableGear.nl
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

What we like about Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 7 0 P3110 WiFi (1GB + 32GB)

  • Competitive price point offering good value for a name-brand tablet
  • Compact and lightweight design, making it highly portable and comfortable for one-handed use
  • Includes a microSD card slot for storage expansion up to 32GB
  • Full access to the Google Play Store and standard Android ecosystem
  • Reliable battery life for mixed daily tasks like reading and light browsing

What we don't like about Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 7 0 P3110 WiFi (1GB + 32GB)

  • Middling screen resolution (1024 x 600) with colors that can appear dull or washed out
  • Limited internal storage, with only about 4.3GB of the advertised 8GB actually usable by the user
  • Pedestrian 1GHz dual-core processor can lead to choppy performance in demanding apps or 3D games
  • Poor camera quality, lacking autofocus and an LED flash, leading to grainy low-light photos
  • Display can be unresponsive to touch at times, making web navigation difficult
  • Proprietary 30-pin charging port requires a specific Samsung cable rather than standard micro-USB

Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 7.0 P3110 is a compact WiFi-only tablet featuring a 7-inch PLS LCD display with a 1024 x 600 resolution and approximately 170 ppi density. It is powered by a 1.0 GHz dual-core TI OMAP 4430 processor, 1GB of RAM, and 32GB of internal storage, which is further expandable up to 32GB via a microSD slot. Key characteristics include a 3.2MP rear camera capable of 720p video recording, a VGA front-facing camera, and a 4,000 mAh battery that supports up to 10 hours of use. Main pros are its highly portable, lightweight design (344g), reliable WiFi connectivity, and the inclusion of an IR blaster for universal remote functionality. However, it suffers from several cons, including an outdated Android operating system (originally 4.0.3), lackluster low-light camera performance, and occasional interface lag during demanding tasks.

Compare Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 7 0 P3110 WiFi (1GB + 32GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 7 0 P3110 WiFi (1GB + 32GB) and other tablets

No results found