OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Tablets Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Samsung Galaxy Tab 10 1 Cellular (1GB + 32GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£620RAM capacity:1 GBInternal storage:32 GBScreen size:10.1 inchesChipset:Nvidia Tegra 2 T20

Samsung Galaxy Tab 10 1 Cellular (1GB + 32GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

4.9

Overall score

Score
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
Score components

90%

4.9

Technical score

10%

?

User score

â–¼Worse than 94% of tablets
4.9

Technical score

Technical score
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
Score components

22%

4.2

Performance

20%

4.3

Display

16%

5.3

Camera

14%

4.6

Battery

12%

6.4

Connectivity

8%

5.2

Software & Features

5%

5.4

Design

3%

4.8

Audio & Multimedia

â–¼Worse than 90% of tablets
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £620

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Samsung Galaxy Tab 10 1 Cellular (1GB + 32GB)

Technical score
Technical score
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
Score components:

22%

4.2

Performance

20%

4.3

Display

16%

5.3

Camera

14%

4.6

Battery

12%

6.4

Connectivity

8%

5.2

Software & Features

5%

5.4

Design

3%

4.8

Audio & Multimedia

4.9
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
Samsung Galaxy Tab 10 1 Cellular (1GB + 32GB) has a popularity of 1 point, which is higher than 65.8% of Tablets.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
Score components:

60%

4.9

Overall score

40%

7.2

Price

5.6
RAM capacity
1 GB
RAM capacity
1 GB
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 1 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 77.8% of tablets and equal to that of 19.3% of tablets.
Process node
40 nm
Process node
40 nm
â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 40 nm process node, which is larger than the node size used in 86.8% of tablets and equal to the node used in 8% of tablets.
Internal storage
32 GB
Internal storage
32 GB
â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 32 GB which is smaller than the storage of 60.5% of tablets and equal to that of 18% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
?
Chipset
Nvidia Tegra 2 T20
Chipset
Nvidia Tegra 2 T20
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
This tablet uses the Nvidia Tegra 2 T20 chipset, which is less advanced than the chipsets in 70.5% of tablets and equal to those in 2.6% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
1280×800
Screen resolution
1280×800
â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
This tablet has a screen resolution of 1280×800 which is lower than that of 68.1% of tablets and equal to that of 21.7% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Refresh rate
60 Hz
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
Display type
IPS LCD
â–² Better than 17% of models
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
149 ppi
Pixel density
149 ppi
â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 149 ppi which is lower than that of 86.8% of tablets and equal to that of 9.2% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass
â–² Better than 45% of models
This tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass display glass which is stronger than that on 45.4% of tablets and equal to that on 32.7% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
Optical image stabilization
no
Category Benchmark
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
3 MP
Main camera megapixels
3 MP
â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 3 MP which is lower than that of 92.5% of tablets and equal to that of 0.9% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
2 MP
Front camera megapixels
2 MP
â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 2 MP which is lower than in 53.6% of tablets and equal to that in 25.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.6
Main camera aperture
f/2.6
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.6 which is narrower than that of 87.5% of tablets and equal to that of 2% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
Optical zoom
1xx
â–² Better than 18% of models
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
7,000 mAh
Battery capacity
7,000 mAh
â–² Better than 54% of models
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 7,000 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 54% of tablets and equal to those in 3.6% of tablets.
Charging speed
9 W
Charging speed
9 W
â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 9 W which is slower than in 94.2% of tablets and equal to speeds in 0.8% of tablets.
Battery life
10 hours
Battery life
10 hours
â–¼ Worse than 40% of models
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 10 hours, which is longer than that of 39.1% of tablets and equal to that of 20.5% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
Wireless charging
no
â–¼ Worse than 2% of models
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
no
Fast charging
no
â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
This tablet does not support fast charging. 49.7% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
yes
LTE support
yes
â–² Better than 37% of models
This tablet supports LTE. 36.8% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Category Benchmark
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
â–² Better than 17% of models
This tablet supports GPS. 17.3% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
5G connectivity
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
NFC
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Android
Operating system
Android
â–² Better than 23% of models
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.3%.
Update support duration
short
Update support duration
short
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.7% of tablets and equal to that of 47.3% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
no
Direct OS updates
no
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
This tablet does not receive direct OS updates. 79.7% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
On-device AI
no
â–¼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
App tracking protection
no
â–¼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
IP rating
not rated
â–¼ Worse than 16% of models
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
565 g
Weight
565 g
â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 565 g which is heavier than 67.6% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.8% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
Backlit keyboard
no
â–¼ Worse than 10% of models
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
Keyboard accessory
yes
â–² Better than 16% of models
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
1
Number of microphones
1
â–¼ Worse than 45% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This tablet includes 1 microphones, which is more than in 0.2% of tablets and equal to the number in 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
aptX Adaptive
no
â–¼ Worse than 7% of models
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
no
Dolby Atmos support
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
N. of speakers
2
â–¼ Worse than 29% of models
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.9% of tablets.
FM radio
no
FM radio
no
â–¼ Worse than 19% of models
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Samsung Galaxy Tab 10 1 Cellular (1GB + 32GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • Allows manual focus
    Manual focus
    yes
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    This tablet allows manual focus control, the average tablet does not. 37.2% of tablets include manual focus.
  • More capable chipset
    Chipset
    Nvidia Tegra 2 T20
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    This tablet uses the Nvidia Tegra 2 T20 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Nvidia Tegra 2 T20 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Includes flash
    Flash
    yes
    â–² Better than 55% of models
    This tablet features a built-in flash, the average tablet does not. 45.2% of tablets include a flash.
  • 4 more GPU execution units
    GPU execution units
    8
    â–² Better than 68% of models
    Market range: <2 – >24
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (8 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    8 vs 4
  • Designed for kids
    Designed for kids
    yes
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    This tablet is suitable for kids, the average tablet is not. 23.7% of tablets are suitable for kids.
  • More capable chipset
    Chipset
    Nvidia Tegra 2 T20
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    This tablet uses the Nvidia Tegra 2 T20 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Nvidia Tegra 2 T20 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 4 more GPU execution units
    GPU execution units
    8
    â–² Better than 68% of models
    Market range: <2 – >24
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (8 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    8 vs 4
  • Allows manual focus
    Manual focus
    yes
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    This tablet allows manual focus control, the average tablet does not. 37.2% of tablets include manual focus.
  • Includes flash
    Flash
    yes
    â–² Better than 55% of models
    This tablet features a built-in flash, the average tablet does not. 45.2% of tablets include a flash.
  • Designed for kids
    Designed for kids
    yes
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    This tablet is suitable for kids, the average tablet is not. 23.7% of tablets are suitable for kids.
  • No USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • 3 GB less RAM
    RAM capacity
    1 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (1 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    1 GB vs 4 GB
  • 50% lower CPU speed
    CPU speed
    1 GHz
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    Market range: <1.2 GHz – >3.2 GHz
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 5 MP lower main camera megapixels
    Main camera megapixels
    3 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
    Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
    This tablet has a lower-resolution main camera than the average tablet (3 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a 8 MP main camera.
    3 MP vs 8 MP
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • Worse GPU
    GPU model
    ULP GeForce
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    This tablet uses the ULP GeForce GPU, while the average tablet uses the stronger Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    ULP GeForce vs Mali-G51
  • 3 MP lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    2 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    2 MP vs 5 MP
  • 33.5% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    149 ppi
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (149 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    149 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • 26.8% worse value for money
    Samsung Galaxy Tab 10 1 Cellular (1GB + 32GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (5.6 vs 7.1).
    5.6 vs 7.1
  • 2.38x more expensive
    Samsung Galaxy Tab 10 1 Cellular (1GB + 32GB) is more expensive than the average tablet (£620 vs £260).
    £620 vs £260
  • 4.81x less popular
    Samsung Galaxy Tab 10 1 Cellular (1GB + 32GB) is less popular than the average tablet (1 vs 4.8).
    1 vs 4.81
  • 3 GB less RAM
    RAM capacity
    1 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (1 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    1 GB vs 4 GB
  • 50% lower CPU speed
    CPU speed
    1 GHz
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    Market range: <1.2 GHz – >3.2 GHz
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • Worse GPU
    GPU model
    ULP GeForce
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    This tablet uses the ULP GeForce GPU, while the average tablet uses the stronger Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    ULP GeForce vs Mali-G51
  • 2.86x larger process node
    Process node
    40 nm
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
    This tablet uses a larger process node than the average tablet (40 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    40 nm vs 14 nm
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    CPU threads
    2
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <2 – >12
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (2 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    2 vs 6
  • 83.9% lower memory bandwidth
    Memory bandwidth
    2.4 GB/s
    â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
    Market range: <4.26 GB/s – >60 GB/s
    This tablet has a lower memory bandwidth than the average tablet (2.4 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    2.4 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    big.LITTLE Architecture
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This tablet does not use a big.LITTLE architecture, the average tablet does. 51.3% of tablets use a big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 50% less storage
    Internal storage
    32 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
    This tablet has less internal storage than the average tablet (32 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    32 GB vs 64 GB
  • Older DDR memory version
    DDR memory version
    LPDDR2
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This tablet uses an older DDR memory version than the average tablet (LPDDR2 vs LPDDR3). The average tablet uses DDR version LPDDR3.
    LPDDR2 vs LPDDR3
  • 33.5% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    149 ppi
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (149 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    149 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • 65 nits lower peak brightness
    Peak brightness
    336 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <320 nits – >750 nits
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (336 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    336 nits vs 401 nits
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    1280×800
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This tablet has a lower screen resolution than the average tablet (1280×800 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet has a resolution of 1920×1200.
    1280×800 vs 1920×1200
  • 64 nits lower typical brightness
    Typical brightness
    336 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
    Market range: <300 nits – >600 nits
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (336 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    336 nits vs 400 nits
  • 72 ppi lower screen sharpness
    Screen sharpness
    149 ppi
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a lower screen sharpness than the average tablet (149 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    149 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • 50% lower touch sampling rate
    Touch sampling rate
    60 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    Market range: <60 Hz – >300 Hz
    This tablet has a lower touch sampling rate than the average tablet (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average tablet has touch sampling rate of 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 5 MP lower main camera megapixels
    Main camera megapixels
    3 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
    Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
    This tablet has a lower-resolution main camera than the average tablet (3 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a 8 MP main camera.
    3 MP vs 8 MP
  • 3 MP lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    2 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    2 MP vs 5 MP
  • Worse main-camera video
    Video recording (main camera)
    720 x 30 fps
    â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
    This tablet supports worse main-camera video recording than the average tablet (720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps). The average tablet supports 1080x30 fps main-camera video recording.
    720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps
  • No HDR photo mode
    HDR photo mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    This tablet does not have HDR photo mode, the average tablet does. 79.6% of tablets support HDR photo mode.
  • No manual white balance
    Manual white balance
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    This tablet does not allow manual white balance adjustments, the average tablet does. 51.6% of tablets include white balance controls.
  • No burst mode
    Serial shot / Burst mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet does not support burst mode, the average tablet does. 60.5% of tablets support burst mode.
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    Main camera aperture
    f/2.6
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    This tablet has a worse main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.6 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 main camera aperture.
    f/2.6 vs f/2.2
  • No panorama mode
    Panorama mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    This tablet does not have a panorama mode, the average tablet does. 78.6% of tablets include panorama features.
  • No BSI sensor
    BSI sensor
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a BSI sensor, the average tablet has one. 52.6% of tablets use BSI sensors for better low-light shots.
  • No timelapse video
    Timelapse video
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets include timelapse modes.
  • 50% slower charging speed
    Charging speed
    9 W
    â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
    Market range: <10 W – >60 W
    This tablet supports slower charging than the average tablet (9 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    9 W vs 18 W
  • No USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    2.1
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    This tablet uses an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (2.1 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    2.1 vs 5.0
  • Older Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This tablet uses an older Wi-Fi version than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average tablet uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • Does not receive direct OS updates
    Direct OS updates
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    This tablet does not support direct OS updates, the average tablet does. 79.7% of tablets support direct OS updates.
  • No split-screen
    Split-screen support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This tablet does not support split-screen, the average tablet does. 72.4% of tablets support split-screen.
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    Picture-in-picture
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • No camera/mic privacy toggles
    Camera/mic privacy
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This tablet lacks camera and microphone privacy toggles, the average tablet includes them. 56.2% of tablets offer these toggles.
  • No multi-user mode
    User score
    8.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Samsung Galaxy Tab 10 1 Cellular
    the average tablet
    Samsung Galaxy Tab 10 1 Cellular (1GB + 32GB) does not support multi-user mode, the average tablet does. 73.6% of tablets allow multiple user profiles.
  • No full-page screenshots
    Full-page screenshots
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 52.5% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • No location privacy controls
    Location privacy
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    This tablet does not offer location privacy controls, the average tablet does. 76.5% of tablets include location privacy features.
  • No dark mode
    Dark mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
    This tablet does not support dark mode, the average tablet does. 57.2% of tablets have dark mode.
  • 15.3% heavier
    Weight
    565 g
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    Market range: <315 g – >730 g
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (565 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    565 g vs 490 g
  • 8 older release date
    Release date
    2011
    â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This tablet is an older model than the average tablet (2011 vs 2019).
    June 2011
    2011 vs 2019
  • 56.7 mm taller
    Width
    256.7 mm
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    Market range: <123.8 mm – >274 mm
    This tablet is taller than the average tablet (256.7 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200.0 mm tall.
    256.7 mm vs 200.0 mm
  • 0.6 mm thicker
    Thickness
    8.6 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
    Market range: <6.1 mm – >11.5 mm
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (8.6 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    8.6 mm vs 8.0 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

Z
zdnet.com
17/06/2011
Summary of the review
ZDNET: Hands-on review: Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 Would you like to compare these cellular performance benchmarks against the Wi-Fi only version or a mo...
I
itpro.com
04/08/2011
Summary of the review
IT Pro: Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 review
P
pcper.com
10/08/2011
Summary of the review
PC Perspective: Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 Review - The Best Android Tablet?
B
boomertechtalk.com
12/10/2011
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 Review - Boomer Tech Talk
D
delimiter.com.au
03/02/2012
Summary of the review
Delimiter: Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1: Review (Testing 3G/Wi-Fi performance)
N
newbusiness.co.uk
20/02/2012
Summary of the review
New Business: Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 (Vodafone UK Cellular version)
T
thegate.ca
18/04/2012
Summary of the review
The GATE: Review: Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 (Testing 4G model)
C
cnet.com
29/03/2011
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1v review - CNET
C
cnet.com
16/08/2011
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 4G LTE Verizon review
A
androidcommunity.com
10/08/2011
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 4G LTE Review [Verizon]
T
techadvisor.com
04/12/2019
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) Review: Best Budget Tablet
U
uk.pcmag.com
11/04/2012
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 (Verizon Wireless) - Review 2012
C
chip.de
07/03/2011
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 im Praxis-Test - CHIP
(Translated)Show original
V
video.golem.de
21/07/2011
Summary of the review
Video: Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 - Test - Golem.de
(Translated)Show original
C
computerwoche.de
25/03/2012
Summary of the review
Tablet-PC: Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1N im Test - Computerwoche
(Translated)Show original
C
connect.de
16/01/2012
Summary of the review
Datenblatt: Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1N GT-P7501 - Connect
(Translated)Show original
C
computerbild.de
10/02/2013
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1N 3G im Test - COMPUTER BILD
(Translated)Show original
G
golem.de
21/07/2011
Summary of the review
Galaxy Tab 10.1 im Test: Schlankes Tablet mit Android 3.1
(Translated)Show original
C
computerbild.de
08/06/2012
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1N im Test
(Translated)Show original
L
lesnumeriques.com
21/09/2011
Summary of the review
Test La 1ère Galaxy Tab 10.1, de 2011
(Translated)Show original
B
belgium-iphone.lesoir.be
31/08/2011
Summary of the review
On a testé la Galaxy Tab 10.1 !
(Translated)Show original
F
franceinfo.fr
02/11/2011
Summary of the review
On a testé : la tablette Galaxy Tab 10.1 de Samsung
(Translated)Show original
T
tomshardware.fr
21/09/2011
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 : la tablette idéale ?
(Translated)Show original
E
elespanol.com
20/12/2011
Summary of the review
Análisis a fondo de la Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 - Pura tablet Android
(Translated)Show original
D
dday.it
07/07/2011
Summary of the review
Galaxy Tab 10.1 con Touchwiz: la prova completa
(Translated)Show original
T
tech.everyeye.it
07/07/2011
Summary of the review
Recensione Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 - Everyeye Tech
(Translated)Show original
T
tech.everyeye.it
18/03/2011
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1: video review in italiano
(Translated)Show original
T
techzine.nl
19/08/2011
Summary of the review
Review: Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 - Techzine.nl
(Translated)Show original
H
hardware.info
21/08/2011
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 review - Interface en toepassingen - Hardware Info
(Translated)Show original
T
tweakers.net
11/08/2011
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1: most wanted - Review - Tweakers
(Translated)Show original
F
fwd.nl
16/07/2011
Summary of the review
Review: Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1
(Translated)Show original
E
ereaders.nl
24/08/2011
Summary of the review
Review Samsung Galaxy Tab 10,1: mooi apparaat, maar waar blijven de apps?
(Translated)Show original
T
techzine.nl
19/08/2011
Summary of the review
Review: Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 - Techzine.nl
(Translated)Show original
H
hardware.info
21/08/2011
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 review - Interface en toepassingen
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

What we like about Samsung Galaxy Tab 10 1 Cellular (1GB + 32GB)

  • Extremely thin and lightweight design, often cited as more portable than contemporary rivals
  • High-quality PLS LCD display with wide viewing angles and vivid colors
  • Solid build quality and comfortable ergonomics for long-term handling
  • Good battery life during media playback, often lasting through several movies
  • Smooth performance in dual-core optimized games and high-definition video playback

What we don't like about Samsung Galaxy Tab 10 1 Cellular (1GB + 32GB)

  • Lack of expandable storage (no microSD card slot)
  • Reliance on a proprietary 30-pin connector instead of standard micro-USB for charging and data
  • Absence of a dedicated HDMI-out port, requiring expensive proprietary adapters
  • Underwhelming camera performance, particularly in low light or for still photography
  • Occasional software lag or stutters in the stock Honeycomb user interface and browser
  • Proprietary charging requirement prevents charging via standard computer USB ports

Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 Cellular is a slim, lightweight tablet featuring a 10.1-inch PLS LCD display with a 1280 x 800 resolution and 16:10 aspect ratio. It is powered by a 1.0 GHz dual-core Nvidia Tegra 2 processor paired with 1GB of RAM and 32GB of internal storage, supporting 4G HSPA+ connectivity and dual-band Wi-Fi for versatile mobile use. Main characteristics include its impressively thin 8.6mm profile, weighing just 565g, alongside a 3.15MP rear camera with autofocus and a 2MP front-facing camera for video calls. Key pros include its highly portable, sleek design that rivals the iPad 2 in build, a bright screen with good viewing angles, and the inclusion of stereo speakers and Adobe Flash support. Notable cons include its older Android Honeycomb operating system, a lack of built-in ports like HDMI or USB without proprietary adapters, and a plastic rear casing that can feel less rigid than metal competitors.

Compare Samsung Galaxy Tab 10 1 Cellular (1GB + 32GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Samsung Galaxy Tab 10 1 Cellular (1GB + 32GB) and other tablets

No results found