OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Tablets Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Archos Arnova 90 G3 (512MB + 4GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£140RAM capacity:0.5 GBInternal storage:4 GBScreen size:9 inchesChipset:ARM Cortex-A9

Archos Arnova 90 G3 (512MB + 4GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

4.8

Overall score

Score
4.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
Score components

90%

4.7

Technical score

10%

6.4

User score

â–¼Worse than 95% of tablets
4.7

Technical score

Technical score
4.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
Score components

22%

4.1

Performance

20%

5.8

Display

16%

4.1

Camera

14%

3.5

Battery

12%

5.0

Connectivity

8%

5.8

Software & Features

5%

5.5

Design

3%

3.9

Audio & Multimedia

â–¼Worse than 96% of tablets
6.4

User score

User score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
Score components

70%

6.8

User ratings

30%

5.5

Number of reviews

Based on 103 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 92% of tablets
  • archos-arnova-90-g3-512mb-4gb
  • archos-arnova-90-g3-512mb-4gb
  • archos-arnova-90-g3-512mb-4gb
  • archos-arnova-90-g3-512mb-4gb
  • archos-arnova-90-g3-512mb-4gb
  • archos-arnova-90-g3-512mb-4gb
archos-arnova-90-g3-512mb-4gb
archos-arnova-90-g3-512mb-4gb
archos-arnova-90-g3-512mb-4gb
archos-arnova-90-g3-512mb-4gb
archos-arnova-90-g3-512mb-4gb
archos-arnova-90-g3-512mb-4gb

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Archos Arnova 90 G3 (512MB + 4GB)

Technical score
Technical score
4.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
Score components:

22%

4.1

Performance

20%

5.8

Display

16%

4.1

Camera

14%

3.5

Battery

12%

5.0

Connectivity

8%

5.8

Software & Features

5%

5.5

Design

3%

3.9

Audio & Multimedia

4.7
User score
User score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
Score components

70%

6.8

User ratings

30%

5.5

Number of reviews

Based on 103 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
6.4
Popularity
Popularity
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 55% of models
Popularity:
Archos Arnova 90 G3 (512MB + 4GB) has a user popularity of 5.5 points, which is lower than 54.9% of Tablets.
5.5
Value for money
Value for money
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
Score components:

60%

4.8

Overall score

40%

9.8

Price

6.3
RAM capacity
0.5 GB
RAM capacity
0.5 GB
â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 0.5 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 97.1% of tablets and equal to that of 2.6% of tablets.
Process node
55 nm
Process node
55 nm
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 55 nm process node, which is larger than the node size used in 99.3% of tablets and equal to the node used in 0.3% of tablets.
Internal storage
4 GB
Internal storage
4 GB
â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 4 GB which is smaller than the storage of 98.5% of tablets and equal to that of 1.3% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
?
Chipset
ARM Cortex-A9
Chipset
ARM Cortex-A9
â–¼ Worse than 100% of models
This tablet uses the ARM Cortex-A9 chipset, which is less advanced than the chipsets in 99.8% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
800×480
Screen resolution
800×480
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
This tablet has a screen resolution of 800×480 which is lower than that of 99.2% of tablets and equal to that of 0.7% of tablets.
Refresh rate
?
Display type
LCD
Display type
LCD
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
This tablet uses a LCD display type. 83% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
104 ppi
Pixel density
104 ppi
â–¼ Worse than 100% of models
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 104 ppi which is lower than that of 99.9% of tablets and equal to that of 0.1% of tablets.
Display glass type
Chemically Strengthened Glass
Display glass type
Chemically Strengthened Glass
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
This tablet uses Chemically Strengthened Glass display glass which is weaker than that on 65.1% of tablets and equal to that on 13% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
Optical image stabilization
no
Category Benchmark
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
0.3 MP
Main camera megapixels
0.3 MP
â–¼ Worse than 100% of models
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 0.3 MP which is lower than that of 99.7% of tablets and equal to that of 0.3% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
0.3 MP
Front camera megapixels
0.3 MP
â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 0.3 MP which is lower than in 93% of tablets and equal to that in 7% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
N/A
Optical zoom
1xxx
Optical zoom
1xx
â–² Better than 18% of models
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
?
Charging speed
10 W
Charging speed
10 W
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 10 W which is slower than in 61% of tablets and equal to speeds in 33.2% of tablets.
Battery life
6 hours
Battery life
6 hours
â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 6 hours, which is shorter than that of 92% of tablets and equal to that of 2.6% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
Wireless charging
no
â–¼ Worse than 2% of models
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
no
Fast charging
no
â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
This tablet does not support fast charging. 49.7% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
no
LTE support
no
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
This tablet does not support LTE. 63.3% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Category Benchmark
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
no
GPS
no
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
This tablet does not support GPS. 82.7% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
5G connectivity
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
NFC
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Android
Operating system
Android
â–² Better than 23% of models
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.3%.
Update support duration
short
Update support duration
short
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.7% of tablets and equal to that of 47.3% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
Direct OS updates
yes
â–² Better than 20% of models
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
On-device AI
no
â–¼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
App tracking protection
no
â–¼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
IP rating
not rated
â–¼ Worse than 16% of models
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
480 g
Weight
480 g
â–² Better than 53% of models
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 480 g which is lighter than 53.2% of tablets and equal to the weight of 1.7% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
Backlit keyboard
no
â–¼ Worse than 10% of models
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
Keyboard accessory
yes
â–² Better than 16% of models
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
1
Number of microphones
1
â–¼ Worse than 45% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This tablet includes 1 microphones, which is more than in 0.2% of tablets and equal to the number in 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
aptX Adaptive
no
â–¼ Worse than 7% of models
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
no
Dolby Atmos support
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
1
N. of speakers
1
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 1 speakers, which is fewer than in 90.2% of tablets and equal to the number in 9.6% of tablets.
FM radio
no
FM radio
no
â–¼ Worse than 19% of models
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Archos Arnova 90 G3 (512MB + 4GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • Supports slow-motion recording
    Slow-motion recording
    yes
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    This tablet supports slow-motion recording, the average tablet does not. 37.5% of tablets offer slow-mo.
  • 85.7% cheaper
    Archos Arnova 90 G3 (512MB + 4GB) is cheaper than the average tablet (£140 vs £260).
    £140 vs £260
  • 27.3 mm narrower
    Width
    148 mm
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <123.8 mm – >274 mm
    This tablet is narrower than the average tablet (148 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    148 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • Newer DDR memory version
    DDR memory version
    DDR3
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This tablet supports a newer DDR version than the average tablet (DDR3 vs LPDDR3). The average DDR version is LPDDR3.
    DDR3 vs LPDDR3
  • 85.7% cheaper
    Archos Arnova 90 G3 (512MB + 4GB) is cheaper than the average tablet (£140 vs £260).
    £140 vs £260
  • Newer DDR memory version
    DDR memory version
    DDR3
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This tablet supports a newer DDR version than the average tablet (DDR3 vs LPDDR3). The average DDR version is LPDDR3.
    DDR3 vs LPDDR3
  • Supports slow-motion recording
    Slow-motion recording
    yes
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    This tablet supports slow-motion recording, the average tablet does not. 37.5% of tablets offer slow-mo.
  • 27.3 mm narrower
    Width
    148 mm
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <123.8 mm – >274 mm
    This tablet is narrower than the average tablet (148 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    148 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • 4.7 MP lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    0.3 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (0.3 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    0.3 MP vs 5 MP
  • 3.5 GB less RAM
    RAM capacity
    0.5 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
    Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (0.5 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    0.5 GB vs 4 GB
  • 4 hours shorter battery life
    Battery life
    6 hours
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
    Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (6 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    6 hours vs 10 hours
  • No USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • 7.7 MP lower main camera megapixels
    Main camera megapixels
    0.3 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 100% of models
    Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
    This tablet has a lower-resolution main camera than the average tablet (0.3 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a 8 MP main camera.
    0.3 MP vs 8 MP
  • Worse GPU
    GPU model
    Mali-400
    â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
    This tablet uses the Mali-400 GPU, while the average tablet uses the stronger Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Mali-400 vs Mali-G51
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    800×480
    â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
    This tablet has a lower screen resolution than the average tablet (800×480 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet has a resolution of 1920×1200.
    800×480 vs 1920×1200
  • 50% lower CPU speed
    CPU speed
    1 GHz
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    Market range: <1.2 GHz – >3.2 GHz
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 24.5% lower user score
    User score
    6.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Archos Arnova 90 G3
    the average tablet
    Archos Arnova 90 G3 (512MB + 4GB) has a lower user score than the average tablet (6.43 vs 8.000).
    6.43 vs 8
  • 12.1% worse value for money
    Archos Arnova 90 G3 (512MB + 4GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (6.33 vs 7.1).
    6.33 vs 7.1
  • 3.5 GB less RAM
    RAM capacity
    0.5 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
    Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (0.5 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    0.5 GB vs 4 GB
  • Worse GPU
    GPU model
    Mali-400
    â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
    This tablet uses the Mali-400 GPU, while the average tablet uses the stronger Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Mali-400 vs Mali-G51
  • 50% lower CPU speed
    CPU speed
    1 GHz
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    Market range: <1.2 GHz – >3.2 GHz
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 3.93x larger process node
    Process node
    55 nm
    â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
    Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
    This tablet uses a larger process node than the average tablet (55 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    55 nm vs 14 nm
  • 5 fewer CPU threads
    CPU threads
    1
    â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
    Market range: <2 – >12
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (1 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    1 vs 6
  • 93.8% less storage
    Internal storage
    4 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
    This tablet has less internal storage than the average tablet (4 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    4 GB vs 64 GB
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    big.LITTLE Architecture
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This tablet does not use a big.LITTLE architecture, the average tablet does. 51.3% of tablets use a big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 3 fewer GPU execution units
    GPU execution units
    1
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    Market range: <2 – >24
    This tablet has less GPU execution units than the average tablet (1 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    1 vs 4
  • Less capable chipset
    Chipset
    ARM Cortex-A9
    â–¼ Worse than 100% of models
    This tablet uses the ARM Cortex-A9 chipset, while the average tablet uses the newer MediaTek MT8169A.
    ARM Cortex-A9 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    800×480
    â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
    This tablet has a lower screen resolution than the average tablet (800×480 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet has a resolution of 1920×1200.
    800×480 vs 1920×1200
  • 53.6% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    104 ppi
    â–¼ Worse than 100% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (104 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    104 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • Inferior display type
    Display type
    LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    LCD vs IPS LCD
  • Less durable display glass
    Display glass type
    Chemically Strengthened Glass
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    This tablet uses weaker display glass than the average tablet (Chemically Strengthened Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Chemically Strengthened Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • 117 ppi lower screen sharpness
    Screen sharpness
    104 ppi
    â–¼ Worse than 100% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a lower screen sharpness than the average tablet (104 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    104 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • 1.1 inches smaller screen size
    Screen size
    9 inches
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <7 inches – >12 inches
    This tablet has a lower screen size than the average tablet (9 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    9 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 4.7 MP lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    0.3 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (0.3 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    0.3 MP vs 5 MP
  • 7.7 MP lower main camera megapixels
    Main camera megapixels
    0.3 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 100% of models
    Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
    This tablet has a lower-resolution main camera than the average tablet (0.3 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a 8 MP main camera.
    0.3 MP vs 8 MP
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus in video
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • No touch autofocus
    Touch autofocus
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This tablet does not support touch autofocus, the average tablet does. 82.8% of tablets allow touch-to-focus.
  • No manual exposure control
    Manual exposure
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This tablet does not offer manual exposure control, the average tablet does. 63.6% of tablets have manual exposure.
  • No manual white balance
    Manual white balance
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    This tablet does not allow manual white balance adjustments, the average tablet does. 51.6% of tablets include white balance controls.
  • No burst mode
    Serial shot / Burst mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet does not support burst mode, the average tablet does. 60.5% of tablets support burst mode.
  • No BSI sensor
    BSI sensor
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a BSI sensor, the average tablet has one. 52.6% of tablets use BSI sensors for better low-light shots.
  • No timelapse video
    Timelapse video
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets include timelapse modes.
  • 4 hours shorter battery life
    Battery life
    6 hours
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
    Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (6 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    6 hours vs 10 hours
  • 44.4% slower charging speed
    Charging speed
    10 W
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <10 W – >60 W
    This tablet supports slower charging than the average tablet (10 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    10 W vs 18 W
  • No USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • No LTE support
    LTE support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • Older Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This tablet uses an older Wi-Fi version than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average tablet uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • No GPS
    GPS
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This tablet does not have GPS, the average tablet does. 82.7% of tablets feature GPS.
  • No cellular module
    Cellular module
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • Fewer Wi-Fi bands
    Wi-Fi bands
    2.4GHz
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    This tablet supports fewer Wi-Fi bands than the average tablet (2.4GHz vs 2.4GHz/5GHz). The average tablet supports 2.4GHz/5GHz Wi-Fi bands.
    2.4GHz vs 2.4GHz/5GHz
  • No HDMI output
    HDMI output
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This tablet does not have an HDMI output, the average tablet does. 50.1% of tablets support HDMI output.
  • No face recognition
    Face recognition
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56% of tablets support face recognition.
  • No Ethernet support
    Ethernet support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    This tablet does not have Ethernet support, the average tablet does. 76.3% of tablets support Ethernet.
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • No split-screen
    Split-screen support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This tablet does not support split-screen, the average tablet does. 72.4% of tablets support split-screen.
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    Picture-in-picture
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • No camera/mic privacy toggles
    Camera/mic privacy
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This tablet lacks camera and microphone privacy toggles, the average tablet includes them. 56.2% of tablets offer these toggles.
  • No multi-user mode
    User score
    6.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Archos Arnova 90 G3
    the average tablet
    Archos Arnova 90 G3 (512MB + 4GB) does not support multi-user mode, the average tablet does. 73.6% of tablets allow multiple user profiles.
  • No full-page screenshots
    Full-page screenshots
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 52.5% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • No location privacy controls
    Location privacy
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    This tablet does not offer location privacy controls, the average tablet does. 76.5% of tablets include location privacy features.
  • No voice command support
    Voice commands
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
    This tablet does not support voice commands, the average tablet does. 96.3% of tablets include voice command support.
  • No dark mode
    Dark mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
    This tablet does not support dark mode, the average tablet does. 57.2% of tablets have dark mode.
  • No offline voice recognition
    Offline voice recognition
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    This tablet does not support offline voice recognition, the average tablet does. 76.1% of tablets support offline voice recognition.
  • 3.6 mm thicker
    Thickness
    11.6 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    Market range: <6.1 mm – >11.5 mm
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (11.6 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    11.6 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • 6 older release date
    Release date
    2013
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This tablet is an older model than the average tablet (2013 vs 2019).
    April 2013
    2013 vs 2019
  • 39 mm taller
    Width
    239 mm
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <123.8 mm – >274 mm
    This tablet is taller than the average tablet (239 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200.0 mm tall.
    239 mm vs 200.0 mm
  • 1 fewer speakers
    N. of speakers
    1
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    Market range: <1 – >6
    This tablet has less speakers than the average tablet (1 vs 2). The average tablet has 2 speakers.
    1 vs 2

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

F
fwd.nl
04/04/2013
Summary of the review
Archos lanceert Arnova 90 G3 budgettablet met Android 4.1 Note on Selection:
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on 103 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: May 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Archos Arnova 90 G3 (512MB + 4GB)

  • Affordable price point for a 9-inch tablet
  • Lightweight and relatively slim design for its size
  • Includes a microSD/SDHC card slot for expandable storage up to 32GB
  • Runs Android 4.1 Jelly Bean, which was relatively current for its time
  • Equipped with a front-facing webcam for video chats
  • Supports features like HDR mode and panorama in-camera

What we don't like about Archos Arnova 90 G3 (512MB + 4GB)

  • Extremely low screen resolution (800 x 480) resulting in poor pixel density
  • Not Google Certified; lacks official Google Play Store and Google apps (Gmail, Maps, etc.)
  • Underpowered hardware with only 512MB of RAM and a single-core 1GHz processor
  • Limited internal storage of only 4GB
  • Reported issues with battery life and recharging reliability
  • Poor viewing angles and unresponsive capacitive touchscreen

Verdict

The Archos Arnova 90 G3 is a budget-oriented 9-inch tablet featuring an ARM Cortex A9 1GHz processor, 512MB of RAM, and 4GB of internal flash storage, which is expandable by up to 32GB via a microSD slot. It features a 9-inch capacitive multi-touch LCD with an 800 x 480 resolution and runs on the Android 4.1 Jelly Bean operating system, offering a front-facing webcam for video calls and built-in Wi-Fi for connectivity. Main advantages include its lightweight 480g design, relatively thin 11.6mm profile, and support for various media formats, making it a portable option for basic entertainment. However, significant drawbacks include a very low pixel density of 104 ppi, limited multitasking capabilities due to the small 512MB RAM, and the lack of official Google Play Store access, requiring users to rely on the AppsLib store instead.

Compare Archos Arnova 90 G3 (512MB + 4GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Archos Arnova 90 G3 (512MB + 4GB) and other tablets

No results found