OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Amazon Kindle Fire (1GB + 64GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£220RAM capacity:1 GBInternal storage:64 GBScreen size:7 inchesChipset:TI OMAP 4430

Amazon Kindle Fire (1GB + 64GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

5.5/10

Overall score

Score
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components

90%

5.1

Technical score

10%

9.2

User score

â–¼Worse than 73% of tablets
6.7

Value for money

Value for money
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
Score components

70%

5.5

Overall score

30%

9.4

Price

â–¼Worse than 67%
5.1

Technical score

Technical score
5.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
Score components

22%

4.6

Performance

20%

4.6

Display

16%

4.8

Camera

14%

4.0

Battery

12%

6.6

Connectivity

8%

7.0

Software & Features

5%

6.1

Design

3%

5.9

Audio & Multimedia

â–¼Worse than 83%
9.2

User score

User score
9.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 92% of models
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

★Better than 92%
  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £220
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
1GB + 16GBCheck price3GB + 64GBCheck price
Other versions:
1GB + 64GB512MB + 8GB1GB + 32GB2GB + 16GB2GB + 32GB2GB + 64GB3GB + 32GB4GB + 32GB4GB + 64GB4GB + 128GB
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Amazon Kindle Fire (1GB + 64GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
Score components:

22%

4.6

Performance

20%

4.6

Display

16%

4.8

Camera

14%

4.0

Battery

12%

6.6

Connectivity

8%

7.0

Software & Features

5%

6.1

Design

3%

5.9

Audio & Multimedia

5.1
User score
User score
9.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 92% of models
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

9.2
Popularity
Popularity
10/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 92% of models
Popularity:
Amazon Kindle Fire (1GB + 64GB) has a user popularity of 10 points, which is lower than 91.8% of Tablets.
10
Value for money
Value for money
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
Score components:

70%

5.5

Overall score

30%

9.4

Price

6.7
RAM capacity
1 GB
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 1 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 77.8% of tablets and equal to that of 19.3% of tablets.
Process node
45 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 45 nm process node, which is larger than the node size used in 94.9% of tablets and equal to the node used in 4.4% of tablets.
Internal storage
64 GB
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 64 GB which is larger than the storage of 39.5% of tablets and equal to that of 17.1% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
322 points
Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
This tablet scored 322 points in Geekbench 6 (single-core) which is lower than the score of 80.5% of tablets and equal to the score of 1.4% of tablets.
Chipset
TI OMAP 4430
This tablet uses the TI OMAP 4430 chipset, which is less advanced than the chipsets in 68.4% of tablets and equal to those in 2.1% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
1024×600
This tablet has a screen resolution of 1024×600 which is lower than that of 92.8% of tablets and equal to that of 6.2% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
169 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 169 ppi which is lower than that of 81.3% of tablets and equal to that of 0.3% of tablets.
Display glass type
Aluminosilicate Glass
This tablet uses Aluminosilicate Glass display glass which is weaker than that on 58% of tablets and equal to that on 7% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
N/A
Front camera megapixels
2 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 2 MP which is lower than in 53.6% of tablets and equal to that in 25.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
N/A
Optical zoom
N/A
Show more
Battery capacity
4,400 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 4,400 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 79.9% of tablets and equal to those in 0.5% of tablets.
Charging speed
15 W
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 15 W which is slower than in 52.2% of tablets and equal to speeds in 6.3% of tablets.
Battery life
8 hours
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 8 hours, which is shorter than that of 72.2% of tablets and equal to that of 11.9% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
yes
This tablet supports fast charging. 50.4% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
yes
This tablet supports LTE. 36.8% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
no
This tablet does not support GPS. 82.7% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Fire
This tablet uses the Fire operating system, which is less advanced than the one used by 82%.
Update support duration
medium
This tablet offers medium update support, which is longer than the support period of 47.3% of tablets and equal to that of 32.6% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
yes
This tablet supports on-device AI. 71.8% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
413 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 413 g which is lighter than 73.9% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.2% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
1
Market range: <0 – >5
This tablet includes 1 microphones, which is more than in 0.2% of tablets and equal to the number in 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
yes
This tablet supports Dolby Atmos. 68.6% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.9% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Amazon Kindle Fire (1GB + 64GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • Supports fast charging
    This tablet supports fast charging, the average tablet does not. 49.7% of tablets feature fast charging.
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
    This tablet supports Dolby Atmos, the average tablet does not. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
  • Includes on-device AI
    This tablet includes on-device AI, the average tablet does not. 28.3% of tablets include on-device AI.
  • 50 nits higher typical brightness
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (450 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    450 nits vs 400 nits
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the TI OMAP 4430 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    TI OMAP 4,430 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 15.7% lighter
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (413 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    413 g vs 490 g
  • Includes flash
    This tablet features a built-in flash, the average tablet does not. 45.2% of tablets include a flash.
  • 14.6% higher user score
    User score
    9.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Amazon Kindle Fire
    the average tablet
    Amazon Kindle Fire (1GB + 64GB) has a higher user score than the average tablet (9.17 vs 8.000).
    9.17 vs 8
  • 14.6% higher user score
    User score
    9.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Amazon Kindle Fire
    the average tablet
    Amazon Kindle Fire (1GB + 64GB) has a higher user score than the average tablet (9.17 vs 8.000).
    9.17 vs 8
  • 2.08x more popular
    Amazon Kindle Fire (1GB + 64GB) is more popular than the average tablet (10 vs 4.8).
    10 vs 4.81
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the TI OMAP 4430 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    TI OMAP 4,430 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 50 nits higher typical brightness
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (450 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    450 nits vs 400 nits
  • 49 nits higher peak brightness
    This tablet has a higher peak brightness than the average tablet (450 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    450 nits vs 401 nits
  • Includes flash
    This tablet features a built-in flash, the average tablet does not. 45.2% of tablets include a flash.
  • Supports fast charging
    This tablet supports fast charging, the average tablet does not. 49.7% of tablets feature fast charging.
  • Includes on-device AI
    This tablet includes on-device AI, the average tablet does not. 28.3% of tablets include on-device AI.
  • 15.7% lighter
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (413 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    413 g vs 490 g
  • Designed for kids
    This tablet is suitable for kids, the average tablet is not. 23.7% of tablets are suitable for kids.
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
    This tablet supports Dolby Atmos, the average tablet does not. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
  • 3 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (1 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    1 GB vs 4 GB
  • Lower screen resolution
    This tablet has a lower screen resolution than the average tablet (1024×600 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet has a resolution of 1920×1200.
    1024×600 vs 1920×1200
  • 3 MP lower front camera megapixels
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    2 MP vs 5 MP
  • 3.21x larger process node
    This tablet uses a larger process node than the average tablet (45 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    45 nm vs 14 nm
  • 3.1 inches smaller screen size
    This tablet has a lower screen size than the average tablet (7 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    7 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (2 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    2 vs 6
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • 2 hours shorter battery life
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (8 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    8 hours vs 10 hours
  • 6.5% worse value for money
    Amazon Kindle Fire (1GB + 64GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (6.67 vs 7.1).
    6.67 vs 7.1
  • 3 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (1 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    1 GB vs 4 GB
  • 3.21x larger process node
    This tablet uses a larger process node than the average tablet (45 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    45 nm vs 14 nm
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (2 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    2 vs 6
  • 1,533 MHz slower RAM speed
    This tablet has a lower RAM speed than the average tablet (333 MHz vs 1,866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1,866 MHz.
    333 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • 78.5% lower memory bandwidth
    This tablet has a lower memory bandwidth than the average tablet (3.2 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    3.2 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 55.8% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score than the average tablet (322 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    322 points vs 729 points
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    This tablet does not use a big.LITTLE architecture, the average tablet does. 51.3% of tablets use a big.LITTLE architecture.
  • Older DDR memory version
    This tablet uses an older DDR memory version than the average tablet (LPDDR2 vs LPDDR3). The average tablet uses DDR version LPDDR3.
    LPDDR2 vs LPDDR3
  • 2 fewer GPU execution units
    This tablet has less GPU execution units than the average tablet (2 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    2 vs 4
  • Lower screen resolution
    This tablet has a lower screen resolution than the average tablet (1024×600 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet has a resolution of 1920×1200.
    1024×600 vs 1920×1200
  • 3.1 inches smaller screen size
    This tablet has a lower screen size than the average tablet (7 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    7 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 24.6% lower pixel density
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (169 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    169 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • Lower contrast ratio
    This tablet has a lower contrast ratio than the average tablet (896:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    896:1 vs 1,015:1
  • Less durable display glass
    This tablet uses weaker display glass than the average tablet (Aluminosilicate Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Aluminosilicate Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • 50 ppi lower screen sharpness
    This tablet has a lower screen sharpness than the average tablet (171 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    171 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • 3 MP lower front camera megapixels
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    2 MP vs 5 MP
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • Worse main-camera video
    This tablet supports worse main-camera video recording than the average tablet (720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps). The average tablet supports 1080x30 fps main-camera video recording.
    720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps
  • No touch autofocus
    This tablet does not support touch autofocus, the average tablet does. 82.8% of tablets allow touch-to-focus.
  • No manual exposure control
    This tablet does not offer manual exposure control, the average tablet does. 63.6% of tablets have manual exposure.
  • No manual white balance
    This tablet does not allow manual white balance adjustments, the average tablet does. 51.6% of tablets include white balance controls.
  • No BSI sensor
    This tablet lacks a BSI sensor, the average tablet has one. 52.6% of tablets use BSI sensors for better low-light shots.
  • No timelapse video
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets include timelapse modes.
  • 33.1% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a lower battery capacity than the average tablet (4,400 mAh vs 6,580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6,580 mAh.
    4,400 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • 2 hours shorter battery life
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (8 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    8 hours vs 10 hours
  • 16.7% slower charging speed
    This tablet supports slower charging than the average tablet (15 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    15 W vs 18 W
  • No GPS
    This tablet does not have GPS, the average tablet does. 82.7% of tablets feature GPS.
  • No cellular module
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • No HDMI output
    This tablet does not have an HDMI output, the average tablet does. 50.1% of tablets support HDMI output.
  • No face recognition
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56% of tablets support face recognition.
  • No Ethernet support
    This tablet does not have Ethernet support, the average tablet does. 76.3% of tablets support Ethernet.
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Fire vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Fire vs Android
  • No split-screen
    This tablet does not support split-screen, the average tablet does. 72.4% of tablets support split-screen.
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • No full-page screenshots
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 52.5% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • No dark mode
    This tablet does not support dark mode, the average tablet does. 57.2% of tablets have dark mode.
  • No offline voice recognition
    This tablet does not support offline voice recognition, the average tablet does. 76.1% of tablets support offline voice recognition.
  • 8 older release date
    This tablet is an older model than the average tablet (2011 vs 2019).
    November 2011
    2011 vs 2019
  • 1 mm thicker
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (9 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    9 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • 26.7 mm wider
    This tablet is wider than the average tablet (202 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    202.0 mm vs 175.3 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

arstechnica.com
14/11/2011
Hands-on review · E-reader and video
Verdict
The Amazon Kindle Fire is great for Amazon video, music and ebooks, but merely OK as an e-reader and unreliable as a full tablet.
uk.pcmag.com
14/11/2011
Full review · Entertainment tablet
Verdict
The Amazon Kindle Fire is an easy-to-use tablet with incredible value for Amazon content, but limited storage and a reflective screen hold it back.
wired.com
14/11/2011
Five-day test · Media tablet
Verdict
The Amazon Kindle Fire works well as a shopping portal and video player, but its small screen and slow processor make it a poor everyday tablet.
B
businessinsider.com
17/11/2011
Summary of the review
The Kindle Fire: Nice Try, Amazon [REVIEW] - Business Insider
cnn.com
18/11/2011
Hands-on review · Entertainment tablet
Verdict
The Amazon Kindle Fire is a fun entertainment tablet at a fantastic price, but it lacks the speed, cameras and app choice of an iPad.
I
ign.com
19/11/2011
Summary of the review
Amazon Kindle Fire Review - IGN
C
cnet.com
21/11/2011
Summary of the review
Amazon Kindle Fire review - CNET
techradar.com
08/03/2013
Full review · Budget Android tablet
Verdict
The Amazon Kindle Fire is a good-value alternative to the iPad with an excellent custom interface, but no cameras and erratic performance hold it back.
P
popzara.com
21/11/2011
Summary of the review
Amazon Kindle Fire Tablet (2011) | Computer Reviews
theverge.com
13/11/2011
Full review · Media-focused tablet
Verdict
The Amazon Kindle Fire is a proper tablet best for books, music and video, but its unoriginal design and hidden home button make it awkward.
engadget.com
16/11/2011
First impressions · Media tablet
Verdict
The Amazon Kindle Fire is a media device for Amazon books, video and music, not an iPad rival, and feels like a work in progress.
C
cnet.com
13/11/2011
Summary of the review
Reviewing Amazon Kindle Fire not an easy task
N
notebookcheck.com
09/01/2012
Summary of the review
Test Amazon Kindle Fire 7" Tablet
(Translated)Show original
E
ebook-fieber.de
14/11/2011
Summary of the review
Kindle Fire im Test: Amazon-Tablet bekommt gute Noten, offenbart aber auch Schwächen(www.computerbild.de) | 16.11.2011 | Amazon Kindle Fire im Test: D...
(Translated)Show original
H
hifitest.de
01/09/2011
Summary of the review
Test - technische Daten Tablets - Amazon Kindle Fire
(Translated)Show original
igen.fr
30/11/2011
Hands-on test · Design and interface
Verdict
The Amazon Kindle Fire is a comfortable 7-inch Kindle with a bright screen and long battery life, but its on-screen-only controls make everyday use frustrating.
L
lepoint.fr
12/10/2011
Summary of the review
Test - Le Kindle, livre électronique d'Amazon
(Translated)Show original
X
xataka.com
28/09/2011
Summary of the review
Amazon Kindle Fire
(Translated)Show original
N
notebookcheck.nl
04/10/2011
Summary of the review
Amazon Kindle Fire 7" Notebookcheck Review Would you like a similar list for the Kindle Fire HD or later Fire tablet generations?
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Amazon Kindle Fire (1GB + 64GB)

  • Extremely affordable price point, often undercutting other budget tablets
  • Deeply integrated with the Amazon ecosystem (Prime Video, Kindle books, Amazon Music)
  • Durable build quality and rugged design, particularly suitable for children
  • Long battery life on higher-end models like the Fire HD 10
  • Expandable storage via a microSD card slot up to 1TB

What customers don't like about Amazon Kindle Fire (1GB + 64GB)

  • Lack of Google Play Store access limits the selection of available apps
  • Slower performance and occasional lag, especially on entry-level models or with multiple apps open
  • Heavily ad-supported interface unless an additional fee is paid to remove 'Special Offers'
  • Fire OS can feel restrictive and user-hostile compared to stock Android or iPadOS
  • Lower-tier models often have low-resolution displays and poor viewing angles
  • Mediocre camera quality, typically only sufficient for basic video calls

Verdict

The Amazon Fire HD tablet featuring 1GB of RAM and 64GB of internal storage is a budget-friendly 7-inch or 8-inch device designed primarily for media consumption within the Amazon ecosystem. It features a 1.2GHz or 1.5GHz processor and a high-definition IPS display (1024 x 600 or 1280 x 800 resolution) that provides clear visuals for reading and streaming. Main pros include its highly affordable price point, durable build quality, and long battery life of up to 10–12 hours, making it ideal for travel or kids. However, significant cons include its limited 1GB of RAM which can lead to sluggish multitasking, a restricted app selection via the Amazon Appstore, and the presence of lock-screen advertisements on base models.

Compare Amazon Kindle Fire (1GB + 64GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Amazon Kindle Fire (1GB + 64GB) and other tablets

No results found