OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Smartwatches Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 3,488 independent expert reviews and 5,192 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v2.0

Garmin Fenix 7 Review | 126 Data compared

Avg. price:~£350Screen size:?Battery life:18 daysDisplay type:MIP LCD

Garmin Fenix 7 Review: Compare 126 technical specifications and 19 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

8.4

Overall score

Score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartwatch's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartwatches on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 96% of models
Score components

70%

8.3

Technical score

30%

8.7

Review score ( 7 · 12)

Review score 30% · 8.7 · based on 19 independent reviews
Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 30%, technical score 70%. This model has enough reviews, so its review score is the weighted average of their grades. 16 more reviews are not scored yet.
★Better than 96% of smartwatches
8.3

Technical score

Technical score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 93% of models
Score components

24%

7.8

Health

21%

10

Fitness

16%

8.6

Battery

14%

7.6

Smart features

12%

8.5

Connectivity

9%

7.7

Display & Design

4%

4.7

Hardware

★Better than 93% of smartwatches
8.7

Review score

Review score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 96% of models
Grades by review (19)
7 reviews: 4 with a printed score, 3 estimated from the review. 12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Text reviews 2
✓ explicit
1

9.6%

9.0

techradar.com

≈ estimated
1

7.7%

9.5

treelinereview.com

Video reviews 6

3.8%

9.5

TECHNO TESTED

3.8%

9.0

Thomas Tech

3.8%

9.0

DC Rainmaker

3.8%

9.0

Chase the Summit

3.8%

6.0

W2Best Tech

3.8%

6.0

The Quantified Scientist

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
★Better than 96% of smartwatches
  • garmin-fenix-7
  • garmin-fenix-7
  • garmin-fenix-7
  • garmin-fenix-7
  • garmin-fenix-7
  • garmin-fenix-7
  • garmin-fenix-7
  • garmin-fenix-7
  • garmin-fenix-7
  • garmin-fenix-7
  • garmin-fenix-7
  • garmin-fenix-7
  • garmin-fenix-7
  • garmin-fenix-7
  • garmin-fenix-7
  • garmin-fenix-7
garmin-fenix-7
garmin-fenix-7
garmin-fenix-7
garmin-fenix-7
garmin-fenix-7
garmin-fenix-7
garmin-fenix-7
garmin-fenix-7
garmin-fenix-7
garmin-fenix-7
garmin-fenix-7
garmin-fenix-7
garmin-fenix-7
garmin-fenix-7
garmin-fenix-7
garmin-fenix-7

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Garmin Fenix 7

Technical score
Technical score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 93% of models
Score components:

24%

7.8

Health

21%

10

Fitness

16%

8.6

Battery

14%

7.6

Smart features

12%

8.5

Connectivity

9%

7.7

Display & Design

4%

4.7

Hardware

8.3
Review score
Review score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 96% of models
Grades by review (19)
7 reviews: 4 with a printed score, 3 estimated from the review. 12 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Text reviews 2
✓ explicit
1

9.6%

9.0

techradar.com

≈ estimated
1

7.7%

9.5

treelinereview.com

Video reviews 6

3.8%

9.5

TECHNO TESTED

3.8%

9.0

Thomas Tech

3.8%

9.0

DC Rainmaker

3.8%

9.0

Chase the Summit

3.8%

6.0

W2Best Tech

3.8%

6.0

The Quantified Scientist

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
8.7
Popularity
Popularity
4.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartwatch.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 63% of models
Popularity:
Garmin Fenix 7 has a popularity of 4.4 points, which is lower than 61.6% of smartwatches.
4.4
Value for money
Value for money
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 90% of models
Score components:

60%

8.4

Overall score

40%

8.7

Price

8.5
Brand name
Garmin
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
▲ Better than 11% of models
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 10.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
▲ Better than 33% of models
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 33.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
ECG
no
▼ Worse than 17% of models
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 16.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
Irregular heart rate warnings
yes
▲ Better than 52% of models
This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings. 51.9% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
Supports abnormal high/low heart-rate alerts (typically after inactivity).
Show more
What reviewers say
Accelerometer
yes
Accelerometer
yes
▲ Better than 1% of models
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.6% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
yes
Barometer
yes
▲ Better than 51% of models
This smartwatch includes a barometer. 50.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
yes
Gyroscope
yes
▲ Better than 30% of models
This smartwatch includes a gyroscope. 30.2% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
yes
Cadence sensor
yes
▲ Better than 69% of models
This smartwatch includes a cadence sensor. 69% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Cadence may require external sensor/app pairing on some models.
Distance tracking
yes
Distance tracking
yes
▲ Better than 4% of models
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 4.1% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery life
18 days
Battery life
18 days
★ Better than 91% of models
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch offers a battery life of 18 days which is longer than that of 90.5% of smartwatches and equal to that of 1% of smartwatches.
Battery life in training mode
69.5 h
Battery life in training mode
69.5 h
★ Better than 97% of models
Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
This smartwatch lasts 69.5 h in training mode which is longer than 96.6% of smartwatches.
Battery life with GPS on
57 h
Battery life with GPS on
57 h
★ Better than 96% of models
Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
This smartwatch lasts 57 h with GPS on which is longer than 95.7% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.9% of smartwatches.
Battery power
325 mAh
Battery power
325 mAh
▲ Better than 58% of models
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a battery capacity of 325 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 58.3% of smartwatches and equal to those in 0.7% of smartwatches.
Charge time
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Garmin OS
Operating system
Garmin OS
▲ Better than 71% of models
This smartwatch runs Garmin OS which is more advanced than the operating system in 71.1% of smartwatches and the same as that in 7.7% of smartwatches.
Software update frequency
occasional
Software update frequency
occasional
▲ Better than 58% of models
This smartwatch has occasional software update support which is more active than that of 57.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 36.2% of smartwatches.
Updates are typically released about every 3 months.
Third-party app support
yes
Third-party app support
yes
▲ Better than 52% of models
This smartwatch supports third-party apps. 52.4% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
no
Voice assistant support
no
▼ Worse than 68% of models
This smartwatch does not support voice assistants. 67.8% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
Cellular module
no
Cellular module
no
▼ Worse than 18% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 18% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
▲ Better than 44% of models
This smartwatch supports GPS. 43.9% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
yes
Galileo support
yes
▲ Better than 62% of models
This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation. 61.6% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Compass
yes
Compass
yes
▲ Better than 47% of models
This smartwatch includes a compass. 47.5% of smartwatches include a compass.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen size
?
Display type
MIP LCD
Display type
MIP LCD
▼ Worse than 60% of models
This smartwatch uses a MIP LCD display type which is less advanced than that of 60% of smartwatches and the same as that of 5% of smartwatches.
Resolution
260x 260
Resolution
260x 260
▼ Worse than 65% of models
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 260x260 which is lower than that of 65% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.9% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
452 ppi
Pixel density
452 ppi
▲ Better than 75% of models
Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 452 ppi which is higher than that of 75.2% of smartwatches.
Display brightness
?
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
0.2 GHz
CPU speed
0.2 GHz
▼ Worse than 78% of models
This smartwatch uses a CPU configuration of 0.2 GHz which is slower than that in 78% of smartwatches and equal to that in 5.2% of smartwatches.
Processor model
NXP RT500
Processor model
NXP RT500
▼ Worse than 76% of models
This smartwatch uses the NXP RT500 processor model.
RAM
?
Internal storage
16 GB
Internal storage
16 GB
▲ Better than 80% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch uses 16 GB for internal storage which is larger than that of 79.8% of smartwatches and equal to that of 4.7% of smartwatches.
External memory slot
no
External memory slot
no
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Garmin Fenix 7 vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • 11 days day/s longer battery life
    Battery life
    18 days
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 18 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    18 days vs 7 days
  • 37 h longer GPS battery life
    Battery life with GPS on
    57 h
    ★ Better than 96% of models
    Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
    This smartwatch lasts longer with GPS on than the average smartwatch (57 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h.
    57 h vs 20 h
  • 50.25 h longer training battery life
    Battery life in training mode
    69.5 h
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
    This smartwatch lasts longer in training mode than the average smartwatch (69.5 h vs 19.25 h). The average smartwatch lasts 19.25 h.
    69.5 h vs 19.25 h
  • Temperature sensing
    Temperature sensor
    yes
    ▲ Better than 73% of models
    This smartwatch includes a temperature sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 26.8% of smartwatches include a temperature sensor.
    Temperature readings may be skin/ambient trends, not core-body medical values.
  • Crash detection capability
    Crash detection
    yes
    ▲ Better than 87% of models
    This smartwatch supports crash detection, the average smartwatch does not. 12.6% of smartwatches support crash detection.
    select outdoor activities; paired phone required
  • Readiness score
    Readiness score
    yes
    ▲ Better than 83% of models
    This smartwatch supports readiness scores, the average smartwatch does not. 17.5% of smartwatches support readiness scores.
  • HRV tracking
    HRV tracking
    yes
    ▲ Better than 59% of models
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 40.8% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • Maps support
    Maps support
    yes
    ▲ Better than 69% of models
    This smartwatch supports maps, the average smartwatch does not. 31.5% of smartwatches support maps.
  • 13.1% better value for money
    Garmin Fenix 7 has a higher value-for-money score than the average smartwatch (8.5 vs 7.5).
    8.5 vs 7.52
  • Temperature sensing
    Temperature sensor
    yes
    ▲ Better than 73% of models
    This smartwatch includes a temperature sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 26.8% of smartwatches include a temperature sensor.
    Temperature readings may be skin/ambient trends, not core-body medical values.
  • Readiness score
    Readiness score
    yes
    ▲ Better than 83% of models
    This smartwatch supports readiness scores, the average smartwatch does not. 17.5% of smartwatches support readiness scores.
  • HRV tracking
    HRV tracking
    yes
    ▲ Better than 59% of models
    This smartwatch supports HRV tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 40.8% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
  • VO2 max measurement
    VO2 max measurement
    yes
    ▲ Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch measures VO2 max, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • Irregular heart rate alerts
    Irregular heart rate warnings
    yes
    ▲ Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does not. 48.1% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
    Supports abnormal high/low heart-rate alerts (typically after inactivity).
  • Weight tracking
    Weight tracking
    yes
    ▲ Better than 61% of models
    This smartwatch supports weight tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 39.1% of smartwatches support weight tracking.
    Weight tracking may rely on manual app entry or smart-scale sync.
  • Water intake tracking
    Water intake tracking
    yes
    ▲ Better than 56% of models
    This smartwatch tracks water intake, the average smartwatch does not. 44% of smartwatches track water intake.
  • Perspiration monitoring
    Perspiration monitoring
    yes
    ▲ Better than 86% of models
    This smartwatch tracks perspiration, the average smartwatch does not. 14.1% of smartwatches track perspiration.
  • External heart rate monitor support
    External heart rate monitor compatibility
    yes
    ▲ Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports external heart rate monitor compatibility, the average smartwatch does not. 42.7% of smartwatches support external heart rate monitor compatibility.
  • Barometer sensor included
    Barometer
    yes
    ▲ Better than 51% of models
    This smartwatch includes a barometer, the average smartwatch does not. 49.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • Cadence tracking
    Cadence sensor
    yes
    ▲ Better than 69% of models
    This smartwatch includes a cadence sensor, the average smartwatch does not. 31.1% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
    Cadence may require external sensor/app pairing on some models.
  • Route support
    Route support
    yes
    ▲ Better than 50% of models
    This smartwatch supports route support, the average smartwatch does not. 50% of smartwatches support route support.
  • 610 m higher max altitude
    Maximum altitude
    9,144 m
    ▲ Better than 79% of models
    Market range: <3k m – >9.1k m
    This smartwatch supports a higher maximum altitude than the average smartwatch (9144 m vs 8534 m). The average smartwatch reaches 8534 m.
    Includes conversion from feet to meters.
    9,144 m vs 8,534 m
  • 11 days day/s longer battery life
    Battery life
    18 days
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 18 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    18 days vs 7 days
  • 37 h longer GPS battery life
    Battery life with GPS on
    57 h
    ★ Better than 96% of models
    Market range: <5.75 h – >43 h
    This smartwatch lasts longer with GPS on than the average smartwatch (57 h vs 20 h). The average smartwatch lasts 20 h.
    57 h vs 20 h
  • 50.25 h longer training battery life
    Battery life in training mode
    69.5 h
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
    This smartwatch lasts longer in training mode than the average smartwatch (69.5 h vs 19.25 h). The average smartwatch lasts 19.25 h.
    69.5 h vs 19.25 h
  • Maps support
    Maps support
    yes
    ▲ Better than 69% of models
    This smartwatch supports maps, the average smartwatch does not. 31.5% of smartwatches support maps.
  • NFC functionality
    NFC
    yes
    ▲ Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 43.4% of smartwatches support NFC.
  • Supports Wi-Fi
    Wi-Fi support
    yes
    ▲ Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports Wi-Fi, the average smartwatch does not. 43.3% of smartwatches support Wi-Fi.
  • Supports ANT+
    ANT+ support
    yes
    ▲ Better than 88% of models
    This smartwatch supports ANT+, the average smartwatch does not. 11.7% of smartwatches support ANT+.
  • Galileo satellite support
    Galileo support
    yes
    ▲ Better than 62% of models
    This smartwatch supports Galileo navigation, the average smartwatch does not. 38.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
  • Stronger display glass
    Display glass type
    Corning Gorilla Glass DX
    ▲ Better than 79% of models
    This smartwatch uses Corning Gorilla Glass DX display glass, while the average smartwatch uses mineral glass.
    Corning Gorilla Glass DX vs mineral glass
  • Rugged construction
    Rugged design
    yes
    ▲ Better than 62% of models
    This smartwatch has a rugged design, the average smartwatch does not. 37.9% of smartwatches have a rugged design.
  • Better case material
    Case material
    stainless steel, titanium, fiber-reinforced polymer
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    This smartwatch uses stainless steel, titanium, fiber-reinforced polymer for the case material, while the average smartwatch uses polycarbonate.
    stainless steel, titanium, fiber-reinforced polymer vs polycarbonate
  • 50 m deeper water resistance
    Waterproof depth rating
    100 m
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    Market range: <1 m – >50 m
    This smartwatch has a deeper waterproof rating than the average smartwatch (100 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch reaches 50 m.
    100 m vs 50 m
  • 126 ppi higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    452 ppi
    ▲ Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
    This smartwatch has a higher pixel density than the average smartwatch (452 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch display reaches 326 ppi.
    452 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • Crash detection capability
    Crash detection
    yes
    ▲ Better than 87% of models
    This smartwatch supports crash detection, the average smartwatch does not. 12.6% of smartwatches support crash detection.
    select outdoor activities; paired phone required
  • More advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Garmin OS
    ▲ Better than 71% of models
    This smartwatch runs a more advanced operating system than the average smartwatch (Garmin OS vs Proprietary OS).
    Garmin OS vs Proprietary OS
  • Emergency SOS
    Emergency SOS
    yes
    ▲ Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch includes Emergency SOS, the average smartwatch does not. 42.8% of smartwatches include Emergency SOS.
    SOS feature has implementation limits (phone/app/subscription/activity dependent).
  • Third-party app support
    Third-party app support
    yes
    ▲ Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports third-party apps, the average smartwatch does not. 47.6% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
  • More frequent updates
    Software update frequency
    occasional
    ▲ Better than 58% of models
    This smartwatch receives occasional software updates, while the average smartwatch receives ended updates.
    Updates are typically released about every 3 months.
    occasional vs ended
  • 12 GB more storage
    Internal storage
    16 GB
    ▲ Better than 80% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
    This smartwatch offers more internal storage than the average smartwatch (16 GB vs 4 GB). The average smartwatch provides 4 GB of storage.
    16 GB vs 4 GB
  • No voice assistant
    Voice assistant support
    no
    ▼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not support voice assistants, the average smartwatch does. 67.7% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
  • No call answering
    Call answering
    no
    ▼ Worse than 58% of models
    This smartwatch does not support call answering, the average smartwatch does. 58.1% of smartwatches support call answering.
  • No speaker
    Built-in speaker
    no
    ▼ Worse than 56% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a built-in speaker, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches include a built-in speaker.
  • No voice command support
    Voice commands
    no
    ▼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartwatch does not support voice commands, the average smartwatch does. 67% of smartwatches support voice commands.
  • Basic display type
    Display type
    MIP LCD
    ▼ Worse than 60% of models
    This smartwatch uses MIP LCD display technology, while the average smartwatch features AMOLED.
    MIP LCD vs AMOLED
  • No ambient light sensor
    Ambient light sensor
    no
    ▼ Worse than 61% of models
    This smartwatch does not include an ambient light sensor, the average smartwatch does. 60.7% of smartwatches include an ambient light sensor.
  • 34 g heavier weight
    Weight
    79.0 g
    ▼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is heavier than the average smartwatch (79 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    79.0 g vs 45.0 g
  • 2.9 mm thicker watch body
    Thickness
    14.50 mm
    ▼ Worse than 93% of models
    Market range: <9.8 mm – >14.1 mm
    This smartwatch is thicker than the average smartwatch (14.5 mm vs 11.6 mm). The average smartwatch thickness is 11.6 mm.
    Some sources mention variant-dependent thickness values.
    14.50 mm vs 11.6 mm
  • 2.69x more expensive
    Garmin Fenix 7 is more expensive than the average smartwatch (£350 vs £130).
    £350 vs £130
  • Basic display type
    Display type
    MIP LCD
    ▼ Worse than 60% of models
    This smartwatch uses MIP LCD display technology, while the average smartwatch features AMOLED.
    MIP LCD vs AMOLED
  • No ambient light sensor
    Ambient light sensor
    no
    ▼ Worse than 61% of models
    This smartwatch does not include an ambient light sensor, the average smartwatch does. 60.7% of smartwatches include an ambient light sensor.
  • 34 g heavier weight
    Weight
    79.0 g
    ▼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is heavier than the average smartwatch (79 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    79.0 g vs 45.0 g
  • 2.9 mm thicker watch body
    Thickness
    14.50 mm
    ▼ Worse than 93% of models
    Market range: <9.8 mm – >14.1 mm
    This smartwatch is thicker than the average smartwatch (14.5 mm vs 11.6 mm). The average smartwatch thickness is 11.6 mm.
    Some sources mention variant-dependent thickness values.
    14.50 mm vs 11.6 mm
  • 5 mm wider watch width
    Width
    47.0 mm
    ▼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <34.6 mm – >46.8 mm
    This smartwatch is wider than the average smartwatch (47 mm vs 42 mm). The average smartwatch width is 42.0 mm.
    47.0 mm vs 42.0 mm
  • Lower resolution
    Display type
    260 x 260
    ▼ Worse than 60% of models
    This smartwatch has a display resolution of 260x260, while the average smartwatch reaches 352x430.
    260x260 vs 352x430
  • 2 mm taller watch height
    Height
    47.0 mm
    ▼ Worse than 72% of models
    Market range: <39.5 mm – >51 mm
    This smartwatch is taller than the average smartwatch (47 mm vs 45 mm). The average smartwatch height is 45 mm.
    47.0 mm vs 45 mm
  • No voice assistant
    Voice assistant support
    no
    ▼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not support voice assistants, the average smartwatch does. 67.7% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
  • No call answering
    Call answering
    no
    ▼ Worse than 58% of models
    This smartwatch does not support call answering, the average smartwatch does. 58.1% of smartwatches support call answering.
  • No voice command support
    Voice commands
    no
    ▼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartwatch does not support voice commands, the average smartwatch does. 67% of smartwatches support voice commands.
  • No smart alarm
    Smart alarm
    no
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not support a smart alarm, the average smartwatch does. 52.7% of smartwatches support smart alarms.
  • No speaker
    Built-in speaker
    no
    ▼ Worse than 56% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a built-in speaker, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches include a built-in speaker.
  • 1 fewer microphones
    Number of microphones
    0
    ▼ Worse than 75% of models
    Market range: <0 – >1
    This smartwatch has fewer microphones than the average smartwatch (0 vs 1). The average smartwatch includes 1 microphones.
    0 vs 1
  • Slower CPU speed
    CPU speed
    0.2 GHz
    ▼ Worse than 78% of models
    This smartwatch uses a CPU configuration of 0.2 GHz, while the average smartwatch uses 1 GHz.
    0.2 GHz vs 1 GHz

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
Thomas Tech
≈ estimated
28/11/2025
Full review · build, display, sports and smart features
Verdict
Garmin Fenix 7 is one of the best multisport GPS watches you can buy right now, though it is not the cheapest.
9.5
TECHNO TESTED
≈ estimated
09/07/2024
Long-term test · one year of daily use
Verdict
The Garmin Fenix 7 is a durable watch built to last, with a good screen, reliable buttons and strong everyday features.
6.0
W2Best Tech
≈ estimated
07/03/2023
Long-term review · about two months of use
Verdict
Garmin Fenix 7 is an impressive watch, but limited storage, stiff buttons and activity limits make it less than ideal.
6.0
The Quantified Scientist
≈ estimated
30/01/2022
Lab test · health sensors, GPS and sleep tracking
Verdict
Garmin Fenix 7 is a mixed bag: strong GPS and map features, but uneven health tracking for the price.
9.0
DC Rainmaker
≈ estimated
18/01/2022
In-depth review · new features and real-world testing
Verdict
Garmin Fenix 7 suits daily use and sport tracking well, though its screen is less vivid than the Epix's.
9.0
Chase the Summit
≈ estimated
18/01/2022
Hands-on review · GPS accuracy, battery and feature tests
Verdict
Garmin Fenix 7 is a strong multisport watch for hikers, trail runners and endurance athletes, but it lacks LTE and a speaker.
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

What reviewers agree on

Based on 9 · 12

Long battery life, accurate GPS and rugged durability win praise, but many find it overpriced and the display underwhelming.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

9.0
techradar.com
✓ explicit
19/11/2024
Real-world test · Running and training
Verdict
The Garmin Fenix 7 is a strong multisport watch with accurate GPS and long battery life, but its low-contrast screen and lack of a microphone hold it back.
the5krunner.com
18/01/2022
Not graded yet
sport-passion.fr
15/08/2022
Not graded yet
8.8
joliefoulee.fr
✓ explicit
13/05/2023
Hands-on test · Running and outdoor
Verdict
The Garmin Fenix 7 is a discreet outdoor multisport watch with strong GPS and about 10 days of battery between charges.
journaldutrail.com
18/01/2022
Not graded yet
montre-cardio-gps.fr
18/01/2022
Not graded yet
8.0
frandroid.com
✓ explicit
24/06/2025
Two-month test · Running and multisport
Verdict
The Garmin Fenix 7 is a rugged sports watch with long battery life, but it is heavy and has no real speaker or microphone.
premarathon.com
24/01/2022
Not graded yet
labolsadelcorredor.com
20/01/2022
Not graded yet
trailrunningreview.com
17/01/2022
Not graded yet

Third-party reviews

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Garmin Fenix 7

  • Exceptional battery life, often lasting weeks between charges, especially with solar-enhanced models.
  • Superior GPS accuracy and reliability, particularly on versions featuring multi-band GNSS.
  • Highly durable, rugged build quality that withstands heavy outdoor use.
  • Comprehensive suite of advanced training metrics and sports tracking profiles for dedicated athletes.
  • Excellent outdoor legibility with the transflective MIP display in bright sunlight.
  • Versatile control options through a responsive touchscreen and traditional five-button system.
  • Integrated LED flashlight (standard on Pro models and 7X) is widely praised as a highly practical everyday tool.

What we don't like about Garmin Fenix 7

  • Premium price point that many users consider an expensive investment.
  • MIP display lacks the vividness, color depth, and brightness of modern AMOLED screens.
  • Limited smartwatch ecosystem with fewer third-party apps and restricted bank support for Garmin Pay compared to competitors.
  • Steep learning curve due to a dense, complex user interface and extensive feature sets.
  • Significant physical size and weight, which can feel bulky or uncomfortable on smaller wrists.
  • Software stability issues and bugs reported by some users, including occasional lag or reboots.
  • Omission of a voice assistant or built-in speaker for phone-free communication.

Verdict

The Garmin Fenix 7 is a premium multisport GPS smartwatch featuring a 1.3-inch transflective memory-in-pixel (MIP) touchscreen with 260 x 260 resolution, housed in a 47mm fiber-reinforced polymer case with a stainless steel bezel and 10 ATM water resistance. Its standout characteristics include multi-band GNSS for superior positioning accuracy, 16GB of internal storage for offline music and TopoActive mapping, and a battery that lasts up to 18 days in smartwatch mode or 57 hours in GPS mode. Main pros include its extremely rugged military-standard (MIL-STD-810) durability, a highly responsive dual-interface of buttons and touch, and exhaustive health metrics like VO2 max, stamina tracking, and Body Battery energy monitoring. However, its significant weight (79g) can sometimes affect the accuracy of the optical heart rate sensor during high-intensity movements, it lacks a built-in speaker or microphone for voice calls, and its high price point makes it an expensive investment compared to more lifestyle-oriented smartwatches.

Compare Garmin Fenix 7 with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Garmin Fenix 7 and other Smartwatches

No results found