OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartphones Methodology v1.0

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (8GB + 256GB) Review | 197 Data compared

Avg. price:~£1,320RAM capacity:8 GBInternal storage:256 GBScreen size:6.7 inchesMain camera megapixels:12 MP & 12 MP

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (8GB + 256GB) Review: Compare 197 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (8GB + 256GB)
6.5/10

Overall score

Score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartphones on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 59% of models
Score components

90%

6.4

Technical score

10%

7.1

User score

▼Worse than 59% of smartphones
5.6

Value for money

Value for money
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components

70%

6.5

Overall score

30%

3.5

Price

▼Worse than 99%
6.4

Technical score

Technical score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 58% of models
Score components

25%

6.4

Performance & Hardware

18%

6.7

Camera

15%

7.5

Display

15%

6.1

Battery

10%

3.7

Software

10%

6.8

Connectivity

4%

6.8

Audio

3%

7.1

Design

▼Worse than 58%
7.1

User score

User score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 90% of models
Score components

70%

7.5

User ratings

30%

6.2

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
▼Worse than 90%
  • samsung-galaxy-z-flip
  • samsung-galaxy-z-flip
  • samsung-galaxy-z-flip
  • samsung-galaxy-z-flip
  • samsung-galaxy-z-flip
  • samsung-galaxy-z-flip
  • samsung-galaxy-z-flip
  • samsung-galaxy-z-flip
  • samsung-galaxy-z-flip
  • samsung-galaxy-z-flip
  • samsung-galaxy-z-flip
  • samsung-galaxy-z-flip
  • samsung-galaxy-z-flip
  • samsung-galaxy-z-flip
  • samsung-galaxy-z-flip
  • samsung-galaxy-z-flip
  • samsung-galaxy-z-flip
  • samsung-galaxy-z-flip
  • samsung-galaxy-z-flip
  • samsung-galaxy-z-flip
  • samsung-galaxy-z-flip
  • samsung-galaxy-z-flip
  • samsung-galaxy-z-flip
  • samsung-galaxy-z-flip
  • samsung-galaxy-z-flip
  • samsung-galaxy-z-flip
  • samsung-galaxy-z-flip
  • samsung-galaxy-z-flip
  • samsung-galaxy-z-flip
  • samsung-galaxy-z-flip
  • samsung-galaxy-z-flip
  • samsung-galaxy-z-flip
  • samsung-galaxy-z-flip
  • samsung-galaxy-z-flip
  • samsung-galaxy-z-flip
  • samsung-galaxy-z-flip
  • samsung-galaxy-z-flip
  • samsung-galaxy-z-flip
  • samsung-galaxy-z-flip
  • samsung-galaxy-z-flip
  • samsung-galaxy-z-flip
  • samsung-galaxy-z-flip
samsung-galaxy-z-flip
samsung-galaxy-z-flip
samsung-galaxy-z-flip
samsung-galaxy-z-flip
samsung-galaxy-z-flip
samsung-galaxy-z-flip
samsung-galaxy-z-flip
samsung-galaxy-z-flip
samsung-galaxy-z-flip
samsung-galaxy-z-flip
samsung-galaxy-z-flip
samsung-galaxy-z-flip
samsung-galaxy-z-flip
samsung-galaxy-z-flip
samsung-galaxy-z-flip
samsung-galaxy-z-flip
samsung-galaxy-z-flip
samsung-galaxy-z-flip
samsung-galaxy-z-flip
samsung-galaxy-z-flip
samsung-galaxy-z-flip
samsung-galaxy-z-flip
samsung-galaxy-z-flip
samsung-galaxy-z-flip
samsung-galaxy-z-flip
samsung-galaxy-z-flip
samsung-galaxy-z-flip
samsung-galaxy-z-flip
samsung-galaxy-z-flip
samsung-galaxy-z-flip
samsung-galaxy-z-flip
samsung-galaxy-z-flip
samsung-galaxy-z-flip
samsung-galaxy-z-flip
samsung-galaxy-z-flip
samsung-galaxy-z-flip
samsung-galaxy-z-flip
samsung-galaxy-z-flip
samsung-galaxy-z-flip
samsung-galaxy-z-flip
samsung-galaxy-z-flip
samsung-galaxy-z-flip
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartphone Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (8GB + 256GB)

Technical score
Technical score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 58% of models
Score components:

25%

6.4

Performance & Hardware

18%

6.7

Camera

15%

7.5

Display

15%

6.1

Battery

10%

3.7

Software

10%

6.8

Connectivity

4%

6.8

Audio

3%

7.1

Design

6.4
User score
User score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 90% of models
Score components

70%

7.5

User ratings

30%

6.2

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
7.1
Popularity
Popularity
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 56% of models
Popularity:
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (8GB + 256GB) has a popularity of 6.2 points, which is higher than 56.3% of smartphones.
6.2
Value for money
Value for money
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components:

70%

6.5

Overall score

30%

3.5

Price

5.6
Brand name
Samsung
Processor model
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus
This smartphone uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus processor which is faster than processors in 56% of smartphones and equal to processors in 0.3% of smartphones.
RAM capacity
8 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This smartphone has a RAM capacity of 8 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 28.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 30.4% of smartphones.
Internal storage
256 GB
Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
This smartphone has an internal storage capacity of 256 GB which is larger than the storage of 38.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 38.3% of smartphones.
CPU boost clock speed
2.96 GHz
Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
The CPU boost clock speed of this smartphone is 2.96 GHz which is higher than the boost speed of 75% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.3% of smartphones.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This smartphone uses the Android operating system, which outperforms that of 1%.
Android 10
Android version
Android 10
This smartphone runs Android version Android 10 which is older than that found in 88.8% of smartphones and equal to that in 5.1% of smartphones.
Direct OS updates
no
This smartphone does not receive direct OS updates. 20.6% of smartphones receive direct updates.
Open-source OS
yes
This smartphone uses an open-source OS. 94.6% of smartphones use an open-source OS.
Dark mode
yes
This smartphone offers dark mode. 95.8% of smartphones support this feature.
Show more
Multi-lens main camera
yes
This smartphone includes a multi-lens main camera system. 93.7% of smartphones include multi-lens setups.
Main camera megapixels
12 MP & 12 MP
Market range: <10 – >100
This smartphone has a main camera resolution of 12 MP & 12 MP which is lower than that of 95.9% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.2% of smartphones.
Main camera aperture
f/1.8 & f/2.2
This smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.8 & f/2.2 which is narrower than that of 52.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 5.2% of smartphones.
Main camera sensor area
23.5 mm²
Market range: <19.7 mm² – >71.4 mm²
This smartphone has a main camera sensor area of 23.5 mm² which is smaller than the main camera sensor area of 73.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 2.1% of smartphones.
Main camera pixel size
1.4 µm
Market range: <0.64 µm – >1.22 µm
This smartphone has a main camera pixel size of 1.4 µm which is larger than in 92.7% of smartphones and equal to the size in 4% of smartphones.
Show more
Number of SIM slots
2
Market range: <1 – >6
This smartphone has 2 SIM slots, which is more than in 3.8% of smartphones and equal to the number in 96.1% of smartphones.
1 SIM, 1 eSIM
Cellular module
yes
This smartphone includes a cellular module. 100% of smartphones include cellular modules.
5G connectivity
no
This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity. 66.9% of smartphones support 5G.
LTE support
yes
This smartphone supports LTE. 99.7% of smartphones include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This smartphone supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 100% of smartphones offer Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Screen size
6.7 inches
Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
This smartphone has a screen size of 6.7 inches which is larger than the screens of 52.2% of smartphones and equal to those of 10.1% of smartphones.
Screen resolution
1080x 2636 px
This smartphone has a screen resolution of 1080x2636 px which is higher than that of 71.8% of smartphones.
Pixel density
425 ppi
Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
This smartphone has a pixel density of 425 ppi which is higher than that of 73% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.1% of smartphones.
Display type
OLED/AMOLED
This smartphone uses a OLED/AMOLED display type. 58.6% of smartphones use this display technology.
Refresh rate
?
Show more
Battery capacity
3,300 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
This smartphone has a battery capacity of 3,300 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 95.6% of smartphones and equal to those in 0.6% of smartphones.
Charging speed
25 W
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This smartphone supports charging speeds of 25 W which is slower than in 66.9% of smartphones and equal to speeds in 5.3% of smartphones.
Fast charging
yes
This smartphone supports fast charging. 93.1% of smartphones support fast charging.
GSMArena full wired charge time
?
Wireless charging
yes
This smartphone supports wireless charging. 25.2% of smartphones support wireless charging.
Show more
Stereo speakers
yes
This smartphone includes stereo speakers. 64.4% of smartphones provide stereo audio.
3.5 mm headphone jack
no
This smartphone does not include a 3.5 mm headphone jack. 45.5% of smartphones offer this port.
Number of microphones
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This smartphone includes 3 microphones, which is more than in 77.2% of smartphones and equal to the number in 19.7% of smartphones.
FM radio
no
This smartphone does not include an FM radio. 34.2% of smartphones offer FM radio functionality.
aptX Lossless
no
This smartphone does not support aptX Lossless. 12.9% of smartphones provide aptX Lossless.
Show more
Height
167.9 mm
Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
This smartphone has a height of 167.9 mm which is taller than 82.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.1% of smartphones.
Width
73.6 mm
Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
This smartphone has a width of 73.6 mm which is narrower than 86.9% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.4% of smartphones.
Thickness
7.2 mm
Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
This smartphone has a thickness of 7.2 mm which is thinner than 95.4% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.7% of smartphones.
Weight
183 g
Market range: <175 g – >256 g
This smartphone weighs 183 g which is lighter than 82.3% of smartphones and equal to the weight of 0.9% of smartphones.
Device volume
85,337 cm³
Market range: <80 cm³ – >190 cm³
This smartphone has a device volume of 85,337 cm³ which is smaller than 82.9% of smartphones.
Show more

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (8GB + 256GB) vs the average smartphone

246810TotalPerformance & HardwareSoftwareCameraConnectivityDisplayBatteryAudioDesign
  • Has optical image stabilization
    This smartphone has optical image stabilization (OIS), the average smartphone does not. 48.3% of smartphones feature OIS.
  • Supports wireless charging
    This smartphone supports wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 25.2% of smartphones are wireless charging compatible.
  • 0.6 µm larger main camera pixel size
    This smartphone has a larger main camera pixel size than the average smartphone (1.4 µm vs 0.8 µm). The average pixel size is 0.8 µm.
    1.4 µm vs 0.8 µm
  • 96.9% higher Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This smartphone scores better in Geekbench 6 single-core than the average smartphone (1,855 vs 942). The average smartphone scores 942 in single-core.
    1,855 vs 942
  • Supports reverse wireless charging
    This smartphone supports reverse wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 23.6% of smartphones offer reverse wireless charging.
  • 6 more memory channels
    This smartphone has more memory channels than the average smartphone (8 vs 2). The average smartphone has 2 memory channels.
    8 vs 2
  • 2.42x higher Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    This smartphone scores better in Geekbench 6 multi-core than the average smartphone (6,120 vs 2,533). The average smartphone scores 2,533 in multi-core.
    6,120 vs 2,533
  • 23.3% higher CPU boost clock speed
    This smartphone has a higher CPU boost clock speed than the average smartphone (3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The average smartphone has a boost clock speed of 2.4 GHz.
    2.96 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • 96.9% higher Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This smartphone scores better in Geekbench 6 single-core than the average smartphone (1,855 vs 942). The average smartphone scores 942 in single-core.
    1,855 vs 942
  • 23.3% higher CPU boost clock speed
    This smartphone has a higher CPU boost clock speed than the average smartphone (3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The average smartphone has a boost clock speed of 2.4 GHz.
    2.96 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • 6 more memory channels
    This smartphone has more memory channels than the average smartphone (8 vs 2). The average smartphone has 2 memory channels.
    8 vs 2
  • 2.42x higher Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    This smartphone scores better in Geekbench 6 multi-core than the average smartphone (6,120 vs 2,533). The average smartphone scores 2,533 in multi-core.
    6,120 vs 2,533
  • Higher CPU base clock speed
    This smartphone has a higher CPU base clock speed than the average smartphone (1x2.96 GHz & 3x2.42 GHz & 4x1.8 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz). The average smartphone has a base clock speed of 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz.
    1x2.96 GHz & 3x2.42 GHz & 4x1.8 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz
  • 14.3% higher maximum RAM
    This smartphone supports more maximum RAM than the average smartphone (16 GB vs 14 GB). The average smartphone supports 14 GB RAM.
    16 GB vs 14 GB
  • 24.2% higher memory bandwidth
    This smartphone has higher memory bandwidth than the average smartphone (31.8 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s). The average memory bandwidth is 25.6 GB/s.
    31.79 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s
  • 50% more shader units
    This smartphone features more shader units than the average smartphone (384 vs 256). The average smartphone has 256 shader units.
    384 vs 256
  • Supports desktop mode
    This smartphone includes desktop mode, the average smartphone does not. 9.4% of smartphones support desktop functionality.
  • Has optical image stabilization
    This smartphone has optical image stabilization (OIS), the average smartphone does not. 48.3% of smartphones feature OIS.
  • 0.6 µm larger main camera pixel size
    This smartphone has a larger main camera pixel size than the average smartphone (1.4 µm vs 0.8 µm). The average pixel size is 0.8 µm.
    1.4 µm vs 0.8 µm
  • Supports RAW photo capture
    This smartphone supports RAW photo capture, the average smartphone does not. 37.1% of smartphones allow RAW files.
  • Uses a BSI sensor
    This smartphone uses a BSI sensor, the average smartphone does not. 40.5% of smartphones include BSI sensors.
  • Better main camera video
    This smartphone records better main camera video than the average smartphone. 22.60x of smartphones support 4K or higher.
    2160x60 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • Supports HDR10 video recording
    This smartphone supports HDR10 video recording, the average smartphone does not. 35.9% of smartphones support HDR10.
  • Newer USB version
    This smartphone supports a newer USB version than the average smartphone (3.1 vs 2). The average version is USB 2.0.
    3.1 vs 2.0
  • Newer Wi-Fi version
    This smartphone supports a newer Wi-Fi version than the average smartphone (Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)). The average smartphone uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n).
    Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
  • Supports ANT+
    This smartphone supports ANT+ technology, the average smartphone does not. 6% of smartphones are ANT+ compatible.
  • Has a barometer
    This smartphone features a barometer, the average smartphone does not. 19.9% of smartphones include a barometer.
  • Supports HDR10 support
    This smartphone supports HDR10, the average smartphone does not. 42.7% of smartphones are HDR10 compatible.
  • Has an always-on display
    This smartphone features an always-on display, the average smartphone does not. 49.2% of smartphones offer always-on functionality.
  • 7.6% higher pixel density
    This smartphone has a higher pixel density than the average smartphone (425 ppi vs 395 ppi). The average smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi.
    425 ppi vs 395 ppi
  • Higher screen resolution
    This smartphone has a higher screen resolution than the average smartphone (1080x2636 px vs 1080x2400 px). The average smartphone resolution is 1080x2400 px.
    1080x2636 px vs 1080x2400 px
  • Has a secondary display
    This smartphone features a secondary display, the average smartphone does not. 6.7% of smartphones include a secondary screen.
  • 0.03 inches inch larger screen size
    This smartphone has a larger screen size than the average smartphone (6.7 inches vs 6.67 inches). The average smartphone screen is 6.67 inches.
    6.7 inches vs 6.67 inches
  • Better display glass type
    This smartphone features a better display glass type than the average smartphone (Corning Gorilla Glass 6 vs Corning Gorilla Glass 5). The average smartphone uses Corning Gorilla Glass 5 protection.
    Ultra Thin Glass (UTG)
    Corning Gorilla Glass 6 vs Corning Gorilla Glass 5
  • Supports wireless charging
    This smartphone supports wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 25.2% of smartphones are wireless charging compatible.
  • Supports reverse wireless charging
    This smartphone supports reverse wireless charging, the average smartphone does not. 23.6% of smartphones offer reverse wireless charging.
  • 1 more microphone/s
    This smartphone has more microphones than the average smartphone (3 vs 2). The average smartphone has 2 microphones.
    3 vs 2
  • Supports aptX
    This smartphone supports aptX, the average smartphone does not. 50% of smartphones are aptX compatible.
  • 1.1 mm thinner
    This smartphone is thinner than the average smartphone (7.2 mm vs 8.3 mm). The average smartphone thickness is 8.3 mm.
    7.2 mm vs 8.3 mm
  • 6.7% lighter
    This smartphone is lighter than the average smartphone (183 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    183 g vs 196.2 g
  • 2.4 mm narrower
    This smartphone is narrower than the average smartphone (73.6 mm vs 76 mm). The average smartphone width is 76 mm.
    73.6 mm vs 76 mm
  • Is foldable
    This smartphone is foldable, the average smartphone is not. 3.9% of smartphones are foldable devices.
  • No 5G connectivity
    This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity, the average smartphone does. 66.9% of smartphones are 5G compatible.
  • 73.7% slower GPU clock
    This smartphone has a lower GPU frequency than the average smartphone (250 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone has a GPU frequency of 950 MHz.
    250 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • Lower-resolution main camera
    This smartphone has a lower-resolution main camera than the average smartphone (12 MP & 12 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone has a 50 MP & 8 MP main camera.
    12 MP & 12 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • 34% smaller battery capacity
    This smartphone has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartphone (3300 mAh vs 5000 mAh). The average smartphone has a capacity of 5000 mAh.
    3,300 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • No live text recognition
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • No memory card slot
    This smartphone does not have a memory card slot, the average smartphone does. 53.5% of smartphones feature expandable storage.
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    This smartphone has a narrower main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/1.8 & f/2.2 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone aperture is f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/1.8 & f/2.2 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • Lacks app tracking protection
    This smartphone does not have app tracking protection, the average smartphone does. 70.2% of smartphones include app tracking protection.
  • 5.08x more expensive
    Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (8GB + 256GB) is more expensive than the average smartphone (£1,320 vs £260).
    £1,320 vs £260
  • 31.1% worse value for money
    Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (8GB + 256GB) has worse value for money than the average smartphone (5.59 vs 7.3).
    5.59 vs 7.34
  • 12.4% lower user score
    User score
    7.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Samsung Galaxy Z Flip
    the average smartphone
    Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (8GB + 256GB) has a lower user score than the average smartphone (7.12 vs 8.000).
    7.12 vs 8
  • 73.7% slower GPU clock
    This smartphone has a lower GPU frequency than the average smartphone (250 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone has a GPU frequency of 950 MHz.
    250 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • 50% less L3 cache
    This smartphone has a smaller L3 cache than the average smartphone (2048 KB vs 4096 KB). The average smartphone has an L3 cache of 4096 KB.
    2,048 KB vs 4,096 KB
  • Worse processor
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • 16.7% larger process node
    This smartphone is manufactured on a larger process node than the average smartphone (7 nm vs 6 nm). The average smartphone uses a 6 nm process.
    7 nm vs 6 nm
  • 35% fewer transistors
    This smartphone contains fewer transistors than the average smartphone (6700 million vs 10300 million). The average smartphone has 10300 million transistors.
    6,700 million vs 10,300 million
  • 22.4% slower memory speed
    This smartphone has a lower memory speed than the average smartphone (2133 MHz vs 2750 MHz). The average smartphone has a memory speed of 2750 MHz.
    2,133 MHz vs 2,750 MHz
  • 31.9% lower 3DMark Wild Life benchmark
    This smartphone performs worse in the 3DMark Wild Life benchmark than the average smartphone (2,121 vs 3,115). The average smartphone scores 3,115 in this benchmark.
    2,121 vs 3,115
  • No live text recognition
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • No location privacy controls
    This smartphone does not offer location privacy controls, the average smartphone does. 88% of smartphones include location privacy features.
  • Lacks app tracking protection
    This smartphone does not have app tracking protection, the average smartphone does. 70.2% of smartphones include app tracking protection.
  • Older Android version
    This smartphone runs an older Android version than the average smartphone (Android 10 vs Android 14). The average smartphone runs Android version Android 14.
    Android 10 vs Android 14
  • Lacks focus mode
    This smartphone does not have a focus mode, the average smartphone does. 60.4% of smartphones include a dedicated focus mode.
  • No camera/mic privacy toggles
    This smartphone lacks camera and microphone privacy toggles, the average smartphone includes them. 87% of smartphones offer these toggles.
  • No Wi-Fi password sharing
    This smartphone does not support Wi-Fi password sharing, the average smartphone does. 57.9% of smartphones allow easy Wi-Fi sharing.
  • No battery health monitoring
    This smartphone lacks battery health monitoring, the average smartphone includes it. 66.3% of smartphones provide battery health stats.
  • Lacks on-device AI
    This smartphone does not support on-device AI, the average smartphone does. 99.3% of smartphones include on-device AI processing.
    Limited to basic, pre-AI, system-level optimizations
  • Does not allow app offloading
    This smartphone does not support app offloading, the average smartphone does. 51.9% of smartphones support app offloading to save space.
  • Lacks instant markup
    This smartphone does not support instant markup, the average smartphone does. 52.2% of smartphones include instant markup tools.
  • No scrolling screenshot support
    This smartphone does not support scrolling screenshots, the average smartphone does. 81.1% of smartphones allow scrolling screenshots.
  • No theme customization
    This smartphone does not support theme customization, the average smartphone does. 91% of smartphones allow theme customization.
  • No offline voice commands
    This smartphone does not support offline voice commands, the average smartphone does. 90.4% of smartphones offer offline voice control.
  • Does not allow play while downloading
    This smartphone cannot play games while downloading, the average smartphone can. 77.3% of smartphones support play-while-downloading.
  • No dynamic theme support
    This smartphone does not support dynamic themes, the average smartphone does. 81.9% of smartphones support dynamic theming.
  • Lacks extra dim mode
    This smartphone does not have extra dim mode, the average smartphone does. 82.5% of smartphones offer extra dimming features.
  • Lower on-device AI tier
    This smartphone runs on the none AI tier, while the average smartphone runs on fundamental, so its on-device AI features are more limited.
    none vs fundamental
  • Lower-resolution main camera
    This smartphone has a lower-resolution main camera than the average smartphone (12 MP & 12 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone has a 50 MP & 8 MP main camera.
    12 MP & 12 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    This smartphone has a narrower main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/1.8 & f/2.2 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone aperture is f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/1.8 & f/2.2 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • 26.6% smaller main camera sensor area
    This smartphone has a smaller main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (23.5 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average smartphone sensor area is 32 mm².
    23.5 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • 12.5% lower DxOMark Mobile score
    This smartphone has a lower DxOMark Mobile score than the average smartphone (105 vs 120). The average smartphone scores 120.
    105 vs 120
  • 15.3% lower DxOMark Selfie score
    This smartphone has a lower DxOMark Selfie score than the average smartphone (83 vs 98). The average smartphone scores 98.
    83 vs 98
  • Lower front camera megapixels
    This smartphone has lower front camera megapixels than the average smartphone (10 MP vs 16 MP). The average smartphone has a 16 MP front camera.
    10 MP vs 16 MP
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    This smartphone has a narrower front camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/2.4 vs f/2.2). The average smartphone front aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.4 vs f/2.2
  • No 5G connectivity
    This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity, the average smartphone does. 66.9% of smartphones are 5G compatible.
  • No memory card slot
    This smartphone does not have a memory card slot, the average smartphone does. 53.5% of smartphones feature expandable storage.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This smartphone uses an older Bluetooth version than the average smartphone (5 vs 5.2). The average smartphone uses Bluetooth 5.2.
    5.0 vs 5.2
  • 297.5 nits lower GSMArena max display brightness
    This smartphone has a lower GSMArena max display brightness than the average smartphone (596 nits vs 893.5 nits). The average smartphone scores 893.5 nits.
    596 nits vs 893.5 nits
  • 34% smaller battery capacity
    This smartphone has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartphone (3300 mAh vs 5000 mAh). The average smartphone has a capacity of 5000 mAh.
    3,300 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • 25% slower wireless charging speed
    This smartphone has a slower wireless charging speed than the average smartphone (15 W vs 20 W). The average smartphone wireless charging speed is 20 W.
    15 W vs 20 W
  • 24.2% slower charging speed
    This smartphone has a slower charging speed than the average smartphone (25 W vs 33 W). The average smartphone charges at 33 W.
    25 W vs 33 W
  • 4 year/s older release date
    This smartphone is an older model than the average smartphone (2020 vs 2024). 4.00% of smartphones were released more recently.
    February 2020
    2020 vs 2024
  • 4.3 mm taller
    This smartphone is taller than the average smartphone (167.9 mm vs 163.6 mm). The average smartphone has a height of 163.6 mm.
    167.9 mm vs 163.6 mm
  • Poor brand origin
    This smartphone has a poorer brand origin compared to the average smartphone. 0.00% of smartphones come from top-tier brand origins.
    South Korea vs China

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

P
pcmag.com
19/02/2020
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip Review
T
theguardian.com
19/02/2020
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip review: back to the folding flip phone future
E
engadget.com
21/02/2020
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip review: Admire it, don't buy it
S
shellypalmer.com
01/02/2020
Summary of the review
A Week with the Samsung Z Flip
W
whathifi.com
12/02/2020
Summary of the review
Hands on: Samsung Galaxy Z Flip review
T
tomsguide.com
01/02/2021
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip review
T
techradar.com
16/12/2020
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip review
C
cnet.com
02/08/2020
Summary of the review
Galaxy Z Flip: Even I'm surprised by how much I still love this phone
N
nytimes.com
11/03/2020
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip Review: A Folding Phone That's a Dud
F
forbes.com
21/02/2020
Summary of the review
Galaxy Z Flip Review: Not For Me; But I'm Glad Others Love It
C
cnbc.com
18/02/2020
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip review
F
forbes.com
19/02/2020
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip Review: A More Refined Foldable Phone
C
cnetfrance.fr
17/04/2020
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip Review: The Fold of the Show
(Translated)Show original
F
frandroid.com
26/02/2020
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip Review: We Love To Snap It Shut
(Translated)Show original
L
leclaireur.fnac.com
22/02/2020
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip Hands-on: Is This Foldable Clamshell Phone Worth It?
(Translated)Show original
T
test-achats.be
14/02/2020
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip Review - Testachats
(Translated)Show original
C
clubic.com
19/03/2020
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip Review: Testing the folding smartphone formula in everyday life
(Translated)Show original
J
journaldugeek.com
20/02/2020
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip Review: This Time, It's the One
(Translated)Show original
C
ct.nl
12/09/2020
Summary of the review
(Translated)Show original
G
galaxyclub.nl
14/02/2020
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip hands-on preview: conclusion
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: August 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (8GB + 256GB)

  • Ultra-portable and pocket-friendly clamshell design
  • Vibrant and high-quality 120Hz AMOLED main display
  • Solid flagship-level performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (on Flip 6)
  • Innovative Flex Mode for hands-free photos and video calls
  • Improved durability with official IP48 dust and water resistance
  • Class-leading 7-year software update commitment
  • Significantly less visible screen crease compared to older models

What we don't like about Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (8GB + 256GB)

  • High price point compared to traditional slab smartphones
  • Relatively slow 25W wired charging speeds
  • Limited cover screen functionality out of the box (requires Good Lock for full app support)
  • Lack of a dedicated telephoto (zoom) lens in the camera array
  • Internal screen remains more fragile and prone to scratches than standard glass
  • Device can become warm during intensive tasks or gaming
  • Average battery life that typically only lasts one full day

Verdict

The original Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (8GB + 256GB) is a 4G clamshell foldable smartphone powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ processor, featuring a 6.7-inch foldable Dynamic AMOLED main display and a tiny 1.1-inch Super AMOLED cover screen for notifications. Its key pros include its highly portable, compact form factor when folded, a good main screen for its time, capable dual 12MP rear cameras that allow for hands-free photography using "Flex Mode," and flagship-level performance with a generous 256GB of non-expandable storage. Primary cons are a smaller-than-average 3,300mAh battery for a flagship phone, relatively slow 15W charging speeds, the main screen's potential fragility and a visible crease, and the lack of a headphone jack and microSD card slot.

Compare Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (8GB + 256GB) with other smartphones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (8GB + 256GB) and other smartphones

No results found