Scored using Routers Methodology v3.0
Routers Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Routers Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Routers Methodology v3.0

Cudy WR3000 review: 77 specs compared

Avg. price:~£55Wi-Fi version:Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)Wi-Fi speed:3000 MbpsLAN port speeds:1 GbpsMesh Wi-Fi:yes

Cudy WR3000 Review: Compare 77 technical specifications, 2 expert and video reviews and 1 best-of list to see how this product ranks in the Routers category and whether it is worth buying.

Cudy WR3000
7.7/10

Overall score

Score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, expert reviews, best-of lists and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 40%, Reviews score 25%, List score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

40%

7.6

Technical score

25%

7.6

Reviews score

25%

7.6

List score

10%

9.2

Sentiment score

▲Better than 67% of routers
8.4

Value for money

Value for money
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the router's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a router with a good balance between network performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.7

Overall score

30%

10

Price

▲Better than 74%
7.6

Technical score

Technical score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

26%

7.3

Wireless

20%

5.8

Ports

18%

8.9

Networking

14%

9.7

Security

12%

6.6

Hardware

10%

7.6

Management

▲Better than 67%
7.6

Reviews score

Reviews score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.7 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10

7.6

Mark 7.9 is below the typical mark 8.1 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

8.3

Average grade

20%

6.3

Popularity

Grades by review (2)
2 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
▼Worse than 62%
7.6

List score

List score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 25% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (1)
List score: in 1 of 84 lists (1%)
▲Better than 70%
  • cudy-wr3000
  • cudy-wr3000
  • cudy-wr3000
  • cudy-wr3000
  • cudy-wr3000
  • cudy-wr3000
  • cudy-wr3000
  • cudy-wr3000
  • cudy-wr3000
cudy-wr3000
cudy-wr3000
cudy-wr3000
cudy-wr3000
cudy-wr3000
cudy-wr3000
cudy-wr3000
cudy-wr3000
cudy-wr3000
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What owners say about the Cudy WR3000

Based on 34 owners sharing their experience in online comments

47%positive15%mixed38%negative

Owners praise smooth streaming and value, while recurring speed and connection problems hold it back.

What owners dislike

  • Owners report 5GHz drops when many devices connect, and the router sometimes restarts itself under load. Some lose internet mid-use.6
  • Owners report slow downloads, with some 5GHz links showing only about 72 Mbps; one found speed no better than their old router.5
  • Owners say 160MHz width falls back to 80MHz on their own. Some found 5GHz did not work after setup until a firmware update.3
  • Owners report the router failing within months, and a reset button that seems to do nothing when pressed.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Routers model ranking

Ranked #133 of 524 models in Routers (Overall score)

Technical Specifications of router Cudy WR3000

Technical score
Technical score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

26%

7.3

Wireless

20%

5.8

Ports

18%

8.9

Networking

14%

9.7

Security

12%

6.6

Hardware

10%

7.6

Management

7.6
Reviews score
7.6
List score
7.6
Value for money
Value for money
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the router's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a router with a good balance between network performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

7.7

Overall score

30%

10

Price

8.4
Brand name
Cudy
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)
This router uses Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), which is more advanced than 58.5% of routers and equal to 25.9% of routers.
Wi-Fi bands
2.4 GHz + 5 GHz
This router supports 2.4 GHz + 5 GHz Wi-Fi bands, which are more versatile than 24.2% of routers and equal to 65.6% of routers.
Wi-Fi speed
3,000 Mbps
This router delivers 3,000 Mbps Wi-Fi speed, which is higher than 65.9% of routers and equal to 6.6% of routers.
Channel widths supported
20 MHz + 40 MHz + 80 MHz + 160 MHz
This router supports 20 MHz + 40 MHz + 80 MHz + 160 MHz channel width options, which is more than 66.5% of routers and the same as 27.4% of routers.
Show more
Wi-Fi security protocols
WPA3, WPA2, WPA, WEP
This router supports WPA3, WPA2, WPA, WEP Wi-Fi security protocols, which are more advanced than 67% of routers and equal to 2.9% of routers.
DoS protection
yes
This router includes DoS protection. 9.8% of routers include DoS protection.
SPI intrusion protection
yes
This router includes SPI-based intrusion protection. 4.7% of routers include SPI-based intrusion protection.
MAC address filtering
yes
This router supports MAC address filtering. 1.7% of routers include MAC address filtering.
URL filter
yes
This router supports URL filtering. 2.6% of routers include URL filtering.
Show more
IPv6 support
yes
This router supports IPv6. 8.8% of routers are IPv6-ready.
Dynamic routing
no
This router does not support dynamic routing. 46.2% of routers support dynamic routing.
Inter-VLAN routing
?
VLAN tagging
?
QoS
yes
This router includes QoS controls. 2.4% of routers include QoS controls.
Show more
N. of LAN ports
3
This router has 3 LAN ports, which is fewer than 66% of routers and the same as 18.2% of routers.
LAN port speeds
1 Gbps
This router offers 1 Gbps on its LAN ports, which is faster than 25.7% of routers and on par with 56.1% of routers.
N. of WAN ports
1
This router has 1 WAN ports, which is more than 0.8% of routers and the same as 89.4% of routers.
N. of USB ports
0
This router has 0 USB ports, which is fewer than 60.1% of routers and the same as 39.9% of routers.
Power over Ethernet (PoE)
no
This router does not support Power over Ethernet (PoE). 1.7% of routers can be powered over Ethernet.
Show more
Management interface
Web UI, App
This router uses Web UI, App for management, which is more advanced than 29.7% of routers and equal to 60.9% of routers.
Firmware upgrade method
Web UI, App
This router supports Web UI, App firmware update methods, which are more convenient than 62.3% of routers and equal to 8.4% of routers.
Traffic monitoring
yes
This router includes traffic monitoring. 13.9% of routers include traffic monitoring.
Guest Wi-Fi network
yes
This router offers a guest Wi‑Fi network. 7.3% of routers offer a guest Wi‑Fi network.
Captive portal
no
This router does not offer captive portal features. 22.4% of routers offer captive portal features.
Show more
CPU clock speed
2x 1.2 GHz
This router runs at 2x1.2 GHz, which is faster than 56.6% of routers and on par with 1% of routers.
RAM capacity
256 MB
This router has 256 MB of RAM, which is more than 46.3% of routers and the same as 14.9% of routers.
Internal storage
0.015625 GB
This router has 0.015625 GB of internal storage, which is less than 55.2% of routers and the same as 13% of routers.
Hardware acceleration
yes
This router offers hardware acceleration. 24.9% of routers offer hardware acceleration.
N. of external antennas
4
This router has 4 external antennas, which is more than 69.9% of routers and the same as 19.4% of routers.
Show more

Cudy WR3000 vs the average router

246810TotalWirelessSecurityNetworkingPortsManagementHardware
  • Stronger Wi-Fi security
    This router supports the Wi-Fi security protocols WPA3, WPA2, WPA, WEP, while the average router supports WPA2, WPA/WPA2, WEP.
    WPA3, WPA2, WPA, WEP vs WPA2, WPA/WPA2, WEP
  • Supports mesh Wi-Fi
    This router supports mesh Wi-Fi, while the average router does not. 45.2% of routers support mesh Wi-Fi.
  • Supports OFDMA
    This router supports OFDMA, while the average router does not. 41.5% of routers support OFDMA.
  • Newer Wi-Fi version
    This router supports a newer Wi-Fi version than the average router (Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average router uses Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • 71.4% faster Wi-Fi speed
    This router has a higher Wi-Fi speed than the average router (3,000 Mbps vs 1,750 Mbps). The average router reaches Wi-Fi speed of 1,750 Mbps.
    3,000 Mbps vs 1,750 Mbps
  • Wider channel widths
    This router has a higher supported channel width than the average router (20 MHz + 40 MHz + 80 MHz + 160 MHz vs 20 MHz + 40 MHz + 80 MHz). The average router supports channel width of 20 MHz + 40 MHz + 80 MHz.
    20 MHz + 40 MHz + 80 MHz + 160 MHz vs 20 MHz + 40 MHz + 80 MHz
  • Supports TWT
    This router supports Target Wake Time (TWT), while the average router does not. 42.6% of routers support Target Wake Time (TWT).
  • 2 more external antennas
    This router has more external antennas than the average router (4 vs 2). The average router has 2 external antennas.
    4 vs 2
  • 17.9% higher sentiment score
    9.2 vs 7.8
  • Supports mesh Wi-Fi
    This router supports mesh Wi-Fi, while the average router does not. 45.2% of routers support mesh Wi-Fi.
  • Supports OFDMA
    This router supports OFDMA, while the average router does not. 41.5% of routers support OFDMA.
  • Newer Wi-Fi version
    This router supports a newer Wi-Fi version than the average router (Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average router uses Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • 71.4% faster Wi-Fi speed
    This router has a higher Wi-Fi speed than the average router (3,000 Mbps vs 1,750 Mbps). The average router reaches Wi-Fi speed of 1,750 Mbps.
    3,000 Mbps vs 1,750 Mbps
  • Wider channel widths
    This router has a higher supported channel width than the average router (20 MHz + 40 MHz + 80 MHz + 160 MHz vs 20 MHz + 40 MHz + 80 MHz). The average router supports channel width of 20 MHz + 40 MHz + 80 MHz.
    20 MHz + 40 MHz + 80 MHz + 160 MHz vs 20 MHz + 40 MHz + 80 MHz
  • Supports TWT
    This router supports Target Wake Time (TWT), while the average router does not. 42.6% of routers support Target Wake Time (TWT).
  • Stronger Wi-Fi security
    This router supports the Wi-Fi security protocols WPA3, WPA2, WPA, WEP, while the average router supports WPA2, WPA/WPA2, WEP.
    WPA3, WPA2, WPA, WEP vs WPA2, WPA/WPA2, WEP
  • 2 more external antennas
    This router has more external antennas than the average router (4 vs 2). The average router has 2 external antennas.
    4 vs 2
  • 3 years newer release date
    This router was released more recently than the average router (2022 vs 2019). The average router release year is 2019.
    2022 vs 2019
  • 1 fewer LAN ports
    This router has fewer LAN ports than the average router (3 vs 4). The average router has 4 LAN ports.
    3 vs 4
  • 1 fewer USB ports
    This router has fewer USB ports than the average router (0 vs 1). The average router has 1 USB ports.
    0 vs 1
  • 30.1% narrower wireless coverage
    This router has narrower wireless coverage than the average router (130 m² vs 186 m²). The average router offers wireless coverage of 186 m².
    130 m² vs 186 m²
  • Limited firmware updates
    This router supports the firmware update methods Web UI, App, while the average router supports Web UI, App, Automatic.
    Web UI, App vs Web UI, App, Automatic
  • 87.5% less internal storage
    This router has less internal storage than the average router (0 GB vs 0.1 GB). The average router offers 0.125 GB of internal storage.
    0.015625 GB vs 0.125 GB
  • 3.4 W higher power consumption
    This router uses more power than the average router (11.5 W vs 8.1 W). The average router uses 8.1 W power.
    11.5 W vs 8.1 W
  • 6.2% lower list score
    List score
    7.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
    How we count it
    Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 25% of the overall score.
    Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
    Lists with this model (1)
    List score: in 1 of 84 lists (1%)
    7.6 vs 8.1
  • 118.6 mm higher height
    This router is taller than the average router (170 mm vs 51.4 mm). The average router is 51.4 mm tall.
    170 mm vs 51.4 mm
  • 6.2% lower list score
    List score
    7.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
    How we count it
    Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 25% of the overall score.
    Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
    Lists with this model (1)
    List score: in 1 of 84 lists (1%)
    7.6 vs 8.1
  • 30.1% narrower wireless coverage
    This router has narrower wireless coverage than the average router (130 m² vs 186 m²). The average router offers wireless coverage of 186 m².
    130 m² vs 186 m²
  • Narrower DFS range
    This router has fewer supported DFS channels than the average router (52-64 + 100-140 vs 52-64 + 100-144). The average router supports 52-64 + 100-144 DFS channels.
    52-64 + 100-140 vs 52-64 + 100-144
  • 1 fewer LAN ports
    This router has fewer LAN ports than the average router (3 vs 4). The average router has 4 LAN ports.
    3 vs 4
  • 1 fewer USB ports
    This router has fewer USB ports than the average router (0 vs 1). The average router has 1 USB ports.
    0 vs 1
  • Limited firmware updates
    This router supports the firmware update methods Web UI, App, while the average router supports Web UI, App, Automatic.
    Web UI, App vs Web UI, App, Automatic
  • 87.5% less internal storage
    This router has less internal storage than the average router (0 GB vs 0.1 GB). The average router offers 0.125 GB of internal storage.
    0.015625 GB vs 0.125 GB
  • 3.4 W higher power consumption
    This router uses more power than the average router (11.5 W vs 8.1 W). The average router uses 8.1 W power.
    11.5 W vs 8.1 W
  • 118.6 mm higher height
    This router is taller than the average router (170 mm vs 51.4 mm). The average router is 51.4 mm tall.
    170 mm vs 51.4 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
jacqalas
≈ estimated
01/12/2025
Hands-on setup · mesh system, firmware update and app features
Verdict
Cudy WR3000 mesh setup worked well for calls throughout the house, but the short power cable and lack of PoE are drawbacks.
Overview video
Shop video
Shop video

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Cudy WR3000

  • Wi-Fi 6 AX3000 with 2,402 Mbps on 5 GHz
  • 160 MHz channels with OFDMA and MU-MIMO
  • Four Gigabit Ethernet ports for wired devices
  • 1.2 GHz dual-core CPU with 256 MB RAM
  • Built-in VPN server and client
  • Mesh support and access point mode

What customers don't like about Cudy WR3000

  • No 2.5 Gbps port for multi-gig internet lines
  • No built-in modem, external modem required
  • Dual-band only, no 6 GHz band
  • Fixed antennas cannot be replaced

Verdict

Cudy's WR3000 is a no-fuss Wi-Fi 6 router that keeps the price low. AX3000 speeds split into 2,402 Mbps on 5 GHz and 574 Mbps on 2.4 GHz, with 160 MHz channels, OFDMA, MU-MIMO and beamforming. A 1.2 GHz dual-core CPU and 256 MB of RAM run the system, and the listing rates coverage at 130 square metres and more than 100 devices. Four gigabit Ethernet ports handle wired gear, though none is faster than 1 Gbps, which matters on a multi-gig line. Five operating modes include access point mode. VPN server and client support is built in, and setup runs through the Cudy app or a web interface. There is no modem, so a separate modem or fibre box is required. It is a budget answer for flats and small houses.

Compare Cudy WR3000 with other routers

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Cudy WR3000 and other routers

No results found