Belkin AC1200 Review | 77 Data compared

Avg. price:~£35Wi-Fi version:Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)Wi-Fi speed:1200 MbpsLAN port speeds:1 GbpsMesh Wi-Fi:no

Belkin AC1200 Review: Compare 77 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Routers category and whether it is worth buying.

6.9

Overall score

Score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the router's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best routers on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

6.8

Technical Score

10%

8.3

User score

â–¼Worse than 53% of routers
6.8

Technical Score

Technical score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the router's technical performance, covering key areas such as Wi-Fi performance, wired connectivity, security, software features, coverage, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare routers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

26%

5.4

Wireless

20%

6.4

Ports

18%

7.5

Networking

14%

8.3

Security

12%

7.4

Hardware

10%

7.0

Management

â–¼Worse than 55% of routers
8.3

User score

User score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the router.
When it matters
When you want to know how a router performs in daily use and how reliable it is for speed, coverage, and stability according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.0

User reviews

30%

9.0

Popularity

User score:
United Kingdom
amazon
4.0
(1986)
amazon
4.1
(749)
amazon
4.0
(311)
amazon
3.8
(220)
United States
Amazon_logo.png
4.0
(1524)
Amazon_logo.png
4.1
(806)
Amazon_logo.png
3.8
(278)

(Reviews last updated: May 2026)

â–²Better than 72% of routers
  • belkin-ac1200
  • belkin-ac1200
  • belkin-ac1200
belkin-ac1200
belkin-ac1200
belkin-ac1200

Best prices in UK

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Verdict

The Belkin AC1200 DB is a dual-band Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac) router featuring theoretical speeds of up to 1200 Mbps, split between 300 Mbps on the 2.4 GHz band and 867 Mbps on the 5 GHz band. It includes four Gigabit Ethernet LAN ports, one WAN port, and two USB 2.0 ports for sharing printers or external storage. Key characteristics include its distinctive upright 'shark fin' chassis, internal multi-beam antenna technology, and Simple Start browser-based setup. Main pros include its user-friendly installation, solid 5 GHz performance, and robust parental controls powered by Norton. However, notable cons include its dual-stream limitation compared to three-stream AC1750 competitors, a lack of LAN/WAN port status LEDs, and a vertical-only design that can be prone to toppling due to its narrow base.

Technical Specifications of router Belkin AC1200

Technical Score
Technical score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the router's technical performance, covering key areas such as Wi-Fi performance, wired connectivity, security, software features, coverage, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare routers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

26%

5.4

Wireless

20%

6.4

Ports

18%

7.5

Networking

14%

8.3

Security

12%

7.4

Hardware

10%

7.0

Management

6.8
Belkin AC1200 has a technical score of 6.8 points, which is lower than that of 55.4% of products in this category.
User score
User score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the router.
When it matters
When you want to know how a router performs in daily use and how reliable it is for speed, coverage, and stability according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.0

User reviews

30%

9.0

Popularity

User score:
United Kingdom
amazon
4.0
(1986)
amazon
4.1
(749)
amazon
4.0
(311)
amazon
3.8
(220)
United States
Amazon_logo.png
4.0
(1524)
Amazon_logo.png
4.1
(806)
Amazon_logo.png
3.8
(278)

(Reviews last updated: May 2026)

8.3
Belkin AC1200 has a user score of 8.31 points, which is higher than that of 71.6% of products in this category.
Popularity
Popularity
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the router.
When it matters
When you prefer to choose a router reviewed and selected by many other buyers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Belkin AC1200 has a popularity score of 9 points, which is higher than that of 81.4% of products in this category.
9.0
Belkin AC1200 has a popularity score of 9 points, which is higher than that of 81.4% of products in this category.
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the router's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a router with a good balance between network performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

6.9

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.8
Belkin AC1200 has a value-for-money score of 7.8 points, which is higher than that of 45.1% of products in this category.
Brand name
Belkin
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
This router uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), which is more advanced than 39.5% of routers and equal to 25.3% of routers.
Wi-Fi bands
2.4 GHz + 5 GHz
Wi-Fi bands
2.4 GHz + 5 GHz
This router supports 2.4 GHz + 5 GHz Wi-Fi bands, which are more versatile than 24.8% of routers and equal to 68.1% of routers.
Wi-Fi speed
1,200 Mbps
Wi-Fi speed
1,200 Mbps
This router delivers 1,200 Mbps Wi-Fi speed, which is lower than 52.1% of routers and equal to 5.8% of routers.
Channel widths supported
20 MHz + 40 MHz + 80 MHz
Channel widths supported
20 MHz + 40 MHz + 80 MHz
This router supports 20 MHz + 40 MHz + 80 MHz channel width options, which is more than 40.9% of routers and the same as 31.6% of routers.
Show more
Wi-Fi security protocols
WPA2, WPA, WEP, WPS
Wi-Fi security protocols
WPA2, WPA, WEP, WPS
This router supports WPA2, WPA, WEP, WPS Wi-Fi security protocols, which are less advanced than 67.5% of routers and equal to 11.6% of routers.
DoS protection
yes
DoS protection
yes
This router includes DoS protection. 12.8% of routers include DoS protection.
SPI intrusion protection
yes
SPI intrusion protection
yes
This router includes SPI-based intrusion protection. 6.1% of routers include SPI-based intrusion protection.
MAC address filtering
yes
MAC address filtering
yes
This router supports MAC address filtering. 2.2% of routers include MAC address filtering.
URL filter
yes
URL filter
yes
This router supports URL filtering. 3.4% of routers include URL filtering.
Show more
IPv6 support
yes
IPv6 support
yes
This router supports IPv6. 11.5% of routers are IPv6-ready.
Dynamic routing
no
Dynamic routing
no
This router does not support dynamic routing. 52.5% of routers support dynamic routing.
Inter-VLAN routing
no
Inter-VLAN routing
no
This router does not support inter-VLAN routing. 23.5% of routers support inter-VLAN routing.
VLAN tagging
no
VLAN tagging
no
This router does not support VLAN tagging. 62% of routers include VLAN tagging.
QoS
yes
QoS
yes
This router includes QoS controls. 3.2% of routers include QoS controls.
Show more
N. of LAN ports
4
N. of LAN ports
4
This router has 4 LAN ports, which is more than 23.7% of routers and the same as 69.2% of routers.
LAN port speeds
1 Gbps
LAN port speeds
1 Gbps
This router offers 1 Gbps on its LAN ports, which is faster than 27.1% of routers and on par with 59.9% of routers.
N. of WAN ports
1
N. of WAN ports
1
This router has 1 WAN ports, which is more than 1% of routers and the same as 90.1% of routers.
N. of USB ports
2
N. of USB ports
2
This router has 2 USB ports, which is more than 79.2% of routers and the same as 20.6% of routers.
Power over Ethernet (PoE)
no
Power over Ethernet (PoE)
no
This router does not support Power over Ethernet (PoE). 0.5% of routers can be powered over Ethernet.
Show more
Management interface
Web UI, Utility
Management interface
Web UI, Utility
This router uses Web UI, Utility for management, which is less advanced than 66.8% of routers and equal to 2.2% of routers.
Belkin Dashboard
Firmware upgrade method
Web UI, Automatic
Firmware upgrade method
Web UI, Automatic
This router supports Web UI, Automatic firmware update methods, which are more convenient than 35.4% of routers and equal to 37.8% of routers.
Traffic monitoring
no
Traffic monitoring
no
This router does not include traffic monitoring. 82.1% of routers include traffic monitoring.
Guest Wi-Fi network
yes
Guest Wi-Fi network
yes
This router offers a guest Wi‑Fi network. 8.6% of routers offer a guest Wi‑Fi network.
Captive portal
yes
Captive portal
yes
This router offers captive portal features. 76.7% of routers offer captive portal features.
Browser-based guest login page.
Show more
CPU clock speed
?
RAM capacity
?
Internal storage
?
Hardware acceleration
yes
Hardware acceleration
yes
This router offers hardware acceleration. 31.4% of routers offer hardware acceleration.
N. of external antennas
0
N. of external antennas
0
This router has 0 external antennas, which is fewer than 59.6% of routers and the same as 40.4% of routers.
Show more

Belkin AC1200 vs the average router

246810TotalWirelessSecurityNetworkingPortsManagementHardware
  • 1 more USB ports
    N. of USB ports
    2
    This router has more USB ports than the average router (2 vs 1). The average router has 1 USB ports.
    2 vs 1
  • Supports captive portal
    Captive portal
    yes
    This router supports captive portal, while the average router does not. 23.5% of routers support captive portal.
    Browser-based guest login page.
  • More advanced integrated modem
    Integrated modem type
    ADSL2+
    This router uses a ADSL2+ integrated modem, while the average router uses none (external modem required).
    ADSL2+ vs none (external modem required)
  • 2 more internal antennas
    N. of internal antennas
    2
    This router has more internal antennas than the average router (2 vs 0). The average router has 0 internal antennas.
    2 vs 0
  • 2.57x cheaper
    Belkin AC1200 is cheaper than the average router (£35 vs £90).
    £35 vs £90
  • 3.9% higher user score
    User score
    8.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the router.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a router performs in daily use and how reliable it is for speed, coverage, and stability according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Belkin AC1200
    the average router
    Belkin AC1200 has a higher user score than the average router (8.31 vs 8.000).
    8.31 vs 8
  • 37.8% more popular
    Belkin AC1200 is more popular than the average router (9 vs 6.5).
    9 vs 6.54
  • 2.57x cheaper
    Belkin AC1200 is cheaper than the average router (£35 vs £90).
    £35 vs £90
  • 3.9% higher user score
    User score
    8.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the router.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a router performs in daily use and how reliable it is for speed, coverage, and stability according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Belkin AC1200
    the average router
    Belkin AC1200 has a higher user score than the average router (8.31 vs 8.000).
    8.31 vs 8
  • 37.8% more popular
    Belkin AC1200 is more popular than the average router (9 vs 6.5).
    9 vs 6.54
  • 1 more USB ports
    N. of USB ports
    2
    This router has more USB ports than the average router (2 vs 1). The average router has 1 USB ports.
    2 vs 1
  • More advanced integrated modem
    Integrated modem type
    ADSL2+
    This router uses a ADSL2+ integrated modem, while the average router uses none (external modem required).
    ADSL2+ vs none (external modem required)
  • Supports captive portal
    Captive portal
    yes
    This router supports captive portal, while the average router does not. 23.5% of routers support captive portal.
    Browser-based guest login page.
  • 2 more internal antennas
    N. of internal antennas
    2
    This router has more internal antennas than the average router (2 vs 0). The average router has 0 internal antennas.
    2 vs 0
  • No VLAN tagging
    VLAN tagging
    no
    This router does not support VLAN tagging, while the average router does. 61.9% of routers support VLAN tagging.
  • No VPN server support
    VPN server support
    no
    This router cannot act as a VPN server, while the average router can. 66.3% of routers can act as a VPN server.
  • Limited firmware updates
    Firmware upgrade method
    Web UI, Automatic
    This router supports the firmware update methods Web UI, Automatic, while the average router supports Web UI, App, Automatic.
    Web UI, Automatic vs Web UI, App, Automatic
  • No dynamic routing
    Dynamic routing
    no
    This router does not support dynamic routing, while the average router does. 52.3% of routers support dynamic routing.
  • No traffic monitoring
    Traffic monitoring
    no
    This router does not offer traffic monitoring, while the average router does. 81.9% of routers offer traffic monitoring.
  • Less capable NAS services
    Built-in NAS services
    SMB, FTP, media server
    This router includes SMB, FTP, media server NAS services, while the average router includes SMB, FTP, time machine, NFS, web access.
    SMB, FTP, media server vs SMB, FTP, time machine, NFS, web access
  • 1 fewer spatial streams
    N. of spatial streams
    2
    This router has fewer spatial streams than the average router (2 vs 3). The average router has 3 spatial streams.
    2 vs 3
  • No band steering
    Band steering
    no
    This router does not support band steering, while the average router does. 51.8% of routers support band steering.
  • 1 fewer spatial streams
    N. of spatial streams
    2
    This router has fewer spatial streams than the average router (2 vs 3). The average router has 3 spatial streams.
    2 vs 3
  • No band steering
    Band steering
    no
    This router does not support band steering, while the average router does. 51.8% of routers support band steering.
  • 18.6% slower Wi-Fi speed
    Wi-Fi speed
    1,200 Mbps
    This router has a lower Wi-Fi speed than the average router (1200 Mbps vs 1475 Mbps). The average router reaches Wi-Fi speed of 1475 Mbps.
    1,200 Mbps vs 1,475 Mbps
  • No VPN server support
    VPN server support
    no
    This router cannot act as a VPN server, while the average router can. 66.3% of routers can act as a VPN server.
  • No PPTP server
    PPTP server
    no
    This router cannot act as a PPTP server, while the average router can. 62.4% of routers can act as a PPTP server.
  • No VLAN tagging
    VLAN tagging
    no
    This router does not support VLAN tagging, while the average router does. 61.9% of routers support VLAN tagging.
  • No dynamic routing
    Dynamic routing
    no
    This router does not support dynamic routing, while the average router does. 52.3% of routers support dynamic routing.
  • 13,788 fewer NAT sessions
    NAT concurrent sessions
    1,200
    This router has fewer concurrent NAT sessions than the average router (1,200 vs 14,988). The average router supports 14,988 concurrent NAT sessions.
    1,200 vs 14,988
  • Limited firmware updates
    Firmware upgrade method
    Web UI, Automatic
    This router supports the firmware update methods Web UI, Automatic, while the average router supports Web UI, App, Automatic.
    Web UI, Automatic vs Web UI, App, Automatic
  • No traffic monitoring
    Traffic monitoring
    no
    This router does not offer traffic monitoring, while the average router does. 81.9% of routers offer traffic monitoring.
  • Less capable NAS services
    Built-in NAS services
    SMB, FTP, media server
    This router includes SMB, FTP, media server NAS services, while the average router includes SMB, FTP, time machine, NFS, web access.
    SMB, FTP, media server vs SMB, FTP, time machine, NFS, web access
  • Weaker management tools
    Management interface
    Web UI, Utility
    This router uses the management interface Web UI, Utility, while the average router uses Web UI, App.
    Belkin Dashboard
    Web UI, Utility vs Web UI, App
  • 2 fewer external antennas
    N. of external antennas
    0
    This router has fewer external antennas than the average router (0 vs 2). The average router has 2 external antennas.
    0 vs 2
  • 300.5 mm higher height
    Height
    348 mm
    This router is taller than the average router (348 mm vs 47.5 mm). The average router is 47.5 mm tall.
    348 mm vs 47.5 mm
  • 37 mm thicker design
    Thickness
    82 mm
    This router is thicker than the average router (82 mm vs 45 mm). The average router is 45 mm thick.
    82 mm vs 45 mm
  • 3 older release date
    Release date
    2012
    This router is an older model than the average router (2012 vs 2015). The average router release year is 2015.
    2012 vs 2015
  • 1 W higher power consumption
    Power consumption
    9.1 W
    This router uses more power than the average router (9.1 W vs 8.1 W). The average router uses 8.1 W power.
    9.1 W vs 8.1 W

Graphic comparison of Belkin AC1200 and other routers

No results found

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Belkin AC1200?

  • Simple and quick setup process, often taking less than 10 minutes
  • Sleek and modern aesthetic design that fits well in living areas
  • Strong and stable performance on the 5GHz band
  • Includes dual USB ports for easy printer and external drive sharing
  • Effective parental controls and sophisticated guest access options
  • Generally considered a good value for the price point

What customers dislike about Belkin AC1200?

  • Significant performance drop at long range, especially on the 2.4GHz band
  • Software glitches and instability, including conflicts with Windows networking settings
  • Uses a slower 2x2 antenna stream design compared to many 3x3 AC competitors
  • Extremely slow file transfer speeds when using the USB storage sharing feature
  • Lacks advanced features such as dedicated mobile apps for remote management
  • Reports of hardware unreliability, with some units failing shortly after purchase

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

P
pcworld.com
11/09/2012
Summary of the review
P
pcmag.com
29/08/2012
Summary of the review
E
expertreviews.co.uk
02/02/2014
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
21/10/2012
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
20/08/2012
Summary of the review
C
cnet.com
22/08/2012
Summary of the review
L
laptopmag.com
15/10/2012
Summary of the review

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Compare Belkin AC1200 with other routers

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)