OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Robot Vacuums Methodology v1.0
Robot Vacuums Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Robot Vacuums Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Robot Vacuums Methodology v1.0

Shark AV2511AE review: 118 specs compared

Avg. price:~£400Max suction power:?Runtime:120 minDustbin capacity:?Max threshold height:19 mm

Shark AV2511AE Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Robot Vacuums category and whether it is worth buying.

Shark AV2511AE
6.4/10

Overall score

Score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the robot vacuum's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best robot vacuums on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Score components

80%

6.3

Technical score

20%

6.7

User score

â–¼Worse than 70% of robot vacuums
7.0

Value for money

Value for money
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the robot vacuum's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a robot vacuum with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
Score components

70%

6.4

Overall score

30%

8.4

Price

â–¼Worse than 83%
6.3

Technical score

Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of robot-vacuum performance across cleaning, navigation, mopping, battery life, filtration, brush design, smart features, and dimensions.
When it matters
When you want to compare robot vacuums based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
Score components

30%

7.1

Cleaning

23%

6.9

Navigation

18%

3.9

Mopping

12%

5.2

Battery

10%

8.3

Smart Features

7%

6.2

Design

â–¼Worse than 66%
6.7

User score

User score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the robot vacuum
When it matters
When you want to know how a robot vacuum handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
Score components

70%

7.0

User ratings

30%

6.1

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–¼Worse than 91%
  • shark-av2511ae
  • shark-av2511ae
  • shark-av2511ae
  • shark-av2511ae
  • shark-av2511ae
  • shark-av2511ae
  • shark-av2511ae
  • shark-av2511ae
  • shark-av2511ae
shark-av2511ae
shark-av2511ae
shark-av2511ae
shark-av2511ae
shark-av2511ae
shark-av2511ae
shark-av2511ae
shark-av2511ae
shark-av2511ae
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of robot vacuum Shark AV2511AE

Technical score
Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of robot-vacuum performance across cleaning, navigation, mopping, battery life, filtration, brush design, smart features, and dimensions.
When it matters
When you want to compare robot vacuums based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
Score components:

30%

7.1

Cleaning

23%

6.9

Navigation

18%

3.9

Mopping

12%

5.2

Battery

10%

8.3

Smart Features

7%

6.2

Design

6.3
User score
User score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the robot vacuum
When it matters
When you want to know how a robot vacuum handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
Score components

70%

7.0

User ratings

30%

6.1

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
6.7
Popularity
Popularity
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the robot vacuum.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
Popularity:
Shark AV2511AE has a popularity index of 6.1, lower than that of 53.7% of robot vacuums and equal to that of 0.4% of robot vacuums.
6.1
Value for money
Value for money
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the robot vacuum's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a robot vacuum with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
Score components:

70%

6.4

Overall score

30%

8.4

Price

7.0
Max suction power
?
N. of suction power levels
3
Market range: <2 – >4
This robot vacuum has 3 suction power levels, which is fewer than 50.5% of robot vacuums offer and the same number as 35.5% of robot vacuums offer.
Motor type
brushed
This robot vacuum uses a brushed motor, a type that is generally less efficient than those used by 97.5% of robot vacuums and also used by 2.5% of robot vacuums.
Power
120 W
Cleaning modes
4
Market range: <2 – >5
This robot vacuum offers 4 cleaning modes, which is more than 38.2% of robot vacuums offer and the same number as 47.5% of robot vacuums offer.
Show more
Mopping capability
no
This robot vacuum cannot mop floors, although 79% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Mopping system type
none
This robot vacuum uses none for mopping. This system is less effective than those on 79.8% of robot vacuums and as effective as those on 20.2% of robot vacuums.
Mop pad type
none
Mop pad material
none
Mop pressure
N/A
Show more
Primary navigation technology
LiDAR
This robot vacuum uses LiDAR as its primary navigation system, which is more capable than the systems in 34.7% of robot vacuums and matched by 60.4% of robot vacuums.
Mapping capability
yes
This robot vacuum maps the floor. 74% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Real-time mapping
no
This robot vacuum does not update its map in real time, although 68.7% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Multiple map storage
no
This robot vacuum does not store multiple maps, although 56.6% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Map editing
yes
This robot vacuum lets you edit maps. 63.8% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Show more
App control
yes
This robot vacuum supports app control. 5.5% of robot vacuums support app control.
App name
SharkClean
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This robot vacuum supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 6.3% of robot vacuums support Wi-Fi connectivity.
Supported Wi-Fi bands
2.4 GHz
Bluetooth connectivity
yes
This robot vacuum supports Bluetooth connectivity. 35.5% of robot vacuums support Bluetooth connectivity.
Show more
Battery capacity
3,000 mAh
Market range: <2.4k mAh – >5.2k mAh
This robot vacuum has a battery capacity of 3,000 mAh, which is lower than 53.7% of robot vacuums and equal to 3.4% of robot vacuums.
Battery type
Li-ion
Battery voltage
14.4 V
Runtime
120 min
Market range: <90 min – >240 min
This robot vacuum runs for 120 min per charge, which is shorter than 57.6% of robot vacuums and equal to 19.8% of robot vacuums.
Recharge and resume
yes
This robot vacuum resumes cleaning after charging. 83.1% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Show more
Shape
round
Height
104.1 mm
Width
348 mm
Length
348 mm
Weight
?
Show more

Shark AV2511AE vs the average robot vacuum

246810TotalBatteryDesignSmart FeaturesNavigationCleaningMopping
  • Has anti-tangle technology
    This robot vacuum has anti-tangle technology, while the average robot vacuum does not. 42.8% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
  • 1 more side brushes
    This robot vacuum has more side brushes than the average robot vacuum (2 vs 1). The average robot vacuum has 1 side brushes.
    2 vs 1
  • Has anti-tangle technology
    This robot vacuum has anti-tangle technology, while the average robot vacuum does not. 42.8% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
  • 1 more side brushes
    This robot vacuum has more side brushes than the average robot vacuum (2 vs 1). The average robot vacuum has 1 side brushes.
    2 vs 1
  • More basic obstacle avoidance
    This robot vacuum uses LiDAR for obstacle avoidance, while the average robot vacuum uses hybrid.
    LiDAR vs hybrid
  • Does not detect carpets automatically
    This robot vacuum does not detect carpets automatically, while the average robot vacuum detects carpets automatically.
  • No no-mop zones
    This robot vacuum does not support no-mop zones, while the average robot vacuum does. 53.1% of robot vacuums support this feature.
  • Does not boost suction automatically on carpets
    This robot vacuum does not boost suction automatically on carpets, while the average robot vacuum boosts suction on carpets automatically.
  • Does not have a floating main brush
    This robot vacuum does not have a floating main brush, while the average robot vacuum has a floating main brush.
  • Does not store multiple maps
    This robot vacuum does not store multiple maps, while the average robot vacuum stores multiple maps.
  • Does not update its map in real time
    This robot vacuum does not update its map in real time, while the average robot vacuum updates its map in real time.
  • 1 fewer suction power levels
    This robot vacuum offers fewer suction power levels than the average robot vacuum (3 vs 4). The average robot vacuum offers 4 suction power levels.
    3 vs 4
  • 18.6% lower user score
    User score
    6.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the robot vacuum
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a robot vacuum handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Shark AV2511AE
    the average robot vacuum
    Shark AV2511AE has a lower user score than the average robot vacuum (6.74 vs 8).
    6.74 vs 8
  • 8.3% worse value for money
    Shark AV2511AE has worse value for money than the average robot vacuum (7.01 vs 7.6).
    7.01 vs 7.59
  • 53.9% more expensive
    Shark AV2511AE is more expensive than the average robot vacuum (£400 vs £260).
    £400 vs £260
  • 30 min shorter runtime
    This robot vacuum runs for less time per charge than the average robot vacuum (120 min vs 150 min). The average robot vacuum runs for 150 min.
    120 min vs 150 min
  • 1.5 h longer charging time
    This robot vacuum takes longer to recharge fully than the average robot vacuum (6 h vs 4.5 h). The average robot vacuum takes 4.5 h.
    6 h vs 4.5 h
  • 200 mAh smaller battery capacity
    This robot vacuum has a smaller battery capacity than the average robot vacuum (3,000 mAh vs 3,200 mAh). The average robot vacuum has a battery capacity of 3,200 mAh.
    3,000 mAh vs 3,200 mAh
  • 4 dB louder
    This robot vacuum has a higher reported cleaning noise level than the average robot vacuum (69 dB vs 65 dB). The average robot vacuum has a reported noise level of 65 dB.
    69 dB vs 65 dB
  • Older model
    This robot vacuum was released in 2022, earlier than the average robot vacuum in 2023. The average release year for robot vacuums is 2023.
    2022 vs 2023
  • No maintenance notifications
    This robot vacuum does not provide maintenance notifications, while the average robot vacuum does. 76.8% of robot vacuums offer these.
  • More basic obstacle avoidance
    This robot vacuum uses LiDAR for obstacle avoidance, while the average robot vacuum uses hybrid.
    LiDAR vs hybrid
  • No no-mop zones
    This robot vacuum does not support no-mop zones, while the average robot vacuum does. 53.1% of robot vacuums support this feature.
  • Does not store multiple maps
    This robot vacuum does not store multiple maps, while the average robot vacuum stores multiple maps.
  • Does not update its map in real time
    This robot vacuum does not update its map in real time, while the average robot vacuum updates its map in real time.
  • Does not show its location in real time
    This robot vacuum does not show its location in real time, while the average robot vacuum shows its location in real time.
  • 1 mm lower threshold clearance
    This robot vacuum can only cross lower thresholds than the average robot vacuum (19 mm vs 20 mm). The average robot vacuum can cross thresholds up to 20 mm high.
    19 mm vs 20 mm
  • Does not detect carpets automatically
    This robot vacuum does not detect carpets automatically, while the average robot vacuum detects carpets automatically.
  • Does not boost suction automatically on carpets
    This robot vacuum does not boost suction automatically on carpets, while the average robot vacuum boosts suction on carpets automatically.
  • Does not have a floating main brush
    This robot vacuum does not have a floating main brush, while the average robot vacuum has a floating main brush.
  • 1 fewer suction power levels
    This robot vacuum offers fewer suction power levels than the average robot vacuum (3 vs 4). The average robot vacuum offers 4 suction power levels.
    3 vs 4
  • 33 mm narrower main brush
    This robot vacuum has a narrower main brush than the average robot vacuum (145 mm vs 178 mm). The average robot vacuum has a main brush 178 mm wide.
    145 mm vs 178 mm
  • Less efficient motor type
    This robot vacuum uses a generally less efficient motor type than the average robot vacuum (brushed vs brushless).
    brushed vs brushless
  • Does not include a cleaning tool
    This robot vacuum does not include a cleaning tool, while the average robot vacuum includes a cleaning tool.
  • Cannot mop floors
    This robot vacuum cannot mop floors, while the average robot vacuum can mop floors.
  • No water flow control
    This robot vacuum does not support water flow control, while the average robot vacuum does. 70% of robot vacuums support water flow control.
  • Less capable mopping system
    This robot vacuum uses none for mopping, while the average robot vacuum uses static pad.
    none vs static pad
  • 3 fewer water flow levels
    This robot vacuum offers fewer water flow levels than the average robot vacuum (0 vs 3). The average number of water flow levels is 3.
    0 vs 3

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

R
rtings.com
13/11/2024
Summary of the review
Shark AI Ultra Robot AV2501S Review - RTINGS.com
R
rtings.com
13 de noviembre de 2024
Summary of the review
Shark AI Ultra Robot AV2501S Review (Hands-on testing included for the AV2511AE model)
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about Shark AV2511AE

  • Efficient self-empty base with HEPA filter reduces maintenance
  • Strong suction power effectively picks up pet hair and debris
  • 360° LiDAR vision allows for fast, accurate mapping and navigation
  • Matrix Clean Navigation ensures straight-line cleaning and full coverage
  • Quiet operation
  • Good, consistent cleaning performance on hard floors and carpets

What customers don't like about Shark AV2511AE

  • Software/app can be unreliable or difficult to use
  • Brushroll can still get tangled with long hair, despite 'self-cleaning' claims
  • Can struggle with solid debris on low-pile carpets
  • Side brushes are sometimes ineffective, leading to poor edge cleaning
  • May struggle to navigate around complex obstacles like chair legs
  • Requires high maintenance for the filter and base station

Verdict

The Shark AV2511AE AI Ultra is a mid-range robot vacuum equipped with 360-degree LiDAR navigation for precision home mapping, a self-cleaning anti-hair wrap brushroll, and a 0.27-gallon onboard dustbin capacity. A major characteristic is its bagless, self-emptying XL base station that can hold up to 60 days of dirt and debris, alongside its Matrix Clean Technology that utilizes a multi-pass grid pattern for thorough coverage across carpets and hard floors. Main pros include a strong 120-minute lithium-ion battery life with automatic recharge-and-resume functionality, robust pet hair pick-up, and seamless hands-free integration with Amazon Alexa or Google Assistant. However, notable cons include lacking real-time tracking within the SharkClean companion app, an algorithm that can occasionally get the vacuum stuck in tighter furniture layouts, and an inability to save multi-floor maps.

Compare Shark AV2511AE with other robot vacuums

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Shark AV2511AE and other robot vacuums

No results found