OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Robot Vacuums Methodology v1.0
Robot Vacuums Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Robot Vacuums Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Robot Vacuums Methodology v1.0

Rowenta RR7387WH X-Plorer Serie 50 review: 118 specs compared

Avg. price:~£280Max suction power:2000 PaRuntime:120 minDustbin capacity:400 mLMax threshold height:15 mm

Rowenta RR7387WH X-Plorer Serie 50 Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Robot Vacuums category and whether it is worth buying.

Rowenta RR7387WH X-Plorer Serie 50
5.9/10

Overall score

Score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the robot vacuum's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best robot vacuums on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
Score components

80%

5.4

Technical score

20%

7.9

User score

â–¼Worse than 85% of robot vacuums
6.9

Value for money

Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the robot vacuum's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a robot vacuum with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
Score components

70%

5.9

Overall score

30%

9.0

Price

â–¼Worse than 86%
5.4

Technical score

Technical score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of robot-vacuum performance across cleaning, navigation, mopping, battery life, filtration, brush design, smart features, and dimensions.
When it matters
When you want to compare robot vacuums based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
Score components

30%

5.7

Cleaning

23%

4.8

Navigation

18%

5.5

Mopping

12%

3.4

Battery

10%

8.1

Smart Features

7%

6.2

Design

â–¼Worse than 89%
7.9

User score

User score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the robot vacuum
When it matters
When you want to know how a robot vacuum handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
Score components

70%

8.4

User ratings

30%

6.6

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–¼Worse than 67%
  • rowenta-rr7387wh-x-plorer-serie-50
  • rowenta-rr7387wh-x-plorer-serie-50
  • rowenta-rr7387wh-x-plorer-serie-50
  • rowenta-rr7387wh-x-plorer-serie-50
  • rowenta-rr7387wh-x-plorer-serie-50
  • rowenta-rr7387wh-x-plorer-serie-50
  • rowenta-rr7387wh-x-plorer-serie-50
  • rowenta-rr7387wh-x-plorer-serie-50
  • rowenta-rr7387wh-x-plorer-serie-50
rowenta-rr7387wh-x-plorer-serie-50
rowenta-rr7387wh-x-plorer-serie-50
rowenta-rr7387wh-x-plorer-serie-50
rowenta-rr7387wh-x-plorer-serie-50
rowenta-rr7387wh-x-plorer-serie-50
rowenta-rr7387wh-x-plorer-serie-50
rowenta-rr7387wh-x-plorer-serie-50
rowenta-rr7387wh-x-plorer-serie-50
rowenta-rr7387wh-x-plorer-serie-50
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of robot vacuum Rowenta RR7387WH X-Plorer Serie 50

Technical score
Technical score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of robot-vacuum performance across cleaning, navigation, mopping, battery life, filtration, brush design, smart features, and dimensions.
When it matters
When you want to compare robot vacuums based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
Score components:

30%

5.7

Cleaning

23%

4.8

Navigation

18%

5.5

Mopping

12%

3.4

Battery

10%

8.1

Smart Features

7%

6.2

Design

5.4
User score
User score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the robot vacuum
When it matters
When you want to know how a robot vacuum handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
Score components

70%

8.4

User ratings

30%

6.6

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
7.9
Popularity
Popularity
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the robot vacuum.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 50% of models
Popularity:
Rowenta RR7387WH X-Plorer Serie 50 has a popularity index of 6.6, higher than that of 50.3% of robot vacuums and equal to that of 0.4% of robot vacuums.
6.6
Value for money
Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the robot vacuum's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a robot vacuum with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
Score components:

70%

5.9

Overall score

30%

9.0

Price

6.9
Max suction power
2000 Pa
Market range: <1.6k Pa – >12k Pa
This robot vacuum has a maximum suction pressure of 2000 Pa, which is lower than 77.8% of robot vacuums and equal to 8.4% of robot vacuums.
N. of suction power levels
3
Market range: <2 – >4
This robot vacuum has 3 suction power levels, which is fewer than 50.5% of robot vacuums offer and the same number as 35.5% of robot vacuums offer.
Motor type
brushless
This robot vacuum uses a brushless motor, a type that is generally more efficient than those used by 2.7% of robot vacuums and also used by 97.3% of robot vacuums.
Power
?
Cleaning modes
3
Market range: <2 – >5
This robot vacuum offers 3 cleaning modes, which is fewer than 62% of robot vacuums offer and the same number as 27.7% of robot vacuums offer.
Show more
Mopping capability
yes
This robot vacuum can mop floors. 78.8% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Mopping system type
static pad
This robot vacuum uses static pad for mopping. This system is more effective than those on 20.4% of robot vacuums and as effective as those on 46.3% of robot vacuums.
Mop pad type
semi-circular
Mop pad material
microfiber
Mop pressure
?
Show more
Primary navigation technology
gyroscope
This robot vacuum uses gyroscope as its primary navigation system, which is less capable than the systems in 73.9% of robot vacuums and matched by 19.2% of robot vacuums.
Mapping capability
no
This robot vacuum does not map the floor, although 74.2% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Real-time mapping
yes
This robot vacuum updates its map in real time. 68.5% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Multiple map storage
no
This robot vacuum does not store multiple maps, although 56.6% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Map editing
no
This robot vacuum does not support map editing, although 64% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Show more
App control
yes
This robot vacuum supports app control. 5.5% of robot vacuums support app control.
App name
Rowenta Robots
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This robot vacuum supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 6.3% of robot vacuums support Wi-Fi connectivity.
Supported Wi-Fi bands
2.4 GHz
Bluetooth connectivity
yes
This robot vacuum supports Bluetooth connectivity. 35.5% of robot vacuums support Bluetooth connectivity.
Show more
Battery capacity
2,600 mAh
Market range: <2.4k mAh – >5.2k mAh
This robot vacuum has a battery capacity of 2,600 mAh, which is lower than 59% of robot vacuums and equal to 26.9% of robot vacuums.
Battery type
Li-ion
Battery voltage
14.4 V
Runtime
120 min
Market range: <90 min – >240 min
This robot vacuum runs for 120 min per charge, which is shorter than 57.6% of robot vacuums and equal to 19.8% of robot vacuums.
Recharge and resume
no
This robot vacuum does not resume cleaning after charging, although 83.3% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Show more
Shape
round
Height
80 mm
Width
325 mm
Length
325 mm
Weight
3.79 kg
Market range: <2.59 kg – >4.76 kg
This robot vacuum weighs 3.79 kg, making it heavier than 61% of robot vacuums and the same weight as 1.2% of robot vacuums.
Show more

Rowenta RR7387WH X-Plorer Serie 50 vs the average robot vacuum

246810TotalBatteryDesignSmart FeaturesNavigationCleaningMopping
  • 1 more side brushes
    This robot vacuum has more side brushes than the average robot vacuum (2 vs 1). The average robot vacuum has 1 side brushes.
    2 vs 1
  • 0.9 % higher filter efficiency
    This robot vacuum has higher filter efficiency than the average robot vacuum (99.9 % vs 99 %). The average robot vacuum has a filter efficiency of 99 %.
    99.9 % vs 99 %
  • Has a child lock
    This robot vacuum has a child lock, while the average robot vacuum does not. 44.9% of robot vacuums offer this.
  • 1 W lower standby power consumption
    This robot vacuum draws less power in standby than the average robot vacuum (1 W vs 2 W). The average robot vacuum draws 2 W in standby.
    1 W vs 2 W
  • 0.2 m longer power cord
    This robot vacuum has a longer power cord than the average robot vacuum (1.7 m vs 1.5 m). The average robot vacuum's power cord is 1.5 m long.
    1.7 m vs 1.5 m
  • 1 W lower standby power consumption
    This robot vacuum draws less power in standby than the average robot vacuum (1 W vs 2 W). The average robot vacuum draws 2 W in standby.
    1 W vs 2 W
  • 0.2 m longer power cord
    This robot vacuum has a longer power cord than the average robot vacuum (1.7 m vs 1.5 m). The average robot vacuum's power cord is 1.5 m long.
    1.7 m vs 1.5 m
  • Has a child lock
    This robot vacuum has a child lock, while the average robot vacuum does not. 44.9% of robot vacuums offer this.
  • 1 more side brushes
    This robot vacuum has more side brushes than the average robot vacuum (2 vs 1). The average robot vacuum has 1 side brushes.
    2 vs 1
  • 0.9 % higher filter efficiency
    This robot vacuum has higher filter efficiency than the average robot vacuum (99.9 % vs 99 %). The average robot vacuum has a filter efficiency of 99 %.
    99.9 % vs 99 %
  • More basic obstacle avoidance
    This robot vacuum uses infrared for obstacle avoidance, while the average robot vacuum uses hybrid.
    infrared vs hybrid
  • More basic navigation
    This robot vacuum uses gyroscope for navigation, while the average robot vacuum uses LiDAR.
    gyroscope vs LiDAR
  • 2,000 Pa weaker maximum suction
    This robot vacuum has weaker maximum suction than the average robot vacuum (2000 Pa vs 4,000 Pa). The average robot vacuum has a maximum suction pressure of 4,000 Pa.
    2,000 Pa vs 4,000 Pa
  • Does not detect carpets automatically
    This robot vacuum does not detect carpets automatically, while the average robot vacuum detects carpets automatically.
  • No no-mop zones
    This robot vacuum does not support no-mop zones, while the average robot vacuum does. 53.1% of robot vacuums support this feature.
  • 5 mm lower threshold clearance
    This robot vacuum can only cross lower thresholds than the average robot vacuum (15 mm vs 20 mm). The average robot vacuum can cross thresholds up to 20 mm high.
    15 mm vs 20 mm
  • 1 fewer cleaning modes
    This robot vacuum offers fewer cleaning modes than the average robot vacuum (3 vs 4). The average robot vacuum offers 4 cleaning modes.
    3 vs 4
  • Does not map the floor
    This robot vacuum does not map the floor, while the average robot vacuum maps the floor.
  • 10.6% worse value for money
    Rowenta RR7387WH X-Plorer Serie 50 has worse value for money than the average robot vacuum (6.86 vs 7.6).
    6.86 vs 7.59
  • 1.9% lower user score
    User score
    7.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the robot vacuum
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a robot vacuum handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Rowenta RR7387WH X-Plorer Serie 50
    the average robot vacuum
    Rowenta RR7387WH X-Plorer Serie 50 has a lower user score than the average robot vacuum (7.85 vs 8.000).
    7.85 vs 8
  • Does not resume cleaning after charging
    This robot vacuum does not resume cleaning after charging, while the average robot vacuum resumes cleaning after charging.
  • 30 min shorter runtime
    This robot vacuum runs for less time per charge than the average robot vacuum (120 min vs 150 min). The average robot vacuum runs for 150 min.
    120 min vs 150 min
  • 60 m² smaller cleaning area
    This robot vacuum has a smaller maximum cleaning area than the average robot vacuum (120 m² vs 180 m²). The average robot vacuum has a maximum cleaning area of 180 m².
    120 m² vs 180 m²
  • 1.5 h longer charging time
    This robot vacuum takes longer to recharge fully than the average robot vacuum (6 h vs 4.5 h). The average robot vacuum takes 4.5 h.
    6 h vs 4.5 h
  • 600 mAh smaller battery capacity
    This robot vacuum has a smaller battery capacity than the average robot vacuum (2,600 mAh vs 3,200 mAh). The average robot vacuum has a battery capacity of 3,200 mAh.
    2,600 mAh vs 3,200 mAh
  • Older model
    This robot vacuum was released in 2021, earlier than the average robot vacuum in 2023. The average release year for robot vacuums is 2023.
    2021 vs 2023
  • 6.2% heavier
    This robot vacuum is heavier than the average robot vacuum (3.8 kg vs 3.57 kg). The average robot vacuum weighs 3.57 kg.
    3.79 kg vs 3.57 kg
  • No maintenance notifications
    This robot vacuum does not provide maintenance notifications, while the average robot vacuum does. 76.8% of robot vacuums offer these.
  • No voice prompts
    This robot vacuum does not provide voice prompts, while the average robot vacuum does. 76.3% of robot vacuums offer these.
  • No do not disturb mode
    This robot vacuum does not have a do not disturb mode, while the average robot vacuum does. 89.3% of robot vacuums offer this.
  • More basic obstacle avoidance
    This robot vacuum uses infrared for obstacle avoidance, while the average robot vacuum uses hybrid.
    infrared vs hybrid
  • More basic navigation
    This robot vacuum uses gyroscope for navigation, while the average robot vacuum uses LiDAR.
    gyroscope vs LiDAR
  • No no-mop zones
    This robot vacuum does not support no-mop zones, while the average robot vacuum does. 53.1% of robot vacuums support this feature.
  • 5 mm lower threshold clearance
    This robot vacuum can only cross lower thresholds than the average robot vacuum (15 mm vs 20 mm). The average robot vacuum can cross thresholds up to 20 mm high.
    15 mm vs 20 mm
  • Does not map the floor
    This robot vacuum does not map the floor, while the average robot vacuum maps the floor.
  • Does not support map editing
    This robot vacuum does not support map editing, while the average robot vacuum lets you edit maps.
  • Does not store multiple maps
    This robot vacuum does not store multiple maps, while the average robot vacuum stores multiple maps.
  • Does not recognize individual rooms
    This robot vacuum does not recognize individual rooms, while the average robot vacuum recognizes individual rooms.
  • Does not support virtual boundaries
    This robot vacuum does not support virtual boundaries, while the average robot vacuum supports virtual boundaries.
  • Does not show its location in real time
    This robot vacuum does not show its location in real time, while the average robot vacuum shows its location in real time.
  • 2,000 Pa weaker maximum suction
    This robot vacuum has weaker maximum suction than the average robot vacuum (2000 Pa vs 4,000 Pa). The average robot vacuum has a maximum suction pressure of 4,000 Pa.
    2,000 Pa vs 4,000 Pa
  • Does not detect carpets automatically
    This robot vacuum does not detect carpets automatically, while the average robot vacuum detects carpets automatically.
  • 1 fewer cleaning modes
    This robot vacuum offers fewer cleaning modes than the average robot vacuum (3 vs 4). The average robot vacuum offers 4 cleaning modes.
    3 vs 4
  • 1 fewer suction power levels
    This robot vacuum offers fewer suction power levels than the average robot vacuum (3 vs 4). The average robot vacuum offers 4 suction power levels.
    3 vs 4
  • Does not support zone cleaning
    This robot vacuum does not support zone cleaning, while the average robot vacuum supports zone cleaning.
  • Does not support room-by-room cleaning
    This robot vacuum does not support room-by-room cleaning, while the average robot vacuum supports room-by-room cleaning.
  • Does not include a cleaning tool
    This robot vacuum does not include a cleaning tool, while the average robot vacuum includes a cleaning tool.
  • No water flow control
    This robot vacuum does not support water flow control, while the average robot vacuum does. 70% of robot vacuums support water flow control.
  • 130 mL less onboard water capacity
    This robot vacuum has a smaller onboard water tank than the average robot vacuum (110 mL vs 240 mL). The average robot vacuum's onboard water tank holds 240 mL.
    110 mL vs 240 mL
  • 2 fewer water flow levels
    This robot vacuum offers fewer water flow levels than the average robot vacuum (1 vs 3). The average number of water flow levels is 3.
    1 vs 3

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

M
meilleur-aspirateur-robot.be
01/07/2026
Summary of the review
Rowenta X-Plorer Serie 50: Review & Opinions July 2026
(Translated)Show original
K
kieskeurig.nl
16/04/2024
Summary of the review
Rowenta X-Plorer Serie 50 RR7387 reviews | Kieskeurig.nl
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about Rowenta RR7387WH X-Plorer Serie 50

  • The compact, very low 8 cm body is ideal for cleaning under beds and sofas.
  • The powered central brush captures pet hair very effectively.
  • The Aqua Power system vacuums and mops simultaneously.
  • Good battery life and the ability to climb moderately thick rugs.
  • Methodical navigation and support for Alexa and Google Home.

What customers don't like about Rowenta RR7387WH X-Plorer Serie 50

  • The combined dust and water container is small and requires frequent emptying.
  • Mopping helps with daily maintenance but does not replace a traditional mop.
  • In cluttered homes it may become disoriented or struggle to return to the dock.
  • The brushes need regular cleaning to prevent tangles.

Verdict

The Rowenta RR7387WH X-Plorer Serie 50 is a white, round robot vacuum and mop featuring an 8 cm slim profile, a brushless BLDC motor, and an Aqua Force mopping system. It operates with a 67 dB noise level and relies on integrated gyroscopic navigation and infrared sensors for methodical route tracking across three specialized cleaning modes (Method, Spot, and Wall-tracking). Key advantages include its 120-minute battery runtime on a single 6-hour charge, an Animal & Allergy Kit with a specialized turbo roller brush and high-efficiency filtration capturing up to 99.9% of particles, and app connectivity with Google Assistant and Amazon Alexa. However, it is held back by a relatively small 0.4-liter dust container that requires frequent emptying, an inability to set software-based no-go zones within the application, and reliance on expensive magnetic strips for physical boundary restriction.

Compare Rowenta RR7387WH X-Plorer Serie 50 with other robot vacuums

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Rowenta RR7387WH X-Plorer Serie 50 and other robot vacuums

No results found