OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Robot Vacuums Methodology v1.0
Robot Vacuums Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Robot Vacuums Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Robot Vacuums Methodology v1.0

DEENKEE DK3000 review: 118 specs compared

Avg. price:~£180Max suction power:?Runtime:180 minDustbin capacity:600 mLMax threshold height:16 mm

DEENKEE DK3000 Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Robot Vacuums category and whether it is worth buying.

6.3/10

Overall score

Score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the robot vacuum's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best robot vacuums on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
Score components

80%

6.3

Technical score

20%

?

User score

â–¼Worse than 74% of robot vacuums
7.3

Value for money

Value for money
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the robot vacuum's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a robot vacuum with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
Score components

70%

6.3

Overall score

30%

9.6

Price

â–¼Worse than 71%
6.3

Technical score

Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of robot-vacuum performance across cleaning, navigation, mopping, battery life, filtration, brush design, smart features, and dimensions.
When it matters
When you want to compare robot vacuums based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
Score components

30%

7.1

Cleaning

23%

4.5

Navigation

18%

6.2

Mopping

12%

5.6

Battery

10%

7.8

Smart Features

7%

7.8

Design

â–¼Worse than 67%
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the robot vacuum
When it matters
When you want to know how a robot vacuum handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £180
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of robot vacuum DEENKEE DK3000

Technical score
Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of robot-vacuum performance across cleaning, navigation, mopping, battery life, filtration, brush design, smart features, and dimensions.
When it matters
When you want to compare robot vacuums based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
Score components:

30%

7.1

Cleaning

23%

4.5

Navigation

18%

6.2

Mopping

12%

5.6

Battery

10%

7.8

Smart Features

7%

7.8

Design

6.3
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the robot vacuum
When it matters
When you want to know how a robot vacuum handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the robot vacuum.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
DEENKEE DK3000 has a popularity index of 1, lower than that of 70.7% of robot vacuums and equal to that of 29.3% of robot vacuums.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the robot vacuum's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a robot vacuum with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
Score components:

70%

6.3

Overall score

30%

9.6

Price

7.3
Max suction power
?
N. of suction power levels
4
Market range: <2 – >4
This robot vacuum has 4 suction power levels, which is more than 49.7% of robot vacuums offer and the same number as 43.8% of robot vacuums offer.
Motor type
brushless
This robot vacuum uses a brushless motor, a type that is generally more efficient than those used by 2.7% of robot vacuums and also used by 97.3% of robot vacuums.
Power
?
Cleaning modes
6
Market range: <2 – >5
This robot vacuum offers 6 cleaning modes, which is more than 92.3% of robot vacuums offer and the same number as 5.7% of robot vacuums offer.
Show more
Mopping capability
yes
This robot vacuum can mop floors. 78.8% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Mopping system type
none
This robot vacuum uses none for mopping. This system is less effective than those on 79.8% of robot vacuums and as effective as those on 20.2% of robot vacuums.
Mop pad type
flat
Mop pad material
microfiber
Mop pressure
?
Show more
Primary navigation technology
gyroscope
This robot vacuum uses gyroscope as its primary navigation system, which is less capable than the systems in 73.9% of robot vacuums and matched by 19.2% of robot vacuums.
Mapping capability
no
This robot vacuum does not map the floor, although 74.2% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Real-time mapping
no
This robot vacuum does not update its map in real time, although 68.7% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Multiple map storage
no
This robot vacuum does not store multiple maps, although 56.6% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Map editing
no
This robot vacuum does not support map editing, although 64% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Show more
App control
yes
This robot vacuum supports app control. 5.5% of robot vacuums support app control.
App name
?
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This robot vacuum supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 6.3% of robot vacuums support Wi-Fi connectivity.
Supported Wi-Fi bands
2.4 GHz
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This robot vacuum does not support Bluetooth connectivity. 64.7% of robot vacuums support Bluetooth connectivity.
Show more
Battery capacity
2,600 mAh
Market range: <2.4k mAh – >5.2k mAh
This robot vacuum has a battery capacity of 2,600 mAh, which is lower than 59% of robot vacuums and equal to 26.9% of robot vacuums.
Battery type
Li-ion
Battery voltage
14.4 V
Runtime
180 min
Market range: <90 min – >240 min
This robot vacuum runs for 180 min per charge, which is longer than 63.4% of robot vacuums and equal to 13.3% of robot vacuums.
Recharge and resume
no
This robot vacuum does not resume cleaning after charging, although 83.3% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Show more
Shape
round
Height
69.8 mm
Width
328.3 mm
Length
325 mm
Weight
?
Show more

DEENKEE DK3000 vs the average robot vacuum

246810TotalBatteryDesignSmart FeaturesNavigationCleaningMopping
  • 2 more cleaning modes
    This robot vacuum offers more cleaning modes than the average robot vacuum (6 vs 4). The average robot vacuum offers 4 cleaning modes.
    6 vs 4
  • 200 mL larger dustbin
    This robot vacuum has a larger onboard dustbin than the average robot vacuum (600 mL vs 400 mL). The average robot vacuum has a dustbin capacity of 400 mL.
    600 mL vs 400 mL
  • 0.97 % higher filter efficiency
    This robot vacuum has higher filter efficiency than the average robot vacuum (100 % vs 99 %). The average robot vacuum has a filter efficiency of 99 %.
    99.97 % vs 99 %
  • 10 dB quieter
    This robot vacuum has a lower reported cleaning noise level than the average robot vacuum (55 dB vs 65 dB). The average robot vacuum has a reported noise level of 65 dB.
    55 dB vs 65 dB
  • 90 m² larger cleaning area
    This robot vacuum has a larger maximum cleaning area than the average robot vacuum (270 m² vs 180 m²). The average robot vacuum has a maximum cleaning area of 180 m².
    270 m² vs 180 m²
  • 30 min longer runtime
    This robot vacuum runs longer per charge than the average robot vacuum (180 min vs 150 min). The average robot vacuum runs for 150 min.
    180 min vs 150 min
  • 60 mL more onboard water capacity
    This robot vacuum has a larger onboard water tank than the average robot vacuum (300 mL vs 240 mL). The average robot vacuum's onboard water tank holds 240 mL.
    300 mL vs 240 mL
  • 3.92 kg lighter base station
    This robot vacuum has a lighter base station than the average robot vacuum (0.4 kg vs 4.3 kg). The average robot vacuum's base station weighs 4.3 kg.
    0.38 kg vs 4.3 kg
  • 90 m² larger cleaning area
    This robot vacuum has a larger maximum cleaning area than the average robot vacuum (270 m² vs 180 m²). The average robot vacuum has a maximum cleaning area of 180 m².
    270 m² vs 180 m²
  • 30 min longer runtime
    This robot vacuum runs longer per charge than the average robot vacuum (180 min vs 150 min). The average robot vacuum runs for 150 min.
    180 min vs 150 min
  • 10 dB quieter
    This robot vacuum has a lower reported cleaning noise level than the average robot vacuum (55 dB vs 65 dB). The average robot vacuum has a reported noise level of 65 dB.
    55 dB vs 65 dB
  • 3.92 kg lighter base station
    This robot vacuum has a lighter base station than the average robot vacuum (0.4 kg vs 4.3 kg). The average robot vacuum's base station weighs 4.3 kg.
    0.38 kg vs 4.3 kg
  • 2 more cleaning modes
    This robot vacuum offers more cleaning modes than the average robot vacuum (6 vs 4). The average robot vacuum offers 4 cleaning modes.
    6 vs 4
  • 200 mL larger dustbin
    This robot vacuum has a larger onboard dustbin than the average robot vacuum (600 mL vs 400 mL). The average robot vacuum has a dustbin capacity of 400 mL.
    600 mL vs 400 mL
  • 0.97 % higher filter efficiency
    This robot vacuum has higher filter efficiency than the average robot vacuum (100 % vs 99 %). The average robot vacuum has a filter efficiency of 99 %.
    99.97 % vs 99 %
  • 60 mL more onboard water capacity
    This robot vacuum has a larger onboard water tank than the average robot vacuum (300 mL vs 240 mL). The average robot vacuum's onboard water tank holds 240 mL.
    300 mL vs 240 mL
  • More basic obstacle avoidance
    This robot vacuum uses infrared for obstacle avoidance, while the average robot vacuum uses hybrid.
    infrared vs hybrid
  • More basic navigation
    This robot vacuum uses gyroscope for navigation, while the average robot vacuum uses LiDAR.
    gyroscope vs LiDAR
  • No no-mop zones
    This robot vacuum does not support no-mop zones, while the average robot vacuum does. 53.1% of robot vacuums support this feature.
  • Does not have a floating main brush
    This robot vacuum does not have a floating main brush, while the average robot vacuum has a floating main brush.
  • Does not map the floor
    This robot vacuum does not map the floor, while the average robot vacuum maps the floor.
  • Does not support map editing
    This robot vacuum does not support map editing, while the average robot vacuum lets you edit maps.
  • Does not store multiple maps
    This robot vacuum does not store multiple maps, while the average robot vacuum stores multiple maps.
  • Does not recognize individual rooms
    This robot vacuum does not recognize individual rooms, while the average robot vacuum recognizes individual rooms.
  • 6.53x less popular
    DEENKEE DK3000 is less popular than the average robot vacuum (1 vs 6.5).
    1 vs 6.53
  • 4.4% worse value for money
    DEENKEE DK3000 has worse value for money than the average robot vacuum (7.27 vs 7.6).
    7.27 vs 7.59
  • Does not resume cleaning after charging
    This robot vacuum does not resume cleaning after charging, while the average robot vacuum resumes cleaning after charging.
  • 600 mAh smaller battery capacity
    This robot vacuum has a smaller battery capacity than the average robot vacuum (2,600 mAh vs 3,200 mAh). The average robot vacuum has a battery capacity of 3,200 mAh.
    2,600 mAh vs 3,200 mAh
  • 0.5 h longer charging time
    This robot vacuum takes longer to recharge fully than the average robot vacuum (5 h vs 4.5 h). The average robot vacuum takes 4.5 h.
    5 h vs 4.5 h
  • Older model
    This robot vacuum was released in 2021, earlier than the average robot vacuum in 2023. The average release year for robot vacuums is 2023.
    2021 vs 2023
  • No cleaning reports
    This robot vacuum does not provide cleaning reports, while the average robot vacuum does. 87.4% of robot vacuums offer these.
  • No voice prompts
    This robot vacuum does not provide voice prompts, while the average robot vacuum does. 76.3% of robot vacuums offer these.
  • No Bluetooth
    This robot vacuum does not support Bluetooth connectivity, while the average robot vacuum does. 64.6% of robot vacuums support Bluetooth connectivity.
  • No do not disturb mode
    This robot vacuum does not have a do not disturb mode, while the average robot vacuum does. 89.3% of robot vacuums offer this.
  • 4 fewer languages supported
    This robot vacuum supports fewer languages than the average robot vacuum (13 vs 17). The average robot vacuum supports 17 languages.
    13 vs 17
  • More basic obstacle avoidance
    This robot vacuum uses infrared for obstacle avoidance, while the average robot vacuum uses hybrid.
    infrared vs hybrid
  • More basic navigation
    This robot vacuum uses gyroscope for navigation, while the average robot vacuum uses LiDAR.
    gyroscope vs LiDAR
  • No no-mop zones
    This robot vacuum does not support no-mop zones, while the average robot vacuum does. 53.1% of robot vacuums support this feature.
  • Does not map the floor
    This robot vacuum does not map the floor, while the average robot vacuum maps the floor.
  • Does not support map editing
    This robot vacuum does not support map editing, while the average robot vacuum lets you edit maps.
  • Does not store multiple maps
    This robot vacuum does not store multiple maps, while the average robot vacuum stores multiple maps.
  • Does not recognize individual rooms
    This robot vacuum does not recognize individual rooms, while the average robot vacuum recognizes individual rooms.
  • Does not update its map in real time
    This robot vacuum does not update its map in real time, while the average robot vacuum updates its map in real time.
  • 4 mm lower threshold clearance
    This robot vacuum can only cross lower thresholds than the average robot vacuum (16 mm vs 20 mm). The average robot vacuum can cross thresholds up to 20 mm high.
    16 mm vs 20 mm
  • Does not support virtual boundaries
    This robot vacuum does not support virtual boundaries, while the average robot vacuum supports virtual boundaries.
  • Does not show its location in real time
    This robot vacuum does not show its location in real time, while the average robot vacuum shows its location in real time.
  • Does not have a floating main brush
    This robot vacuum does not have a floating main brush, while the average robot vacuum has a floating main brush.
  • Does not support zone cleaning
    This robot vacuum does not support zone cleaning, while the average robot vacuum supports zone cleaning.
  • Does not support room-by-room cleaning
    This robot vacuum does not support room-by-room cleaning, while the average robot vacuum supports room-by-room cleaning.
  • Non-washable filter
    This robot vacuum does not have a washable filter, while the average robot vacuum does. 72.5% of robot vacuums have a washable filter.
  • 14 mm narrower main brush
    This robot vacuum has a narrower main brush than the average robot vacuum (164 mm vs 178 mm). The average robot vacuum has a main brush 178 mm wide.
    164 mm vs 178 mm
  • Less capable mopping system
    This robot vacuum uses none for mopping, while the average robot vacuum uses static pad.
    none vs static pad

Third-party reviews

What customers like about DEENKEE DK3000

  • Strong suction power (up to 3000Pa) that handles dust, dirt, and crumbs effectively.
  • Excellent at picking up pet hair on hard surfaces and low-pile carpets.
  • Quiet operation with a low-decibel hum that doesn't disrupt daily activities.
  • Slim profile allows it to slide easily under low furniture like sofas and beds.
  • Good value for money compared to higher-priced competitors.
  • Dual-functionality with vacuuming and light mopping options on various surfaces.
  • Easy setup process and seamless integration with app/voice controls like Alexa.

What customers don't like about DEENKEE DK3000

  • Random or less methodical navigation patterns can leave some spots missed during a single run.
  • Prone to getting stuck under certain furniture or tangled on loose cords.
  • Struggles to provide a deep, thorough clean on thick or shaggy carpets.
  • Side brush bristles tend to get gnarled, worn, or lost easily over time.
  • May repeatedly forget areas where it previously got stuck after returning to the charging dock.

Verdict

The DEENKEE DK3000 is a versatile 3-in-1 robot vacuum and mop combo that features an impressive 3000Pa of suction power, an ultra-slim 2.75-inch body for cleaning under low furniture, and smart Gyroscope Navigation 3.0 which follows an efficient S-shaped path. Key advantages include up to 180 minutes of battery life, six specialized cleaning modes, smart voice and app controls via Wi-Fi, and AutoBoost technology that automatically enhances suction on carpets. However, it lacks advanced LiDAR mapping capabilities, prevents you from creating digital no-go zones in the companion app, and can occasionally struggle with deep or heavy-profile carpets.

Compare DEENKEE DK3000 with other robot vacuums

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of DEENKEE DK3000 and other robot vacuums

No results found