OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS

Trust Puck Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price:~£20Connectivity:wirelessMaximum polling rate:125 HzMaximum DPI:1600 DPIWeight:110 g

Trust Puck Review: Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Mice category and whether it is worth buying.

5.2

Overall score

Score
5.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the mouse's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best mice on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components

80%

4.4

Technical Score

20%

8.3

User score

â–¼Worse than 78% of mice
4.4

Technical Score

Technical score
4.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
Score components

36%

3.4

Performance & Sensor

22%

5.6

Controls

16%

4.9

Design

14%

1.0

Features

7%

9.7

Connectivity

5%

7.4

Battery & Charging

â–¼Worse than 83% of mice
8.3

User score

User score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 64% of models
Score components

70%

8.6

User ratings

30%

7.6

Number of reviews

Based on 1,308 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–²Better than 64% of mice
  • trust-puck
  • trust-puck
  • trust-puck
  • trust-puck
  • trust-puck
  • trust-puck
  • trust-puck
  • trust-puck
  • trust-puck
  • trust-puck
  • trust-puck
  • trust-puck
  • trust-puck
trust-puck
trust-puck
trust-puck
trust-puck
trust-puck
trust-puck
trust-puck
trust-puck
trust-puck
trust-puck
trust-puck
trust-puck
trust-puck

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Verdict

The Trust Puck is an ultra-thin, minimalistic wireless mouse designed for high portability with a height of just 27mm and an ambidextrous, symmetrical shape. Its core technical specifications include a dual-mode wireless connection via Bluetooth or a storable 2.4 GHz USB micro-receiver, an optical sensor with four adjustable DPI levels (800, 1000, 1200, or 1600), and a built-in rechargeable lithium polymer battery charged via USB-C. Main pros include its silent-click buttons that reduce noise by 90%, eco-friendly rechargeable design that eliminates disposable batteries, and its compact size that fits easily into slim laptop bags. However, some cons include its low-profile ergonomic design which may not be comfortable for long work sessions, a maximum sensitivity of 1600 DPI which may be insufficient for high-precision gaming or graphic design, and a lack of additional side buttons.

Technical Specifications of mouse Trust Puck

Technical Score
Technical score
4.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
Score components:

36%

3.4

Performance & Sensor

22%

5.6

Controls

16%

4.9

Design

14%

1.0

Features

7%

9.7

Connectivity

5%

7.4

Battery & Charging

4.4
Trust Puck has a technical score of 4.4 points, which is lower than that of 83.1% of products in this category.
User score
User score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 64% of models
Score components

70%

8.6

User ratings

30%

7.6

Number of reviews

Based on 1,308 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.3
Trust Puck has a user score of 8.31 points, which is higher than that of 63.9% of products in this category.
Popularity
Popularity
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you prefer a mouse that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 67% of models
Popularity:
Trust Puck has a popularity score of 7.6 points, which is higher than that of 67% of products in this category.
7.6
Trust Puck has a popularity score of 7.6 points, which is higher than that of 67% of products in this category.
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the mouse's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a mouse that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
Score components:

60%

5.2

Overall score

40%

10

Price

6.6
Trust Puck has a value-for-money score of 6.6 points, which is lower than that of 78.4% of products in this category.
Brand name
Trust
Maximum polling rate
125 Hz
Maximum polling rate
125 Hz
â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 125 Hz, which is lower than 75.8% of mice and equal to 23.9% of mice.
Wired polling rate
N/A
2.4 GHz polling rate
125 Hz
2.4 GHz polling rate
125 Hz
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 125 Hz, which is lower than 71.1% of mice and equal to 28.8% of mice.
Bluetooth polling rate
125 Hz
Bluetooth polling rate
125 Hz
â–² Better than 68% of models
Market range: <0 Hz – >125 Hz
This mouse has a Bluetooth polling rate of 125 Hz, which is higher than 67.8% of mice and equal to 30.7% of mice.
Show more
Connectivity
wireless
Connectivity
wireless
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
This mouse supports wireless connectivity, which is more versatile than 35% of mice and equal to 21.7% of mice.
connection modes: Bluetooth / 2.4 GHz.
Bluetooth support
yes
Bluetooth support
yes
â–² Better than 65% of models
This mouse supports Bluetooth. 64.5% of mice support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
?
Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
yes
Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
yes
â–² Better than 39% of models
This mouse supports proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless. 38.8% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
Receiver included
yes
Receiver included
yes
â–² Better than 38% of models
This mouse includes a receiver. 37.8% of mice include a receiver.
Show more
Battery life
?
Battery capacity
400 mAh
Battery capacity
400 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
Market range: <300 mAh – >800 mAh
This mouse has a battery capacity of 400 mAh, which is smaller than 57.8% of mice and equal to 6% of mice.
Battery form factor
integrated
Rechargeable battery
yes
Rechargeable battery
yes
â–² Better than 54% of models
This mouse uses a rechargeable battery. 54.2% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
Removable battery
no
Removable battery
no
â–¼ Worse than 22% of models
This mouse does not use a removable battery. 22.3% of mice use a removable battery.
Show more
N. of buttons
4
N. of buttons
4
â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
Market range: <4 – >9
This mouse has 4 buttons, which is less than 86.6% of mice and equal to 4.3% of mice.
N. of side buttons
0
N. of side buttons
0
â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
Market range: <0 – >3
This mouse has 0 side buttons, which is less than 85.3% of mice and equal to 14.7% of mice.
N. of programmable buttons
0
N. of programmable buttons
0
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
Market range: <0 – >9
This mouse has 0 programmable buttons, which is less than 83.4% of mice and equal to 16.7% of mice.
DPI switching button
yes
DPI switching button
yes
â–² Better than 15% of models
This mouse includes a DPI switching button. 14.7% of mice include a DPI switching button.
Profile switching button
no
Profile switching button
no
â–¼ Worse than 16% of models
This mouse does not include a profile switching button. 16% of mice include a profile switching button.
Show more
Orientation
ambidextrous
Weight
110 g
Weight
110 g
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
Market range: <52 g – >125 g
This mouse weighs 110 g, which is heavier than 80.4% of mice and equal to 2% of mice.
Extra weights
0 g
Extra weights
0 g
â–¼ Worse than 5% of models
Market range: <0 g – >25 g
This mouse comes with 0 g extra weights, which is less than 4.6% of mice and equal to 95.4% of mice.
Cable length
0.8 m
Cable length
0.8 m
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Market range: <1.5 m – >2 m
This mouse has a cable length of 0.8 m, which is less than 99.3% of mice.
Cable type
?
Show more
Onboard memory profiles
0
Onboard memory profiles
0
â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, which is less than 52.2% of mice and equal to 47.8% of mice.
Onboard memory size
0 KB
Onboard memory size
0 KB
â–¼ Worse than 13% of models
Market range: <0 KB – >128 KB
This mouse has an onboard memory size of 0 KB, which is smaller than 12.6% of mice and equal to 87.4% of mice.
no onboard memory.
Software name
N/A
Firmware upgradable
no
Firmware upgradable
no
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
This mouse does not support firmware upgrades. 77.7% of mice support firmware upgrades.
Suitable for gaming
no
Suitable for gaming
no
â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
This mouse is not suitable for gaming. 76.2% of mice are suitable for gaming.

Trust Puck vs the average mouse

246810TotalPerformance & SensorConnectivityBattery & ChargingControlsDesignFeatures
  • Silent primary switches
    Silent primary switches
    yes
    â–² Better than 86% of models
    This mouse uses silent primary switches, while the average mouse does not. 14.1% of mice use silent primary switches.
  • Usable while charging
    Use while charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This mouse can be used while charging, while the average mouse cannot. 47.5% of mice can be used while charging.
  • Rechargeable battery
    Rechargeable battery
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This mouse uses a rechargeable battery, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
  • Detachable cable
    Detachable cable
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This mouse comes with a detachable cable, while the average mouse does not. 43% of mice come with a detachable cable.
  • 12.7 mm lower mouse height
    Height
    27 mm
    ★ Better than 98% of models
    Market range: <36 mm – >43 mm
    This mouse is 27 mm tall, while the average mouse is 39.7 mm tall.
    27 mm vs 39.7 mm
  • 9 mm narrower mouse width
    Width
    57 mm
    ★ Better than 96% of models
    Market range: <60 mm – >78 mm
    This mouse is 57 mm wide, while the average mouse is 66 mm wide.
    57 mm vs 66 mm
  • Bluetooth support
    Bluetooth support
    yes
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    This mouse supports Bluetooth, while the average mouse does not. 35.5% of mice support Bluetooth.
  • Receiver storage inside mouse
    Receiver storage in mouse
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This mouse has receiver storage inside the mouse, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice have receiver storage inside the mouse.
  • 75% cheaper
    Trust Puck is cheaper than the average mouse (£20 vs £35).
    £20 vs £35
  • Bluetooth support
    Bluetooth support
    yes
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    This mouse supports Bluetooth, while the average mouse does not. 35.5% of mice support Bluetooth.
  • Receiver storage inside mouse
    Receiver storage in mouse
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This mouse has receiver storage inside the mouse, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice have receiver storage inside the mouse.
  • Usable while charging
    Use while charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This mouse can be used while charging, while the average mouse cannot. 47.5% of mice can be used while charging.
  • Rechargeable battery
    Rechargeable battery
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This mouse uses a rechargeable battery, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
  • Silent primary switches
    Silent primary switches
    yes
    â–² Better than 86% of models
    This mouse uses silent primary switches, while the average mouse does not. 14.1% of mice use silent primary switches.
  • Detachable cable
    Detachable cable
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This mouse comes with a detachable cable, while the average mouse does not. 43% of mice come with a detachable cable.
  • 12.7 mm lower mouse height
    Height
    27 mm
    ★ Better than 98% of models
    Market range: <36 mm – >43 mm
    This mouse is 27 mm tall, while the average mouse is 39.7 mm tall.
    27 mm vs 39.7 mm
  • 9 mm narrower mouse width
    Width
    57 mm
    ★ Better than 96% of models
    Market range: <60 mm – >78 mm
    This mouse is 57 mm wide, while the average mouse is 66 mm wide.
    57 mm vs 66 mm
  • 6 fewer programmable buttons
    N. of programmable buttons
    0
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <0 – >9
    This mouse has 0 programmable buttons, while the average mouse has 6 programmable buttons.
    0 vs 6
  • 87.5% lower maximum polling rate
    Maximum polling rate
    125 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
    This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 125 Hz, while the average mouse has a maximum polling rate of 1000 Hz.
    125 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • 34.1% higher mouse weight
    Weight
    110 g
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <52 g – >125 g
    This mouse weighs 110 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    110 g vs 82 g
  • 92.5% lower tracking speed
    Maximum tracking speed
    30 IPS
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <30 IPS – >650 IPS
    This mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 30 IPS, while the average mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 400 IPS.
    30 IPS vs 400 IPS
  • No firmware upgrades
    Firmware upgradable
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    This mouse does not support firmware upgrades, while the average mouse does. 77.6% of mice support firmware upgrades.
  • 84% lower maximum DPI
    Maximum DPI
    1,600 DPI
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <1.6k DPI – >26k DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 1600 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10000 DPI.
    1,600 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • 1 fewer onboard profiles
    Onboard memory profiles
    0
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <0 – >5
    This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, while the average mouse supports 1 onboard memory profiles.
    0 vs 1
  • 87.5% lower 2.4 GHz polling rate
    2.4 GHz polling rate
    125 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
    This mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 125 Hz, while the average mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 1000 Hz.
    125 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • 10% worse value for money
    Trust Puck has worse value for money than the average mouse (6.65 vs 7.3).
    6.65 vs 7.31
  • 87.5% lower maximum polling rate
    Maximum polling rate
    125 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
    This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 125 Hz, while the average mouse has a maximum polling rate of 1000 Hz.
    125 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • 92.5% lower tracking speed
    Maximum tracking speed
    30 IPS
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <30 IPS – >650 IPS
    This mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 30 IPS, while the average mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 400 IPS.
    30 IPS vs 400 IPS
  • 84% lower maximum DPI
    Maximum DPI
    1,600 DPI
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <1.6k DPI – >26k DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 1600 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10000 DPI.
    1,600 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • 87.5% lower 2.4 GHz polling rate
    2.4 GHz polling rate
    125 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
    This mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 125 Hz, while the average mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 1000 Hz.
    125 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • 600 DPI higher minimum setting
    Minimum DPI
    800 DPI
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <50 DPI – >1k DPI
    This mouse has a minimum DPI of 800 DPI, while the average mouse has a minimum DPI of 200 DPI.
    800 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • 75% lower maximum acceleration
    Maximum acceleration
    10 G
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <10 G – >50 G
    This mouse has a maximum acceleration of 10 G, while the average mouse has a maximum acceleration of 40 G.
    10 G vs 40 G
  • No angle snapping support
    Angle snapping
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This mouse does not support angle snapping, while the average mouse does. 54.4% of mice support angle snapping.
  • 305 DPI coarser step size
    DPI step size
    400 DPI
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
    Market range: <50 DPI – >400 DPI
    This mouse has a DPI step size of 400 DPI, while the average mouse has a DPI step size of 95 DPI.
    400 DPI vs 95 DPI
  • 2 fewer stored DPI steps
    DPI steps stored
    3
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <3 – >6
    This mouse stores 3 DPI steps, while the average mouse stores 5 DPI steps.
    3 vs 5
  • 1 hours longer full charge time
    Full charge time
    3 hours
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <1.5 hours – >4 hours
    This mouse reaches a full charge in 3 hours, while the average mouse reaches a full charge in 2 hours.
    3 hours vs 2 hours
  • 6 fewer programmable buttons
    N. of programmable buttons
    0
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <0 – >9
    This mouse has 0 programmable buttons, while the average mouse has 6 programmable buttons.
    0 vs 6
  • 2 fewer side buttons
    N. of side buttons
    0
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <0 – >3
    This mouse has 0 side buttons, while the average mouse has 2 side buttons.
    0 vs 2
  • 2 fewer buttons
    N. of buttons
    4
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <4 – >9
    This mouse has 4 buttons, while the average mouse has 6 buttons.
    4 vs 6
  • 34.1% higher mouse weight
    Weight
    110 g
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <52 g – >125 g
    This mouse weighs 110 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    110 g vs 82 g
  • No RGB lighting
    RGB lighting
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This mouse does not have RGB lighting, while the average mouse does. 56.3% of mice have RGB lighting.
  • 1 m shorter cable
    Cable length
    0.8 m
    â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
    Market range: <1.5 m – >2 m
    This mouse has a cable length of 0.8 m, while the average mouse has a cable length of 1.8 m.
    0.8 m vs 1.8 m
  • No firmware upgrades
    Firmware upgradable
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    This mouse does not support firmware upgrades, while the average mouse does. 77.6% of mice support firmware upgrades.
  • 1 fewer onboard profiles
    Onboard memory profiles
    0
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <0 – >5
    This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, while the average mouse supports 1 onboard memory profiles.
    0 vs 1
  • Not suitable for gaming
    Suitable for gaming
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    This mouse is not suitable for gaming, while the average mouse is. 76.1% of mice are suitable for gaming.

Graphic comparison of Trust Puck and other products in the Mice category

No results found

Third-party reviews

Based on 1,308 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: May 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What customers like about Trust Puck?

  • Ultra-thin and compact design (27mm height) makes it highly portable for travel bags
  • Silent buttons significantly reduce clicking noise, ideal for shared workspaces
  • Dual connectivity options with both Bluetooth and a storable 2.4 GHz USB micro-receiver
  • Eco-friendly rechargeable battery that can be used while charging
  • Ambidextrous symmetrical design suitable for both right and left-handed users
  • Good value for money compared to higher-priced competitors with similar specs

What customers dislike about Trust Puck?

  • Build quality concerns, with some users reporting fragile components like the scroll wheel breaking
  • Occasional connectivity issues, including frequent Bluetooth disconnections or 'jerky' movement on iPads
  • Optical sensor may require a mouse pad for accurate tracking on certain surfaces
  • Extremely flat profile may not be ergonomic or comfortable for users with larger hands during long use
  • Some users reported the device becoming less effective or unresponsive over a few years

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Compare Trust Puck with other products in the Mice category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)