OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS

Trust Ozaa Compact Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price:~£35Connectivity:wirelessMaximum polling rate:125 HzMaximum DPI:3200 DPIWeight:68 g

Trust Ozaa Compact Review: Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Mice category and whether it is worth buying.

5.8

Overall score

Score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the mouse's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best mice on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
Score components

80%

5.3

Technical Score

20%

7.7

User score

â–¼Worse than 60% of mice
5.3

Technical Score

Technical score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Score components

36%

3.3

Performance & Sensor

22%

5.7

Controls

16%

8.3

Design

14%

2.8

Features

7%

9.9

Connectivity

5%

8.6

Battery & Charging

â–¼Worse than 61% of mice
7.7

User score

User score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

4.7

Number of reviews

Based on 54 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 72% of mice
  • trust-ozaa-compact
  • trust-ozaa-compact
  • trust-ozaa-compact
  • trust-ozaa-compact
  • trust-ozaa-compact
  • trust-ozaa-compact
  • trust-ozaa-compact
  • trust-ozaa-compact
  • trust-ozaa-compact
  • trust-ozaa-compact
  • trust-ozaa-compact
  • trust-ozaa-compact
  • trust-ozaa-compact
trust-ozaa-compact
trust-ozaa-compact
trust-ozaa-compact
trust-ozaa-compact
trust-ozaa-compact
trust-ozaa-compact
trust-ozaa-compact
trust-ozaa-compact
trust-ozaa-compact
trust-ozaa-compact
trust-ozaa-compact
trust-ozaa-compact
trust-ozaa-compact

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Verdict

The Trust Ozaa Compact is a right-handed productivity mouse weighing approximately 68g-69g and featuring an adjustable optical sensor with a maximum sensitivity of 3200 DPI (800-3200). Its primary characteristics include a multi-device wireless connection that supports up to three devices simultaneously via a 2.4GHz USB receiver and two Bluetooth channels, as well as a sustainable build made of 60% recycled plastics. Main pros include its silent buttons for quiet operation, a built-in rechargeable battery providing up to one month of use per charge, and the ability to continue working while recharging. Potential cons include a relatively low polling rate of 125Hz, which may cause noticeable delay for high-performance gaming, and lack of features like a tilting scroll wheel or gesture support.

Technical Specifications of mouse Trust Ozaa Compact

Technical Score
Technical score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Score components:

36%

3.3

Performance & Sensor

22%

5.7

Controls

16%

8.3

Design

14%

2.8

Features

7%

9.9

Connectivity

5%

8.6

Battery & Charging

5.3
Trust Ozaa Compact has a technical score of 5.3 points, which is lower than that of 60.7% of products in this category.
User score
User score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

4.7

Number of reviews

Based on 54 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.7
Trust Ozaa Compact has a user score of 7.71 points, which is lower than that of 71.6% of products in this category.
Popularity
Popularity
4.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you prefer a mouse that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
Popularity:
Trust Ozaa Compact has a popularity score of 4.7 points, which is lower than that of 66.8% of products in this category.
4.7
Trust Ozaa Compact has a popularity score of 4.7 points, which is lower than that of 66.8% of products in this category.
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the mouse's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a mouse that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
Score components:

60%

5.8

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.0
Trust Ozaa Compact has a value-for-money score of 7 points, which is lower than that of 59.3% of products in this category.
Brand name
Trust
Maximum polling rate
125 Hz
Maximum polling rate
125 Hz
â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 125 Hz, which is lower than 75.8% of mice and equal to 23.9% of mice.
Wired polling rate
125 Hz
Wired polling rate
125 Hz
â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
Market range: <125 Hz – >1k Hz
This mouse has a wired polling rate of 125 Hz, which is lower than 89.2% of mice and equal to 10.8% of mice.
2.4 GHz polling rate
125 Hz
2.4 GHz polling rate
125 Hz
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 125 Hz, which is lower than 71.1% of mice and equal to 28.8% of mice.
Bluetooth polling rate
125 Hz
Bluetooth polling rate
125 Hz
â–² Better than 68% of models
Market range: <0 Hz – >125 Hz
This mouse has a Bluetooth polling rate of 125 Hz, which is higher than 67.8% of mice and equal to 30.7% of mice.
Show more
Connectivity
wireless
Connectivity
wireless
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
This mouse supports wireless connectivity, which is more versatile than 35% of mice and equal to 21.7% of mice.
connection modes: Bluetooth / 2.4 GHz.
Bluetooth support
yes
Bluetooth support
yes
â–² Better than 65% of models
This mouse supports Bluetooth. 64.5% of mice support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
5
Bluetooth version
5
â–² Better than 74% of models
This mouse uses Bluetooth 5, which is newer than 73.9% of mice and equal to 12.3% of mice.
Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
yes
Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
yes
â–² Better than 39% of models
This mouse supports proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless. 38.8% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
Receiver included
yes
Receiver included
yes
â–² Better than 38% of models
This mouse includes a receiver. 37.8% of mice include a receiver.
Show more
Battery life
?
Battery capacity
?
Battery form factor
integrated
Rechargeable battery
yes
Rechargeable battery
yes
â–² Better than 54% of models
This mouse uses a rechargeable battery. 54.2% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
Removable battery
no
Removable battery
no
â–¼ Worse than 22% of models
This mouse does not use a removable battery. 22.3% of mice use a removable battery.
Show more
N. of buttons
6
N. of buttons
6
â–¼ Worse than 37% of models
Market range: <4 – >9
This mouse has 6 buttons, which is more than 23.2% of mice and equal to 40% of mice.
N. of side buttons
2
N. of side buttons
2
â–¼ Worse than 16% of models
Market range: <0 – >3
This mouse has 2 side buttons, which is more than 15% of mice and equal to 68.6% of mice.
N. of programmable buttons
0
N. of programmable buttons
0
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
Market range: <0 – >9
This mouse has 0 programmable buttons, which is less than 83.4% of mice and equal to 16.7% of mice.
DPI switching button
yes
DPI switching button
yes
â–² Better than 15% of models
This mouse includes a DPI switching button. 14.7% of mice include a DPI switching button.
Profile switching button
no
Profile switching button
no
â–¼ Worse than 16% of models
This mouse does not include a profile switching button. 16% of mice include a profile switching button.
Show more
Orientation
right-handed
Weight
68 g
Weight
68 g
â–² Better than 67% of models
Market range: <52 g – >125 g
This mouse weighs 68 g, which makes it lighter than 66.6% of mice and equal to 0.8% of mice.
Extra weights
0 g
Extra weights
0 g
â–¼ Worse than 5% of models
Market range: <0 g – >25 g
This mouse comes with 0 g extra weights, which is less than 4.6% of mice and equal to 95.4% of mice.
Cable length
1 m
Cable length
1 m
â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
Market range: <1.5 m – >2 m
This mouse has a cable length of 1 m, which is less than 96.7% of mice and equal to 2.1% of mice.
Cable type
?
Show more
Onboard memory profiles
0
Onboard memory profiles
0
â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, which is less than 52.2% of mice and equal to 47.8% of mice.
Onboard memory size
0 KB
Onboard memory size
0 KB
â–¼ Worse than 13% of models
Market range: <0 KB – >128 KB
This mouse has an onboard memory size of 0 KB, which is smaller than 12.6% of mice and equal to 87.4% of mice.
no onboard memory.
Software name
N/A
Firmware upgradable
?
Suitable for gaming
no
Suitable for gaming
no
â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
This mouse is not suitable for gaming. 76.2% of mice are suitable for gaming.

Trust Ozaa Compact vs the average mouse

246810TotalPerformance & SensorConnectivityBattery & ChargingControlsDesignFeatures
  • Silent primary switches
    Silent primary switches
    yes
    â–² Better than 86% of models
    This mouse uses silent primary switches, while the average mouse does not. 14.1% of mice use silent primary switches.
  • 17.1% lower mouse weight
    Weight
    68 g
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    Market range: <52 g – >125 g
    This mouse weighs 68 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    68 g vs 82 g
  • Usable while charging
    Use while charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This mouse can be used while charging, while the average mouse cannot. 47.5% of mice can be used while charging.
  • 2 more paired devices
    Multi-device pair count
    3
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <1 – >3
    This mouse pairs with 3 devices, while the average mouse pairs with 1 devices.
    3 vs 1
  • Multi-device pairing
    Multi-device pairing
    yes
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    This mouse supports multi-device pairing, while the average mouse does not. 20.3% of mice support multi-device pairing.
  • Rechargeable battery
    Rechargeable battery
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This mouse uses a rechargeable battery, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
  • Detachable cable
    Detachable cable
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This mouse comes with a detachable cable, while the average mouse does not. 43% of mice come with a detachable cable.
  • Bluetooth support
    Bluetooth support
    yes
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    This mouse supports Bluetooth, while the average mouse does not. 35.5% of mice support Bluetooth.
  • 2 more paired devices
    Multi-device pair count
    3
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <1 – >3
    This mouse pairs with 3 devices, while the average mouse pairs with 1 devices.
    3 vs 1
  • Multi-device pairing
    Multi-device pairing
    yes
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    This mouse supports multi-device pairing, while the average mouse does not. 20.3% of mice support multi-device pairing.
  • Bluetooth support
    Bluetooth support
    yes
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    This mouse supports Bluetooth, while the average mouse does not. 35.5% of mice support Bluetooth.
  • Receiver storage inside mouse
    Receiver storage in mouse
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This mouse has receiver storage inside the mouse, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice have receiver storage inside the mouse.
  • Usable while charging
    Use while charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This mouse can be used while charging, while the average mouse cannot. 47.5% of mice can be used while charging.
  • Rechargeable battery
    Rechargeable battery
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This mouse uses a rechargeable battery, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
  • Silent primary switches
    Silent primary switches
    yes
    â–² Better than 86% of models
    This mouse uses silent primary switches, while the average mouse does not. 14.1% of mice use silent primary switches.
  • 17.1% lower mouse weight
    Weight
    68 g
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    Market range: <52 g – >125 g
    This mouse weighs 68 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    68 g vs 82 g
  • Detachable cable
    Detachable cable
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This mouse comes with a detachable cable, while the average mouse does not. 43% of mice come with a detachable cable.
  • 3 newer release date
    Release date
    2024
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This mouse was released in 2024, while the average mouse was released in 2021.
    2024 vs 2021
  • 6 fewer programmable buttons
    N. of programmable buttons
    0
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <0 – >9
    This mouse has 0 programmable buttons, while the average mouse has 6 programmable buttons.
    0 vs 6
  • 87.5% lower maximum polling rate
    Maximum polling rate
    125 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
    This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 125 Hz, while the average mouse has a maximum polling rate of 1000 Hz.
    125 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • 90% lower tracking speed
    Maximum tracking speed
    40 IPS
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <30 IPS – >650 IPS
    This mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 40 IPS, while the average mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 400 IPS.
    40 IPS vs 400 IPS
  • 87.5% lower wired polling rate
    Wired polling rate
    125 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <125 Hz – >1k Hz
    This mouse has a wired polling rate of 125 Hz, while the average mouse has a wired polling rate of 1000 Hz.
    125 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • 1 fewer onboard profiles
    Onboard memory profiles
    0
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <0 – >5
    This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, while the average mouse supports 1 onboard memory profiles.
    0 vs 1
  • 68% lower maximum DPI
    Maximum DPI
    3,200 DPI
    â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
    Market range: <1.6k DPI – >26k DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 3200 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10000 DPI.
    3,200 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • 87.5% lower 2.4 GHz polling rate
    2.4 GHz polling rate
    125 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
    This mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 125 Hz, while the average mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 1000 Hz.
    125 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • Not suitable for gaming
    Suitable for gaming
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    This mouse is not suitable for gaming, while the average mouse is. 76.1% of mice are suitable for gaming.
  • 35.8% less popular
    Trust Ozaa Compact is less popular than the average mouse (4.7 vs 6.4).
    4.7 vs 6.38
  • 3.8% lower user score
    User score
    7.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Trust Ozaa Compact
    the average mouse
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    Trust Ozaa Compact has a lower user score than the average mouse (7.71 vs 8.000).
    7.71 vs 8
  • 87.5% lower maximum polling rate
    Maximum polling rate
    125 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
    This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 125 Hz, while the average mouse has a maximum polling rate of 1000 Hz.
    125 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • 90% lower tracking speed
    Maximum tracking speed
    40 IPS
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <30 IPS – >650 IPS
    This mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 40 IPS, while the average mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 400 IPS.
    40 IPS vs 400 IPS
  • 87.5% lower wired polling rate
    Wired polling rate
    125 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <125 Hz – >1k Hz
    This mouse has a wired polling rate of 125 Hz, while the average mouse has a wired polling rate of 1000 Hz.
    125 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • 68% lower maximum DPI
    Maximum DPI
    3,200 DPI
    â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
    Market range: <1.6k DPI – >26k DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 3200 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10000 DPI.
    3,200 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • 87.5% lower 2.4 GHz polling rate
    2.4 GHz polling rate
    125 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
    This mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 125 Hz, while the average mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 1000 Hz.
    125 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • 600 DPI higher minimum setting
    Minimum DPI
    800 DPI
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <50 DPI – >1k DPI
    This mouse has a minimum DPI of 800 DPI, while the average mouse has a minimum DPI of 200 DPI.
    800 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • 75% lower maximum acceleration
    Maximum acceleration
    10 G
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <10 G – >50 G
    This mouse has a maximum acceleration of 10 G, while the average mouse has a maximum acceleration of 40 G.
    10 G vs 40 G
  • 2 fewer stored DPI steps
    DPI steps stored
    3
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <3 – >6
    This mouse stores 3 DPI steps, while the average mouse stores 5 DPI steps.
    3 vs 5
  • 6 fewer programmable buttons
    N. of programmable buttons
    0
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <0 – >9
    This mouse has 0 programmable buttons, while the average mouse has 6 programmable buttons.
    0 vs 6
  • No RGB lighting
    RGB lighting
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This mouse does not have RGB lighting, while the average mouse does. 56.3% of mice have RGB lighting.
  • 0.8 m shorter cable
    Cable length
    1 m
    â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
    Market range: <1.5 m – >2 m
    This mouse has a cable length of 1 m, while the average mouse has a cable length of 1.8 m.
    1 m vs 1.8 m
  • 1 fewer onboard profiles
    Onboard memory profiles
    0
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <0 – >5
    This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, while the average mouse supports 1 onboard memory profiles.
    0 vs 1
  • Not suitable for gaming
    Suitable for gaming
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    This mouse is not suitable for gaming, while the average mouse is. 76.1% of mice are suitable for gaming.

Graphic comparison of Trust Ozaa Compact and other products in the Mice category

No results found

Third-party reviews

Based on 54 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: May 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What customers like about Trust Ozaa Compact?

  • Silent click buttons are ideal for shared workspaces
  • Versatile multi-device connectivity (2.4GHz + 2x Bluetooth) for up to 3 devices
  • Impressive battery life for a compact mouse, lasting weeks to months on a single charge
  • Eco-friendly construction using 60% recycled plastics
  • Compact and ergonomic design that fits comfortably in the hand
  • Can be used while charging via the included cable
  • On-the-fly DPI switching for adjustable cursor speed

What customers dislike about Trust Ozaa Compact?

  • Some users find the scroll wheel feels stiff or can become squeaky over time
  • Occasional reports of inconsistent tracking or 'sketchy' movement
  • Build quality can feel 'cheap' to some users compared to premium competitors
  • Reports of long-term durability issues with left-click responsiveness
  • The dongle range is noted as being somewhat short in certain environments
  • Software support for specific features like the side scroll wheel is limited

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Compare Trust Ozaa Compact with other products in the Mice category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)