OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Mice Methodology v1.0
Mice Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Mice Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Mice Methodology v1.0

Qpad Mark Model 5 Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price:~£110Connectivity:wireless+wiredMaximum polling rate:4000 HzMaximum DPI:26000 DPIWeight:52 g

Qpad Mark Model 5 Review: Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Mice category and whether it is worth buying.

9.1/10

Overall score

Score
9.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the mouse's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best mice on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 99% of models
Score components

80%

9.1

Technical score

20%

?

User score

★Better than 99% of mice
9.4

Value for money

Value for money
9.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the mouse's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a mouse that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 99% of models
Score components

70%

9.1

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

★Better than 99%
9.1

Technical score

Technical score
9.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 99% of models
Score components

36%

9.9

Performance & Sensor

22%

7.7

Controls

16%

9.4

Design

14%

9.7

Features

7%

9.8

Connectivity

5%

6.4

Battery & Charging

★Better than 99%
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £110
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of mouse Qpad Mark Model 5

Technical score
Technical score
9.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 99% of models
Score components:

36%

9.9

Performance & Sensor

22%

7.7

Controls

16%

9.4

Design

14%

9.7

Features

7%

9.8

Connectivity

5%

6.4

Battery & Charging

9.1
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you prefer a mouse that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
Qpad Mark Model 5 has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than that of 83.8% of products in this category.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
9.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the mouse's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a mouse that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 100% of models
Score components:

70%

9.1

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

9.4
Brand name
Qpad
Maximum polling rate
4,000 Hz
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 4,000 Hz, which is higher than 85.2% of mice and equal to 3% of mice.
Wired polling rate
1,000 Hz
Market range: <125 Hz – >1k Hz
This mouse has a wired polling rate of 1,000 Hz, which is higher than 13.2% of mice and equal to 77.4% of mice.
2.4 GHz polling rate
4,000 Hz
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 4,000 Hz, which is higher than 81.7% of mice and equal to 7.4% of mice.
Bluetooth polling rate
125 Hz
Market range: <0 Hz – >125 Hz
This mouse has a Bluetooth polling rate of 125 Hz, which is higher than 67.8% of mice and equal to 30.7% of mice.
Show more
Connectivity
wireless+wired
This mouse supports wireless+wired connectivity, which is more versatile than 56.8% of mice and equal to 43.3% of mice.
connection modes: wired / Bluetooth / 2.4 GHz.
Bluetooth support
yes
This mouse supports Bluetooth. 64.5% of mice support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
5.1
This mouse uses Bluetooth 5.1, which is newer than 86.3% of mice and equal to 6.1% of mice.
Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
yes
This mouse supports proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless. 38.8% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
Receiver included
yes
This mouse includes a receiver. 37.8% of mice include a receiver.
Show more
Battery life
88 hours
Market range: <50 hours – >500 hours
This mouse lasts 88 hours on a charge, which is longer than 50.3% of mice and equal to 0.3% of mice.
Battery capacity
?
Battery form factor
integrated
Rechargeable battery
yes
This mouse uses a rechargeable battery. 54.2% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
Removable battery
no
This mouse does not use a removable battery. 22.3% of mice use a removable battery.
Show more
N. of buttons
6
Market range: <4 – >9
This mouse has 6 buttons, which is more than 23.2% of mice and equal to 40% of mice.
N. of side buttons
2
Market range: <0 – >3
This mouse has 2 side buttons, which is more than 15% of mice and equal to 68.6% of mice.
N. of programmable buttons
5
Market range: <0 – >9
This mouse has 5 programmable buttons, which is less than 64.5% of mice and equal to 13.4% of mice.
DPI switching button
yes
This mouse includes a DPI switching button. 14.7% of mice include a DPI switching button.
Profile switching button
no
This mouse does not include a profile switching button. 16% of mice include a profile switching button.
Show more
Orientation
right-handed
Weight
52 g
Market range: <52 g – >125 g
This mouse weighs 52 g, which makes it lighter than 89.8% of mice and equal to 0.9% of mice.
Extra weights
0 g
Market range: <0 g – >25 g
This mouse comes with 0 g extra weights, which is less than 4.6% of mice and equal to 95.4% of mice.
Cable length
1.8 m
Market range: <1.5 m – >2 m
This mouse comes with a 1.8 m cable, which is longer than 18.4% of mice and equal to 65.2% of mice.
Cable type
fabric
Show more
Onboard memory profiles
5
Market range: <0 – >5
This mouse stores 5 onboard profiles, which is more than 81.4% of mice and equal to 18.2% of mice.
Onboard memory size
?
Software name
?
Firmware upgradable
yes
This mouse supports firmware updates. 22.5% of mice support firmware updates.
Suitable for gaming
yes
This mouse is suitable for gaming. 23.9% of mice are suitable for gaming.

Qpad Mark Model 5 vs the average mouse

246810TotalPerformance & SensorConnectivityBattery & ChargingControlsDesignFeatures
  • 4x higher maximum polling rate
    This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 4,000 Hz, while the average mouse has a maximum polling rate of 1,000 Hz.
    4,000 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • 50 million clicks longer switch lifespan
    This mouse offers switch durability of 80 million clicks, while the average mouse offers switch durability of 30 million clicks.
    80 million clicks vs 30 million clicks
  • 4 more onboard profiles
    This mouse stores 5 onboard profiles, while the average mouse stores 1 onboard profiles.
    5 vs 1
  • 36.6% lower mouse weight
    This mouse weighs 52 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    52 g vs 82 g
  • 2.6x higher maximum DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 26,000 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10,000 DPI.
    26,000 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • 4x higher 2.4 GHz polling rate
    This mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 4,000 Hz, while the average mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 1,000 Hz.
    4,000 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • Adjustable lift-off distance
    This mouse supports adjustable lift-off distance, while the average mouse does not. 46.5% of mice support adjustable lift-off distance.
  • 62.5% higher tracking speed
    This mouse offers a maximum tracking speed of 650 IPS, while the average mouse offers a maximum tracking speed of 400 IPS.
    650 IPS vs 400 IPS
  • 28.2% better value for money
    Qpad Mark Model 5 has better value for money than the average mouse (9.37 vs 7.3).
    9.37 vs 7.31
  • 4x higher maximum polling rate
    This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 4,000 Hz, while the average mouse has a maximum polling rate of 1,000 Hz.
    4,000 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • 2.6x higher maximum DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 26,000 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10,000 DPI.
    26,000 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • 4x higher 2.4 GHz polling rate
    This mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 4,000 Hz, while the average mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 1,000 Hz.
    4,000 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • Adjustable lift-off distance
    This mouse supports adjustable lift-off distance, while the average mouse does not. 46.5% of mice support adjustable lift-off distance.
  • 62.5% higher tracking speed
    This mouse offers a maximum tracking speed of 650 IPS, while the average mouse offers a maximum tracking speed of 400 IPS.
    650 IPS vs 400 IPS
  • 25% higher maximum acceleration
    This mouse has a maximum acceleration of 50 G, while the average mouse has a maximum acceleration of 40 G.
    50 G vs 40 G
  • 85 DPI finer step size
    This mouse adjusts DPI in 10 DPI steps, while the average mouse adjusts DPI in 95 DPI steps.
    10 DPI vs 95 DPI
  • Versatile connectivity
    This mouse supports wireless+wired connectivity, while the average mouse supports wireless connectivity.
    connection modes: wired / Bluetooth / 2.4 GHz.
    wireless+wired vs wireless
  • Bluetooth support
    This mouse supports Bluetooth, while the average mouse does not. 35.5% of mice support Bluetooth.
  • Receiver storage inside mouse
    This mouse has receiver storage inside the mouse, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice have receiver storage inside the mouse.
  • Usable while charging
    This mouse can be used while charging, while the average mouse cannot. 47.5% of mice can be used while charging.
  • Rechargeable battery
    This mouse uses a rechargeable battery, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
  • 50 million clicks longer switch lifespan
    This mouse offers switch durability of 80 million clicks, while the average mouse offers switch durability of 30 million clicks.
    80 million clicks vs 30 million clicks
  • Adjustable debounce time
    This mouse supports adjustable debounce time, while the average mouse does not. 28.2% of mice support adjustable debounce time.
  • 36.6% lower mouse weight
    This mouse weighs 52 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    52 g vs 82 g
  • Detachable cable
    This mouse comes with a detachable cable, while the average mouse does not. 43% of mice come with a detachable cable.
  • 4 newer release date
    This mouse was released in 2025, while the average mouse was released in 2021.
    November 2025
    2025 vs 2021
  • 4 more onboard profiles
    This mouse stores 5 onboard profiles, while the average mouse stores 1 onboard profiles.
    5 vs 1
  • 1 fewer programmable buttons
    This mouse has 5 programmable buttons, while the average mouse has 6 programmable buttons.
    5 vs 6
  • 3.14x more expensive
    Qpad Mark Model 5 is more expensive than the average mouse (£110 vs £35).
    £110 vs £35
  • 6.38x less popular
    Qpad Mark Model 5 is less popular than the average mouse (1 vs 6.4).
    1 vs 6.38
  • 200 DPI higher minimum setting
    This mouse has a minimum DPI of 400 DPI, while the average mouse has a minimum DPI of 200 DPI.
    400 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • 3.14x more expensive
    Qpad Mark Model 5 is more expensive than the average mouse (£110 vs £35).
    £110 vs £35
  • 6.38x less popular
    Qpad Mark Model 5 is less popular than the average mouse (1 vs 6.4).
    1 vs 6.38
  • 200 DPI higher minimum setting
    This mouse has a minimum DPI of 400 DPI, while the average mouse has a minimum DPI of 200 DPI.
    400 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • 1 fewer programmable buttons
    This mouse has 5 programmable buttons, while the average mouse has 6 programmable buttons.
    5 vs 6

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Qpad Mark Model 5

  • High-end performance specs including 26,000 DPI and a 4K polling rate
  • Incredibly lightweight at approximately 52-55g, reducing fatigue during long sessions
  • Versatile tri-mode connectivity (2.4 GHz wireless, Bluetooth, and USB-C wired)
  • Vision Dongle features a helpful LED screen to monitor DPI, battery, and polling rate mid-game
  • Comfortable ergonomic shape with included grip tape and speed skates for customisation
  • Strong battery life lasting up to 88-100 hours depending on connection and polling settings

What customers don't like about Qpad Mark Model 5

  • DPI switch is located on the bottom of the mouse, making it difficult to swap on the fly
  • Design is considered fairly basic or lacking 'visual personality' for its premium price point
  • Higher price point compared to some competitors with similar features
  • Lacks a dedicated physical button for switching between saved profiles
  • Limited number of programmable buttons may not satisfy hardcore gamers needing complex macros

Verdict

The QPAD Mark Model 5 is an ultra-lightweight 52g wireless gaming mouse featuring the high-end PixArt PAW3395 optical sensor with a sensitivity of up to 26,000 DPI. It offers tri-mode connectivity (2.4 GHz wireless, Bluetooth 5.1, and USB-C wired), a competitive 4,000 Hz polling rate for 0.25 ms latency, and up to 88 hours of battery life. Key characteristics include an ergonomic right-handed design and a unique 'Vision Dongle' that displays real-time DPI and battery status. Main pros are its exceptional weight-to-performance ratio, smooth 650 IPS tracking speed, and included accessories like grip tape and speed skates. Notable cons include a DPI switch inconveniently located on the bottom of the mouse and a relatively simple design with only two main programmable side buttons that may feel basic given its premium price point.

Compare Qpad Mark Model 5 with other products in the Mice category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Qpad Mark Model 5 and other products in the Mice category

No results found