OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS

Mars Gaming Mmw Ergopro Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price:~£25Connectivity:wirelessMaximum polling rate:1000 HzMaximum DPI:3200 DPIWeight:100 g

Mars Gaming Mmw Ergopro Review: Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Mice category and whether it is worth buying.

6.2

Overall score

Score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the mouse's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best mice on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 51% of models
Score components

80%

6.0

Technical Score

20%

7.2

User score

â–²Better than 51% of mice
6.0

Technical Score

Technical score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 55% of models
Score components

36%

5.2

Performance & Sensor

22%

7.2

Controls

16%

6.4

Design

14%

3.7

Features

7%

9.6

Connectivity

5%

6.0

Battery & Charging

â–²Better than 55% of mice
7.2

User score

User score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
Score components

70%

7.5

User ratings

30%

6.5

Number of reviews

Based on 374 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 86% of mice
  • mars-gaming-mmw-ergopro
  • mars-gaming-mmw-ergopro
  • mars-gaming-mmw-ergopro
  • mars-gaming-mmw-ergopro
  • mars-gaming-mmw-ergopro
  • mars-gaming-mmw-ergopro
mars-gaming-mmw-ergopro
mars-gaming-mmw-ergopro
mars-gaming-mmw-ergopro
mars-gaming-mmw-ergopro
mars-gaming-mmw-ergopro
mars-gaming-mmw-ergopro

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Verdict

The Mars Gaming MMW-ERGOPRO is a wireless vertical mouse featuring a 60° natural tilt angle and a 'Folded Pro-Grip' design specifically for right-handed users to reduce wrist strain. It is equipped with an optical sensor providing adjustable sensitivity levels of 1200, 2400, and 3200 DPI, along with durable HUANO mechanical switches and a 1000Hz polling rate for responsive performance. Key advantages include its stable 2.4GHz wireless connectivity, multi-platform compatibility (PC, Mac, and consoles like PS5 or Xbox Series X/S), and long-lasting autonomy powered by a single AA battery. However, notable drawbacks include its lack of a rechargeable battery, the absence of RGB lighting for those seeking a gaming aesthetic, and a relatively high weight of 100g (without the battery) compared to non-ergonomic gaming alternatives.

Technical Specifications of mouse Mars Gaming Mmw Ergopro

Technical Score
Technical score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 55% of models
Score components:

36%

5.2

Performance & Sensor

22%

7.2

Controls

16%

6.4

Design

14%

3.7

Features

7%

9.6

Connectivity

5%

6.0

Battery & Charging

6.0
Mars Gaming Mmw Ergopro has a technical score of 6 points, which is higher than that of 55% of products in this category.
User score
User score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
Score components

70%

7.5

User ratings

30%

6.5

Number of reviews

Based on 374 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.2
Mars Gaming Mmw Ergopro has a user score of 7.21 points, which is lower than that of 86.1% of products in this category.
Popularity
Popularity
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you prefer a mouse that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 51% of models
Popularity:
Mars Gaming Mmw Ergopro has a popularity score of 6.5 points, which is higher than that of 50.9% of products in this category.
6.5
Mars Gaming Mmw Ergopro has a popularity score of 6.5 points, which is higher than that of 50.9% of products in this category.
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the mouse's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a mouse that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
Score components:

60%

6.2

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.3
Mars Gaming Mmw Ergopro has a value-for-money score of 7.3 points, which is higher than that of 48% of products in this category.
Brand name
Mars
Maximum polling rate
1,000 Hz
Maximum polling rate
1,000 Hz
â–² Better than 28% of models
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 1,000 Hz, which is higher than 27.8% of mice and equal to 55% of mice.
Wired polling rate
N/A
2.4 GHz polling rate
1,000 Hz
2.4 GHz polling rate
1,000 Hz
â–² Better than 33% of models
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 1,000 Hz, which is higher than 33.4% of mice and equal to 46.9% of mice.
Bluetooth polling rate
0 Hz
Bluetooth polling rate
0 Hz
â–¼ Worse than 36% of models
Market range: <0 Hz – >125 Hz
This mouse has a Bluetooth polling rate of 0 Hz, which is lower than 36% of mice and equal to 64% of mice.
2.4GHz only.
Show more
Connectivity
wireless
Connectivity
wireless
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
This mouse supports wireless connectivity, which is more versatile than 35% of mice and equal to 21.7% of mice.
connection modes: 2.4 GHz.
Bluetooth support
no
Bluetooth support
no
â–¼ Worse than 36% of models
This mouse does not support Bluetooth. 35.6% of mice support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
yes
Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
yes
â–² Better than 39% of models
This mouse supports proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless. 38.8% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
Receiver included
yes
Receiver included
yes
â–² Better than 38% of models
This mouse includes a receiver. 37.8% of mice include a receiver.
Show more
Battery life
N/A
Battery capacity
N/A
Battery form factor
AA
Rechargeable battery
no
Rechargeable battery
no
â–¼ Worse than 46% of models
This mouse does not use a rechargeable battery. 46% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
â–² Better than 78% of models
This mouse uses a removable battery. 77.8% of mice use a removable battery.
Show more
N. of buttons
6
N. of buttons
6
â–¼ Worse than 37% of models
Market range: <4 – >9
This mouse has 6 buttons, which is more than 23.2% of mice and equal to 40% of mice.
N. of side buttons
2
N. of side buttons
2
â–¼ Worse than 16% of models
Market range: <0 – >3
This mouse has 2 side buttons, which is more than 15% of mice and equal to 68.6% of mice.
N. of programmable buttons
6
N. of programmable buttons
6
â–² Better than 36% of models
Market range: <0 – >9
This mouse has 6 programmable buttons, which is more than 35.6% of mice and equal to 31.2% of mice.
DPI switching button
yes
DPI switching button
yes
â–² Better than 15% of models
This mouse includes a DPI switching button. 14.7% of mice include a DPI switching button.
Profile switching button
no
Profile switching button
no
â–¼ Worse than 16% of models
This mouse does not include a profile switching button. 16% of mice include a profile switching button.
Show more
Orientation
right-handed
Weight
100 g
Weight
100 g
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
Market range: <52 g – >125 g
This mouse weighs 100 g, which is heavier than 70.5% of mice and equal to 2% of mice.
Extra weights
0 g
Extra weights
0 g
â–¼ Worse than 5% of models
Market range: <0 g – >25 g
This mouse comes with 0 g extra weights, which is less than 4.6% of mice and equal to 95.4% of mice.
Cable length
N/A
Cable type
N/A
Show more
Onboard memory profiles
0
Onboard memory profiles
0
â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, which is less than 52.2% of mice and equal to 47.8% of mice.
Onboard memory size
0 KB
Onboard memory size
0 KB
â–¼ Worse than 13% of models
Market range: <0 KB – >128 KB
This mouse has an onboard memory size of 0 KB, which is smaller than 12.6% of mice and equal to 87.4% of mice.
no onboard memory.
Software name
N/A
Firmware upgradable
?
Suitable for gaming
yes
Suitable for gaming
yes
â–² Better than 24% of models
This mouse is suitable for gaming. 23.9% of mice are suitable for gaming.

Mars Gaming Mmw Ergopro vs the average mouse

246810TotalPerformance & SensorConnectivityBattery & ChargingControlsDesignFeatures
  • Vertical design
    Vertical design
    yes
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    This mouse uses a vertical design, while the average mouse does not. 2.7% of mice use a vertical design.
  • Removable battery
    Removable battery
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This mouse uses a removable battery, while the average mouse does not. 22.3% of mice use a removable battery.
  • Detachable cable
    Detachable cable
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This mouse comes with a detachable cable, while the average mouse does not. 43% of mice come with a detachable cable.
  • Receiver storage inside mouse
    Receiver storage in mouse
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This mouse has receiver storage inside the mouse, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice have receiver storage inside the mouse.
  • Receiver storage inside mouse
    Receiver storage in mouse
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This mouse has receiver storage inside the mouse, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice have receiver storage inside the mouse.
  • Removable battery
    Removable battery
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This mouse uses a removable battery, while the average mouse does not. 22.3% of mice use a removable battery.
  • Vertical design
    Vertical design
    yes
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    This mouse uses a vertical design, while the average mouse does not. 2.7% of mice use a vertical design.
  • Detachable cable
    Detachable cable
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This mouse comes with a detachable cable, while the average mouse does not. 43% of mice come with a detachable cable.
  • 22% higher mouse weight
    Weight
    100 g
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    Market range: <52 g – >125 g
    This mouse weighs 100 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    100 g vs 82 g
  • 1 fewer onboard profiles
    Onboard memory profiles
    0
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <0 – >5
    This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, while the average mouse supports 1 onboard memory profiles.
    0 vs 1
  • 68% lower maximum DPI
    Maximum DPI
    3,200 DPI
    â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
    Market range: <1.6k DPI – >26k DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 3200 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10000 DPI.
    3,200 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • 1,000 DPI higher minimum setting
    Minimum DPI
    1,200 DPI
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    Market range: <50 DPI – >1k DPI
    This mouse has a minimum DPI of 1200 DPI, while the average mouse has a minimum DPI of 200 DPI.
    1,200 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • 75% lower maximum acceleration
    Maximum acceleration
    10 G
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <10 G – >50 G
    This mouse has a maximum acceleration of 10 G, while the average mouse has a maximum acceleration of 40 G.
    10 G vs 40 G
  • No RGB lighting
    RGB lighting
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This mouse does not have RGB lighting, while the average mouse does. 56.3% of mice have RGB lighting.
  • No battery level indicator
    Battery level indicator
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This mouse does not include a battery level indicator, while the average mouse does. 59.4% of mice include a battery level indicator.
  • 11% lower user score
    User score
    7.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Mars Gaming Mmw Ergopro
    the average mouse
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    Mars Gaming Mmw Ergopro has a lower user score than the average mouse (7.21 vs 8.000).
    7.21 vs 8
  • 11% lower user score
    User score
    7.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Mars Gaming Mmw Ergopro
    the average mouse
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    Mars Gaming Mmw Ergopro has a lower user score than the average mouse (7.21 vs 8.000).
    7.21 vs 8
  • 68% lower maximum DPI
    Maximum DPI
    3,200 DPI
    â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
    Market range: <1.6k DPI – >26k DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 3200 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10000 DPI.
    3,200 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • 1,000 DPI higher minimum setting
    Minimum DPI
    1,200 DPI
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    Market range: <50 DPI – >1k DPI
    This mouse has a minimum DPI of 1200 DPI, while the average mouse has a minimum DPI of 200 DPI.
    1,200 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • 75% lower maximum acceleration
    Maximum acceleration
    10 G
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <10 G – >50 G
    This mouse has a maximum acceleration of 10 G, while the average mouse has a maximum acceleration of 40 G.
    10 G vs 40 G
  • 2 fewer stored DPI steps
    DPI steps stored
    3
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <3 – >6
    This mouse stores 3 DPI steps, while the average mouse stores 5 DPI steps.
    3 vs 5
  • No battery level indicator
    Battery level indicator
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This mouse does not include a battery level indicator, while the average mouse does. 59.4% of mice include a battery level indicator.
  • 22% higher mouse weight
    Weight
    100 g
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    Market range: <52 g – >125 g
    This mouse weighs 100 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    100 g vs 82 g
  • No RGB lighting
    RGB lighting
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This mouse does not have RGB lighting, while the average mouse does. 56.3% of mice have RGB lighting.
  • 27.3 mm taller mouse height
    Height
    67 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
    Market range: <36 mm – >43 mm
    This mouse has a height of 67 mm, while the average mouse has a height of 39.7 mm.
    67 mm vs 39.7 mm
  • 14 mm wider mouse width
    Width
    80 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
    Market range: <60 mm – >78 mm
    This mouse has a width of 80 mm, while the average mouse has a width of 66 mm.
    80 mm vs 66 mm
  • 1 fewer onboard profiles
    Onboard memory profiles
    0
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <0 – >5
    This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, while the average mouse supports 1 onboard memory profiles.
    0 vs 1

Graphic comparison of Mars Gaming Mmw Ergopro and other products in the Mice category

No results found

Third-party reviews

Based on 374 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: May 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What customers like about Mars Gaming Mmw Ergopro?

  • Effective ergonomic vertical design that reduces wrist strain during long sessions
  • Excellent value for money and overall cost-efficiency
  • Highly silent main buttons, suitable for quiet office environments
  • Reliable 2.4GHz wireless connectivity with minimal reported lag
  • Tactile and responsive clicks thanks to the inclusion of HUANO mechanical switches

What customers dislike about Mars Gaming Mmw Ergopro?

  • Connection stability can be sensitive to physical obstacles between the mouse and USB dongle
  • Limited maximum sensitivity (3200 DPI), which may not satisfy high-performance gaming needs
  • Relies on external AA batteries rather than being internally rechargeable
  • White model is prone to showing dirt and stains in high-contact areas over time
  • The 100g weight might feel heavy compared to modern ultra-light gaming mice
  • The 1200 DPI minimum setting may be too high for users who prefer very slow cursor speeds

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Compare Mars Gaming Mmw Ergopro with other products in the Mice category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)