OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Mice Methodology v1.0
Mice Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Mice Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Mice Methodology v1.0

GIGABYTE Aivia Neon Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price:~£45Connectivity:wirelessMaximum polling rate:125 HzMaximum DPI:1200 DPIWeight:107 g

GIGABYTE Aivia Neon Review: Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Mice category and whether it is worth buying.

4.9/10

Overall score

Score
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the mouse's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best mice on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
Score components

80%

4.9

Technical score

20%

?

User score

â–¼Worse than 87% of mice
6.4

Value for money

Value for money
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the mouse's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a mouse that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
Score components

70%

4.9

Overall score

30%

10

Price

â–¼Worse than 88%
4.9

Technical score

Technical score
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
Score components

36%

2.8

Performance & Sensor

22%

7.0

Controls

16%

5.2

Design

14%

2.8

Features

7%

9.6

Connectivity

5%

8.6

Battery & Charging

â–¼Worse than 72%
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £45
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of mouse GIGABYTE Aivia Neon

Technical score
Technical score
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
Score components:

36%

2.8

Performance & Sensor

22%

7.0

Controls

16%

5.2

Design

14%

2.8

Features

7%

9.6

Connectivity

5%

8.6

Battery & Charging

4.9
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you prefer a mouse that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
GIGABYTE Aivia Neon has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than that of 83.8% of products in this category.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the mouse's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a mouse that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
Score components:

70%

4.9

Overall score

30%

10

Price

6.4
Brand name
Gigabyte
Maximum polling rate
125 Hz
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 125 Hz, which is lower than 75.8% of mice and equal to 23.9% of mice.
Wired polling rate
125 Hz
Market range: <125 Hz – >1k Hz
This mouse has a wired polling rate of 125 Hz, which is lower than 89.2% of mice and equal to 10.8% of mice.
2.4 GHz polling rate
125 Hz
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 125 Hz, which is lower than 71.1% of mice and equal to 28.8% of mice.
Bluetooth polling rate
0 Hz
Market range: <0 Hz – >125 Hz
This mouse has a Bluetooth polling rate of 0 Hz, which is lower than 36% of mice and equal to 64% of mice.
2.4GHz only.
Show more
Connectivity
wireless
This mouse supports wireless connectivity, which is more versatile than 35% of mice and equal to 21.7% of mice.
connection modes: 2.4 GHz.
Bluetooth support
no
This mouse does not support Bluetooth. 35.6% of mice support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
yes
This mouse supports proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless. 38.8% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
Receiver included
yes
This mouse includes a receiver. 37.8% of mice include a receiver.
Show more
Battery life
?
Battery capacity
?
Battery form factor
integrated
Rechargeable battery
yes
This mouse uses a rechargeable battery. 54.2% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
Removable battery
no
This mouse does not use a removable battery. 22.3% of mice use a removable battery.
Show more
N. of buttons
7
Market range: <4 – >9
This mouse has 7 buttons, which is more than 63.3% of mice and equal to 15.1% of mice.
N. of side buttons
1
Market range: <0 – >3
This mouse has 1 side buttons, which is less than 85.1% of mice and equal to 0.1% of mice.
N. of programmable buttons
7
Market range: <0 – >9
This mouse has 7 programmable buttons, which is more than 66.9% of mice and equal to 12.7% of mice.
DPI switching button
no
This mouse does not include a DPI switching button. 85.4% of mice include a DPI switching button.
Profile switching button
no
This mouse does not include a profile switching button. 16% of mice include a profile switching button.
Show more
Orientation
right-handed
Weight
107 g
Market range: <52 g – >125 g
This mouse weighs 107 g, which is heavier than 78.5% of mice and equal to 1% of mice.
Extra weights
0 g
Market range: <0 g – >25 g
This mouse comes with 0 g extra weights, which is less than 4.6% of mice and equal to 95.4% of mice.
Cable length
?
Cable type
N/A
Show more
Onboard memory profiles
0
Market range: <0 – >5
This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, which is less than 52.2% of mice and equal to 47.8% of mice.
Onboard memory size
0 KB
Market range: <0 KB – >128 KB
This mouse has an onboard memory size of 0 KB, which is smaller than 12.6% of mice and equal to 87.4% of mice.
no onboard memory.
Software name
Aivia GHOST Engine
Firmware upgradable
?
Suitable for gaming
no
This mouse is not suitable for gaming. 76.2% of mice are suitable for gaming.

GIGABYTE Aivia Neon vs the average mouse

246810TotalPerformance & SensorConnectivityBattery & ChargingControlsDesignFeatures
  • 1 more programmable buttons
    This mouse has 7 programmable buttons, while the average mouse has 6 programmable buttons.
    7 vs 6
  • Usable while charging
    This mouse can be used while charging, while the average mouse cannot. 47.5% of mice can be used while charging.
  • Rechargeable battery
    This mouse uses a rechargeable battery, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
  • 9 mm narrower mouse width
    This mouse is 57 mm wide, while the average mouse is 66 mm wide.
    57 mm vs 66 mm
  • Receiver storage inside mouse
    This mouse has receiver storage inside the mouse, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice have receiver storage inside the mouse.
  • Receiver storage inside mouse
    This mouse has receiver storage inside the mouse, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice have receiver storage inside the mouse.
  • Usable while charging
    This mouse can be used while charging, while the average mouse cannot. 47.5% of mice can be used while charging.
  • Rechargeable battery
    This mouse uses a rechargeable battery, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
  • 1 more programmable buttons
    This mouse has 7 programmable buttons, while the average mouse has 6 programmable buttons.
    7 vs 6
  • 9 mm narrower mouse width
    This mouse is 57 mm wide, while the average mouse is 66 mm wide.
    57 mm vs 66 mm
  • 87.5% lower maximum polling rate
    This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 125 Hz, while the average mouse has a maximum polling rate of 1,000 Hz.
    125 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • 30.5% higher mouse weight
    This mouse weighs 107 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    107 g vs 82 g
  • 88% lower maximum DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 1,200 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10,000 DPI.
    1,200 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • 87.5% lower wired polling rate
    This mouse has a wired polling rate of 125 Hz, while the average mouse has a wired polling rate of 1,000 Hz.
    125 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • 1 fewer onboard profiles
    This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, while the average mouse supports 1 onboard memory profiles.
    0 vs 1
  • No adjustable DPI
    This mouse does not support adjustable DPI, while the average mouse does. 93.9% of mice support adjustable DPI.
  • 62.5% lower tracking speed
    This mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 150 IPS, while the average mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 400 IPS.
    150 IPS vs 400 IPS
  • 1,000 DPI higher minimum setting
    This mouse has a minimum DPI of 1,200 DPI, while the average mouse has a minimum DPI of 200 DPI.
    1,200 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • 6.38x less popular
    GIGABYTE Aivia Neon is less popular than the average mouse (1 vs 6.4).
    1 vs 6.38
  • 14.1% worse value for money
    GIGABYTE Aivia Neon has worse value for money than the average mouse (6.41 vs 7.3).
    6.41 vs 7.31
  • 87.5% lower maximum polling rate
    This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 125 Hz, while the average mouse has a maximum polling rate of 1,000 Hz.
    125 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • 88% lower maximum DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 1,200 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10,000 DPI.
    1,200 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • 87.5% lower wired polling rate
    This mouse has a wired polling rate of 125 Hz, while the average mouse has a wired polling rate of 1,000 Hz.
    125 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • No adjustable DPI
    This mouse does not support adjustable DPI, while the average mouse does. 93.9% of mice support adjustable DPI.
  • 62.5% lower tracking speed
    This mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 150 IPS, while the average mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 400 IPS.
    150 IPS vs 400 IPS
  • 1,000 DPI higher minimum setting
    This mouse has a minimum DPI of 1,200 DPI, while the average mouse has a minimum DPI of 200 DPI.
    1,200 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • 87.5% lower 2.4 GHz polling rate
    This mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 125 Hz, while the average mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 1,000 Hz.
    125 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • No angle snapping support
    This mouse does not support angle snapping, while the average mouse does. 54.4% of mice support angle snapping.
  • 25% lower maximum acceleration
    This mouse has a maximum acceleration of 30 G, while the average mouse has a maximum acceleration of 40 G.
    30 G vs 40 G
  • No DPI switching button
    This mouse does not include a DPI switching button, while the average mouse does. 85.3% of mice include a DPI switching button.
  • 1 fewer side buttons
    This mouse has 1 side buttons, while the average mouse has 2 side buttons.
    1 vs 2
  • 30.5% higher mouse weight
    This mouse weighs 107 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    107 g vs 82 g
  • No RGB lighting
    This mouse does not have RGB lighting, while the average mouse does. 56.3% of mice have RGB lighting.
  • 8 older release date
    This mouse has a release date of 2013, while the average mouse has a release date of 2021.
    April 2013
    2013 vs 2021
  • 1 fewer onboard profiles
    This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, while the average mouse supports 1 onboard memory profiles.
    0 vs 1
  • Not suitable for gaming
    This mouse is not suitable for gaming, while the average mouse is. 76.1% of mice are suitable for gaming.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Third-party reviews

What customers like about GIGABYTE Aivia Neon

  • Versatile dual-mode functionality as both a standard wireless mouse and an air-presenter
  • Excellent for presentations with a built-in laser pointer and 'Aivia Painter' screen drawing tools
  • Innovative 'Touch and Charge' system allows the mouse to charge via the USB nano-receiver
  • Comfortable ergonomic design for mid-air use, similar to a remote or wand
  • Portable and lightweight with a high-quality build and included protective pouch
  • Tilting scroll wheel supports both vertical and horizontal scrolling

What customers don't like about GIGABYTE Aivia Neon

  • Awkward ergonomics for traditional desktop use, particularly for users with larger hands
  • Air-mode cursor tracking is based on relative movement, which can be difficult to control precisely
  • The charging connection between the mouse and receiver can be finicky and easily disconnected
  • Lacks dedicated presentation buttons found on other devices, such as play/pause or slide back
  • Non-adjustable 1200 DPI sensitivity and 125Hz polling rate are insufficient for gaming
  • Software suite feels unrefined or 'beta-ish' compared to other Aivia products

Verdict

The Gigabyte Aivia Neon is a hybrid wireless presenter mouse featuring a 1200 DPI laser sensor and 2.4GHz connectivity with a range of up to 15 meters. It distinguishes itself with 'Air-Mouse' technology, allowing users to control the cursor in mid-air via an internal gyroscope, and includes a built-in laser pointer for presentations. Additional features include 'Touch and Charge' for its rechargeable Li-ion battery via the USB nano-receiver, Aivia Painter for on-screen drawing, and free-scrolling technology for efficient navigation. Main pros are its seamless transition between desk and air modes, portable design, and handy presentation tools. However, its small, unconventional shape can be uncomfortable for extended desktop use or users with larger hands, and some find the software interface dated.

Compare GIGABYTE Aivia Neon with other products in the Mice category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of GIGABYTE Aivia Neon and other products in the Mice category

No results found