OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS

Attack Shark X6 Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price:~£45Connectivity:wireless+wiredMaximum polling rate:1000 HzMaximum DPI:26000 DPIWeight:49 g

Attack Shark X6 Review: Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Mice category and whether it is worth buying.

7.9

Overall score

Score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the mouse's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best mice on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 84% of models
Score components

80%

7.7

Technical Score

20%

8.6

User score

â–²Better than 84% of mice
7.7

Technical Score

Technical score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 83% of models
Score components

36%

6.8

Performance & Sensor

22%

8.5

Controls

16%

9.4

Design

14%

6.1

Features

7%

10

Connectivity

5%

7.7

Battery & Charging

â–²Better than 83% of mice
8.6

User score

User score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 72% of models
Score components

70%

8.7

User ratings

30%

8.2

Number of reviews

Based on 2,556 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–²Better than 72% of mice
  • attack-shark-x6
  • attack-shark-x6
  • attack-shark-x6
  • attack-shark-x6
  • attack-shark-x6
  • attack-shark-x6
  • attack-shark-x6
  • attack-shark-x6
  • attack-shark-x6
attack-shark-x6
attack-shark-x6
attack-shark-x6
attack-shark-x6
attack-shark-x6
attack-shark-x6
attack-shark-x6
attack-shark-x6
attack-shark-x6

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Verdict

The Attack Shark X6 is an ultra-lightweight gaming mouse weighing approximately 49g, featuring a flagship PixArt PAW3395 optical sensor with a maximum sensitivity of 26,000 DPI, 650 IPS tracking speed, and 50G acceleration. It offers tri-mode connectivity (2.4GHz wireless, Bluetooth 5.2/5.4, and USB-C wired) and is equipped with Kailh GM 8.0 switches rated for 80 million clicks alongside a precise TTC scroll wheel encoder. Main pros include its highly competitive weight-to-performance ratio, an included magnetic RGB charging dock, and a long-lasting battery life of up to 200 hours. However, some users have reported cons such as potential quality control issues, mushy side buttons with noticeable pre-travel, and occasional reports of the charging dock failing or the scroll wheel developing tracking jumps over long-term use.

Technical Specifications of mouse Attack Shark X6

Technical Score
Technical score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 83% of models
Score components:

36%

6.8

Performance & Sensor

22%

8.5

Controls

16%

9.4

Design

14%

6.1

Features

7%

10

Connectivity

5%

7.7

Battery & Charging

7.7
Attack Shark X6 has a technical score of 7.7 points, which is higher than that of 83% of products in this category.
User score
User score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 72% of models
Score components

70%

8.7

User ratings

30%

8.2

Number of reviews

Based on 2,556 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.6
Attack Shark X6 has a user score of 8.55 points, which is higher than that of 72.4% of products in this category.
Popularity
Popularity
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you prefer a mouse that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 74% of models
Popularity:
Attack Shark X6 has a popularity score of 8.2 points, which is higher than that of 74% of products in this category.
8.2
Attack Shark X6 has a popularity score of 8.2 points, which is higher than that of 74% of products in this category.
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the mouse's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a mouse that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 83% of models
Score components:

60%

7.9

Overall score

40%

10

Price

8.5
Attack Shark X6 has a value-for-money score of 8.5 points, which is higher than that of 82.7% of products in this category.
Brand name
Attack
Maximum polling rate
1,000 Hz
Maximum polling rate
1,000 Hz
â–² Better than 28% of models
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 1,000 Hz, which is higher than 27.8% of mice and equal to 55% of mice.
Wired polling rate
1,000 Hz
Wired polling rate
1,000 Hz
â–² Better than 13% of models
Market range: <125 Hz – >1k Hz
This mouse has a wired polling rate of 1,000 Hz, which is higher than 13.2% of mice and equal to 77.4% of mice.
2.4 GHz polling rate
1,000 Hz
2.4 GHz polling rate
1,000 Hz
â–² Better than 33% of models
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 1,000 Hz, which is higher than 33.4% of mice and equal to 46.9% of mice.
Bluetooth polling rate
125 Hz
Bluetooth polling rate
125 Hz
â–² Better than 68% of models
Market range: <0 Hz – >125 Hz
This mouse has a Bluetooth polling rate of 125 Hz, which is higher than 67.8% of mice and equal to 30.7% of mice.
Show more
Connectivity
wireless+wired
Connectivity
wireless+wired
â–² Better than 57% of models
This mouse supports wireless+wired connectivity, which is more versatile than 56.8% of mice and equal to 43.3% of mice.
connection modes: wired / Bluetooth / 2.4 GHz.
Bluetooth support
yes
Bluetooth support
yes
â–² Better than 65% of models
This mouse supports Bluetooth. 64.5% of mice support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
5.2
Bluetooth version
5.2
★ Better than 93% of models
This mouse uses Bluetooth 5.2, which is newer than 92.5% of mice and equal to 4.6% of mice.
Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
yes
Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
yes
â–² Better than 39% of models
This mouse supports proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless. 38.8% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
Receiver included
yes
Receiver included
yes
â–² Better than 38% of models
This mouse includes a receiver. 37.8% of mice include a receiver.
Show more
Battery life
200 hours
Battery life
200 hours
â–² Better than 87% of models
Market range: <50 hours – >500 hours
This mouse lasts 200 hours on a charge, which is longer than 87.1% of mice and equal to 6.6% of mice.
Battery capacity
500 mAh
Battery capacity
500 mAh
â–² Better than 48% of models
Market range: <300 mAh – >800 mAh
This mouse has a battery capacity of 500 mAh, which is larger than 48.2% of mice and equal to 22.1% of mice.
Battery form factor
integrated
Rechargeable battery
yes
Rechargeable battery
yes
â–² Better than 54% of models
This mouse uses a rechargeable battery. 54.2% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
Removable battery
no
Removable battery
no
â–¼ Worse than 22% of models
This mouse does not use a removable battery. 22.3% of mice use a removable battery.
Show more
N. of buttons
7
N. of buttons
7
â–² Better than 63% of models
Market range: <4 – >9
This mouse has 7 buttons, which is more than 63.3% of mice and equal to 15.1% of mice.
N. of side buttons
2
N. of side buttons
2
â–¼ Worse than 16% of models
Market range: <0 – >3
This mouse has 2 side buttons, which is more than 15% of mice and equal to 68.6% of mice.
N. of programmable buttons
7
N. of programmable buttons
7
â–² Better than 67% of models
Market range: <0 – >9
This mouse has 7 programmable buttons, which is more than 66.9% of mice and equal to 12.7% of mice.
DPI switching button
yes
DPI switching button
yes
â–² Better than 15% of models
This mouse includes a DPI switching button. 14.7% of mice include a DPI switching button.
Profile switching button
no
Profile switching button
no
â–¼ Worse than 16% of models
This mouse does not include a profile switching button. 16% of mice include a profile switching button.
Show more
Orientation
ambidextrous
Weight
49 g
Weight
49 g
★ Better than 93% of models
Market range: <52 g – >125 g
This mouse weighs 49 g, which makes it lighter than 92.9% of mice and equal to 1.8% of mice.
Extra weights
0 g
Extra weights
0 g
â–¼ Worse than 5% of models
Market range: <0 g – >25 g
This mouse comes with 0 g extra weights, which is less than 4.6% of mice and equal to 95.4% of mice.
Cable length
1.8 m
Cable length
1.8 m
â–² Better than 18% of models
Market range: <1.5 m – >2 m
This mouse comes with a 1.8 m cable, which is longer than 18.4% of mice and equal to 65.2% of mice.
Cable type
braided
Show more
Onboard memory profiles
1
Onboard memory profiles
1
â–² Better than 48% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This mouse stores 1 onboard profiles, which is more than 48% of mice and equal to 20% of mice.
Onboard memory size
?
Software name
Attack Shark Driver
Firmware upgradable
yes
Firmware upgradable
yes
â–² Better than 22% of models
This mouse supports firmware updates. 22.5% of mice support firmware updates.
Suitable for gaming
yes
Suitable for gaming
yes
â–² Better than 24% of models
This mouse is suitable for gaming. 23.9% of mice are suitable for gaming.

Attack Shark X6 vs the average mouse

246810TotalPerformance & SensorConnectivityBattery & ChargingControlsDesignFeatures
  • 50 million clicks longer switch lifespan
    Switch durability
    80 million clicks
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <5 million clicks – >90 million clicks
    This mouse offers switch durability of 80 million clicks, while the average mouse offers switch durability of 30 million clicks.
    80 million clicks vs 30 million clicks
  • 40.2% lower mouse weight
    Weight
    49 g
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    Market range: <52 g – >125 g
    This mouse weighs 49 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    49 g vs 82 g
  • 2.6x higher maximum DPI
    Maximum DPI
    26,000 DPI
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <1.6k DPI – >26k DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 26000 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10000 DPI.
    26,000 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • Adjustable lift-off distance
    Lift-off distance adjustable
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This mouse supports adjustable lift-off distance, while the average mouse does not. 46.5% of mice support adjustable lift-off distance.
  • 1 more programmable buttons
    N. of programmable buttons
    7
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    Market range: <0 – >9
    This mouse has 7 programmable buttons, while the average mouse has 6 programmable buttons.
    7 vs 6
  • 115 hours longer battery life
    Battery life
    200 hours
    â–² Better than 87% of models
    Market range: <50 hours – >500 hours
    This mouse lasts 200 hours on a charge, while the average mouse lasts 85 hours on a charge.
    200 hours vs 85 hours
  • 62.5% higher tracking speed
    Maximum tracking speed
    650 IPS
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <30 IPS – >650 IPS
    This mouse offers a maximum tracking speed of 650 IPS, while the average mouse offers a maximum tracking speed of 400 IPS.
    650 IPS vs 400 IPS
  • Usable while charging
    Use while charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This mouse can be used while charging, while the average mouse cannot. 47.5% of mice can be used while charging.
  • 16.7% better value for money
    Attack Shark X6 has better value for money than the average mouse (8.54 vs 7.3).
    8.54 vs 7.31
  • 2.6x higher maximum DPI
    Maximum DPI
    26,000 DPI
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <1.6k DPI – >26k DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 26000 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10000 DPI.
    26,000 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • Adjustable lift-off distance
    Lift-off distance adjustable
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This mouse supports adjustable lift-off distance, while the average mouse does not. 46.5% of mice support adjustable lift-off distance.
  • 62.5% higher tracking speed
    Maximum tracking speed
    650 IPS
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <30 IPS – >650 IPS
    This mouse offers a maximum tracking speed of 650 IPS, while the average mouse offers a maximum tracking speed of 400 IPS.
    650 IPS vs 400 IPS
  • 25% higher maximum acceleration
    Maximum acceleration
    50 G
    â–² Better than 55% of models
    Market range: <10 G – >50 G
    This mouse has a maximum acceleration of 50 G, while the average mouse has a maximum acceleration of 40 G.
    50 G vs 40 G
  • Multi-device pairing
    Multi-device pairing
    yes
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    This mouse supports multi-device pairing, while the average mouse does not. 20.3% of mice support multi-device pairing.
  • Versatile connectivity
    Connectivity
    wireless+wired
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This mouse supports wireless+wired connectivity, while the average mouse supports wireless connectivity.
    connection modes: wired / Bluetooth / 2.4 GHz.
    wireless+wired vs wireless
  • Bluetooth support
    Bluetooth support
    yes
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    This mouse supports Bluetooth, while the average mouse does not. 35.5% of mice support Bluetooth.
  • Receiver storage inside mouse
    Receiver storage in mouse
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This mouse has receiver storage inside the mouse, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice have receiver storage inside the mouse.
  • 115 hours longer battery life
    Battery life
    200 hours
    â–² Better than 87% of models
    Market range: <50 hours – >500 hours
    This mouse lasts 200 hours on a charge, while the average mouse lasts 85 hours on a charge.
    200 hours vs 85 hours
  • Usable while charging
    Use while charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This mouse can be used while charging, while the average mouse cannot. 47.5% of mice can be used while charging.
  • Charging dock included
    Charging dock included
    yes
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    This mouse includes a charging dock, while the average mouse does not. 5.4% of mice include a charging dock.
  • Rechargeable battery
    Rechargeable battery
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This mouse uses a rechargeable battery, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
  • Wireless charging
    Wireless charging
    yes
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    This mouse supports wireless charging, while the average mouse does not. 10.6% of mice support wireless charging.
  • 50 million clicks longer switch lifespan
    Switch durability
    80 million clicks
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <5 million clicks – >90 million clicks
    This mouse offers switch durability of 80 million clicks, while the average mouse offers switch durability of 30 million clicks.
    80 million clicks vs 30 million clicks
  • 1 more programmable buttons
    N. of programmable buttons
    7
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    Market range: <0 – >9
    This mouse has 7 programmable buttons, while the average mouse has 6 programmable buttons.
    7 vs 6
  • 40.2% lower mouse weight
    Weight
    49 g
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    Market range: <52 g – >125 g
    This mouse weighs 49 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    49 g vs 82 g
  • Detachable cable
    Detachable cable
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This mouse comes with a detachable cable, while the average mouse does not. 43% of mice come with a detachable cable.
  • 600 DPI higher minimum setting
    Minimum DPI
    800 DPI
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <50 DPI – >1k DPI
    This mouse has a minimum DPI of 800 DPI, while the average mouse has a minimum DPI of 200 DPI.
    800 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • 0.5 hours longer full charge time
    Full charge time
    2.5 hours
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <1.5 hours – >4 hours
    This mouse reaches a full charge in 2.5 hours, while the average mouse reaches a full charge in 2 hours.
    source range 2-3 h.
    2.5 hours vs 2 hours
  • No RGB lighting
    RGB lighting
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This mouse does not have RGB lighting, while the average mouse does. 56.3% of mice have RGB lighting.
  • Thin glide feet
    Feet thickness
    0.75 mm
    â–² Better than 45% of models
    This mouse uses 0.8 mm thick mouse feet, while the average mouse uses 0.8 mm thick mouse feet.
    0.75 mm vs 0.8 mm
  • 600 DPI higher minimum setting
    Minimum DPI
    800 DPI
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <50 DPI – >1k DPI
    This mouse has a minimum DPI of 800 DPI, while the average mouse has a minimum DPI of 200 DPI.
    800 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • 0.5 hours longer full charge time
    Full charge time
    2.5 hours
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <1.5 hours – >4 hours
    This mouse reaches a full charge in 2.5 hours, while the average mouse reaches a full charge in 2 hours.
    source range 2-3 h.
    2.5 hours vs 2 hours
  • No RGB lighting
    RGB lighting
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This mouse does not have RGB lighting, while the average mouse does. 56.3% of mice have RGB lighting.
  • Thin glide feet
    Feet thickness
    0.75 mm
    â–² Better than 45% of models
    This mouse uses 0.8 mm thick mouse feet, while the average mouse uses 0.8 mm thick mouse feet.
    0.75 mm vs 0.8 mm

Graphic comparison of Attack Shark X6 and other products in the Mice category

No results found

Third-party reviews

Based on 2,556 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: May 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What customers like about Attack Shark X6?

  • Exceptional value for money, often described as a 'budget flagship'
  • Extremely lightweight design (approximately 49g) reducing hand fatigue
  • High-performance PixArt PAW3395 sensor provides precise tracking
  • Convenient magnetic RGB charging dock included
  • Versatile tri-mode connectivity (2.4GHz wireless, Bluetooth 5.2/5.4, and USB-C wired)
  • Tactile and crispy Huano/Kailh GM8.0 main switches
  • Excellent battery life, rated up to 200 hours
  • Comfortable ergonomic shape suitable for multiple grip styles (claw and fingertip)

What customers dislike about Attack Shark X6?

  • Inconsistent quality control (QC) with reports of 'lottery' experiences
  • Charging dock issues, including weak magnets and pins failing to charge over time
  • Sub-par stock skates (feet) that may require replacement with PTFE dots for better glide
  • Occasional connectivity bugs, such as freezing when the receiver is plugged into the dock instead of the PC
  • Long-term durability concerns with some users reporting scroll wheel or battery failure after 3-6 months
  • The mouse can feel slightly back-heavy, affecting the balance for some users
  • Software is functional but basic and sometimes displays incorrect battery percentages

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Compare Attack Shark X6 with other products in the Mice category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)