OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Mice Methodology v1.0
Mice Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Mice Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Mice Methodology v1.0

Finalmouse Ultralightx Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price:~£160Connectivity:wireless+wiredMaximum polling rate:8000 HzMaximum DPI:26000 DPIWeight:?

Finalmouse Ultralightx Review: Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Mice category and whether it is worth buying.

Finalmouse Ultralightx
7.2/10

Overall score

Score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the mouse's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best mice on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 73% of models
Score components

80%

7.5

Technical score

20%

6.1

User score

â–²Better than 73% of mice
7.9

Value for money

Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the mouse's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a mouse that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 67% of models
Score components

70%

7.2

Overall score

30%

9.7

Price

â–²Better than 67%
7.5

Technical score

Technical score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 79% of models
Score components

36%

9.9

Performance & Sensor

22%

2.0

Controls

16%

7.8

Design

14%

8.7

Features

7%

9.6

Connectivity

5%

6.0

Battery & Charging

â–²Better than 79%
6.1

User score

User score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
Score components

70%

6.9

User ratings

30%

4.1

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–¼Worse than 97%
  • finalmouse-ultralightx
finalmouse-ultralightx
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of mouse Finalmouse Ultralightx

Technical score
Technical score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 79% of models
Score components:

36%

9.9

Performance & Sensor

22%

2.0

Controls

16%

7.8

Design

14%

8.7

Features

7%

9.6

Connectivity

5%

6.0

Battery & Charging

7.5
User score
User score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
Score components

70%

6.9

User ratings

30%

4.1

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
6.1
Popularity
Popularity
4.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you prefer a mouse that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
Popularity:
Finalmouse Ultralightx has a popularity score of 4.1 points, which is lower than that of 71.2% of products in this category.
4.1
Value for money
Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the mouse's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a mouse that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 67% of models
Score components:

70%

7.2

Overall score

30%

9.7

Price

7.9
Brand name
Finalmouse
Maximum polling rate
8,000 Hz
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 8,000 Hz, which is higher than 88.2% of mice and equal to 11.8% of mice.
Wired polling rate
1,000 Hz
Market range: <125 Hz – >1k Hz
This mouse has a wired polling rate of 1,000 Hz, which is higher than 13.2% of mice and equal to 77.4% of mice.
2.4 GHz polling rate
8,000 Hz
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 8,000 Hz, which is higher than 89.2% of mice and equal to 10.8% of mice.
Bluetooth polling rate
0 Hz
Market range: <0 Hz – >125 Hz
This mouse has a Bluetooth polling rate of 0 Hz, which is lower than 36% of mice and equal to 64% of mice.
no Bluetooth mode.
Show more
Connectivity
wireless+wired
This mouse supports wireless+wired connectivity, which is more versatile than 56.8% of mice and equal to 43.3% of mice.
connection modes: wired / 2.4 GHz.
Bluetooth support
no
This mouse does not support Bluetooth. 35.6% of mice support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
yes
This mouse supports proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless. 38.8% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
Receiver included
yes
This mouse includes a receiver. 37.8% of mice include a receiver.
Show more
Battery life
70 hours
Market range: <50 hours – >500 hours
This mouse has a battery life of 70 hours, which is less than 62.4% of mice and equal to 14.1% of mice.
Battery capacity
250 mAh
Market range: <300 mAh – >800 mAh
This mouse has a battery capacity of 250 mAh, which is smaller than 91.3% of mice and equal to 3.5% of mice.
Battery form factor
integrated
Rechargeable battery
yes
This mouse uses a rechargeable battery. 54.2% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
Removable battery
no
This mouse does not use a removable battery. 22.3% of mice use a removable battery.
Show more
N. of buttons
5
Market range: <4 – >9
This mouse has 5 buttons, which is less than 76.9% of mice and equal to 9.6% of mice.
N. of side buttons
2
Market range: <0 – >3
This mouse has 2 side buttons, which is more than 15% of mice and equal to 68.6% of mice.
N. of programmable buttons
0
Market range: <0 – >9
This mouse has 0 programmable buttons, which is less than 83.4% of mice and equal to 16.7% of mice.
DPI switching button
no
This mouse does not include a DPI switching button. 85.4% of mice include a DPI switching button.
Profile switching button
no
This mouse does not include a profile switching button. 16% of mice include a profile switching button.
Show more
Orientation
ambidextrous
Weight
?
Extra weights
0 g
Market range: <0 g – >25 g
This mouse comes with 0 g extra weights, which is less than 4.6% of mice and equal to 95.4% of mice.
Cable length
N/A
Cable type
?
Show more
Onboard memory profiles
?
Onboard memory size
?
Software name
N/A
Firmware upgradable
yes
This mouse supports firmware updates. 22.5% of mice support firmware updates.
Suitable for gaming
yes
This mouse is suitable for gaming. 23.9% of mice are suitable for gaming.

Finalmouse Ultralightx vs the average mouse

246810TotalPerformance & SensorConnectivityBattery & ChargingControlsDesignFeatures
  • 8x higher maximum polling rate
    This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 8,000 Hz, while the average mouse has a maximum polling rate of 1,000 Hz.
    8,000 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • 8x higher 2.4 GHz polling rate
    This mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 8,000 Hz, while the average mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 1,000 Hz.
    8,000 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • 2.6x higher maximum DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 26,000 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10,000 DPI.
    26,000 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • Adjustable lift-off distance
    This mouse supports adjustable lift-off distance, while the average mouse does not. 46.5% of mice support adjustable lift-off distance.
  • 62.5% higher tracking speed
    This mouse offers a maximum tracking speed of 650 IPS, while the average mouse offers a maximum tracking speed of 400 IPS.
    650 IPS vs 400 IPS
  • Usable while charging
    This mouse can be used while charging, while the average mouse cannot. 47.5% of mice can be used while charging.
  • Rechargeable battery
    This mouse uses a rechargeable battery, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
  • Detachable cable
    This mouse comes with a detachable cable, while the average mouse does not. 43% of mice come with a detachable cable.
  • 8x higher maximum polling rate
    This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 8,000 Hz, while the average mouse has a maximum polling rate of 1,000 Hz.
    8,000 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • 8x higher 2.4 GHz polling rate
    This mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 8,000 Hz, while the average mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 1,000 Hz.
    8,000 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • 2.6x higher maximum DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 26,000 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10,000 DPI.
    26,000 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • Adjustable lift-off distance
    This mouse supports adjustable lift-off distance, while the average mouse does not. 46.5% of mice support adjustable lift-off distance.
  • 62.5% higher tracking speed
    This mouse offers a maximum tracking speed of 650 IPS, while the average mouse offers a maximum tracking speed of 400 IPS.
    650 IPS vs 400 IPS
  • 25% higher maximum acceleration
    This mouse has a maximum acceleration of 50 G, while the average mouse has a maximum acceleration of 40 G.
    50 G vs 40 G
  • Versatile connectivity
    This mouse supports wireless+wired connectivity, while the average mouse supports wireless connectivity.
    connection modes: wired / 2.4 GHz.
    wireless+wired vs wireless
  • Usable while charging
    This mouse can be used while charging, while the average mouse cannot. 47.5% of mice can be used while charging.
  • Rechargeable battery
    This mouse uses a rechargeable battery, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
  • Detachable cable
    This mouse comes with a detachable cable, while the average mouse does not. 43% of mice come with a detachable cable.
  • 9.2 mm narrower mouse width
    This mouse is 56.8 mm wide, while the average mouse is 66 mm wide.
    56.8 mm vs 66 mm
  • 4.5 mm lower mouse height
    This mouse is 35.2 mm tall, while the average mouse is 39.7 mm tall.
    35.2 mm vs 39.7 mm
  • 6 fewer programmable buttons
    This mouse has 0 programmable buttons, while the average mouse has 6 programmable buttons.
    0 vs 6
  • No DPI switching button
    This mouse does not include a DPI switching button, while the average mouse does. 85.3% of mice include a DPI switching button.
  • 10 million clicks shorter switch lifespan
    This mouse has a switch durability of 20 million clicks, while the average mouse has a switch durability of 30 million clicks.
    20 million clicks vs 30 million clicks
  • 4.57x more expensive
    Finalmouse Ultralightx is more expensive than the average mouse (£160 vs £35).
    £160 vs £35
  • No angle snapping support
    This mouse does not support angle snapping, while the average mouse does. 54.4% of mice support angle snapping.
  • 31.7% lower user score
    User score
    6.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Finalmouse Ultralightx
    the average mouse
    Finalmouse Ultralightx has a lower user score than the average mouse (6.07 vs 8).
    6.07 vs 8
  • 15 hours shorter battery life
    This mouse has a battery life of 70 hours, while the average mouse has a battery life of 85 hours.
    70 hours vs 85 hours
  • 200 DPI higher minimum setting
    This mouse has a minimum DPI of 400 DPI, while the average mouse has a minimum DPI of 200 DPI.
    400 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • 4.57x more expensive
    Finalmouse Ultralightx is more expensive than the average mouse (£160 vs £35).
    £160 vs £35
  • 31.7% lower user score
    User score
    6.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Finalmouse Ultralightx
    the average mouse
    Finalmouse Ultralightx has a lower user score than the average mouse (6.07 vs 8).
    6.07 vs 8
  • 55.3% less popular
    Finalmouse Ultralightx is less popular than the average mouse (4.11 vs 6.4).
    4.11 vs 6.38
  • No angle snapping support
    This mouse does not support angle snapping, while the average mouse does. 54.4% of mice support angle snapping.
  • 200 DPI higher minimum setting
    This mouse has a minimum DPI of 400 DPI, while the average mouse has a minimum DPI of 200 DPI.
    400 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • Poor default DPI tuning
    This mouse uses a default DPI of 400 DPI, while the average mouse uses a default DPI of 1,000 DPI.
    400 DPI vs 1,000 DPI
  • 15 hours shorter battery life
    This mouse has a battery life of 70 hours, while the average mouse has a battery life of 85 hours.
    70 hours vs 85 hours
  • 50% smaller battery capacity
    This mouse has a battery capacity of 250 mAh, while the average mouse has a battery capacity of 500 mAh.
    250 mAh vs 500 mAh
  • 6 fewer programmable buttons
    This mouse has 0 programmable buttons, while the average mouse has 6 programmable buttons.
    0 vs 6
  • No DPI switching button
    This mouse does not include a DPI switching button, while the average mouse does. 85.3% of mice include a DPI switching button.
  • 10 million clicks shorter switch lifespan
    This mouse has a switch durability of 20 million clicks, while the average mouse has a switch durability of 30 million clicks.
    20 million clicks vs 30 million clicks

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

4.0
QGinfinite
≈ estimated
22/11/2023
Opinion review · feel, price and early problems
Verdict
Finalmouse UltralightX is not recommended at this price, since many cheaper mice perform as well or better.
9.0
Rocket Jump Ninja
≈ estimated
16/11/2023
Review · lightweight build, shape and wheel tests
Verdict
Finalmouse UltralightX is extremely light and top-tier, highly recommended, though its scroll wheel can misbehave.
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

R
rtings.com
05/01/2024
Summary of the review
Finalmouse UltralightX Mouse Review - RTINGS.com
R
rtings.com
23/01/2025
Summary of the review
Finalmouse UltralightX Competition Mouse Review - RTINGS.com
R
rtings.com
11/06/2024
Summary of the review
Finalmouse ULX Pro Series Mouse Review - RTINGS.com

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: November 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about Finalmouse Ultralightx

  • Extremely lightweight (approx. 31-37g depending on size) reducing fatigue during long sessions.
  • Outstanding sensor performance with high-end accuracy and responsiveness.
  • Web-based configurator (XPANEL) removes the need for bulky background software.
  • Excellent click latency performance suitable for competitive gaming.
  • Responsive 4000Hz (and up to 8000Hz via firmware) wireless polling rate support.
  • Flat base design allows for universal aftermarket mouse skate compatibility.
  • Good weight balancing and a safe, familiar symmetrical shape.

What customers don't like about Finalmouse Ultralightx

  • Frequent quality control (QC) issues including shell creaking, popping, and flexing.
  • Left and right clicks can feel mushy or develop a grinding sensation over time.
  • The scroll wheel feels cheap, lacks grip, and can be unintentionally actuated.
  • High price point ($189+) compared to competitors with better build quality.
  • Carbon fiber composite body feels flimsy and less 'premium' than previous magnesium models.
  • Button cutouts and honeycomb holes can collect dirt and skin oils easily.
  • No Bluetooth support or multi-device pairing for non-gaming productivity.

Verdict

The Finalmouse UltralightX is an ultra-lightweight wireless gaming mouse featuring a honeycomb carbon fiber composite chassis that weighs between 31g and 37g depending on the size variant (Cheetah, Lion, or Tiger). It is equipped with the PixArt PAW3395 sensor, offering up to 26,000 CPI and 650 IPS tracking, and supports a maximum wireless polling rate of 8,000 Hz with sub-300 microsecond click latency. Main pros include its industry-leading strength-to-weight ratio, exceptionally low latency, and a driverless web-based configuration tool called XPanel. However, common cons include inconsistent quality control such as shell flex or grinding main buttons, relatively short battery life when using high polling rates, and a premium price point.

Compare Finalmouse Ultralightx with other products in the Mice category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Finalmouse Ultralightx and other products in the Mice category

No results found