OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0

Russell Hobbs 27141-56 Review | 40 Data compared

Avg. price:~£25Power:500 WCordless:noWeight:1.09 kgStepless variable speed:noDishwasher-safe parts:yes

Russell Hobbs 27141-56 Review: Compare 40 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Immersion Blenders category and whether it is worth buying.

Russell Hobbs 27141-56
6.7/10

Overall score

Score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, ratings from across the web and best-of lists.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 65%, User score 25%, List score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
Score components

65%

5.9

Technical score

25%

8.6

User score

10%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 63% of immersion blenders
7.7

Value for money

Value for money
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
Score components

70%

6.7

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

â–¼Worse than 55%
5.9

Technical score

Technical score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
Score components

45%

4.3

Performance

20%

7.0

Accessories

15%

7.9

Design

10%

5.8

Usability

10%

7.4

Dimensions

â–¼Worse than 71%
8.6

User score

User score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 54% of models

70%

8.0

Rating

30%

10

Popularity

â–²Better than 54%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • russell-hobbs-27141-56
  • russell-hobbs-27141-56
  • russell-hobbs-27141-56
  • russell-hobbs-27141-56
  • russell-hobbs-27141-56
  • russell-hobbs-27141-56
russell-hobbs-27141-56
russell-hobbs-27141-56
russell-hobbs-27141-56
russell-hobbs-27141-56
russell-hobbs-27141-56
russell-hobbs-27141-56
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Immersion Blenders model ranking

Ranked #381 of 725 models in Immersion Blenders (Overall score)

Technical Specifications of immersion blender Russell Hobbs 27141-56

Technical score
Technical score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
Score components:

45%

4.3

Performance

20%

7.0

Accessories

15%

7.9

Design

10%

5.8

Usability

10%

7.4

Dimensions

5.9
Value for money
Value for money
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
Score components:

70%

6.7

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

7.7
Power
500 W
Market range: <200 W – >1.2k W
This immersion blender delivers 500 W of motor power, which is lower than the rated wattage of 61.3% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 4.8% of immersion blenders.
Number of speeds
2
Market range: <1 – >21
This immersion blender features 2 speed levels, which is more finely adjustable than 21% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 31.9% of immersion blenders.
Stepless variable speed
no
This immersion blender does not feature stepless variable speed control.
Turbo mode
no
This immersion blender does not support turbo mode.
Maximum RPM
16,100 RPM
Market range: <10k RPM – >20k RPM
This immersion blender spins up to 16,100 RPM, which is faster than the top blade speed of 82.1% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.2% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Commercial use
no
This immersion blender not designed for commercial use.
Dishwasher-safe parts
yes
This immersion blender has dishwasher-safe parts.
Safety lock
no
This immersion blender does not feature a safety lock.
Cordless
no
This immersion blender does not support cordless operation.
Battery type
-
Show more
Number of accessories
3
Market range: <1 – >6
This immersion blender comes with 3 attachments, which is more versatile than 52.6% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 30.3% of immersion blenders.
Chopper included
yes
This immersion blender includes the chopper attachment.
Chopper capacity
500 ml
Market range: <350 ml – >700 ml
This immersion blender provides a chopper capacity of 500 ml, which is more spacious than the mini-chopper of 14.1% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 59.2% of immersion blenders.
Measuring cup/glass included
yes
This immersion blender includes the measuring cup.
Measuring cup/glass capacity
600 ml
Market range: <600 ml – >800 ml
This immersion blender includes a measuring beaker of 600 ml, which is smaller than the cup of 53.2% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 38.2% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Shaft material
Stainless steel
Blade material
Stainless steel
Body material
Plastic
Detachable shaft
yes
This immersion blender supports a detachable shaft.
No-splash design
yes
This immersion blender supports a no-splash design.
Show more
Power cord length
0.6 m
Market range: <1 m – >2.5 m
This immersion blender has a power cord length of 0.6 m, which is shorter reach than 99.3% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.6% of immersion blenders.
Weight
1.09 kg
Market range: <0.5 kg – >3 kg
This immersion blender weighs 1.09 kg, which is lighter in hand than 49.7% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.3% of immersion blenders.
Height
24 cm
Market range: <28 cm – >48 cm
This immersion blender stands 24 cm in height, which is more compact than 96.6% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.5% of immersion blenders.
Width/Depth
60x 60

Russell Hobbs 27141-56 vs the average immersion blender

246810TotalPerformanceUsabilityAccessoriesDesignDimensions
  • 1,600 RPM higher blade speed
    This immersion blender shears through cooked vegetables faster, producing silky lump-free emulsified textures in seconds compared to the average immersion blender (16,100 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    16,100 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • Includes the chopper attachment
    This immersion blender includes the chopper attachment while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 16 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (24 cm vs 40 cm).
    24 cm vs 40 cm
  • 1 more accessories
    This immersion blender handles whisking, chopping, and mashing right out of the box without separate appliance purchases compared to the average immersion blender (3 vs 2).
    3 vs 2
  • 8.9% higher user score
    User score
    8.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 54% of models

    70%

    8.0

    Rating

    30%

    10

    Popularity

    8.6 vs 7.9
  • 80% cheaper
    Russell Hobbs 27141-56 is cheaper than the average immersion blender (£25 vs £45).
    £25 vs £45
  • 8.9% higher user score
    User score
    8.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 54% of models

    70%

    8.0

    Rating

    30%

    10

    Popularity

    8.6 vs 7.9
  • 80% cheaper
    Russell Hobbs 27141-56 is cheaper than the average immersion blender (£25 vs £45).
    £25 vs £45
  • 1,600 RPM higher blade speed
    This immersion blender shears through cooked vegetables faster, producing silky lump-free emulsified textures in seconds compared to the average immersion blender (16,100 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    16,100 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • Includes the chopper attachment
    This immersion blender includes the chopper attachment while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 1 more accessories
    This immersion blender handles whisking, chopping, and mashing right out of the box without separate appliance purchases compared to the average immersion blender (3 vs 2).
    3 vs 2
  • 16 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (24 cm vs 40 cm).
    24 cm vs 40 cm
  • Does not support turbo mode
    This immersion blender does not support turbo mode while the average immersion blender does.
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • Does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip
    This immersion blender does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip while the average immersion blender does.
  • 200 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (500 W vs 700 W).
    500 W vs 700 W
  • 100 ml smaller beaker volume
    This immersion blender provides a smaller blending cup that fills quickly when whipping liquids or multiple fruit servings compared to the average immersion blender (600 ml vs 700 ml).
    600 ml vs 700 ml
  • 0.6 m shorter power cord
    This immersion blender has a shorter mains cord that may limit movement around spacious kitchen countertops compared to the average immersion blender (0.6 m vs 1.2 m).
    0.6 m vs 1.2 m
  • 0.8% worse value for money
    Russell Hobbs 27141-56 has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (7.66 vs 7.7).
    7.66 vs 7.73
  • 0.1% heavier
    This immersion blender is heavier to hold continuously, causing more arm strain when pureeing large stockpots compared to the average immersion blender (1.1 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    1.09 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 0.8% worse value for money
    Russell Hobbs 27141-56 has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (7.66 vs 7.7).
    7.66 vs 7.73
  • Does not support turbo mode
    This immersion blender does not support turbo mode while the average immersion blender does.
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 200 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (500 W vs 700 W).
    500 W vs 700 W
  • 100 ml smaller beaker volume
    This immersion blender provides a smaller blending cup that fills quickly when whipping liquids or multiple fruit servings compared to the average immersion blender (600 ml vs 700 ml).
    600 ml vs 700 ml
  • Does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip
    This immersion blender does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip while the average immersion blender does.
  • 0.6 m shorter power cord
    This immersion blender has a shorter mains cord that may limit movement around spacious kitchen countertops compared to the average immersion blender (0.6 m vs 1.2 m).
    0.6 m vs 1.2 m
  • 0.1% heavier
    This immersion blender is heavier to hold continuously, causing more arm strain when pureeing large stockpots compared to the average immersion blender (1.1 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    1.09 kg vs 1.089 kg

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Russell Hobbs 27141-56

  • Versatile 3-in-1 design efficiently swaps between blending, chopping, and whisking functions.
  • Powerful 500W motor processes soups, purees, smoothies, and small vegetable portions quickly.
  • Easy to clean with detachable, dishwasher-safe, and BPA-free component parts.
  • Includes a dual-purpose silicone non-slip base for the chopping bowl that doubles as a fresh-keeping lid.
  • Ergonomic handle offers a secure, comfortable, and well-balanced grip during extended kitchen use.
  • Sleek and attractive matte charcoal aesthetic provides a premium look on modern countertops.
  • Good overall value for money given the multi-functional accessory bundle at its price point.

What customers don't like about Russell Hobbs 27141-56

  • Twist-to-lock connection system operates in reverse, which can feel counter-intuitive to new users.
  • The 700ml blending beaker has a somewhat narrow opening that restricts movement during processing.
  • Occasional blending leaves behind minor unblitzed food lumps directly above the blade zone.
  • Chopping bowl has a limited maximum working capacity that requires batch processing for larger recipes.
  • Mixed user reviews regarding plastic durability, with some feeling the storage cup is a bit thin.
  • Power cable length is relatively restrictive and limits flexibility away from direct wall sockets.
  • Power switch lacks a continuous lock button, requiring constant manual pressure during large batches.

Verdict

The Russell Hobbs 27141-56 Desire Matte Charcoal is a versatile 500W 3-in-1 immersion blender equipped with a 500ml chopping bowl, a 600ml blending beaker, and a stainless steel whisk attachment. Its primary pros include a robust 16,100 RPM maximum rotation speed, BPA-free construction, two tiered speed settings with a pulse function, and detachable, dishwasher-safe components that make cleanup effortless. However, a potential con is its lack of an ice-crushing feature, making it unsuitable for processing hard frozen ingredients or large chunks of ice.

Compare Russell Hobbs 27141-56 with other immersion blenders

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Russell Hobbs 27141-56 and other immersion blenders

No results found