OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0

Ufesa Galaxy Max 1500W Review | 40 Data compared

Avg. price:~£25Power:1500 WCordless:noWeight:0.8 kgStepless variable speed:noDishwasher-safe parts:no

Ufesa Galaxy Max 1500W Review: Compare 40 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Immersion Blenders category and whether it is worth buying.

Ufesa Galaxy Max 1500W
8.1/10

Overall score

Score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, ratings from across the web and best-of lists.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 65%, User score 25%, List score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 88% of models
Score components

65%

8.2

Technical score

25%

8.2

User score

10%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–²Better than 88% of immersion blenders
8.6

Value for money

Value for money
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 91% of models
Score components

70%

8.1

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

★Better than 91%
8.2

Technical score

Technical score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 90% of models
Score components

45%

9.0

Performance

20%

7.4

Accessories

15%

8.5

Design

10%

4.6

Usability

10%

9.0

Dimensions

★Better than 90%
8.2

User score

User score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models

8.2

Mark 8.4 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

70%

8.4

Rating

30%

8.2

Popularity

â–¼Worse than 53%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • ufesa-galaxy-max-1500w
  • ufesa-galaxy-max-1500w
  • ufesa-galaxy-max-1500w
  • ufesa-galaxy-max-1500w
  • ufesa-galaxy-max-1500w
  • ufesa-galaxy-max-1500w
  • ufesa-galaxy-max-1500w
ufesa-galaxy-max-1500w
ufesa-galaxy-max-1500w
ufesa-galaxy-max-1500w
ufesa-galaxy-max-1500w
ufesa-galaxy-max-1500w
ufesa-galaxy-max-1500w
ufesa-galaxy-max-1500w
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of immersion blender Ufesa Galaxy Max 1500W

Technical score
Technical score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 90% of models
Score components:

45%

9.0

Performance

20%

7.4

Accessories

15%

8.5

Design

10%

4.6

Usability

10%

9.0

Dimensions

8.2
Value for money
Value for money
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 91% of models
Score components:

70%

8.1

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

8.6
Power
1,500 W
Market range: <200 W – >1.2k W
This immersion blender delivers 1,500 W of motor power, which is higher than the rated wattage of 94.2% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 5.4% of immersion blenders.
Number of speeds
24
Market range: <1 – >21
This immersion blender features 24 speed levels, which is more finely adjustable than 98.6% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.2% of immersion blenders.
Stepless variable speed
no
This immersion blender does not feature stepless variable speed control.
Turbo mode
yes
This immersion blender supports turbo mode.
Maximum RPM
?
Show more
Commercial use
no
This immersion blender not designed for commercial use.
Dishwasher-safe parts
no
This immersion blender does not have dishwasher-safe parts.
Safety lock
?
Cordless
no
This immersion blender does not support cordless operation.
Battery type
-
Show more
Number of accessories
3
Market range: <1 – >6
This immersion blender comes with 3 attachments, which is more versatile than 52.6% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 30.3% of immersion blenders.
Chopper included
yes
This immersion blender includes the chopper attachment.
Chopper capacity
600 ml
Market range: <350 ml – >700 ml
This immersion blender provides a chopper capacity of 600 ml, which is more spacious than the mini-chopper of 74.1% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 12.3% of immersion blenders.
Measuring cup/glass included
yes
This immersion blender includes the measuring cup.
Measuring cup/glass capacity
600 ml
Market range: <600 ml – >800 ml
This immersion blender includes a measuring beaker of 600 ml, which is smaller than the cup of 53.2% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 38.2% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Shaft material
Stainless steel
Blade material
Stainless steel
Body material
Stainless steel
Detachable shaft
yes
This immersion blender supports a detachable shaft.
No-splash design
yes
This immersion blender supports a no-splash design.
Show more
Power cord length
?
Weight
0.8 kg
Market range: <0.5 kg – >3 kg
This immersion blender weighs 0.8 kg, which is lighter in hand than 80.9% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 4.8% of immersion blenders.
Height
42.3 cm
Market range: <28 cm – >48 cm
This immersion blender stands 42.3 cm in height, which is taller than 79.6% of immersion blenders.
Width/Depth
?

Ufesa Galaxy Max 1500W vs the average immersion blender

246810TotalPerformanceUsabilityAccessoriesDesignDimensions
  • 22 speed levels more
    This immersion blender allows starting on gentle low RPM to avoid splashing before ramping up to high speed compared to the average immersion blender (24 vs 2).
    24 vs 2
  • 800 W more motor power
    This immersion blender purees dense root vegetables and fibrous soups directly in hot pans with greater torque and less stalling than the average immersion blender (1,500 W vs 700 W).
    1,500 W vs 700 W
  • Includes the chopper attachment
    This immersion blender includes the chopper attachment while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 100 ml larger chopper volume
    This immersion blender chops whole onions, large bunches of herbs, and portions of meat in a single batch without overloading compared to the average immersion blender (600 ml vs 500 ml).
    600 ml vs 500 ml
  • 1 more blade points
    This immersion blender draws food inwards from multiple angles for faster, more uniform pureeing inside deep cooking pots than the average immersion blender (4 vs 3).
    4 vs 3
  • 26.5% lighter
    This immersion blender causes substantially less wrist and forearm fatigue during extended pot pureeing than the average immersion blender (0.8 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    0.8 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 1 more accessories
    This immersion blender handles whisking, chopping, and mashing right out of the box without separate appliance purchases compared to the average immersion blender (3 vs 2).
    3 vs 2
  • 80% cheaper
    Ufesa Galaxy Max 1500W is cheaper than the average immersion blender (£25 vs £45).
    £25 vs £45
  • 80% cheaper
    Ufesa Galaxy Max 1500W is cheaper than the average immersion blender (£25 vs £45).
    £25 vs £45
  • 11.8% better value for money
    Ufesa Galaxy Max 1500W has better value for money than the average immersion blender (8.63 vs 7.7).
    8.63 vs 7.73
  • 3.8% higher user score
    User score
    8.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models

    8.2

    Mark 8.4 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.4

    Rating

    30%

    8.2

    Popularity

    8.2 vs 7.9
  • 22 speed levels more
    This immersion blender allows starting on gentle low RPM to avoid splashing before ramping up to high speed compared to the average immersion blender (24 vs 2).
    24 vs 2
  • 800 W more motor power
    This immersion blender purees dense root vegetables and fibrous soups directly in hot pans with greater torque and less stalling than the average immersion blender (1,500 W vs 700 W).
    1,500 W vs 700 W
  • 1 more blade points
    This immersion blender draws food inwards from multiple angles for faster, more uniform pureeing inside deep cooking pots than the average immersion blender (4 vs 3).
    4 vs 3
  • Includes the chopper attachment
    This immersion blender includes the chopper attachment while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 100 ml larger chopper volume
    This immersion blender chops whole onions, large bunches of herbs, and portions of meat in a single batch without overloading compared to the average immersion blender (600 ml vs 500 ml).
    600 ml vs 500 ml
  • 1 more accessories
    This immersion blender handles whisking, chopping, and mashing right out of the box without separate appliance purchases compared to the average immersion blender (3 vs 2).
    3 vs 2
  • 26.5% lighter
    This immersion blender causes substantially less wrist and forearm fatigue during extended pot pureeing than the average immersion blender (0.8 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    0.8 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • Does not have dishwasher-safe parts
    This immersion blender does not have dishwasher-safe parts while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip
    This immersion blender does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip while the average immersion blender does.
  • 100 ml smaller beaker volume
    This immersion blender provides a smaller blending cup that fills quickly when whipping liquids or multiple fruit servings compared to the average immersion blender (600 ml vs 700 ml).
    600 ml vs 700 ml
  • 2.3 cm taller wand profile
    This immersion blender has a longer body that may require separating the motor and wand for drawer storage compared to the average immersion blender (42.3 cm vs 40 cm).
    42.3 cm vs 40 cm
  • Does not have dishwasher-safe parts
    This immersion blender does not have dishwasher-safe parts while the average immersion blender does.
  • 100 ml smaller beaker volume
    This immersion blender provides a smaller blending cup that fills quickly when whipping liquids or multiple fruit servings compared to the average immersion blender (600 ml vs 700 ml).
    600 ml vs 700 ml
  • Does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip
    This immersion blender does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip while the average immersion blender does.
  • 2.3 cm taller wand profile
    This immersion blender has a longer body that may require separating the motor and wand for drawer storage compared to the average immersion blender (42.3 cm vs 40 cm).
    42.3 cm vs 40 cm

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Ufesa Galaxy Max 1500W

  • High power performance from the 1500W motor handles tough ingredients easily
  • Precise speed management using the 24 variable speed settings
  • Turbo function delivers quick bursts of maximum power for smoother textures
  • Four highly efficient stainless steel blades cut and blend evenly
  • Ergonomic handle design minimizes hand fatigue during long use
  • Effective anti-splash guard keeps the kitchen workspace clean
  • Includes useful accessories like a 600ml chopper, emulsifying whisk, and measuring beaker

What customers don't like about Ufesa Galaxy Max 1500W

  • Motor unit can become heavy to hold upright over extended periods
  • Higher speed settings can be noisy during operation
  • Chopper bowl attachment can occasionally be tricky to seat cleanly
  • Blade guard design requires careful manual movement to blend evenly without creating a vortex
  • The 24 separate speed increments can feel overly granular or complicated to switch between mid-blend

Verdict

The Ufesa Galaxy Max is a heavy-duty hand immersion blender equipped with a highly powerful 1500W motor, 4 high-efficiency stainless steel blades, and 24 variable speed settings plus a turbo function for precise control. Key advantages include its robust power output for effortless blending, grinding, and whipping, along with a comfortable ergonomic handle, a splash-proof foot design to minimize kitchen mess, and a versatile accessory package containing a 600ml chopper, an emulsifying whisk, and a measuring cup. However, the appliance can feel somewhat heavy during extended use, and its corded power requirement means it cannot be operated wirelessly.

Compare Ufesa Galaxy Max 1500W with other immersion blenders

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Ufesa Galaxy Max 1500W and other immersion blenders

No results found