Scored using Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0

Ufesa BP4762 Review | 40 Data compared

Avg. price:~£25Power:1400 WCordless:noWeight:1 kgStepless variable speed:noDishwasher-safe parts:yes

Ufesa BP4762 Review: Compare 40 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Immersion Blenders category and whether it is worth buying.

Ufesa BP4762
8.2/10

Overall score

Score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, ratings from across the web and best-of lists.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 65%, User score 25%, List score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

65%

8.3

Technical score

25%

8.3

User score

10%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

★Better than 91% of immersion blenders
8.7

Value for money

Value for money
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.2

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

★Better than 95%
8.3

Technical score

Technical score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

45%

9.0

Performance

20%

7.6

Accessories

15%

7.9

Design

10%

5.8

Usability

10%

9.2

Dimensions

★Better than 94%
8.3

User score

User score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10

70%

8.5

Rating

30%

7.8

Popularity

â–¼Worse than 51%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • ufesa-bp4762
  • ufesa-bp4762
  • ufesa-bp4762
  • ufesa-bp4762
  • ufesa-bp4762
ufesa-bp4762
ufesa-bp4762
ufesa-bp4762
ufesa-bp4762
ufesa-bp4762
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of immersion blender Ufesa BP4762

Technical score
Technical score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

45%

9.0

Performance

20%

7.6

Accessories

15%

7.9

Design

10%

5.8

Usability

10%

9.2

Dimensions

8.3
Value for money
Value for money
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

8.2

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

8.7
Power
1,400 W
This immersion blender delivers 1,400 W of motor power, which is higher than the rated wattage of 93.9% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.1% of immersion blenders.
Number of speeds
20
This immersion blender features 20 speed levels, which is more finely adjustable than 85.2% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 8.2% of immersion blenders.
Stepless variable speed
no
This immersion blender does not feature stepless variable speed control.
Turbo mode
yes
This immersion blender supports turbo mode.
Maximum RPM
?
Show more
Commercial use
no
This immersion blender not designed for commercial use.
Dishwasher-safe parts
yes
This immersion blender has dishwasher-safe parts.
Safety lock
no
This immersion blender does not feature a safety lock.
Cordless
no
This immersion blender does not support cordless operation.
Battery type
-
Show more
Number of accessories
3
This immersion blender comes with 3 attachments, which is more versatile than 52.6% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 30.3% of immersion blenders.
Chopper included
yes
This immersion blender includes the chopper attachment.
Chopper capacity
?
Measuring cup/glass included
yes
This immersion blender includes the measuring cup.
Measuring cup/glass capacity
?
Show more
Shaft material
Stainless steel
Blade material
Stainless steel
Body material
Stainless steel
Detachable shaft
yes
This immersion blender supports a detachable shaft.
No-splash design
yes
This immersion blender supports a no-splash design.
Show more
Power cord length
?
Weight
1 kg
This immersion blender weighs 1 kg, which is lighter in hand than 52.3% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 9.3% of immersion blenders.
Height
24.1 cm
This immersion blender stands 24.1 cm in height, which is more compact than 96.5% of immersion blenders.
Width/Depth
?

Ufesa BP4762 vs the average immersion blender

246810TotalPerformanceUsabilityAccessoriesDesignDimensions
  • 18 speed levels more
    This immersion blender allows starting on gentle low RPM to avoid splashing before ramping up to high speed compared to the average immersion blender (20 vs 2).
    20 vs 2
  • 700 W more motor power
    This immersion blender purees dense root vegetables and fibrous soups directly in hot pans with greater torque and less stalling than the average immersion blender (1,400 W vs 700 W).
    1,400 W vs 700 W
  • Includes the chopper attachment
    This immersion blender includes the chopper attachment while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 1 more blade points
    This immersion blender draws food inwards from multiple angles for faster, more uniform pureeing inside deep cooking pots than the average immersion blender (4 vs 3).
    4 vs 3
  • 15.9 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (24.1 cm vs 40 cm).
    24.1 cm vs 40 cm
  • 1 more accessories
    This immersion blender handles whisking, chopping, and mashing right out of the box without separate appliance purchases compared to the average immersion blender (3 vs 2).
    3 vs 2
  • 80% cheaper
    Ufesa BP4762 is cheaper than the average immersion blender (£25 vs £45).
    £25 vs £45
  • 12.6% better value for money
    Ufesa BP4762 has better value for money than the average immersion blender (8.7 vs 7.7).
    8.7 vs 7.73
  • 80% cheaper
    Ufesa BP4762 is cheaper than the average immersion blender (£25 vs £45).
    £25 vs £45
  • 12.6% better value for money
    Ufesa BP4762 has better value for money than the average immersion blender (8.7 vs 7.7).
    8.7 vs 7.73
  • 5.1% higher user score
    User score
    8.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    70%

    8.5

    Rating

    30%

    7.8

    Popularity

    8.3 vs 7.9
  • 18 speed levels more
    This immersion blender allows starting on gentle low RPM to avoid splashing before ramping up to high speed compared to the average immersion blender (20 vs 2).
    20 vs 2
  • 700 W more motor power
    This immersion blender purees dense root vegetables and fibrous soups directly in hot pans with greater torque and less stalling than the average immersion blender (1,400 W vs 700 W).
    1,400 W vs 700 W
  • 1 more blade points
    This immersion blender draws food inwards from multiple angles for faster, more uniform pureeing inside deep cooking pots than the average immersion blender (4 vs 3).
    4 vs 3
  • Includes the chopper attachment
    This immersion blender includes the chopper attachment while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 1 more accessories
    This immersion blender handles whisking, chopping, and mashing right out of the box without separate appliance purchases compared to the average immersion blender (3 vs 2).
    3 vs 2
  • 15.9 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (24.1 cm vs 40 cm).
    24.1 cm vs 40 cm
  • 8.2% lighter
    This immersion blender causes substantially less wrist and forearm fatigue during extended pot pureeing than the average immersion blender (1 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    1 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • Does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip
    This immersion blender does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip
    This immersion blender does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip while the average immersion blender does.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Ufesa BP4762

  • High blending performance powered by a robust 1400W motor
  • Versatile speed control with 20 adjustable speeds and a dedicated Turbo function
  • Efficient and uniform cutting via 4 high-performance stainless steel blades
  • Comfortable, non-fatiguing use due to its ergonomic handle design
  • Clean operation supported by an effective anti-splash guard construction
  • Easy maintenance with a detachable blending foot that is dishwasher-safe
  • Includes useful accessories like a measuring cup, chopper attachment, and emulsifying whisk

What customers don't like about Ufesa BP4762

  • Operates with corded power only, which lacks the freedom of wireless models
  • Power cable length is relatively short at around 1 meter, limiting kitchen mobility
  • Can be quite noisy, especially when utilizing the maximum speed or Turbo boost settings

Verdict

The Ufesa BP4762 Vario 1450 Max is a high-performance, BPA-free immersion blender featuring a powerful 1400W motor, 20 adjustable speed settings, and a dedicated Turbo function for intensive food processing. Its core components include a detachable stainless steel blending foot equipped with 4 high-efficiency stainless steel blades, an ergonomic grip, and a splash-proof shroud design. Main advantages include exceptional blending speed for tough ingredients, excellent texture control, dishwasher-safe removable parts for effortless cleaning, and a versatile 3-in-1 accessory bundle consisting of a measuring cup, a chopper attachment, and an emulsifying whisk. However, potential drawbacks include a heavy or bulky handfeel due to its robust high-wattage motor, and a lack of cordless portability since it relies on a continuous corded power supply.

Compare Ufesa BP4762 with other immersion blenders

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Ufesa BP4762 and other immersion blenders

No results found